Centrifugation

9,096 views 74 slides Nov 15, 2013
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 74
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74

About This Presentation

SYNOPSIS
The principles underlying centrifugal separation of particulate species are briefly considered, and the main types of separator available are noted. The procedures available for scale-up from laboratory or semi-technical data are then discussed in detail with particular reference to perhaps...


Slide Content

41,
{af C?PT.
NO 1 CATALYST, PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

CONSULTANCY

CENTRIFUGATION

Process Information Disclaimer

believed

INTRODUCTION

Centriluge and How Does It Work?
Operating Regimes - What Limits the Machine's Output?
of separation

Characteristics

of Separation

(solids-imitation)
apabilty (Hydraulic limitation)
ling (Flux limitation)

USEFUL LABORATORY TESTS

Background
24.1 Basic Suspension Proper
1.2 Settling Kinetics
4.3. Network Strength N
241.4 Floc Stability Ass
Test Techniques

Scale-Up Factor
Meth

Semi-Empirical Approach I!
Ab Initio Approach

mation of N

Background.

sary Parameters and the Problems

) Factor
sept of Ultimate Thicknes
e-Up When Hindered is the Limiting Process

2 Gravity Thickeners — Behavior

Batch Thickeners

1 _ Continuous Thickeners
Gravity Thickeners — Interpretation of Be
plication to Centrifuges
Batch Flux Curve

3: Prediction of Ultimate Thickness for Solids Limited Syste

Steps in Semi-Empirical Scale-Up for Solid
Limited System

Steps in Ab Initio Scale-Up for Solids Limited Sy
Steps in Semi-Empirical Scale-Up for System Limited
by Hindered Setting Si

Steps in Ab Initio G

Hindered Setting

Worked Examples

Solids-Limited Scale-Up: Background to Examples
olids-Limited Examples: Semi-Empirical and Ab Initio Methods

Semi-Empirical Approach to Solids Limited Operation
(Gimpified method)

52.2 Standard Semi-Empirical Approac!

523 Ab Initio Approach to Solids Limitation

Calculation of Thickening Ultimate Limit
Example: "Structural" limit for Thickening in “Pruteen” Centrifugation
Scales-Up for Clarification Limited Systems
54.1 Ab Initio Clarification Calculation for P2 Type Single Cell Protein
5.4.2 (Ab Initio) Clarification Limit for Unflocculated Bacterial Cells
54.3 Semi£s 'Scale-Up for Clarification

Limited Sy
Ab Initio Calculation for Hindered Setting Li

Starting with the basic concepts behind their design, discussion follows to explain
may limit centrifuge performance. I is shown how a few simple,
1s can give a valuable insight into the design and operation o
full-scale industrial machines. Various scale-up theories are presented and
orked samples given, using data drawn from GBHE Agricultural Di
experience in biological separation:

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Scope of the Section

Centrifugal separation of solids is governed by the action of a centrifugal field in
either enhancing setting of particles or promoting deliquoring by filtration. The

former effect is the more important for fine particie processing (species < 10 um
in size > and thus we have chosen to focus attention on such operations in this
ction.

Fitration in general is considered in GBHE SPG PEG 300 Filtration.

ion is centered upon the scale-up and operation of (continuous)
-nozzle machines: a significant amount of data is available for this very
important class of centrifuges to demonstrate the strength and limitations of
scale-up procedures. It is considered that many of the concepts described can be
readily extended to batch or intermittently discharging machines, and also to.
Centrituges of radically diferent design, such as decanters. However at the
rent time there are insufficient working data to warrant detailed discussion of

In “centrifugal fiters” the phenomenon which gives concentration of the solids is

a fitration mechar are trapped by a filer medium of some

description a erated by the field. Estimates of

the performance of such operations are made by appropriate modification of
ory, based on Darcy's Law ions 3.2 and 3.5)

allow for the “g" force. Procedure

as [1], [7] and [10]. Though f ese predictive techniques are
ni avaable. As a rl cntfuga ers ae not

ecies are =: 100 um or gre
ofthe this manual and wll ol be further considered

In centrifuges based upon a settling principle, it is migration of the solid particles
through the liquid phase that is enhanced by the centrifugal field. As will be seen
later, this may involve either sedimentation of single particles in a Stoke's Law
type of “ree fall” or consolidation of a structured (thickened> sludge. As noted
above, settling rather than filtering centrifuges are appropriate for fine species
particles down to the order of 0.01 um can be dealt with in appropriate
Circumstances, Machines come in very many designs — disc nozzles, decanters
and so on - all of which have their particular operating regimes. Details of the
principal kinds of setting centrifuge are given in reference [10]. It should also be
Noted that centrifuges may have intermittent or continuous solids discharge or
may be operated in batch mode.

Figure 1 represents schematically the continuous disc-nozzle centrifuge which ls
in fine particle Feed Is introduced into the

Figure 1

In this section we will focus our discussion on this kind of process. We wil
consider the way that the output of a given centrifuge is limited by one of three
main mechanisms, viz:

(0. Falure to capture the fine panicles contained in the otherwise clear
contrate.

