Assessment Rubric for Audio Visual Presentation.pdf

criteria for audio-visual presentation during online class

1. Prof.Ed.4
Foundations of Special & Inclusive Education
vv2024
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR AUDIO VISUAL PRESENTATION

Criteria Excellent (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Unsatisfactory (1) Score
Content Relevance
The content is highly
relevant, well-researched,
and directly aligns with the
presentation
objectives/topics.
The content is relevant
and adequately supports
the presentation
objectives/topics.
The content is generally
relevant, but some areas
may lack depth or
connection to the
objectives/topics.
The content is somewhat
relevant but lacks coherence
or a clear connection to the
objectives/topics.
The content is irrelevant or
does not support the
presentation
objectives/topics.

Clarity of Message
The message is
exceptionally clear, with
well-organized structure,
logical flow, and seamless
transitions.
The message is clear, with
a well-organized structure
and mostly smooth
transitions.
The message is
understandable, but there
may be some inconsistencies
in structure and transitions.
The message is unclear at
times, with noticeable
disruptions in structure or
transitions.
The message is confusing or
entirely unclear, making it
difficult for the audience to
follow.

Visual Design and
Layout
The visual design is
outstanding, enhancing the
presentation with
appropriate images,
graphics, and layout.
The visual design is good,
supporting the
presentation with suitable
images, graphics, and
layout.
The visual design is
satisfactory, but
improvements could be
made in the choice of visuals
or layout.
The visual design is lacking
in some aspects, with
visuals that may not
effectively enhance the
message.
The visual design is poor,
detracting from the
presentation and hindering
the audience's
understanding.

Effective Use of
Media Elements
The use of media elements
(audio, video, etc.) is
exceptional, enhancing the
overall impact of the
presentation.
Media elements are used
effectively, contributing to
the presentation's impact.
Media elements are used
adequately, but there may
be instances where they do
not fully enhance the
presentation.
The use of media elements
is somewhat ineffective,
with elements that may
distract from the message.
The use of media elements
is ineffective, hindering the
audience's understanding
or engagement.

Engaging Delivery
The delivery is highly
engaging, with a confident
and dynamic presentation
style that captivates the
audience.
The delivery is engaging,
demonstrating confidence
and a generally dynamic
presentation style.
The delivery is satisfactory,
but there may be moments
where the engagement level
is inconsistent.
The delivery is somewhat
monotonous or lacks
energy, impacting audience
engagement.
The delivery is dull or
disengaging, making it
difficult for the audience to
stay focused.

Technical Quality
(Audio/Visual)
Both audio and visual
components are of excellent
quality, with no technical
issues or disruptions.
Technical quality is good,
with minimal disruptions
in audio and visual
components.
Technical quality is
satisfactory, but there may
be occasional disruptions or
quality issues.
Technical issues with audio
or visual components are
noticeable and impact the
presentation.
Technical issues
significantly hinder the
audience's ability to follow
the presentation.

2. Prof.Ed.4
Foundations of Special & Inclusive Education
vv2024
Criteria Excellent (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Unsatisfactory (1) Score
Time Management
The presentation adheres
precisely to the allocated
time, demonstrating
effective time management
skills.
The presentation is well-
timed, with minor
deviations from the
allocated time.
The presentation generally
adheres to the time limit, but
there may be noticeable
deviations.
The presentation exceeds or
falls significantly short of
the allocated time,
impacting the overall flow.
The presentation drastically
exceeds or falls significantly
short of the allocated time,
causing disruptions.

Q&A Session (if
applicable)
Responses to questions are
thorough, insightful, and
reflect a deep understanding
of the subject matter.
Responses to questions
are adequate,
demonstrating a good
understanding of the
subject matter.
Responses to questions are
generally satisfactory, but
there may be some gaps in
understanding.
Responses to questions lack
depth or coherence,
indicating a limited
understanding of the subject
matter.
Responses to questions are
inadequate, showcasing a
lack of understanding of the
subject matter.

Overall Presentation
Impact
The presentation has a
powerful impact, leaving a
lasting impression on the
audience.
The presentation has a
strong impact, effectively
engaging the audience
and leaving a positive
impression.
The presentation has a
moderate impact, with some
elements that could be
improved for a stronger
effect.
The presentation has a
limited impact, and
improvements are needed to
engage the audience more
effectively.
The presentation lacks
impact, failing to engage or
leave a positive impression
on the audience.

Professionalism and
Etiquette
The presenter demonstrates
a high level of
professionalism and
etiquette throughout the
presentation.
The presenter is
professional and exhibits
appropriate etiquette,
with minor areas for
improvement.
The presenter's
professionalism and
etiquette are generally
satisfactory, but
improvements are needed.
The presenter's
professionalism and
etiquette are somewhat
lacking, with noticeable
areas for improvement.
The presenter's lack of
professionalism and
etiquette significantly
detracts from the
presentation.

Total Score 50 (E) 40(VS) 30(S) 20(NI) 10(U)


Scoring Guidelines:
Excellent (43 – 50): Outstanding performance, surpassing expectations.
Very Satisfactory (35 - 42): Solid performance with a few areas for improvement.
Satisfactory (27 - 34): Acceptable performance, meeting basic expectations.
Needs Improvement (19 - 26): Below expectations, with significant areas for improvement.
Unsatisfactory (10 - 18): Poor performance, not meeting minimum expectations.