Bin and Hopper Design Lecture from Solids processing lab

picollusscribd 23 views 73 slides Mar 04, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 73
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73

About This Presentation

Bin and Hopper Design Lecture


Slide Content

3/17/00 KVJ 1
Bin and Hopper Design
Karl Jacob
The Dow Chemical Company
Solids Processing Lab
[email protected]

3/17/00 KVJ 2
The Four Big Questions
What is the appropriate flow mode?
What is the hopper angle?
How large is the outlet for reliable flow?
What type of discharger is required and
what is the discharge rate?

3/17/00 KVJ 3
Hopper Flow Modes
Mass Flow - all the material in the
hopper is in motion, but not necessarily
at the same velocity
Funnel Flow - centrally moving core,
dead or non-moving annular region
Expanded Flow - mass flow cone with
funnel flow above it

3/17/00 KVJ 4
Mass Flow
Typically need 0.75 D to 1D to
enforce mass flow
D
Material in motion
along the walls
Does not imply plug
flow with equal
velocity

3/17/00 KVJ 5
Funnel Flow
“Dead” or non-
flowing region
A
c
t
iv
e

F
lo
w

C
h
a
n
n
e
l

3/17/00 KVJ 6
Expanded Flow
Funnel Flow
upper section
Mass Flow
bottom section

3/17/00 KVJ 7
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping

3/17/00 KVJ 8
Ratholing/Piping
Stable Annular
Region
V
o
id

3/17/00 KVJ 9
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow

3/17/00 KVJ 10
Funnel Flow
-Segregation
-Inadequate Emptying
-Structural Issues
C
o
a
r
s
e
C
o
a
r
s
e
F
in
e

3/17/00 KVJ 11
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming

3/17/00 KVJ 12
Arching/Doming
Cohesive Arch
preventing material from
exiting hopper

3/17/00 KVJ 13
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow

3/17/00 KVJ 14
Insufficient Flow
- Outlet size too small
- Material not sufficiently
permeable to permit dilation in
conical section -> “plop-plop”
flow
Material needs
to dilate here
Material under
compression in
the cylinder
section

3/17/00 KVJ 15
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing

3/17/00 KVJ 16
Flushing
Uncontrolled flow from a hopper due to
powder being in an aerated state
- occurs only in fine powders (rough rule
of thumb - Geldart group A and smaller)
- causes --> improper use of aeration
devices, collapse of a rathole

3/17/00 KVJ 17
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
Inadequate Emptying

3/17/00 KVJ 18
Inadequate emptying
Usually occurs in funnel flow silos
where the cone angle is insufficient
to allow self draining of the bulk
solid.
Remaining bulk
solid

3/17/00 KVJ 19
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
Inadequate Emptying
Mechanical Arching

3/17/00 KVJ 20
Mechanical Arching
Akin to a “traffic jam” at the outlet of bin
- too many large particle competing for
the small outlet
6 x d
p,large is the minimum outlet size to
prevent mechanical arching, 8-12 x is
preferred

3/17/00 KVJ 21
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
Inadequate Emptying
Mechanical Arching
Time Consolidation - Caking

3/17/00 KVJ 22
Time Consolidation - Caking
Many powders will tend to cake as a
function of time, humidity, pressure,
temperature
Particularly a problem for funnel flow
silos which are infrequently emptied
completely

3/17/00 KVJ 23
Segregation
Mechanisms
- Momentum or velocity
- Fluidization
- Trajectory
- Air current
- Fines

3/17/00 KVJ 24
What the chances for mass flow?
Cone Angle Cumulative % of
from horizontal hoppers with mass flow
450
6025
7050
7570
*data from Ter Borg at Bayer

3/17/00 KVJ 25
Mass Flow (+/-)
+ flow is more consistent
+ reduces effects of radial segregation
+ stress field is more predictable
+ full bin capacity is utilized
+ first in/first out
- wall wear is higher (esp. for abrasives)
- higher stresses on walls
- more height is required

3/17/00 KVJ 26
Funnel flow (+/-)
+ less height required
- ratholing
- a problem for segregating solids
- first in/last out
- time consolidation effects can be severe
- silo collapse
- flooding
- reduction of effective storage capacity

3/17/00 KVJ 27
How is a hopper designed?
Measure
- powder cohesion/interparticle friction
- wall friction
- compressibility/permeability
Calculate
- outlet size
- hopper angle for mass flow
- discharge rates

3/17/00 KVJ 28
What about angle of repose?

