To equip students with knowledge of business research
Size: 1.58 MB
Language: en
Added: Jun 22, 2024
Slides: 129 pages
Slide Content
Research Methods
What is Research
Therearemanywaysofdefining“research”
•Toresearchistocarryoutadiligentinquiryor
acriticalexaminationofagivenphenomena.
•Researchalsoinvolvesacriticalanalysisof
existingconclusionsortheorieswithregardto
newlydiscoveredfacts.
•Researchisasystematic,controlled,empirical,
andcriticalinvestigationofhypothetical
prepositionsaboutthepresumedrelations
amongnaturalphenomena.
What is Research
•Researchistheprocessofarrivingat
dependablesolutionsthroughasystematic
collection,analysisandinterpretationofdata.
•Researchisthecarefulandsystematicinquiry
intoorexaminationofafieldofknowledgein
ordertoestablishfactsandprinciples.
•Alldefinitionsemphasizethatresearchisa
process,notanevent.Itmustthereforebe
carefullyplanned,implemented,disseminated,
andconsumed.
Purpose of Research
•Themainpurposeofresearchistodiscover
newknowledge.
–Thisinvolvesthediscoveryofnewfacts,their
correctinterpretationandpracticalapplication.
•Secondly,istodescribeaphenomenon.
–Accurateidentificationofanyeventinvolves
thoroughdescription.
Purpose of Research
•Thirdly,istoenableprediction.
–Thisistheabilitytoestimatephenomenon.
–Wesometimesuseasetofvariablestopredicta
givenvariable.
•Thefourthpurposeofresearchistoenable
control.
–Inscientificresearchcontrolisconcernedwith
theabilitytoregulatethephenomenonunder
study.
–Manyscientificexperimentsaredesignedto
achievethisobjective.
Purpose of Research
•Thefifthpurposeofresearchistoenable
explanationofphenomenon.
–Explanationinvolvesaccurateobservationand
measurementofagivenphenomenon.
•Thesixthpurposeofresearchistoenable
theorydevelopment.
–Theorydevelopmentinvolvesformulatingconcepts,
lawsandgeneralizationaboutagivenphenomenon
Characteristics of Research
•Researchissystematic
•Researchiscontrolled
•Researchisempirical.Itdealswithdata,
whichistestedscientifically.
•Researchisself-correcting.Theresultsof
researchareopentopublicscrutiny
Natureof Research
•Itstrivestobeobjectiveandlogical.
•Itisbasedonobservableexperience
orempiricalevidence.
•Itischaracterizedbypatientand
unhurriedactivity.
•Itdemandsaccurateobservations,
reservationsanddescriptions.
Natureof Research
•It is directed towards the solution of
the problem.
•It is carefully recorded and reported.
•It requires expertise.
•Itinvolvesgatheringnewdatafrom
primaryorfirsthandsourcesorusing
existingdatafornewpurpose.
TYPES OF RESEARCH
Descriptivevs.Analytical
•Descriptiveresearchincludessurveysandfact-finding
enquiriesofdifferentkinds.
•Insocialscienceandbusinessresearchwequiteoftenuse
thetermExpostfactoresearchfordescriptiveresearch
studies.
•Themaincharacteristicofthismethodisthatthe
researcherhasnocontroloverthevariables;hecanonly
reportwhathashappenedorwhatishappening.
•Themethodsofresearchutilizedindescriptiveresearch
aresurveymethodsofallkinds,includingcomparativeand
correlationmethods.
Types of
Research
Fundamental
Research
Empirical
Research
Analytical
Research
Qualitative
Research
Conceptual
Research
Applied
Research
Descriptive
Research
Quantitative
Research
Historical
Research
Empirical Testing of the
Analysis
Thepurposeoftheempiricaltesting
partoftheresearchreportisto
providetheempiricalevidencefor
yourresearchargument.Thetheme
ofthissectionofthepapercanbe
summarized as:Given your
hypothesis,howdidyoutestitand
whatwereyourfindings?
Empirical Testing of the
Analysis
This section should include:
The data used;
The empirical model and type of
statistical analysis you employed;
The results you hypothesized;
The actual results; and
Your interpretation of the results.
Research Methods versus
Methodology
•Researchmethodsortechniques,thus,refertothe
methodstheresearchersuseinperformingresearch
operations.