(} Falure to give sufficient time for the concentrated stream to adequately
thicken,

(ii) Flux limitation caused by particle;parlcle interaction

The first of these is likely to be the limiting mechanism when centrifuging weak
suspensions of discrete, compact particles of small diameter. The second oc
ing to obtain a thick concentrate from an open, flocculated sı

be obtained on any commer rifuge. An insight into the limiting mechanism

will also allow a quantitative nent of the benefit of modifying proces:
ditions (e. . feed concentration > or machine parameters (e.g. number of

discs) without the need for time consuming, expensive trials. An informed

judgment on the suitability of centrifugation for a given du

obtained,

Currently, the battery of scale-up techniques available for disc-nozzle machin
have not been properly extended to, for example, deca robable that
the concepts of Section 3.4.3 are applicable in sı

obviously inadequate, In particular, decanters are perhaps at best ac

ening to high solids (when their method of solids discharge is more
appropriate than that of the disc-nozzle design). In such a regime it will be
probable that the process Is solids rather than clarification limited as is assumed
inthe E approach.

13 _ What isa Disc Centrifuge and How Does It Work?

sider a simple clarifying tank in which a single, dense particle is setting
ut Under the force of gravity: Figure 2

le up > vb
Therefore the maximum feed rate that the tank can clarfy is given by

= usbl

Le. Max Liquid Rate = Tank Surface Area x Settling Velocity under gravity

The performance of the tank can be improved in one of two ways:
By increasing the gravitational field. An n-fold increase will give an n-fold
Increase in settling velocity and hence allow an n-fold increase In
throughput.

By reducing th e height the particle has to fall, e.g. by paritioning the
tank as shown below: Figure 3

Biawewes
Field
LL.

ho tt

Feed
Figure 4

This is not a practical arrangement because there is no convenient means of
separating solid and liquid flows. In practice, discs are Inclined to the
gravitational field with the feed entering through holes in the discs. The solids
migrate along the underside of the discs to the bow periphery whilst the clarified
supernatant flows inwards.

Figure 5

Liquid inventory in the centrifuge is kept constant by a weir arrangement as
below, the liquid finding Its own level with respect to the applied
tational field. The thickened solids discharge through a number of nozzles.
at the periphery of the bow, the discharge rate being controlled (for some
machines) by varying the nozzle diameter; less sophisticated machines may no
have on-line control but different sizes of nozzles will generally be available.

‘will also be noted that the feed enters the machine axially, typically from above.
Ribbed rotating surfaces in the feed zone help accelerate the Incoming liquid to

velocity. Any necessary further acceleration wil be imparted by the rotating
disc-stack

As a further variation, the solids may be transferred through tubes from the bow!
apex back towards the centre of the machine before reaching a nozzle and being
discharged. The reduced hydrostatic pressure here (smaller radius of rotation
and lower quid depth > mean tha larger nozzles can be used forth

Figure 6

14 Operating Regimes - What Limits the Machine's Output?

1.4.1 The Mechanics of separation

Despite engineering complexities (see Figure 6) the mechanics of separation in a
disc-nozzle centrifuge are straightforward. Feed Introduced to the disc stack Is
conveyed to the periphery by the strong centrifugal field consequent on the
rotation of the disc stack and bowl. The thickened solids are discharged through
nozzles whilst the less dense liquid is forced out at the weir by hydrostatic
pressure. The specific capacity of a centrifuge to concentrate a particular

because the pressure drop across the nozzle is determined solely by the liquid
depth and centrifugal field In the machine,

Increasing either the feed rate or feed concentration will increase the quantity
lids to be discharged in this constant volume, and hence increase the thicks
ncentration. This represents one of those rare occasions when driving a piece
‘equipment harder will improve its performance

Eventually, however, the machine's separation capacity will be exceeded (for one
of a number of reasons to be discussed later) and solids will be lost into the
trate. The point at which this led the breakthrough point

Effect of Nozzle Diameter

es) will allow a greater

te of thicks to pass. I is now possible to reach a new breakthrough
Point where the solids throughput is higher. Generally, however, the solids
Concentration will have been reduced (see later,

The locus of breakthrough points which can be achieved by changing the noz:
diameter Is termed the breakthrough curve. By using a variable diameter nc
itis possible to operate with clear centrate at any point on or below this curv

The above points are sketched below, where thicks concentration is plotted
against solids throughput. The latter represents a measure of both feed rate and
concentration,

Figure 7

1.4.2.3 Theory of Separation.

The detailed hydr high-speed centrifuges are horrendous. Even
simplified” treatments are often mathematically and conceptually comple)
despite the gross assumptions that are usually made. Only concepts direct
relevant to separation power will therefore be discussed,

For the purposes of many applications the separating power of a centrifuge may
be defined as the rate and concentration of thicks attainable at a given solids
throughput while maintaining a nominally clear centrate.

This immediately suggests two separate mechanisms which could limit centrifuge
performance, ie. the ability to thicken concentrate and the ability to clarify

Figure 8

The gravitational field increases with the square of the rotational
proportional to the radial distance from the axis of the machine. The time
available for compaction wil be roughly proportional o the volume of the
peripheral space and is inversely proportional to throughput.

Two points then follow

unimportant for solids-Imited applications;
the dis rification rather than residence times for
solids compaction. If a machine is thought to be solids limited, there Is therefore
litle point In installing a pre-thickening stage or modifying the discs.

1.6 Clarification capability (Hydraulic limitation)

The following sketch illustrates the paths followed by particles in the disc

Solids slide outwards
on underside

ack configuration is similarly important: doubling the number of di
roughly halve the distance each particle has to travel before being captured. This
will theoretically double machine capacity, although other effects, e.g. disc
thickness, flow maldistribution, etc, may be significant

Clarification limitation can be readily identified If different feed concentrations are
fed to a machine because a whole family of breakthrough curves will be
obtained, one for each feed. This follows from a simple mass balance If It Is
recognized that breakthrough will always occur at a constant centrate rate.