Pile of bulk
solids

3/17/00 KVJ 29
Angle of Repose
Angle of repose is not an adequate
indicator of bin design parameters
“… In fact, it (the angle of repose) is only useful in the
determination of the contour of a pile, and its
popularity among engineers and investigators is due
not to its usefulness but to the ease with which it is
measured.” - Andrew W. Jenike
Do not use angle of repose to design
the angle on a hopper!

3/17/00 KVJ 30
Bulk Solids Testing
Wall Friction Testing
Powder Shear Testing - measures both
powder internal friction and cohesion
Compressibility
Permeability

3/17/00 KVJ 31
Sources of Cohesion (Binding Mechanisms)
Solids Bridges
-Mineral bridges
-Chemical reaction
-Partial melting
-Binder hardening
-Crystallization
-Sublimation
Interlocking forces
Attraction Forces
-van der Waal’s
-Electrostatics
-Magnetic
Interfacial forces
-Liquid bridges
-Capillary forces

3/17/00 KVJ 32
Testing Considerations
Must consider the following variables
- time
- temperature
- humidity
- other process conditions

3/17/00 KVJ 33
Wall Friction Testing
Wall friction test is simply Physics 101 - difference for bulk
solids is that the friction coefficient, , is not constant.
P 101
N
F
F = N

3/17/00 KVJ 34
Wall Friction Testing
Jenike Shear Tester
Wall Test
Sample
Ring
Cover
W x A
S x A
Bracket
Bulk Solid

3/17/00 KVJ 35
Wall Friction Testing Results
Wall Yield Locus,
constant wall friction
’
Normal stress, 
W
a
ll
s
h
e
a
r

s
t
r
e
s
s
,



Wall Yield Locus (WYL),
variable wall friction
Powder Technologists usually express  as the
“angle of wall friction”, ’
’ = arctan 

3/17/00 KVJ 36
Jenike Shear Tester
Ring
Cover
W x A
S x A
Bracket
Bulk SolidBulk Solid
Shear plane

3/17/00 KVJ 37
Other Shear Testers
Peschl shear tester
Biaxial shear tester
Uniaxial compaction cell
Annular (ring) shear testers

3/17/00 KVJ 38
Ring Shear Testers
W x A
Bottom cell
rotates slowly
Arm connected to load
cells, S x A
Bulk
solid

3/17/00 KVJ 39
Shear test data analysis


C f
c 
1

3/17/00 KVJ 40
Stresses in Hoppers/Silos
Cylindrical section - Janssen equation
Conical section - radial stress field
Stresses = Pressures

3/17/00 KVJ 41
Stresses in a cylinder
h
dh
P
v
A
D
(P
v
+ dP
v
) A
 A g dh




D

d
h
Consider the equilibrium of forces on a
differential element, dh, in a straight-
sided silo
P
v A = vertical pressure acting from
above
 A g dh = weight of material in element
(P
v + dP
v) A = support of material from
below
  D dh = support from solid friction on
the wall
(P
v
+ dP
v
) A +   D dh = P
v
A +  A g dh

3/17/00 KVJ 42
Stresses in a cylinder (cont’d)
Two key substitutions
 =  P
w
(friction equation)
Janssen’s key assumption: P
w
= K P
v
This is not strictly true but
is good enough from an engineering view.
Substituting and rearranging,
A dP
v =  A g dh -  K P
v  D dh
Substituting A = (/4) D
2
and integrating between h=0, P
v
= 0
and h=H and P
v
= P
v
P
v
= ( g D/ 4  K) (1 - exp(-4H K/D))
This is the Janssen equation.

