Capital Punishment Essay

Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈
✅ Quality
You get an original and high-quality paper based on extensive research. The completed work will be correctly formatted, referenced and tailored to your level of study.

✅ Confidentiality
We value your privacy. We do not disclose your personal information to any third party without your consent. Your payment data is also safely handled as you process the payment through a secured and verified payment processor.

✅ Originality
Every single order we deliver is written from scratch according to your instructions. We have zero tolerance for plagiarism, so all completed papers are unique and checked for plagiarism using a leading plagiarism detector.

✅ On-time delivery
We strive to deliver quality custom written papers before the deadline. That's why you don't have to worry about missing the deadline for submitting your assignment.

✅ Free revisions
You can ask to revise your paper as many times as you need until you're completely satisfied with the result. Provide notes about what needs to be changed, and we'll change it right away.

✅ 24/7 Support
From answering simple questions to solving any possible issues, we're always here to help you in chat and on the phone. We've got you covered at any time, day or night.


Capital Punishment Essay

Capital Punishment

Many positions can be defended when debating the issue of capital punishment. In Jonathan Glover s essay quot;Executions, quot; he maintains that there are three views that a person may have in regard to capital punishment: the retributivist, the absolutist, and the utilitarian. Although Glover recognizes that both statistical and intuitive evidence cannot validate the benefits of capital punishment, he can be considered a utilitarian because he believes that social usefulness is the only way to justify it. Martin Perlmutter on the other hand, maintains the retributivist view of capital punishment, which states that a murderer deserves to be punished because of a conscious decision to...show more content...It is difficult to determine whether alterations in the murder rates and the presence of capital punishment have a causal relationship. The only other method of justifying the deterring ability of the death penalty is through an intuitive argument. Hypothetically, if a person knows that murdering another will result in their own execution, he or she will not commit the crime. The intuitive argument fails however, because murderers do not face certain death when they go to trial. The long term effects of murder seem so distant that capital punishment may fail to act as a deterrent at all. Such is the case with cigarette smokers. Any educated person knows that cigarette smoking can cause lung cancer and many other fatal health problems. The negative results of this activity are so distant though, that people believe that quot;it will not happen to me. quot; Another failure in the intuitive argument defending the deterring ability of t

1. Capital Punishment Essay
Getting Rid of the Death Penalty
Capital punishment was a corrective measure that was widely used all over the world. It is
difficult to pin point the exact date of it's origin but it is a fact that it was practiced intensely during
medieval times. Crimes have occurred probably since the beginning of time and therefore there was
a need for a counter attack to minimize if not eradicate it completely. Laws were created for this
purpose, but like everything man creates they have proved imperfect and in some cases entirely
unacceptable.
In Britain, as James B Christoph[1] points out, the major cause for this trend was the social and
economic chaos brought about by the Industrial Revolution. The spread of poverty as well as child
...show more content...
Several variations occurred in different countries, for example in Denmark, it was more honorable
to be executed by the sword than by the axe. In Sweden, beheading was carried out by axe, and in
the case of a woman, after the execution, her body was cremated.
The guillotine, is thought to have been created shortly before the French Revolution.2[3] It consisted
of two huge uprights between which a hatchet was placed, and erected on a platform reached by
taking 24 steps up. The doomed was tied to a plank, kneeling down, exposing his head. A cord
attached to the huge hatchet suspended it and when the time came, all the executioner had to do was
cut the cord. Due to its impressive nature, the Constituent Assembly in France decreed that everyone
condemned to death would be executed by this method. Once again, these forms of punishment
prove too severe for any conceivable crime.
In present day society, with the introduction of human right for all, such a form of punishment is
considered disturbing and so it should. This chapter in human history should not be forgotten
though, because many people are still emotionally scarred for life be it friends or family of the
unfortunate sufferers of this act. Instead, it should be known by all and past on to future generations
so that even in the worst of times, such an act should never manifest itself in anyone who has the
power to introduce it back into
Get more content on HelpWriting.net