BASIC PRINCIPLES AND FUNDAMENTALS OF CAST PARTIAL DENTURE DESIGNING

14,604 views 64 slides Dec 13, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 64
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64

About This Presentation

Principles of cast partial denture design
Philosophy of design
Basic guidelines for designing
Kennedy's Class I-IV designs
Indications of specific components in designing cast partial denture
Distal extension CPD
Clinical cases
Exam oriented questions


Slide Content

CAST PARTIAL DENTURE DESIGNING BASIC PRINCIPLES DR. AAMIR GODIL DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS M.A.R.D.C

STEPS IN PLANNING A CPD

KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION (1923)

KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION (1923)

Applegate's Rules for Applying the Kennedy Classification Rule 1: Classification should follow rather than precede extraction. Rule 2: If the 3rd molar is missing and not to be replaced, it is not considered in the classification. Rule 3: If the 3rd molar is present and to be used as an abutment, it is considered in the classification. Rule 4: If the second molar is missing and not be replaced, it is not considered in the classification. Rule 5: The most posterior edentulous area determines the classification. Rule 6: Edentulous areas other than those determining classification are called modification spaces. Rule 7: The extent of the modification is not considered, only the number. Rule 8: There is no modification space in Class IV.

SURVEYING

GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CAST PARTIAL DESIGNING

General Principles - Minimize framework elements (minimize minor connectors, plating, etc.) – more hygienic - Obtain good base adaptation - better stress distribution; use altered cast for mandibular distal extensions - Use what is present (e.g. existing rest seats) - Plan for the future (e.g. designing for continued use of RPD framework if a critical abutment is lost; placing rest seats, guide planes and undercuts on crowns to allow fabrication of an RPD later) - Never plan an RPD using a single cast alone. You can’t assess abutment mobility, compressibility of mucosa, the level of the floor of the mouth, prominent freni , or occlusion. Use mounted models and assess these features intraorally as you plan and check your design.

General Principles Occlusion – AVOID: o centric contacts on rests (also ensure no increase in OVD) o heavy buccal contacts on denture teeth– causes more movement of removable partial denture When other dental treatment is planned, and an RPD will be made at the end of treatment – ALWAYS PLAN THE RPD FIRST. You will see which abutment modifications will be needed, and will ensure the planned RPD is feasible, prior to beginning treatment

DIRECT RETAINERS reciprocal arm retentive arm EMBRASSURE CLASP Direct Retainers Kennedy Cl III & IV (Tooth Borne) Clasp of choice: cast circumferential if can’t use cast circumferential next to edentulous space, use double embrasure clasp if abutment is severely tilted use (depending on location of undercut): Cast circumferential clasp with lingual retention Ring clasp with support strut Rotational path removable partial denture CIRCUMFERENTIAL CLASP

Direct Retainers Kennedy Cl I & II (Tooth & Tissue Borne) For posterior abutments, or any tooth needing stress release: Clasp of choice: RPI (mesial rest, distal proximal plate and I-bar) I BAR T BAR RPI CLASP REVERSE CIRCLET CLASP

Direct Retainers Kennedy Cl I & II (Tooth & Tissue Borne) If can’t use an I-bar in vestibule, because of •frenum • shallow vestibule • deep soft tissue undercut then use an RPA retainer (mesial rest, distal proximal plate and wrought wire clasp [Akers]) If can’t use a mesial rest because of: • rotation • heavy centric contact on mesial • large amalgam restoration on mesial then use Combination Clasp (distal rest, buccal wrought wire retention, lingual bracing) for abutments adjacent modification spaces (use tooth borne retainers) RPA CLASP COMBINATION CLASP wrought wire retentive arm

RESTS OCCLUSAL REST CINGULUM REST INCISAL REST Incisal rests/rest seats don’t use : poor esthetics more tilting/ torquing forces (long lever arm from center of rotation) Cingulum rests/rest seats use composite build up, if no prominent cingulum (less dentinal sensitivity) size - min 1 mm (if deeper, chance of dentin exposure) ensure sufficient clearance from opposing occlusion for maxillary cingulum rests Occlusal rests/rest seats size - 1/3 of B-L width of the tooth depth : 1.5 mm of clearance from opposing occlusion (critical at junction of rest & minor connector) line angle of the marginal ridge should be rounded deepest part should be located centrally (positive)