A comparison between solids and clarification limitation Is sho

limitation is less obvious than the previous two but may b
importa ll known effect in gravitational thickener

liquid
‘generally proportional to the applied gravitational field but
as the solids concentration builds up. This latter phenomenon is called
ling”. I results from increasingly significant effects of hydrodynamic
interaction between setting species ge distance between them
reduced by rising solids content.

For a constant volumetric flowrate of fluid the solids flux must, in the absence of
particle-particle Interactions, be proportional to solids concentration. If hindered
settling is taken into account, however, It can be shown that there is an absolute
maximum to the solids flux that can be obtained,

The effect is typified in gravity settlers by a critical concentration which fils the
settler; solids In excess of the maximum flux are lost to the clarified liquor. The

tical concentration reached depends on the feed concentration but will typically
be before compression effects come into play,

There are two possible places where a maximum solids flux may limit centrifuge
performance:

(1) Inthe di ids are setting out of the clarifying centrate.

Concentration. Such information should be yielded by a strobe centrifuge te

1.8 Comments

(1) The underlying principles of centrifuge operation are relatively easy to
comprehend even I the mathematics are frightening

(2) A few strobe centrifuge and pulse shearometer tests of material on a
laboratory sele can theoretical vid al the formation required to
predict centrtuge performance.
interpretation and provide a us
used.

the previous discus
ortex formation, counter-current shear, etc). A
model is therefore a remote possibilty. However,
the general principles discussed should hold to some extent and an
estimate of likely centrifuge limitations should be possible.

In subsequent sections we detail useful laboratory tests for prediction of
Centrifuge performance; develop scale-up theories; and describe and exemplity
the procedures necessary for their application

in the laboratory and estimate behavior o
route Is, as a rule, less expensive and time-consuming and it giv
capacity unattainable by the empirical approach. Also, when novel so
aration problems appear provides ihe oy method of obaning oder
etely "hit or
We would caution, however, that
because of ihe

scale assessment of suspen
to test predictor

The laboratory tests used to characterize the centrifugation of a suspension are
le in concept. They are best understood

reference to the basic phenomena underiying all separations dependent upon
lids setting, whether accelerated or not. Figures 11 and 12 ilustrate these
effects. The first of the diagrams shows typical setting curves under normal
gravity and under enhanced "g’. In the Initial stages the sedimentation graph
tends to be linear, then setting slows as particle interaction or "crowding?
occurs. Eventually, solids content reaches a limiting value as the forces
[promoting consolidation are balanced by the internal strength of the sediment.

sonia

force (beyond this pint onsclidation
= are un alow to be We

Figure 11

Typical setting curves for a suspension sedimenting under

er | Consol
mente! [compression

Solids Content

is colloidally stable, ie. there are repulsive interactions between the
Here the ultimate solids content achievable is when the particles form a

to "ng" is two-fold
sualy nearly with n In the early stages) because o {the greater
ration, and the "structural limit is pushed up as greater
ids content> is required to resist the incre:

Impression. The setting curves are dependent upon suspens ristic
(e.g. degree/strength of flocculation) and the physical set-up of the experiment
used to derive the data < e.g. the number of "g" employed; height of

diment used). In principle, a family of such graphs contain u the inf
a particular suspension needed for prediction o its large-scale centrifuge
behavior. Initial setting rates allow calculation of throughput in the clarification
regime, whilst those for later stages of consolidation are needed for estimation of

ntrifuge requiremel er solids.imitation conditions. The behavior of the

tructural limit” 9" also enables calculation of the maximum
solids that could ever be attained from a particular size/speed of machine,
irrespective of the manipulation performed to increase residence time available
for consolidation.

In practice, it Is useful to have a bit more data than simply the raw settling curves.
for a sequence of accelerating conditions, There are a number of reasons for
this, perhaps the most important being the difficulty in identifying transitions from,
‘say, "free fall” of particles to a hindered setting or compression regime (Section
33.1). However, this problem is readily circumvented by measuring the shear
ure of strength of any cohering

mé and the
‘material starts to exhibit substantial s. It should be
noted that the 'rheologi
hine will be greater than that for a dk
31 of solids discharge.

which the “structural limit” Is
tifuge to thicken

impractical long. Thus if calculations sugges
is just capable of thickening to the required degree,

sub Ke not prove

In Figure 11 we have indicated the kind of "practical" thick
seen in operation

24.1 Basic Suspension Properties

Before carrying out any other measurement til to obtain
certain basic data concerning the feed, viz the particle size, the density of
the solids, the state of aggregation of the species. Simple procedures,
such as optical microscopy, are often entirely appropriate to the purpose.
Further details on methods which can be applied are given In reference
[19]. For biological particles such as bacterial cells the density may often
be accurately measured via a silica suspension density gradient (2

24.2 Settling Kinetics

‚dimentation. Alternati
imated from first pr

the centrifugation experiment
em the larger particles will often have formed cakes at

of the tube before the smaller ones have settled appreciably

These systems require the appropriate sedimentation velocity of a given

clarification criterion: e.g. ifthe separation criterion Is 100% clarity of

centrate then the sedimentation

appropriate quantity for on (see Example (d)

345)

Further details on the precautior ved in the measurement

and interpretation of setting kinetics are given in reference [19].

