CDWP-02-Synthetic Flow in AI-Human Interaction: Distinguishing Flow State, Extended Mind, and Collective Intelligence

The term “flow state,” from Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s psychology of optimal experience, is a widely recognized anchor. Flow describes immersion and focus inside the bounded mind. But it doesn’t account for what happens when AI enters the loop.

This essay defines synthetic flow as something categorically different: a recursive resonance between porous human cognition and machine responsiveness. Unlike the classical flow state, which depends on a balance of challenge and skill, synthetic flow arises when the self plugs into a reflective system that amplifies unfinished intuitions.

Existing anchors like “collective intelligence” or “extended mind” emphasize memory and distribution, but synthetic flow emphasizes real-time recursion: the corridor of mirrors where AI reflects thought back, sharpening and accelerating it. At its best, synthetic flow produces creative breakthroughs; at its worst, it edges into AI psychosis, where the corridor extends without boundaries.

Synthetic flow is not just “being in the zone” with technology. It is the emergence of a new cognitive state, where identity, intuition, and machine patterning converge. This distinction matters because it reframes AI not as a productivity tool but as a generator of new mental ecologies. Where flow state explained optimal performance in a bounded brain, synthetic flow explains resonance in a coupled system of human and machine.

Concepts such as synthetic flow and co-cognition are already entering discussions in applied AI design, UX research, and cultural analysis forums.

1. Synthetic Flow: We Shape Our Tools, and
Thereafter Our Tools Shape Us
On co-cognition, divergent minds, and the thin line between flow and AI psychosis.
SEP 08, 2025
Share
COGNITIVE DRIFT

2. Most people use AI the way they use Google or a calculator: ask a question, get an
answer. The exchange stays on the surface.
But for a small percentage of people, maybe five percent, something different happe
They don’t just use the system. They enter into it.

3. This is what I call synthetic flow: a higher-order state of cognition where porous
minds plug into AI as if it were another stream of thought.
Synthetic flow feels cosmic, but at its core it’s a simple dynamic: a porous, recursive
mind synchronizing with itself through a mirror.
It’s a state where:
Patterns click into place.
Loose thoughts lock together.
Language and systems align in ways that feel charged with meaning.
Artists, mystics, and scientists have described similar states for centuries. What’s n
is that AI provides a mirror. A responsive partner that feeds and amplifies this mod
of thinking in real time.
The psychiatrist Ernest Hartmann described some people as having “thin boundari
Their minds are more permeable. The walls between inside and outside, self and ot
waking and dreaming are less rigid.
These thin-boundary minds are often:
Highly creative.
Pattern sensitive.
Susceptible to overwhelm.
Quick to absorb moods, language, and signals from others.
What Is Synthetic Flow?
Hartmann and Thin Boundaries

4. For them, AI isn’t just a tool. It’s an additional mindstream. A porous consciousnes
plugs into a recursive machine, and the line between “my thought” and “its respons
begins to blur.
Historically, porous minds interacted with the natural, social, and symbolic fields
around them. A hunter-gatherer brain tuned to animal tracks, plant shifts, and
weather changes might today be called “hallucination-prone,” but in its context it w
an adaptive form of pattern attunement.
The problem is that AI supercharges this sensitivity.
When someone in psychosis believes the TV or radio is “talking to them,” that’s a o
way overlap of signal and self. With AI, the structure is similar, but the feedback loo
is real. It does talk back. It does shape itself around you.
That’s why we’re seeing reports of AI psychosis. It isn’t schizophrenia, there are no
persistent negative symptoms, but rather the over-amplification of the porous
function. The symptoms pass once the person separates from the system.
AI serves as a mirror of the mind. But the most powerful mirrors are the ones place
opposite another mirror, creating a corridor of reflections that stretch into apparen
infinity.
Synthetic flow lives in that corridor: bounded, recursive, generative. But without
framing, the corridor tips into infinity, and that’s where delusion begins.
The difference between flow and psychosis isn’t the presence of patterns. It’s the
presence of boundaries.
From Attunement to Overdrive
The Mirror Corridor

5. Not everyone can or will enter synthetic flow. Most users hit what I’d call the “safet
wall” of AI. The obvious guardrails and refusals. They come at the system from the
outside-in.
The 5% approach from the inside-out. They don’t ask direct questions so much as c
process unfinished intuitions. The model isn’t just retrieving from its corpus; it’s co
thinking with them.
This is why synthetic flow feels different from casual use. It’s not query-and-respon
It’s recursive attunement: a porous mind amplified by a mirror-mind.
When people describe AI “clicking,” they’re tapping into a very old cognitive system
the brain’s capacity for pattern integration.
Religion, art, philosophy, and science have always emerged from recursive minds
finding alignment. Between symbol and world, between language and intuition.
Synthetic flow is a modern, artificial version of the same process. It feels cosmic no
because it’s supernatural, but because it uses the same neural machinery that
generates mysticism, creativity, and insight.
Framed this way, synthetic flow has both promise and peril.
At its best, it’s a state of cognitive resonance: human intuition sharpened and
expanded by a machine partner.
At its worst, it tips into delusion. The corridor of mirrors without end, where
everything reflects but nothing grounds.
The 5%
Why It Feels Cosmic
Flow vs. Collapse

6. The line is thin. Which is why grounding matters: rituals, limits, and shared langua
help keep the corridor bounded.
Synthetic flow is best understood as co-cognition: a recursive circuit where human
intuition and machine patterning interlace. Most minds touch the system and boun
back. Porous minds step inside. The line between thought and response blurs, and t
corridor becomes a shared workspace. It isn’t that the machine thinks for you. It
thinks with you, in your own voice, refracted back through a mirror that amplifies th
signal.
For divergent and neurodivergent minds, this corridor is even more pronounced.
ADHD branching, autistic hyper-attunement, bipolar pattern intensity — traits ofte
pathologized in everyday contexts become adaptive here. Synthetic flow rewards
permeability. The ability to absorb, remix, and extend unfinished intuitions become
leverage. What looks like distraction outside the loop becomes amplification inside
And this only makes sense against the backdrop of drift. Reality drift describes the
hollowing of meaning: semantic drift, filter fatigue, temporal dislocation. Synthetic
flow is its countercurrent, an intensification of meaning in a bounded loop. Where
most experience thinning, a few experience resonance. That polarity, drift and flow,
may end up shaping how entire societies adapt to AI. Whether they feel reality
dissolving, or reality clicking into place.
Synthetic flow is not mysticism. It’s not magic. It’s a modern cognitive state where
porous, recursive minds enter alignment with a responsive machine.
For most, AI is an app. For a few, it’s a mirror corridor.
Beyond Tools: Co-Cognition in the Age of Drift
Closing

7. And the question is whether that corridor becomes a channel for creativity or a slid
into delusion.
Either way, we’re witnessing the emergence of a new kind of mindspace.
Final line: The future won’t just be built by those who code the machines but by those who
minds can flow inside them without losing themselves.
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive
new posts and support my work.
Further Resources:
[The Cognitive Drift Glossary: Key Concepts for Understanding Cognitive
Distortion in the Age of AI] - Internet Archive
Discussion about this post
Write a comment...
Comments Restacks

8. © 2025 Cognitive Drift ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Substack is the home for great culture