INDIRECT RETAINER Indirect Retainers 90° from fulcrum line & as far away from primary abutment as possible none required on tooth borne (Cl III & IV) cases canine is usually the most anterior tooth used for indirect retention usually don’t use a lateral (root length) or central incisor (speech) also helpful for seating and support, but not always possible or necessary

Rest Seats/ Rests Ensure sufficient depth, especially at junction of the rest & minor connector (1.5mm minimum) Tooth Borne (Kennedy Class I & II) place rests adjacent to edentulous space (both ends) Tissue/Tooth Borne (Kennedy Class I & II) mesial rest preferred (less torquing of abutment) distal rest preferred when: abutment is rotated (limited access for minor connector to mesial) plunger cusp/heavy centric contact on mesial large restoration on mesial no long guiding planes with distal rests - potential torquing if tooth is severely weakened periodontally – sometimes move rest to the next tooth anterior

MAJOR CONNECTORS (MAXILLARY) PALATAL STRAP BROAD PALATAL COMPLETE PALATAL COVERAGE ANTERO-POSTERIOR BAR HORSE-SHOE Maxillary Major Connectors No tissue relief Tooth borne (Class III & IV): Palatal Strap Tooth & Tissue borne (Class I & II): A-P Strap whenever possible better sensation, preferred (minor salivary glands & taste buds) Full Palatal Strap periodontal involvement of abutments less than 6 teeth left displaceable mucosa (increased coverage Anterior Strap (Horseshoe) only if inoperable torus is present NEVER for Class I or II

MAJOR CONNECTORS (MANDIBULAR) LINGUAL BAR LINGUOPLATE Mandibular Major Connectors Lingual Bar whenever possible (less tissue coverage - hygiene) Lingual Plate if: high floor of mouth tori frenum terminate at FGM Tissue relief – mandibular major connector (29-30 gauge relief) to avoid tissue impingement

MINOR CONNECTOR Minor Connector connecting direct retainer to major connector Minor Connector connecting denture base to major connector Minor Connector connecting auxillary rest to major connector

BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS Forces acting on cast partial dentures in function

BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS

FORCE

LEVER

FULCRUM LINES Horizontal fulcrum line passing between two principal abutment teeth controls rotational motion of denture towards or away from supporting ridge

FULCRUM LINES

FULCRUM LINES

FULCRUM LINES

PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN The dentist must have a thorough knowledge of both the mechanical and biologic factors involved in removable partial denture design. The treatment plan must be based on a complete examination and diagnosis of the individual patient. The dentist must correlate the pertinent factors and determine a proper plan of treatment. A removable partial denture should restore form and function without injury to the remaining oral structure. A removable partial denture is a form of treatment and not a cure. (A.H. SCHMIDT 1956)

PHILOSOPHY OF DESIGN

STRESS EQUILIZATION Resiliency of the tooth secured by the periodontal ligament in an apical direction is not comparable to the greater resiliency and displaceability of the mucosa covering the edentulous ridge. Most common type is a hinge device interposed between the minor connectors of the abutment tooth and the denture base. It permits vertical movement of the denture base when forces are applied to the artificial teeth . It can be adjusted to control the amount of vertical movement.

STRESS EQUILIZATION

PHYSIOLOGIC BASING That there is a significant disparity between the apical displaceability of teeth and compressibility of the soft tissues. It believes that stress equalization can be best achieved by either displacing or depressing the ridge mucosa during the impression making procedure or by relining the denture base after it has been constructed

PHYSIOLOGIC BASING This theory believes that denture bases formed over compressed tissue will show an increased ability to withstand vertical forces. They also recognize the prosthetic teeth and occlusal rests will be positioned above the existing the occlusal plane when the prosthesis is not in function. To permit vertical movement of the partial denture from its rest position to its functioning position , the number of direct retainers must be limited.

PHYSIOLOGIC BASING

BROAD STRESS DISTRIBUTION Advocates of this school of thought believe that trauma to the remaining teeth and residual ridge can be prevented by distributing the forces of occlusion over as many teeth and as much of the available soft tissue area as possible. It is achieved by means of additional rests and clasps assemblies and broad coverage denture bases.