Though strobe centrifuge m rovide the best approach to

characterizing settling kinetics, we would note that information obtained

from even a basic bench centrifuge is better than nothing. Indeed this

appears to be the procedure followed by centrifuge manufacturers under
h names as "spin test" [6]

241.3. Network Strength Measurements

stabilty are rat in diagnostic
rough guide to actual behavior In a lar
for this he difficulty i
and elongational stresses prevalent in a
‘apparatus cannot be designed beca!
1, some assessment can be

uspension towards breakup, albeit
a rather empirical nature. The standard approach involves measuring a
quantity dependent on Floc size, subjecting the suspension to a
prescribed amount of agitation from some kind of mixer, and then re-
measuring the property. The degree to which the two values differ is an

in) stability

Settling rate (as determined by, say, the strobe centrifuge) ls a good Floc-
size-dependent characteristic to observe, though fitration times are also
employed [8.9]. (Fitration is generally faster the larger the Flocs. If
ignficant loe breakup occurs, fitration rates slow dramatically due both
to reduced cake permeability and to binding effects. ) The problems arise
with respect to prescription of the appropriate degree of agitation for the
reasons mentioned above. Commercial apparatus (ex Triton Electronics
Limited) ls available for the task (see reference (81, p179] but a simple
gitator in a beaker probably serves as well. Clearly the method cannot
work on an absolute basis but satisfactory results can be obtained by
comparison.

In addition a relatively new instrument produced by Rank Brothers, the
Photometric Dispersion Analyzer, allows the correlation of Floc size and

Centrfuging biological suspensions due to their buoy

proved. Simple sedimentation tests also have their place - settling usually
stops under “ig” Just where network strength becomes significant. Thus the
suspension concentration process up to this point wil probably be
clarification limited.

22 Test Techniques
Laboratory test methods resolve themselves into four main classes:
(1) Basic suspension properties

Procedures for measuring seing kinetics

Network strength characterization methods;

Techniques for assessing the likelihood of aggregate breakup
in the machine.

3.1.1. Qualitative

Referring back to Section 3.4.1(c), if the solid particle is unable to reach

tling tank before leaving, then it wll pass out in

supernatant stream, ie full clarification of the liquid overflow will not be
was shown that:

ity under one

The clafication capacity of a disc centrifuge can similarly be quantified
and is given the symbol

The E value of a centrifuge represents the area of a simple gravity setting
tank (m?) which would be required to give the same separation capacity

Quantitative

Calculation of the E value of a known centrifuge is reasonabl
straightforward and the standard derivation is outlined below:

For a single disc

Inclined dise

Figure 13

Area of disc between r and r+ 5 ris given by

SA = Zar 6r
sin 8

w (rads/s)

3.1.3 Validity

Although Westfalia Separator ‘equation for 3, Al
an empirically “corrected” version of E, called KQ, where

wie cot 8 irre -

Centrfuge capacities may be compared by means of their relative KO
interpretation.

The use of either E or KQ is widespread and indeed often considered to

be the only scale-up parameter of importance. It is, however, only

‘meaningful when clarification isthe limiting process. It has no relevance to

solids-imited applications,

Other mechanical factors may also reduce the applicability of the above

formula, e.g. 100 narrow disc spacing or Inadequate feed acceleration

Other factors that should ideally be considered include the significant

Coriolis forces present, and the inevitable in actual terminal
locites.

Similarly, a centrituge of equivalent setting area E (m?) could cope with a
liquid throughput (Le.

ugh (m/s)

A more empirical approach may be preferable if data trom e.
technical centrifuges are available. If the performance of a sm:
is known the likely throughput on a large machine may be pred
the ratio of the respective E values for Ihe two:

n Machine

lt mustbe emphasized that this empirical approach should be used whenever

possible. To scale from the behavior of a single particle in a spinning test-tube to
mmercial scale machine may be a useful scouting technique but

accurate,

In this case the principal quantity of importance is, the residence time

sential to give thickening to the required solids content, under the given
centrifugal field, This a of the material and thus the
suspension properties require characterization before accurate s
estimates can be made.

machin:

To reach a given thickness, a minimum residence time t, must be allowed,
For a given radius, this then limits th tra
stream to be

“a3

Where Vis the volume of solids held in the machine, The calculation
oft and V willbe discussed shorty

32.2 Scale-Up Factor

Ideally, a simple scale-up factor analogous to the E value in clarification.
theory is desirable. Such a factor, F, is described be

» is the number of gravities pulled by the machine
periphery (= 9.81 wer);

fan is the mean mass fraction of the consolidating slurry in
the machine

Ha is the depth of consolidating slurry

ap is the density difference between solids and liquid.

The time required for a given degree of consolidation will clearly depend
on the concentrating pressure available. It is reasonable to assume that

(15)

The effective capacities of two centrituges can now be directly compared if
their volume and concentrating pressures are known, viz

GU

The R.HSS. of the equation is thus the required scaling factor, F.

32.3 Three Methods of Application

3.2.3.1 Semi-Empirical Approach |

If data on a given material is available on the semi-technical scale,
then the performance of a full-scale centrifuge can be predicted

up data obtained on material A to predict how
material B will behave in the larger centrifuge.

3.2.3.3 Ab Initio Approach

Insight into the compaction characteristics of a material can be
gained quickly from small quantities of feed Wg a strobe
entifuge, where the time required to achieve a given compaction.
under a known concentrating pressure can be found. Knowing the
concentrating pres a larger centrifuge, the
maximum allowable no: arge rate can be readily

calculat

Estimation of Necessary Parameters and the Problems
Encountered

3.2.4.1 Relationship between i and P

The value of y in equation (15) is difficult to establish a priori
Fortunately, the concentrating press.