•Thus,whenwetalkofresearchmethodologywenot
onlytalkoftheresearchmethodsbutalsoconsider
thelogicbehindthemethodsweuseinthecontextof
ourresearchstudyandexplainwhyweareusinga
particularmethodortechniqueandwhywearenot
usingotherssothatresearchresultsarecapableof
beingevaluatedeitherbytheresearcherhimselforby
others.
Define Research
Problem
Review of the
Literature
Formulate
Hypothesis
Design Research
Collection of
Data
Analyze the
Data
Interpret
&
Report
Flow Chart of Research
Process
Significance of Research
•Itprovidesthebasisfornearlyall
governmentpoliciesinoureconomic
system.
•Ithelpsinsolvingvariousoperationaland
planningproblemsofbusinessandindustry.
•Itisanaidtodecisionmaking.
•Itestablishestherelationbetween
variables.
Significanceof Research
•Itisequallyimportantforsocial
scientistsinstudying social
relationshipsandinseekinganswersto
varioussocialproblems.
•Itprovidesabasisforinnovation.
•Itfacilitatestheprocessofthinking,
analysis,evaluationandinterpretation
ofvarioussituation.
Criteriafor Good Research
•Purposeshouldbeclearlydefined.
•Commonconceptsshouldbeusedthatcanbe
understoodbyall.
•Researchprocedureshouldbeexplainedin
detail.
•Researchdesignshouldbecarefullyplanned.
•Researchershoulddeclareallthepossible
errorsandtheirpossibleimpactonfinding.
Criteriafor Good Research
•Analysisofdatashouldbesufficiently
adequatetorevealsignificance.
•Themethodsofanalysisshouldbe
appropriate.
•Thevalidityandreliabilityofthedata
shouldbecheckedcarefully.
•Theresearcherhavegoodcommandover
researchmethodologiesandshouldbe
intelligentandexperience.
What is LR?
Aliteraturereviewdiscussespublished
informationinaparticularsubjectarea,
andsometimesinformationinaparticular
subjectareawithinacertaintimeperiod.
Aliteraturereviewcanbejustasimple
summaryofthesources,butitusuallyhas
anorganizationalpatternandcombines
bothsummaryandsynthesis.
What is LR?
Asummaryisarecapoftheimportant
informationofthesource,butasynthesisisare-
organization,orareshuffling,ofthatinformation.
Itmightgiveanewinterpretationofoldmaterial
orcombinenewwitholdinterpretations.
Oritmighttracetheintellectualprogressionof
thefield,includingmajordebates.
Anddependingonthesituation,theliterature
reviewmayevaluatethesourcesandadvisethe
readeronthemostpertinentorrelevant.
What is LR?
Theformatofareviewofliteraturemayvaryfrom
disciplinetodisciplineandfromassignmentto
assignment.
Areviewmaybeaself-containedunit--anendin
itself--oraprefacetoandrationaleforengagingin
primaryresearch.Areviewisarequiredpartof
grantandresearchproposalsandoftenachapterin
thesesanddissertations.
Generally,thepurposeofareviewistoanalyze
criticallyasegmentofapublishedbodyofknowledge
throughsummary,classification,andcomparisonof
priorresearchstudies,reviewsofliterature,and
theoreticalarticles.
What is LR?
Aliteraturereviewistheeffectiveevaluation
ofselecteddocumentsonaresearchtopic.
Areviewmayformanessentialpartofthe
researchprocessormayconstitutea
researchprojectinitself.
Inthecontextofaresearchpaperorthesis
theliteraturereviewisacriticalsynthesisof
previousresearch.
Theevaluationoftheliteratureleadslogically
totheresearchquestion.
What is LR?A ‘good’ literature review…..
….. is a synthesis of available research
….. is a critical evaluation
….. has appropriate breadth and depth
….. has clarity and conciseness
….. uses rigorous and consistent
methods
A ‘poor’ literature review is…..
…..an annotated bibliography
….. confined to description
….. narrow and shallow
….. confusing and longwinded
….. constructed in an arbitrary way
Why write LR?
In a broader contextHart (1998) lists the
following purposes of a review:
Distinguishingwhathasbeendonefromwhatneeds
tobedone;
Discoveringimportantvariablesrelevanttothe
topic;
Synthesisingandgaininganewperspective;
Identifyingrelationshipsbetweenideasand
practice;
Establishingthecontextofthetopicorproblem;
Why write LR?