3/17/00 KVJ 43
Stresses in a cylinder (cont’d)
hydrostatic
Bulk solids
Notice that the asymptotic pressure depends
only on D, not on H, hence this is why silos are
tall and skinny, rather than short and squat.

3/17/00 KVJ 44
Stresses - Converging Section
r

Over 40 years ago, the pioneer in bulk
solids flow, Andrew W. Jenike,
postulated that the magnitude of the
stress in the converging section of a
hopper was proportional to the distance
of the element from the hopper apex.
 =  ( r, )
This is the radial stress field
assumption.

3/17/00 KVJ 45
Silo Stresses - Overall
hydrostatic
Bulk solid
Notice that there is essentially no stress at
the outlet. This is good for discharge
devices!

3/17/00 KVJ 46
Janssen Equation - Example
A large welded steel silo 12 ft in diameter and 60 feet high is to
be built. The silo has a central discharge on a flat bottom.
Estimate the pressure of the wall at the bottom of the silo if the
silo is filled with a) plastic pellets, and b) water. The plastic
pellets have the following characteristics:
 = 35 lb/cu ft ’ = 20º
The Janssen equation is
P
v
= ( g D/ 4  K) (1 - exp(-4H K/D))
In this case:D = 12 ft  = tan ’ = tan 20º = 0.364
H = 60 ft g = 32.2 ft/sec
2
 = 35 lb/cu ft

3/17/00 KVJ 47
Janssen Equation - Example
K, the Janssen coefficient, is assumed to be 0.4. It can vary
according to the material but it is not often measured.
Substituting we get P
v
= 21,958 lb
m
/ft - sec
2
.
If we divide by gc, we get P
v
= 681.9 lb
f
/ft
2
or 681.9 psf
Remember that P
w
= K

P
v,
, so P
w
= 272.8 psf.
For water, P =  g H and this results in P = 3744 psf, a factor of 14
greater!

3/17/00 KVJ 48
Types of Bins
Conical Pyramidal
Watch for in-
flowing valleys
in these bins!

3/17/00 KVJ 49
Types of Bins
Wedge/Plane Flow
B
L
L>3B
Chisel

3/17/00 KVJ 50
A thought experiment

1

c

3/17/00 KVJ 51
The Flow Function

1

c
Flow function
Time flow function

3/17/00 KVJ 52
Determination of Outlet Size

1

c
Flow function
Time flow function
Flow factor

c,i

c,t

3/17/00 KVJ 53
Determination of Outlet Size
B = 
c,i H()/
H() is a constant which is a function of
hopper angle

3/17/00 KVJ 54
H() Function
Cone angle from vertical
10 20 30 40 50 60
1
2
3
H
(

)
Rectangular outlets (L > 3B)
Square
Circular

3/17/00 KVJ 55
Example: Calculation of a Hopper
Geometry for Mass Flow
An organic solid powder has a bulk density of 22 lb/cu ft. Jenike
shear testing has determined the following characteristics given
below. The hopper to be designed is conical.
Wall friction angle (against SS plate) = ’ = 25º
Bulk density =  = 22 lb/cu ft
Angle of internal friction =  = 50º
Flow function 
c = 0.3 
1 + 4.3
Using the design chart for conical hoppers, at ’ = 25º
c = 17º with 3º safety factor
& ff = 1.27

3/17/00 KVJ 56
Example: Calculation of a Hopper
Geometry for Mass Flow
ff = /
a or 
a = (1/ff) 
Condition for no arching => 
a
> 
c
(1/ff)  = 0.3 
1 + 4.3 (1/1.27)  = 0.3 
1 + 4.3

1 = 8.82 
c = 8.82/1.27 = 6.95
B = 2.2 x 6.95/22 = 0.69 ft = 8.33 in

3/17/00 KVJ 57
Material considerations for hopper design
Amount of moisture in product?
Is the material typical of what is
expected?
Is it sticky or tacky?
Is there chemical reaction?
Does the material sublime?
Does heat affect the material?