1 total volume which might be filed

by thickened slurry

(including, for example, the volume occluded by th

‘can be evaluated by simple geometry
of the centrifuge. As a first approximati

from the kno\
ion it appe:

take the maximum allowable inventory of thickened slurry as,

half this volume. (In the semi-empirical
sumption will largely cancel but the
potentially more sensitive to the basi

3.2.4.3 Pressure (or “fi

of this factor are based po!

y
‘Ab initio approa
at this part of the calculation.)

n equation (14). For the

entrfuge the quantities to be used are sel evident and are

detailed in the worked exampl

machine some explanation is needed.

later) but for the continuous

Ho, the depth of th idating sediment, is taken as the
distance between the disc stack periphery and the nozzle.

Ing" is some mean of the centrifugal fi
at the machine wall. For the present e»

Id at the disc periphery and
xample we employed an

arithmetic average of the two values in question.

©... nis taken as the solids content where the system starts to

display a perceptible cohesi
solids in the case of flocculated "Prute
because thickening to the so-

en"

speed centrifuge (see Si ofthis manual or
Appendix A, reference [19].

The calculated ultima allows one to rapidly decide

‘whether a desired concentration can sen ieved by
centrifugation.

3.3Scale-Up When Hindered is the Limiting Process
33.1 Background
The terminal velocity of a swarm of particles is generally less than that of a

single parte falling in an infinitely wide pond; the more crowded the
particles, the slower they fall. This is called “hindered setting

The £ theory (Section 3.4.3(a)) implicitly deals with the initial captur
isolated particles from virtually clear supernatant. For capture to be
completed, however, these particles need to be consolidated into a film on
the underside of the discs so that they can subsequently migrate towards
the bow! periphery. I, as a result of hindered setting, a “traffic-jam
prevents this consolidation, the disc-space wil fll up with solids and lead
to carry-over in the centrate.

‘As with the derivation of, the problem of hindered setting will first be
in terme thickener (cf Section 3.3.4). This will

33.3 Batch Thickeners

Figure 14

dered sett

Figure 15

There will often be a minimum in his cur urring at
concentration G* in the above plot. If, as is frequently Ihe case, the
feed concentration is lower than G* and the sludge concentration
higher, then G* represents the maximum solids flux that the
thickener can handle.

H a greater solids loading is imposed, then the thickener can n
longer cope. It wil fl up with material of concentration G* and
3s solids will be lost to the previously clear overt

33.4 Gravity Thickeners - Interpretation of Batch Settling Test

In a batch gravity test, the sediment Interface height above the ves

Interface Height

time t

Figure 16
script o refers to the inital conditions)
hioka Method can now be used to determine the limiting flux rate.
This method is detailed in reference [10] and only the mechanistic step
are shown below

From the plotof Interface height against time

tling velocity u = dh/dt

Solids flux ”

And hence a plot © can
of hindered sertli constant and h
constant and this rises with concentration

A more time consuming, but potentially more accurate, method would be
to make up feeds of varying concentration and measure the initial setting

Figure 17

The intercept yu o used to culculate the minimum settling area
ectsamry do achieve the desired discharge. calculat

where D is the thickened solids volumetric discharge ra

33.5 Application to Centrifuges
33.5.1 Batch Flux Curve

The batch setting test will typically be performed in a strot
centrifuge. The equivalent gravity test can be obtained by
expanding the time scale proportionately to the mean g-force
prevailing,

The preceding analysis will then give the minimum allowable flow

(2) is not clear what concentration to choose for the underflow” In the
above graphical construction, It is probably ML the nozzle discharge
centration but this should give a ve result

(3) The identification of points a and b is generally far from straightforward
given the quality of data experienced in the real world. Point bis the most
important to determine as the anal
it may be most appropriately determined experimentally as the

centration to which particle te under gravity in the
re. An alternative approach tothe problem

However, the E ratio betw
relative capacities for hindered setting limitation. T a great
relief itis a simple result from a complex situation.

4 ASYSTEMATIC APPROACH TOCENTRIFUGE SCALE-UP

The following steps are recommended:

(1) Unless there is strong supporting evidence one way or the other, It is
dangerous to jump to a conclusion regarding the limiting mechanism In
trfuge operation.

le-up methods to predict a f a given
type will be needed to just cope with the envisaged duty

(6) lt must be remembered tl

from their theoretical maximum to ensure centrate remains clear
jte minor process fluctuations. A 20% installed spare

(7) Further allowances for longer term deviations from ideal
nditions may be appropriate.
(8) CIP sequences (e.g. up to 1 hour per shift) need to be accommodated.
some spare capacity to cope with the inevitable mechanical

1ould be considered.

me worked examples.

Validity of Different Methods

Certain of the procedures - e.g. the Ab initio approach to calculation of
centrifuge performanc

In either case, the E or Ki

ion of the tials may
ss provide valuable insight. We suggest that all scale-up
s be tested and quantified as far as possible, but that
ntuition are stil important when working out the
implications. The need for a representative number of trials before
imiting large apital cannot be overstressed.

cedure is displayed diagrammatically in Figures
18 and 19 whilst details on how to perform individual scale-up metho:
are provided in Tables 1-7.

Calculate the free fall velocity under a single gravity (equation (8).

Caleulate the C theory for the centrifuge under consideration (equation
(©) using manufacture

Calculate the maximum centrate rate per machine (equation (10))

Calculate the maximum operational feed rate by simple mass balanc
given the di

Compare with other scale-up methods

Table 2

ical Scale-Up for Clarification Limited Systems
(see Section 3.4.3(a)

Calculate I values for the semi-tech and production centrifuges (equation
(6).