Its purpose is to:
Placeeachworkinthecontextofitscontributionto
theunderstandingofthesubjectunderreview
Describetherelationshipofeachworktotheothers
underconsideration
Identifynewwaystointerpret,andshedlightonany
gapsin,previousresearch
Resolveconflictsamongstseeminglycontradictory
previousstudies
Identifyareasofpriorscholarshiptoprevent
duplicationofeffort
Pointthewayforwardforfurtherresearch
Placeone'soriginalwork(inthecaseofthesesor
dissertations)inthecontextofexistingliterature
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Clarify
Ifyourassignmentisnotveryspecific,seek
clarificationfromyoursupervisor/lecturer:
Roughlyhowmanysourcesshouldyouinclude?
Whattypesofsources(books,journalarticles,
websites)?
Shouldyousummarize,synthesize,orcritiqueyour
sourcesbydiscussingacommonthemeorissue?
Shouldyouevaluateyoursources?
Shouldyouprovidesubheadingsandother
backgroundinformation,suchasdefinitionsand/or
ahistory?
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Find models
Lookforotherliteraturereviewsinyourareaofinterest
orinthedisciplineandreadthemtogetasenseofthe
typesofthemesyoumightwanttolookforinyourown
researchorwaystoorganizeyourfinalreview.
Youcansimplyputtheword"review"inyoursearch
enginealongwithyourothertopictermstofindarticles
ofthistypeontheInternetorinanelectronicdatabase.
Thebibliographyorreferencesectionofsourcesyou've
alreadyreadarealsoexcellententrypointsintoyourown
research.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Narrow your topic
Therearehundredsoreventhousands
ofarticlesandbooksonmostareasof
study.Thenarroweryourtopic,the
easieritwillbetolimitthenumberof
sourcesyouneedtoreadinordertoget
agoodsurveyofthematerial.
Yourinstructorwillprobablynotexpect
youtoreadeverythingthat'soutthere
onthetopic,butyou'llmakeyourjob
easierifyoufirstlimityourscope.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Consider whether your sources are
current
Somedisciplinesrequirethatyouuse
informationthatisascurrentas
possible.Inthesciences,forinstance,
treatmentsformedicalproblemsare
constantlychangingaccordingtothe
lateststudies.Informationeventwo
yearsoldcouldbeobsolete.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
However,ifyouarewritingareviewinthe
humanities,history,orsocialsciences,asurveyof
thehistoryoftheliteraturemaybewhatis
needed,becausewhatisimportantishow
perspectiveshavechangedthroughtheyearsor
withinacertaintimeperiod.
Trysortingthroughsomeothercurrent
bibliographiesorliteraturereviewsinthefieldto
getasenseofwhatyourdisciplineexpects.
Youcanalsousethismethodtoconsiderwhatis
"hot"andwhatisnot.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Find a focus
A literature review, like a term paper, is
usually organized around ideas, not the
sources themselves as an annotated
bibliography would be organized. This
means that you will not just simply list
your sources and go into detail about
each one of them, one at a time.
No.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Asyoureadwidelybutselectivelyinyourtopic
area,considerinsteadwhatthemesorissues
connectyoursourcestogether.
Dotheypresentoneordifferentsolutions?
Isthereanaspectofthefieldthatismissing?
Howwelldotheypresentthematerialanddothey
portrayitaccordingtoanappropriatetheory?
Dotheyrevealatrendinthefield?
Aragingdebate?
Pickoneofthesethemestofocustheorganization
ofyourreview.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Construct a working thesis
statement
Thenusethefocusyou'vefoundto
constructathesisstatement.Yes!
Literaturereviewshave thesis
statementsaswell!
However,yourthesisstatementwillnot
necessarilyargueforapositionoran
opinion;ratheritwillarguefora
particularperspectiveonthematerial.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Some sample thesis statements for
literature reviews are as follows:
The current trend in treatment for
congestive heart failure combines
surgery and medicine.
More and more cultural studies scholars
are accepting popular media as a subject
worthy of academic consideration.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Consider organization
You've got a focus, and you've narrowed
it down to a thesis statement.
Now what is the most effective way of
presenting the information?
What are the most important topics,
subtopics, etc., that your review needs
to include?
And in what order should you present
them?