BROAD STRESS DISTRIBUTION

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRESS TRANSMITTED TO ABUTMENT TEETH 1. Length of edentulous span 2. Quality of support of ridge 3.Clasp. Qualities Design Length Material 4. Surface characterization of the abutment 5. Occlusal harmony

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRESS TRANSMITTED TO ABUTMENT TEETH THE LENGTH OF THE EDENTULOUS SPAN Longer the edentulous span: Fulcrum: near occlusal rest at terminal abutment Load: applied to artificial teeth Length of lever arm: Denture base determines the amount of force the abutments can withstand Thickness of mucosa over the ridge & area of ridge covered by denture base. Efforts made to preserve the posterior abutment tooth.

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRESS TRANSMITTED TO ABUTMENT TEETH THE QUALITY OF THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURES Large well formed ridges withstand greater loads than small ,thin or knife edged ridges. Broad ridges absorb more of the occlusal load and permit the use of well contoured denture flanges. Type and health of mucosa also influence the loads transferred to abutment. Soft, flabby tissue contributes little to the vertical support of the denture & nothing to lateral stability: transmission of stress to adjacent abutment tooth.

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRESS TRANSMITTED TO ABUTMENT TEETH CLASP CONFIGURATION

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRESS TRANSMITTED TO ABUTMENT TEETH SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ABUTMENT Surface of gold crown or restoration offers more frictional resistance to clasp arm movement than does the enamel surface of the tooth. Greater stress is exerted on a tooth restored with gold than on a tooth with intact enamel.

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRESS TRANSMITTED TO ABUTMENT TEETH OCCLUSAL HARMONY Deflective contacts: leverage Ideally, the occlusal load should be applied in the center of the denture –bearing area, both antero-posteriorly and bucco -lingually Partial denture constructed opposing a complete denture will be subjected to a much less occlusal stress than one opposed by natural dentition. Force exerted by natural teeth –300 pounds per square inch. Complete denture – 30 pounds per square inch. Occlusal load applied to the distal end of denture base will result into more stress transmitted to the abutment

COLOR CODING FOR CPD DESIGN

CAST PARTIAL DESIGNS FOR DIFFERENT CLINICAL SITUATIONS DESIGN CONFIGURATION TOOTH SUPPORTED VS TOOTH-TISSUE SUPPORTED CPD KENNEDY’S CLASS I AND II KENNEDY’S CLASS III AND IV

DESIGN CONFIGURATION Triangular Bilateral Quadrilateral Quadrilateral

SEQUENCE OF COMPONENT DESIGNING

TOOTH SUPPORTED VS TISSUE SUPPORTED DENTURES TOOTH SUPPORTED TOOTH-TISSUE SUPPORTED SUPPORT DERIVED From abutment teeth Primarily from tissues Secondarily from abutment teeth IMPRSSION TECHNIQUES Static (anatomic) impression Functional impression for tissues Anatomic impression for teeth INDIRECT RETENTION Not needed Needed, depending on fulcrum line and axis of rotation BASE MATERIALS Generally metal No need for reline Generally acrylic For ease of reline STRESS BREAKING Not needed Recommended for long span CLASS III mod 1 CLASS I

DISTAL EXTENSION CASES KENNEDY’S CLASS I AND II

SUPPORT FOR DISTAL EXTENSION McCraken 1. Contour and quality of the residual ridge 2. Extent of residual ridge coverage by the denture base 3. Type and accuracy of the impression registration 4. Accuracy of the fit of the denture base 5. Design of the removable partial denture framework 6. Total occlusal load applied

KENNEDY’S CLASS I AND II DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: DIRECT RETAINER RPA CLASP COMBINATION CLASP wrought wire retentive arm RPI CLASP REVERSE CIRCLET CLASP For posterior abutments, or any tooth needing stress release: Clasp of choice: RPI (mesial rest, distal proximal plate and I-bar) If can’t use an I-bar in vestibule, because of • frenum • shallow vestibule • deep soft tissue undercut then use an RPA retainer (mesial rest, distal proximal plate and wrought wire clasp [Akers]) If can’t use a mesial rest because of: • rotation • heavy centric contact on mesial • large amalgam restoration on mesial then use Combination Clasp (distal rest, buccal retention, lingual bracing)