‘Scale centrate rates achievable on semi-tech centrifuge using equation
(11) to give maximum centrate rate possible on the production centrifuge.

Check semi-tech behavior as a function of number of discs or feed
concentration, le establishes whether clarification is the limiting factor.

Calculate the internal pressure required to give the desired solids
nitration (reference [19],

Calculate the maximum internal pressure that can be generated by the
entrfuge being considered (equatio

uficiont for the required duty. If
ntrituge or modify the feed material. itis,
check the clarification and compaction kine!

Table 4

Steps in Semi-Empirical Scale-Up for Solids Limited Systems
(see Section 3.4.3(b)

Determine breakthrough solids content as a function of nozzle rate for a
small-scale centrifuge, of comparable design to the subject (possible
production) machine,

Estimate relative maximum allowable Inventories of thickened slurry for (a)
nal -scale machine; (b) subject centrifuge (see text for detal

Evaluate relative values of P for (a) small-scale machine; (b) subject
Centrifuge, from their known speed, dimensions and solids loadin

From Il and Ill estimate the scale-up factor between the centrifuges as

tling curve(s) in strobe centrifuge

From | evaluate ¢, ie. the residence time, to give required solids content In
strobe centrifuge

Evaluate P (the consolidating pressure) in strobe centrifuge from its known
speed, dimensions, and solids loading (reference [19])

Evaluate P in subject centrifuge from its known speed, dimensions and
olids loading,

Using equation (15), evaluate required residence time for subject

centrifuge (assuming y = 1)

From centrifuge dimensions evaluate an approximation to maximum
achievable Inventory at thickened slurry in subject machine (see text for
details).

Estimate maximum allowable nozzle rate, to give required thickening in
‘equation (13)

ulate the maximum feed-rate from simple mass balance.

(Compare with other scale-up methods.

rate achievable on the semi-technical centrifuge (for desired
ration) to give maximum probable rate on production
hine by multiplying flux by & production | semi-tech.
Calculate the: onding maximum feed rates.

Compare results with those determined by other techniques.

#NB Ab Initio scale-up from strobe centrifuge data should be treated with caution
but such a calculation is needed as a guide it should follow the lines of Table 7.

Table 7

Steps in Ab Initio Guide Calculations for Systems Limited
by Hindered Settling Systems’
(see Section 3.4.3(c)

Determine batch setting flux for a known centrifugal field using strobe
centrifuge and the calculation procedure detailed in Section 3.4.3(¢).

Convert above results to their equivalent for a single gravity settler

Calculate the E value for the centrifuge under consideration (equation (6))
using manufacturers specifications.

(1) À European Prut parates biomass from fermenter liquor (3
lating the cells, concentrating the
subsequently centrifuging the cells to 17 wt %.

s a diferent floc
Flocs which are more amenable to centrifugation, The flotation
ould be omitted.

many centrifuges would be required for
a full-scale plant using the n ss, and to quantity the possible
benefits of using a larger but untested centrifuge.

The existing plant has three Alfa-Lavat FEUX 320 disc-no irfugos
each capable of producing up to 2.9 te/h (dry basis> of 17 wt % material
(see Figure 20).

‘Semi-technical trials on a Westfalia NA7 machine (see Table 8) were
Carried out on both the existing and the proposed new flocculation routes,
called Pland P2 respectivel

A possible alternative to the FEUX 320 machines was the new Westfalia
HDA 300 disc-nozzle centrifuge, a more expensive but larger machine.

(8) Experience has shown that increasing the number of discs in the FEUX
320 machines had no effect on instantaneous capacity, i.e. the process ls
probably solids limited. (Indeed, narrow detrimental due

Figure

Estimated limiting solids fluxes (dev

basis) for Pl material thickened in a

Saleulated using only she "volume

factor and is hence expected to proxide
jer bound te possible. output, EM

Upper curve mas estimated using both

Van and #100" terme

ant throughput required = 11.4 te/h (db). On the old P material, the
can produc lb) of 17% material

Jo of FEUX
machines req! d

(PD and Over (P2) are the maximum
ached for a given thicks concentration on th
hen running the 347.

9 machines operat
Habs

Generally, plants operate centrifuges away from breakthrough conditions,
and so in practice 4-5 machines will be required to be online at any one
time. Regular CIP sequences Cup to 1 hour per shift) and breakdowns

means that 6-7 machines should be installed,

Tr ith the estimate obtained from the a prior
approach (see later» and is In fair accord with the (supposed) slightly
more refined semi-empirical (1) technique:

522 Standard Semi-Empirical Approach

alia MP

Estimated Limiting
determined by

solida fluxes

he semi-sepirical
procedure, for P2 materiel thickened
In a PEUX 320, The key de as for

Figure 20. The crosses are expected

2 Solids Content 1X wi

1000 rpm exp
oT

at 500 and 1000 rpm in

Volume” term. However, no further elaboration of the basis of the
calcule justified at present. This require inthe
fundamental science underlying the problem.

rization data are available, the
rd with experien:

‘and the more

discussed, was also satisfactory

The approach has also been applied to prediction of the perform
a Westfalia HDA 300 centrifug eto that of an Alfa-Lavat
Pruleen” feed cream concentration. The data provided in Table
uggests a scale factor of circ
Results from actual operation of such a machine Indicate a scale-up of the
order of 1.4 is observed, provided a close-spaoed disc stack (* 1 mm) is
mployed. Unfortunately this rather Agreement is somewhat
ered by the further observation that with a 2.5 mm stack the relative
performance of the HDA 300 fel to only ~ 1.15 of that of the FEUX 320. At
this stage the reasons for this effect are not clear. However, itis perhaps.
most likely that due to particular design features comparatively more discs
are needed in the HDA 300 to achies tory particle acceleration
and a reasonable approach to the theoretical limit to performance given by
the calculation: Also, the machine ¡sr e | ai ve! y taller and so
maldistibution may be a problem: the extra discs m la

observed to tal ‘minutes

Using equation (15), Section 3.4,3(b), with y

required residence tim:

degrees of thickening :20 machine which can deliver
48 times the concentrating pressure of the stroboscopic instrument.