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Developanorganizationforyourreviewat
bothaglobalandlocallevel:
First,coverthebasiccategories
Justlikemostacademicpapers,literaturereviews
alsomustcontainatleastthreebasicelements:an
introductionorbackgroundinformationsection;the
bodyofthereviewcontainingthediscussionof
sources;and,finally,aconclusionand/or
recommendationssectiontoendthepaper.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Introduction:Gives a quick idea of the topic
of the literature review, such as the central
theme or organizational pattern.
Body:Contains your discussion of sources and
is organized either chronologically,
thematically, or methodologically (see below
for more information on each).
Conclusions/Recommendations:Discuss what
you have drawn from reviewing literature so
far. Where might the discussion proceed?
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
The introductionshould provide the reader with the
scale and structure of your review. It serves as a kind of
map.
The bodyof the review depends on how you have
organised your key points. Literature reviews at
postgraduate level should be evaluative and not merely
descriptive. For example possible reasons for similarities
or differences between studies are considered rather
than a mere identification of them.
The conclusionof the review needs to sum up the main
findings of your research into the literature. The
findings can be related to the aims of the study you are
proposing to do. The reader is thus provided with a
coherent background to the current study.
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Organizing the body
Onceyouhavethebasiccategoriesinplace,thenyou
mustconsiderhowyouwillpresentthesources
themselveswithinthebodyofyourpaper.Createan
organizationalmethodtofocusthissectioneven
further.
Tohelpyoucomeupwithanoverallorganizational
frameworkforyourreview,considerthesixtypicalways
oforganizingthesourcesintoareview:
Chronological
By publication
By trend
Thematic
Methodological
Questions for Further Research
What should I do before writing
the literature review?
Similartoprimaryresearch,developmentofthe
literaturereviewrequiresfourstages:
Problemformulation—whichtopicorfieldis
beingexaminedandwhatareitscomponent
issues?
Literaturesearch—findingmaterialsrelevantto
thesubjectbeingexplored
Dataevaluation—determiningwhichliterature
makesasignificantcontributiontothe
understandingofthetopic
Analysisandinterpretation—discussingthe
findingsandconclusionsofpertinentliterature
What should you write?
the accepted facts in the area
the popular opinion
the main variables
the relationship between concepts and
variables
shortcomings in the existing findings
limitations in the methods used in the existing
findings
the relevance of your research
suggestions for further research in the area.
What should you write?
Literaturereviewsshouldcomprisethefollowingelements:
Anoverviewofthesubject,issueortheoryunder
consideration,alongwiththeobjectivesofthe
literaturereview
Divisionofworksunderreviewintocategories(e.g.
thoseinsupportofaparticularposition,thoseagainst,
andthoseofferingalternativethesesentirely)
Explanationofhoweachworkissimilartoandhowit
variesfromtheothers
Conclusionsastowhichpiecesarebestconsideredin
theirargument,aremostconvincingoftheiropinions,
andmakethegreatestcontributiontotheunderstanding
anddevelopmentoftheirareaofresearch
What should you write?
In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to:
Provenance—Whataretheauthor'scredentials?Are
theauthor'sargumentssupportedbyevidence(e.g.
primaryhistoricalmaterial,casestudies,narratives,
statistics,recentscientificfindings)?
Objectivity—Istheauthor'sperspectiveeven-handed
orprejudicial?Iscontrarydataconsideredoriscertain
pertinentinformationignoredtoprovetheauthor's
point?
Persuasiveness—Whichoftheauthor'sthesesare
most/leastconvincing?
Value—Aretheauthor'sargumentsandconclusions
convincing?Doestheworkultimatelycontributeinany
significantwaytoanunderstandingofthesubject?
What should you write?
Layout
Makeyourliteraturereviewhaveanacademicand
professionalappearance.Herearesomepointstomake
thelookofyourreportappealingtothereader
Whitespace:leavespacebetweensections,especially
fromtheabstract.Thisgivesanunclutteredeffect.
Headings/sub-headings:thesehelptoseparateideas.
Textboxes:youcanusetheseforquotationsor
paraphrasingtoseparatethemfromtherestofyour
text.Itisalsopleasingtotheeye.
What should you write?
Graphics:Centreyourgraphics,suchas
diagramsortables,tohavespacearound
them.Trynottoburygraphicsinyourtext.