3/17/00 KVJ 58
Material considerations for hopper design
Is it a fine powder (< 200 microns)?
Is the material abrasive?
Is the material elastic?
Does the material deform under
pressure?

3/17/00 KVJ 59
Process Questions
How much is to be stored? For how long?
Materials of construction
Is batch integrity important?
Is segregation important?
What type of discharger will be used?
How much room is there for the hopper?

3/17/00 KVJ 60
Discharge Rates
Numerous methods to predict discharge
rates from silos or hopper
For coarse particles (>500 microns)
Beverloo equation - funnel flow
Johanson equation - mass flow
For fine particles - one must consider
influence of air upon discharge rate

3/17/00 KVJ 61
Beverloo equation
W = 0.58 
b
g
0.5
(B - kd
p
)
2.5
where W is the discharge rate (kg/sec)

b
is the bulk density (kg/m
3
)
g is the gravitational constant
B is the outlet size (m)
k is a constant (typically 1.4)
d
p is the particle size (m)
Note: Units must be SI

3/17/00 KVJ 62
Johanson Equation
Equation is derived from fundamental
principles - not empirical
W = 
b (/4) B
2
(gB/4 tan 
c)
0.5
where c is the angle of hopper from vertical
This equation applies to circular outlets
Units can be any dimensionally consistent set
Note that both Beverloo and Johanson show that
W  B
2.5
!

3/17/00 KVJ 63
Discharge Rate - Example
An engineer wants to know how fast a compartment
on a railcar will fill with polyethylene pellets if the
hopper is designed with a 6” Sch. 10 outlet. The car
has 4 compartments and can carry 180000 lbs. The
bulk solid is being discharged from mass flow silo
and has a 65° angle from horizontal. Polyethylene
has a bulk density of 35 lb/cu ft.

3/17/00 KVJ 64
Discharge Rate Example
One compartment = 180000/4 = 45000 lbs.
Since silo is mass flow, use Johanson equation.
6” Sch. 10 pipe is 6.36” in diameter = B
W = (35 lb/ft
3
)(/4)(6.36/12)
2
(32.2x(6.36/12)/4 tan 25)
0.5
W= 23.35 lb/sec
Time required is 45000/23.35 = 1926 secs or ~32 min.
In practice, this is too long - 8” or 10 “ would be a better
choice.

3/17/00 KVJ 65
The Case of Limiting Flow Rates
When bulk solids (even those with little
cohesion) are discharged from a
hopper, the solids must dilate in the
conical section of the hopper. This
dilation forces air to flow from the outlet
against the flow of bulk solids and in the
case of fine materials either slows the
flow or impedes it altogether.

3/17/00 KVJ 66
Limiting Flow Rates
Vertical
stress
Bulk
density
Interstitial gas pressure
Note that gas pressure is less than
ambient pressure

3/17/00 KVJ 67
Limiting Flow Rates
The rigorous calculation of limiting flow
rates requires simultaneous solution of
gas pressure and solids stresses
subject to changing bulk density and
permeability. Fortunately, in many
cases the rate will be limited by some
type of discharge device such as a
rotary valve or screw feeder.

3/17/00 KVJ 68
Limiting Flow Rates - Carleton Equation
g
d
v
B
v
ps
ff

3/5
3/4
0
3/23/12
0
15sin4



3/17/00 KVJ 69
Carleton Equation (cont’d)
where
v
0 is the velocity of the bulk solid
 is the hopper half angle

s is the absolute particle density

f is the density of the gas

f is the viscosity of the gas

3/17/00 KVJ 70
Silo Discharging Devices
Slide valve/Slide gate
Rotary valve
Vibrating Bin Bottoms
Vibrating Grates
others

3/17/00 KVJ 71
Rotary Valves
Quite commonly used to discharge
materials from bins.

3/17/00 KVJ 72
Screw Feeders
Dead Region
Better Solution

3/17/00 KVJ 73
Discharge Aids
Air cannons
Pneumatic Hammers
Vibrators
These devices should not be used in
place of a properly designed hopper!
They can be used to break up the
effects of time consolidation.
Tags