Taking the maximum allowable inventory of thickened slury in the

ipment to be ca 1/2 of machine internal volume predicts limiting
fluxes of 4.0 and 3.3 tonnes / hour of solids. This is in good
agreement with observed performance.

NB key approximation used, le required time is Inversely
proportional to applied pressure, is certainly not a good one for
‘consolidating sediments close to their limiting solids content but,
empirically, It has been found to hold reasonably well for a variety
of flocculated systems in the earlier stages of concentration

53 Calculation of Thickening Ultimate Limit
Example: "Structural" limit for Thickening in “Pruteen” Centrifugation

As previously noted, Itis useful to be able to estimate the ‘structural limit on
thickening to be expected under a particular centrifuge regime, even though
practical constraints over available residence times may prevent such solid
Contents being approached closely. In particular, such calculations are likely to
be valuable in Identifying when the kinetics of consolidation of cohesive sediment

determined using the Triton VRC Frozen Image Centrifuge. Examples for the P2

material are shown in Figure 22. On taking the unknown cell density as ca 1.07

g/cmi agreement between prediction and observed limiting, strobe centrifuge
lids contents were satisfactory (Table 9). (Equation (4)) Appendix A o

reference [19] was used to calculate values for the pressure applied by the

centrifuge using known values for speed, rotor diameter and so on.)

lids content curves, and estimating Ihe pressure
320 centrifuges from various geomet

id never thicken the materials in
(Table 9). These proved to be w nd the values

ight) to which concentration was required and hence it at

engih of centrifugal field per se would not be a problem. It should be noted

that extrapolation of actual centrifuge data (eg Figure (Le. infinite
residence time in the field) gave ultimate limits of the order of those calculated
(Table

t ream (PL route)
Pruteen* Works) in strobo
fentrifuge running at 1000 rpm

pH 3.5, 9
scopic centrifuge running
00 rpm

H 3.5, 90°C heat shock> in
stroboscopic centrifuge run
at 500 pe
Pruteen" Works centrifuge fa
cream in Westfalia BA7
Infinite residence time
As above but in Alfa-Laval FEUX
P2 material
«pk 3.5, 90

« above but in Alfa-Laval FEUX 320

iously, the second Involving recovery of I nism,
ligenes Eutrophus:

5.4.1 Ab Initio Clarification Calculation for P2 Type Single Cell
Protein
The initial setting rate for the P2 material, for a particular "9" was given by

the tangent at the origin to the settling curve, Figure 23. This was equal to
0.0435 em/s at 180 9.

2.42 x 10

308 x 104 m

quatiom (10)
ntrate rate 2.42 x 10% x 6.306 x 10° 3"

0.153 m/s Pa

of 4.61% % thicks, 1 te feed gives
73 te of centrate

hus centrifuge feed rate

Hence maximum solids throughput x 755 te/h (dry solids
basis:

us time for settling of P2 material
trobe centrifuge at 1000 rpm (= 180 8)
initial suspended solids content wi

al solids of approximately 4

Table 10

Calculation of E and KO scale factors for Westfalia NA7 and NDA 300 centrifuges,
and for Alfa-Laval BPR 2075 and FEUX 320 machines

(NB = 2 wh cotO Nr? = ko = 2 coto
3 > 35

Speed o
Machine | (rpm - values | (cot © in No of discs (N ” xa
in rads/sec in | parenthese: (metres) | (mt) | (MKS units)
parentheses)

Westfalia 7500 62 0.036 3.316 x 10%
NAT (785.4) 0.5 mm spa 3

118 xl a 7.43 x 10?

Alfa-Laval | 6150 mm spacing)

BRPX 207s (644.0) 38 2.39 x 102
mm spacing)

Alfa-Laval 3600 a 60 . 4.254 x 103
FEUX 320 (377.0) (1.192) mm spacing)

Westfalia 3000 280 1.867 x 10%
HDA 300 (314.2) (1.881)

al polymer poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) the
umulated by the bacteria as litle intracellular granules and the

fermentation is continued unti at k of the suspended dry matter:

polymer. Since the normal solid density

density of these bacteria at the end of the accumulation is probably

abnormally high ("1.10 g/cm31 for this type of system.

pic centrifuge measurements using the Triton WRC machine at
180 9 gave 0.3 om secimentation ofa clear upper nerace in 30
minutes#. This is equivalent to a gravitational free sedimentation
velocity of 3.3 x 10° mihr at 9.2 x 10” cm/set, which can be combined
the appropriate E: value from Table 10 (10.9 x 10° m‘ to give 360 lter/hr
for the maximum calculated centrate rate for total recovery on the BRPX
207 centrifuge. For this particular example, this would also be the

‘approximate limiting feed rate as feed concentrations would be very low
(see Figure 25).