Pagination:Youcannumberpagesorsections
orboth,buttheimportantthingtodoistobe
consistent.Thecoverpagenormallyisnot
numbered.Thecontentpageandabstract
pageusuallyhaveaseparatenumbering
systemtothebodyofyourliteraturereview.
What should you write?
Language focus
Createabalancebetweendirectquotation
(citation)andparaphrasing.Avoidtoomuchdirect
quoting.Theverbtensechosendependsonyour
emphasis:
Whenyouarecitingaspecificauthor'sfindings,
usethepasttense:(found,demonstrated);
Whenyouarewritingaboutanacceptedfact,use
thepresenttense:(demonstrates,finds);and
Whenyouarecitingseveralauthorsormakinga
generalstatement,usethepresentperfecttense:
(haveshown,havefound,littleresearchhasbeen
done).
What should you write?
Final checklist
Have I fulfilled the purpose of the literature review?
Is it written at a level appropriate to its audience?
Are its facts correct?
Is all the information included relevant?
Are the layout and presentation easy on the eye?
Is the language clear, concise and academic?
Does the abstract summarise the entire review?
Does the introduction adequately introduce the topic?
Is the body organised logically?
Does the conclusion interpret, analyse and evaluate?
Are the recommendations reasonable?
Does the table of contents correspond with the actual contents? Are page
numbers correct?
Have I acknowledged all sources of information through correct
referencing?
Have I checked spelling, grammar and punctuation?
Have I carefully proof-read the final draft?
How to review?
The whole process of reviewing
includes:
a. Searching for literature
b. Sorting and prioritising the retrieved
literature
c. Analytical reading of papers
d. Evaluative reading of papers
e. Comparison across studies
f. Organising the content
g. Writing the review
How to review?
Comparison across studies
The aim is to extract key points by comparing and
contrasting ACROSS studies, instead of reading
one paper after another.
Key points for a review may concern areas of
similarities and/or differences in:
Research aim(s) or hypotheses
Research design and sampling
Instruments and procedures used
How data were analysed
Results or findings
Interpretations
How to review?
Find similarities and differences between
studies at different levels, e.g.:
-philosophy
-epistemology
-morality
-methodology
-methods
-types of data
-data analysis
-interpretation
How to review?
Setoutyourthinkingonpaperthrough
mapsandtrees.Feature map Classifies and categorises your thought in tabular form
Concept map
Links between concepts and processes, or shows relationship between
ideas and practice
Tree construction
Shows how topic branches out into subthemes and related questions or
represents stages in the development of a topic.
How to review?
Tips on writingSentences
Express one idea in a sentence. Ensure that all your sentences have
a subject, verb and object.
Paragraphs
Group sentences that express and develop one aspect of your topic.
Use a new paragraph for another aspect or another topic.
Consistent Grammar
Use sentences and paragraphs with appropriate use of commas,
colours and semi-colours. Incorrect use of punctuation can affect
the meaning.
Transition Words
Use words that link paragraphs and which show contrast and
development to your argument e.g. ‘hence’, ‘therefore’, ‘but’,
‘thus’, ‘as a result’, ‘in contrast’.
How to review?
•Pitfalls
-Vagueness due to too much or
inappropriate generalisations
-Limited range
-Insufficient information
-Irrelevant material
-Omission of contrasting view
-Omission of recent work
ExampleResearch Technique Features
Used
Domain Disadvantage /
Advantage
Future Direction
Lin et al. 2007
A priori algorithm
Association rule
mining
Pre-filtering
architecture
Audiovisual Weather
Sports
Commercial
Reduce the amount of
misclassification errors.
Able to identify a high
percentage of positive
instances in each concept
Due to the different
properties of the data
sets representing the
semantic concepts
such as weather,
commercial, and
sports, they proposed
to use different
strategies to merge the
rules.
Davis & Tyagi
2006
Probabilistic reliable-
inference framework
Hidden Markov
Model (HMM) output
likelihoods and action
priors
Maximum likelihood
(ML) and maximum
a posteriori (MAP)
Motion Walking, running,
standing, bending-
forward, crouching-
down, and sitting
The system only makes
classifications when it
believes the input is
‘good enough’ for
discrimination between
the possible actions
STUDY POPULATION AND SAMPLING
PROCEDURE
Population:Theentiregroupaboutwhichinformationis
desired.