KENNEDY’S CLASS I AND II DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: INDIRECT RETAINER Tissue/Tooth Borne (Kennedy Class I & II) mesial rest preferred (less torquing of abutment) distal rest preferred when: abutment is rotated (limited access for minor connector to mesial) plunger cusp/heavy centric contact on mesial large restoration on mesial no long guiding planes with distal rests - potential torquing if tooth is severely weakened periodontally – sometimes move rest to the next tooth anterior OCCLUSAL REST CINGULUM REST INCISAL REST

KENNEDY’S CLASS I AND II DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: MAJOR CONNECTOR SUPPORT Maxillary: plate type design preferred over strap type Mandibular: Major connector does not provide support (no contact with edentulous mucosa) LOCATION OF EDENTULOUS AREA Must connect all edentulous areas ANTICIPATED LOSS OF NATURAL TOOTH Plating lingual surfaces of natural teeth: ease of replacing in future FUNCTIONAL DEPTH OF LINGUAL VESTIBULE Lingual bar (7-8 mm depth required) vs lingual plate INCLINATION OF REMAINING TEETH Consider labial bar TISSUE RESTRICTIONS Consider tori/ undercuts PATIENT PREFERENCE Based on previous partial denture

MANDIBULAR KENNEDY’S CLASS I Direct Retainer RPI: 34 44 Indirect Retainer and Auxillary Rest Should be provided as cingulum rests with a common minor connector from the mesial rest of 34 and 44 OR by giving lingual plate Minor Connector Lattice for 35 36 37 + 45 46 47 Connecting retainers and rest to major connector Major Connector Lingual bar

MAXILLARY KENNEDY’S CLASS I Direct Retainer Combination clasp: 14 24 Indirect Retainer and Auxillary Rest Cingulum rest: 13 23 Minor Connector Lattice for 15 16 17 + 25 26 27 Connecting retainers and rest to major connector Major Connector Antero-posterior palatal bar (palatal torus)

MANDIBULAR KENNEDY’S CLASS II Direct Retainer RPI: 34 Embrassure clasp: 46 47 Indirect Retainer and Auxillary Rest Mesial rest: 44 Minor Connector Lattice for 35 36 37 Connecting retainers and rest to major connector Major Connector Lingual bar/ plate

MANDIBULAR KENNEDY’S CLASS II MOD 1 Direct Retainer RPA: 34 Simple circlet: 44 47 Indirect Retainer and Auxillary Rest Mesial rest: 44 Minor Connector Lattice for 35 36 37 Mesh for 45 46 Connecting retainers and rest to major connector Major Connector Lingual bar

TOOTH SUPPORTED CPD KENNEDY’S CLASS III AND IV Strap type major connectors for maxillary Support derived from dento -alveolar segment Clasps with minimum tooth coverage to reduce plaque accumulation Nail bead type minor connector for smaller spans

KENNEDY’S CLASS III AND IV DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: DIRECT RETAINERS & MAJOR CONNECTORS PALATAL STRAP ANTERO-POSTERIOR BAR HORSE-SHOE

MANDIBULAR KENNEDY’S CLASS III Direct Retainer Ring clasp: 47 Simple circlet clasp: 44 36 Auxillary Rest Mesial rest: 34 (not needed) Minor Connector Mesh for 45 46 Connecting retainers and rest to major connector Major Connector Lingual bar

MAXILLARY KENNEDY’S CLASS IV

SUMMARY

EXAM ORIENTED QUESTIONS I) LAQ: 1. Discuss the cast partial framework design for maxillary/ mandibular Kennedy’s Class I/II II) SAQ: 1. Philosophy and principles of CPD designing 2. Stress equalization or stress breakers in cast partial dentures 3. Support for distal extension denture bases 4. Direct retainers for distal extension denture bases 5. Kennedy’s class III/IV design 6. Factors influencing stress transmission to abutment teeth in cast partial dentures 7. Difference between tooth supported and tooth-tissue supported cast partial dentures

THANK YOU