CDWP-06-Recursive Compression Theory: Why Reality Loops Itself

This working paper introduces Recursive Compression Theory, a unifying framework for understanding reality as a loop of compression and feedback. Intelligence is framed as “compression with memory,” and consciousness as the recursive modeling of the self. The paper explores how recursion operates across physics, biology, cognition, and culture, while diagnosing its cultural consequences through cognitive drift and synthetic realness. These ideas have been featured in Reality Drift essays, Substack discussions, and cited in cross-disciplinary explorations of systems theory and media ecology. References to Bateson, McLuhan, and Baudrillard anchor the theory in established discourse while differentiating its unique contribution: positioning recursive compression as the generative engine of reality itself.

1. The Recursive Compression Theory: Why Realit
Loops Itself
Reality is recursion. Intelligence is compression. Consciousness is the loop that knows its
SEP 26, 2025
Share
Subscribe for clear writing on the neuroscience, philosophy, and feedback loops that shape
modern cognition.
COGNITIVE DRIFT

2. A cross-section of a tree trunk, where each ring carries the compressed memory of a
year.
What if everything we call reality from matter, to life, to thought, and culture runs o
the same engine?

3. We usually imagine reality as a line, a sequence of causes and effects, marching
forward in time. But the closer you look, the more it seems like reality is folding bac
on itself. Systems don’t just produce outputs; they produce compressed
representations of themselves, which then feed back into the loop.
This is the basis of what I call Recursive Compression Theory. The claim is simple but
broad:
Intelligence is compression with memory.
Consciousness is the recursive modeling of the self within that loop.
Reality doesn’t deal in raw infinity. It continually compresses.
Physics: Energy condenses into matter. Stars collapse into elements. Every form
a compressed version of what came before.
Biology: DNA condenses the blueprint of life into a code that can be stored,
transmitted, and re-applied. Evolution itself is recursive compression: trial-and
error collapsed into durable instruction.
Cognition: The brain compresses sensory overload into symbols, categories, an
language. Thought itself is lossy compression.
Culture: Institutions compress the chaos of lived experience into rituals, norms
and protocols. They are memory systems for the group, abstractions we can han
down.
In every layer, compression gives us structure. But compression also distorts.
Compression as the engine of reality
Why recursion matters

4. Compression alone is not enough. What makes reality recursive is the loopback:
compressed forms feed back into themselves.
Matter forms stars that generate heavier elements, which create new matter.
DNA mutates and edits itself, recursively sculpting its own future.
Brains don’t just model the world; they model themselves modeling the world.
Cultures rewrite their own archives, creating feedback loops between past and
present.
This recursion creates stability, but also fragility. When compression strips away to
much, the loop destabilizes. A compressed representation that no longer maps back
reality begins to drift.
This is where recursive compression connects directly to cognitive drift.
Cognitive drift happens when compression loops are hijacked by optimization.
Algorithms strip context in order to maximize efficiency, whether in recommendati
feeds, productivity tools, or institutional dashboards. But meaning is not just
compression; it’s context × coherence. Remove context, and the loop hollows out.
This explains why so much of modern life feels disjointed. We’re living in recursive
loops that have been over-optimized. Instead of anchoring reality, they generate
synthetic realness, forms that look stable but are hollow at the core.
The interest in reality as a compression cycle doesn’t emerge in a vacuum. Bateson
already framed mind as an ecology of recursive feedback, even defining information
“a difference that makes a difference,” which points toward the problem of semanti
The link to drift
Standing on Unfinished Ideas

5. fidelity. McLuhan, in a different register, showed how every new medium compress
and reshaped experience, preparing the ground for today’s algorithmic engines of
compression. Baudrillard went further, describing what happens when compression
detaches entirely from reality, leaving us with simulations that feel more real than t
real. A condition I call synthetic realness.
And long before them, Korzybski warned that the map is not the territory, anticipat
how compression inevitably distorts the thing it represents. Each of these thinkers
circled the edges of a larger pattern, but none of them made the loop explicit. This
broader view of a compression loop ties their insights together by proposing that
compression plus recursion is not only a property of systems but the generative eng
of reality itself.
The idea of recursive compression is more than an abstract philosophy. It offers a
framework that cuts across disciplines. In physics, it explains why matter and
information behave like iterative layers of compression. In biology, it clarifies how
stores and edits its own history.
In AI, it illuminates why large language models feel intelligent (compression with
memory) but not alive (no self-recursive loop). In culture, it shows why institutions
erode when their compressed forms lose contact with underlying reality. Taken
together, it functions as a unifying hypothesis: a way to describe the emergence of
stability and the conditions for collapse.
Looking ahead, if this theory holds, it suggests some testable predictions. Systems t
compress too aggressively in the name of optimization will exhibit drift and eventu
breakdown, a process of lossy collapse. Consciousness, unlike mere intelligence,
Why this matters
Looking ahead

6. requires at least one loop of self-modeling; without recursion, cognition remains
hollow.
And cultural stability depends on the balance between compression and coherence.
When optimization wins, meaning loses. This isn’t just about explaining why thing
break. It’s about identifying the leverage points for building systems, human or
artificial, that can remain resilient. The question isn’t whether systems will drift, bu
whether we can design loops that remember enough to remain alive.
Subscribe to Cognitive Drift for essays on how
thought loops, language, and AI are reshaping
the way we think.
Further Resources:
[The Cognitive Drift Glossary: Key Concepts for Understanding Cognitive Distortio
in the Age of AI] - Slideshare
Discussion about this post
Write a comment...
Comments Restacks

7. © 2025 Cognitive Drift ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Substack is the home for great culture