Thetheoreticalaggregationofspecifiedelementsasdefined
foragivensurveydefinedbytimeandspace.
Definitionofpopulationgivesaclearstatementofthose
included.Thefollowingaresomeexamples:
Adultsandchildren10-59yearsofageresidinginArua
Municipality
Adults 25-59 years of age residing in Arua Municipality on
July 1, 2014
Employees working in Arua District
Sample:Aproportionorpartofthepopulation-usuallythe
proportionfromwhichinformationisgathered.Orthe
aggregationofthepopulationfromwhichthesampleis
actuallydrawn.
Importance of Sampling
•Sample
–Small representative subset of a larger population
•Random sample
–Every subject had equal chance of being selected
•Representative sample
–Characteristics of participants correspond to larger
population
–Cost
–Time
–Reduce fatigue
–Eliminate errors
Cluster Sampling
ClusterSample:aprobabilitysampleinwhich
eachsamplingunitisacollectionofelements.It
combinesSRS,SS,stratificationandcluster
sampling.
Used when:
Researchers lack a good sampling frame for a
dispersed population.
The cost to reach an element to sample is very high.
Examples of clusters:
City blocks –political or geographical
Housing units –college students
Hospitals –illnesses
Automobile –set of four tires
Research Design
A research designis:
•aframeworkfortheresearchplanof
action.
•amasterplanthatspecifiesthemethods
andproceduresforcollectingand
analyzingtheneededinformation
•astrategyforhowthedatawillbe
collected.
Purposes of Research Design
•Itprovidestheschemeforanswering
researchquestion.
•Itmaintainscontroltoavoidbiasthatmay
affecttheoutcomes.
•Itorganizethestudyinacertainway
defendingtheadvantagesofdoingwhile
beingawareandcautionaboutpotential
disadvantages
Characteristics of good design
•1-Appropriateness to the research question.
•2-Lack of bias.
•3-Precision.
•4-Power.
•Research design can be either quantitative or
qualitative. Both designs complement each
other because they generate different kinds of
knowledge that are useful in nursing practice.
Designs for nursing
research
The four types most commonly used in
nursing are:
* descriptive / exploratory survey
*correlational
*experimental
*Quasi Experimental Design
A-Descriptive: (exploratory
survey) studies
•Its purpose is to provide a picture of a
situation as it naturally happen,
•No manipulation variable is involved
•Some studies contain two variable, others
may include multiple variables.
•They use this design to search for accurate
information about the characteristic s of
particular subject, group, and event or about
the frequency of the phenomena.
•Advantages of descriptive:
•The great deal with information
obtained from large population and is
surprisingly accurate.
•Disadvantagesof descriptive:
•The information collected is very brief
and superficial.
•It is a time consumer process
B-Correlational design
•It examine relationships between or
among two or more variables in a
single group.
•It requires a large sample size.
Subjects are not divided into groups
•The correlational design doesn’t test
the cause and effect relationship
Advantages of Correlational
studies:
•Anincreaseflexibilitywheninvestigatingcomplex
relationshipamongvariables.
•Aneffectiveandefficientmethodofcollectingalarge
amountofdataaboutanissueofinterest.
•Exploring a relationship between variables.
Disadvantages 0F Correlational studies
•Theresearcherisnotemployingtherandomizationinthe
samplingprocedures.
•Theresearcherisunabletodeterminethecausal
relationshipbetweenthevariablesbecauseoflackof
manipulation,controlandrandomization.
C) Experimental Research
Design
•Test a causal hypothesis (Cause and effect
relationship) between the intervention or
treatment and the outcomes
Elements of true experiment
design:
1-control group
2-sample randomization
3-manipulation of the independent variable.
Types of Experimental
Design
There are 3 types of experimental design:-
1-Pre test –post test control group design:-
•theexperimentalandcontrolgroupsareboth
randomlyassignedfromthesamplethatwas
randomlyselected.
•Thetreatmentisundercontrolofthe
researcher,thedependentvariablesis
measuredtwicebeforeandaftermanipulation
oftheindependentvariables.
•theresearcherobservesthetwogroupsto
determineeffectofmanipulation(posttest).
Advantages of Pre test –post test
control group design
•Threatstointernalvalidityareminimized
(controlgroup)
•Presenceofrandomizationleadstoequal
chanceforthesubjecttobeselected.