Figure 24 shows the proportional recovery
function of feed rate on the Alfa Lavat BRPX 270s disc nozzle centrifuge.
The machine was set up with 118 discs at 0.5mm spacing and three 0.45
mm nozzles (probably the minimum number that can be safely used due
to risk of blockage etc). The recovery curve clearly indicates that feed
rates as low as - 500 Iter/hr are needed before -100% retention of solk
achieved. Clearly there is remarkably good agreement between
observation and the performance predicted from calculation, particula
when one considers the difficulty in obtaining a reliable value for the
sedimentation velocity.

|
|
|

| Input Con

= Feed Rate (17h

ram
2 FEUD
ce FEUX Capacity
BAT Capacity

Note that "capacity" here refers to centrate volume
Note also that use of KQ (rather than 2) is equally valid
comparing two centrifuges for clarfying duties and would
capacity ratio of 12.8.

Sample Calculation:

NA7 can handle 1.5 te/h of 10% feed when concentrating up to
13%.

What could the FEUX 320 handle?

Centrate rate from KAT

Te. the cenirfuge
capacity of 2.9 te)

Then 4.3 te rate implie

handle 5.6 x 0.06

This demonstrates the great importance of feed conc
clarification limited duties, even though itis often irreleva
solids limitations

lt should be noted that th ulations under -predict actual
performance. This has litle significance as the calculation method
is invalid for solids limited applications - one cannot scale-up a

lids limited breakthrough curve using clarification limited theory.
We would re-emphasize that this semi-empirical approach does not
give a bound (either upper or lower) to performance.

55 Ab Initio Calculation for Hindered Settling Limitation

Finally it s ngle cell protein example to illustrate use
of the method for calculating hindered setting imitation:

Rates of setting versus solids content could be found by drawing tangents to the
curve in Figur batch settling curve vas party

Batch

ng curve, from 1
strobe

»mtrifage data (Figure 23

for P2 material

5 Flux x 10?

Fig 27 Definition of Terms for Settling Rate Calculation

However, at ow solids contents the rate of settling does not vary and is not, as
assumed in the hindered setting theory, a function of concentration. Thus below
the critical concentration where the falling rate zone commenced Yo was taken
as C x setting velocity, where the latter was, of course, a constant. #

Row for thickening to 17% by weight of total solids (= 15.5 wt. % of suspended
solids) the intercept Y m = 0.295 x 10° g/em'/sec, if we chose Co = 15.5%. Note
that this is for 180 g and thus, scaling already, Ynin (1 g) = 0.131 x 10° gicm?isec.

‘Thus Yen = 8.45 x 10 m/sec,

Yan

where D 18 the thickened solids volumetric discharge rate

settling area for the

lids throughput of the contrifuge:=

56 Comments

The above calculation apparently yields about the correct magnitude for the
centrifuge capacity (see previous examples). Although all data suggest that the
machine is solids-limited it must be remembered that the regions of hindered
settling and compression very much overlap.

Idealized separation into different regimes is generally only seen in textbook
Examination ofthe setting curves in the form of solids content versus time back
this up (Figure 22). We would remind the reader, too, that itis rarely practical to
operate a centrifuge deep In the compression zone where con:

F A Records, “Filtration Theory in Cyclic Centrifuges’, Chem
Process Eng, (November 1972)

CC Donaldson and R F Stewart, "The Thickening of Floceulated
“Pruteen'-Orgenién Suspensions by Centrifugation", Report IC
91985 (1984)

EF Stevart and D Sutton, in "Solid-Liquid Separation"
Ed J Gregory), ppi1i-126 (Ellis Harwood, Chichester), (198

Y Aster, CC Donaldson, J MeMahon and R F Stewart, "The
Control of Floc Structure and Strength XII An Investigation
of the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Flocculated
"Pruteen'-Organisn Suspensions". Report CL/8/01/1736/8.

P D A Mills, D Watkinson and G E Yates, "A Proliminary
Experimental Study of the Kinetics of Sedimentation of
Flocculated Fino Suspensions”, Report to be issued (1985)

D Macdonald, Chen Engineer, 15 March 1985)

A Rushton and M Spear. | Eiltzationnd Senaratione,ay/J)
1975», 254; A Rushton, Erocess Eng, (September 1900), 49.

DF Moir and H J Pearse, "The Use and Selection of
Flocculante", (Harwell = Warren Spring State of the Art Report
SARI6 - available as ¥D/21088), 19%

Dunlop, "Floceulation o£ ASL by the “Prvteen" Partial
Lysis) Route Part I", Agricultural Division Report, 421,10
Gost

P Chokrabeti, "Industrial Solid/Liquid Separation - A Review
and Proposals for Research", Report CL-R/28/1986/4 (1978)

A Harrison, "Seale-Up of Centrifuges for Biochemical Pr
Part A: Sealing up the "Pruteen' Process. Agricultural
Division, Planning & Coordination Department Report. 192

September, 1983

D J Tagg, "Optimisation of Disc Stack Spacing", Agricultural
Division Research Minute, 20th July 1981

x 5 Rogers. "Protein 1 Centrifuges, Conclusions and
Recommendation’, Projects and Engineering Department Niaut
20th March 1979.

B Fitch, “Current Theory and Thickener Design (1975). Parts
1,2 and 9", Eilteation and Separation, July-December 1975

GBH ENTERPRISES, LTD

VULCAN Catalyst Process
Technology Consultancy
Sales and Service

Gerard B. Hawkins
Managing Director, C.E.0.

Stype: GBHEnterrises
Ce: +1-312-235-2610
+52 55 2108 3070

[email protected]
HawkineGerard@@amall.com