•Allowtheresearchertoexaminechanges
occurs.
•Disadvantages :-
•Theresultscannotbegeneralizedonboth
groups.
•Mortalitycanaffectonegroupratherthan
theother
2-Post Test Only Experimental
Group Design:
•Thepretestcannotbeestablished,andalsosubject
responsetoposttestcanbealteredbytheeffectof
thepretest,soposttestonlyisperformed.
Advantages:
•Random assignment decreases the threats to validity.
Disadvantages
•Withouttheeffectofpretesttheresearcherbecome
unabletodeterminetheeffectofthetreatment
received.
3-Solomon four groups
of experimental design
•Fourgroupscanbeusedoneexperimentalandthree
arecontrol,sometimesaredividedequallytwocontrol
andtheotherareexperimental.
•Itisastrongerdesignthantheposttestonlybut
requiresocomplicatedstatisticalanalysis.
•Advantages
•Allowtheexaminertoexaminetheeffectofthepre
testontheposttest.
•Disadvantages
•Mortality can affect the results.
General Advantages of
Experimental Design
•Are most appropriate for testing the cause and
effect relationship between the variables.
•Most appropriate for testing hypothesis.
General Disadvantages of Experimental Design
•Forsomeethicalreasonsmanipulationcannot
beachievedespeciallyonthehumanstudies.
•Pre test can affect the response of post test.
D) Quasi Experimental Design:-
•Quasiexperimentisresearchdesigninwhichthe
researcherinitiatesanexperimentaltreatmentbutsome
characteristicoftrueexperimentislackingeithercontrol
orrandomization.
•italsousedtotestcauseandeffectrelationship,thebasic
problemwiththequasiexperimentistheweakened
confidenceinmakingcausalassertionsoitisusually
exposedtothesubjectcontamination.
•Example: examining differences in the amount of pain that
the patient feel during painful procedure and the effect of
nursing intervention on the experimental group. It might be
impossible to pretest the amount of pain
How and When to use Quasi-
experimental research
•Usedwhenyouhavecontroloverthe
“whenandthewhomofmeasurement”,
butlackcontroloverthe“whenandto
whomofexposure.”(completecontrolis
notpossible)
•Common in educational research.
Data Analysis
•Analysis not left until the end
•Toavoidcollectingdatathatarenot
importanttheresearchermustask:
–How am I going to make sense of this data?
•As they collect data the researcher must
ask
–Why do the participants act as they do?
–What does this focus mean?
–What else do I want to know?
–What new ideas have emerged?
–Is this new information?
Data Analysis:
Qualitative Data
•Onewayistofollowthreeiterativesteps
1.Becomefamiliarwiththedatathrough
1.Reading
2.Memoing
2.Examthedataindepthtoprovidedetailed
descriptionsofthesetting,participants,and
activities.
3.Categorizingandcodingpiecesofdataand
groupingthemintothemes.
Data Analysis: Qualitative Data
Summarizing
•“Thefirsttimeyousitdownwithyourdataisthe
onlytimeyoucometothatparticularsetfresh”-
Kratowohl.
–ReadingandMemoing
•Readwritememosaboutfieldnotes.
–Describing
•Developcomprehensive descriptionsofsetting,
participants,etc.
–Classifying
•Breakingdataintoanalyticunits.
•Categories
•Themes
Data Analysis Strategies :
Qualitative Data
•Identifying themes
–Begin with big picture and list “themes” that
emerge.
•Events that keep repeating themselves
•Coding qualitative data
–Reduce data to a manageable form
–Often done by writing notes on note cards and
sorting into themes.
•Predetermined categories vs. emerging categories
Data Interpretation: Qualitative
Data
•Answer these four questions
–What is important in the data?
–Why is it important?
–What can be learned from it?
–So what?
•Remember
–Interpretation depends on the
perspective of the researcher.
•Why?
Interpretation
•One technique for data
interpretation(Wolcott)
–Extend the analysis by raising questions
–Connect findings to personal
experiences
–Seek the advice of “critical” friends.
–Contextualize findings in the research
•Converging evidence?
–Turn to theory
Mixed Methods?
•Acombinationofquantitativeand
qualitativetechniques.
–Under what circumstances might mixed
methods work?
–Under what circumstances might mixed
methods not work?
•Think epistemological perspectives.