CH10-Qualitative ResearchQualitative Research.ppt

muhweziart 10 views 42 slides Feb 26, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 42
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42

About This Presentation

CH10-Qualitative Research.ppt


Slide Content

Qualitative Research Methods
There’s more to it than meets the
eye!
Dr. Paul Ssemaluulu

Qualitative Methods
1.Get over the idea that research means counting.
2.The focus is on subjective experiences, or the
meanings that people use.
3.Because meaning resides in language (people think
with language), qualitative research largely
involves studying text.
4.The best device for collecting and analyzing
qualitative information is the human brain.
Introduction

Qualitative Methods (1)
5.Qualitative research is local, concrete.
6.Observations and findings depend on
understanding contexts and the meanings held by
the people in those contexts and the meanings of
the things in those contexts.
7.Observations are typically of interactions in smaller
groups or selectively defined settings.
8.Exploration is very often the motive, but not
always.
Introduction

Qualitative Methods (2)
9.Qualitative research often provides idiographic (as
opposed to nomothetic) causal explanations.
10.Qualitative research is typically inductive.
11.The research is reflexive—design is flexible and can
change given the needs of the research. E.g.,
Theoretical Sampling
12.The researcher must be reflexive as well—the brain
tool must be calibrated, understood, active, paid
attention to, controlled
Introduction

Qualitative Methods (3)
13.Qualitative research is very practical, logical,
and critical of itself. Researchers constantly
ask, “Am I accurately depicting the social
world given the ways I am collecting and
analyzing my data?”
14.Good qualitative research is often the most
rigorous, difficult research.
Introduction

DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE REASONING

Elements of the Research Process
Deductive thinking (Quantitative)
THEORY
HYPOTHESIS
OBSERVATION
CONFIRMATION

Elements of the Research Process (Cont.)
Inductive thinking (Qualitative)
OBSERVATION
PATTERNS
HYPOTHESIS
THEORY

IDEAL
QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE
Research process is
deductive.
Research process is
inductive.
Measure objective facts.Document social reality,
meaning is constructed.
Focus on variables. Focus on in-depth meaning.
Firewall between research
process and researchers’
values.
Values are present & explicit
(empathy).
Cross-contextual. Contextual dependence.
Many cases. Few cases.

IDEAL
QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE
Statistical analysis Thematic analysis
Highly structured research
process.
Loosely structured
research process.
Particularistic, specificHolistic perspective
Separation from dataIntimacy with data
Generalize to populationGeneralization to properties and
contexts

Qualitative Methods
When should I use qualitative methods?
•When variables cannot be quantified
•When variables are best understood in their natural
settings
•When variables are studied over real time
•When studying intimate details of roles, processes,
and groups
•When the paramount objective is “understanding”

Qualitative Methods (1)
What skills do I need?What skills do I need?
•Must have requisite knowledge and skills about methodology,
setting and nature of the issue.
•Must be familiar with own biases, assumptions, expectations,
and values.
•Must be empathic, intelligent, energetic, and interested in
listening
•Must be open to embracing multiple realities.
•Must be prepared to produce detailed, comprehensive, and
sometimes lengthy reports.
Source: (Kuh & Andreas, 1991)

Qualitative Methods (2)
Before collecting data, you have to determine what you want to accomplish.
Tight versus Loose Design
Ask yourself:
–How much time do I have?
–What resources are available?
–What is the purpose of the study?
–In what am I really interested?
More structure can prevent waste
–If we already know about the context, it would be wasteful to go exploring
–If you have targeted topic, you can reduce data at the collection stage and
cut down on analysis time
–Loose produces more data, more “surprise discoveries” can be made
Design

Qualitative Methods (3)
Choose your unit of analysis.
•Individuals
–Certain experiences
–Experiences in particular settings
–Identities such as student with disabilities, ex-con
•Groups
–Demographic groups
–Intervention groups
–Types of people such as ball players, secretaries
–Those in one setting versus another
–Organizations
Design

Qualitative Methods (4)
Qualitative research quickly exhausts resources and time.
Limit the amount of data collected.
It’s not the size that matters, it’s what you do with the data.
•Be very clear about the research focus
–Write down your foggy ideas and then get more specific.
•Concentrate on most important issues and not others.
–Start writing specific questions you want to answer.
–Now get even more specific…reduce
Design

Sampling
Plan Data Collection
•Define sampling boundaries:
–Space
–Time
–Social position
–Context
•Record nothing that is not in your sampling
parameters
Design

Select Elements Representative of Target Population
Generalize from sample to population
Make claims about the population
Test theories within population
Select Elements Representative of Research Focus
Generate Detailed and Subjective Understanding
Answer research questions
Build theories
Sampling: (1)
Qualitative versus Quantitative
Quantitative Sampling
Qualitative Sampling

Sampling (2)
•Make choices that narrow or delimit research focus and
activities to a level that
–A researcher’s brain can handle
–Can be done in a reasonable amount of time
–Is within a reasonable budget
•Seek exposure to topic-related information
•Focus only on information directly useful for the research
–Samples should be small, not large
•Sampling decisions are made throughout data collection
Sampling

Data
Text is generally collected from or in the form of…
–Field notes -- Newspaper or magazine stories
–Interviews (recorded and transcribed)
–Focus groups -- Web pages
–Audio & video tapes (transcribed and described)
–Copies of documents-- Photographs (described)
–Narrative descriptions
–Diaries

1.Read Data, develop ideas and
feelings
2.Code Data, tag items with same
meaning using a unique code
3.Search and extract instances of codes
4.Identify patterns among codes
(pattern coding)
5.Create figures, tables, or descriptions
of patternsA
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
THEMES

Analysis (1)
•Process of Qualitative Analysis:
–Data Reduction
–Data Display
–Conclusion Drawing and Verification

Analysis (2)

Coding
What is coding?
•In qualitative analysis, coding is the process of identifying
categories and meanings in text, creating and applying a name
or code to each, and systematically marking similar strings of
text with the same code name.
•Coding permits systematic retrieval of categories and meanings
during analysis. Codes help researchers identify patterns in data.

Coding (1)
•One codes only relevant data (Not all text must be
coded to complete the project)
•Codes may be based on:
Actions, Behaviors,Topics, Ideas, Concepts,
Terms, Phrases, Keywords, and so forth
•Coding is purposeful interpretation, with mindful
reflection on the meanings of the persons, context,
interactions, statements, assumptions, and so forth

Coding (2)
Source: http://onlineqda.hud.ac.uk/Intro_QDA/phpechopage_titleOnlineQDA-Examples_QDA.php
An example of
“old school”
coding

Coding (3)
Sources of codes (typically both):
1.A priori codes—expected, looked for
–Previous research
–Previous theory
–Research question
–Your intuition of the data or setting
2.Grounded codes—discovered
(suspend ideas about the subject and let the data determine codes)

Coding (4)
•It helps if code names are meaningful.
•When new relevant content is discovered, a
new code is created.
•Codes may evolve
•A string of text may contain more than one
code.

Coding (5)
•Codes must be consistently applied
•Keeping a list of codes helps to:
–Identify the content of each code, and
–Reveal the contents of the text.
•Codes should be grouped in some form (e.g.,
related clusters) to advance analysis

Coding (6)
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/209/461

Displays
Making sense of the data

Displays
•There are numerous legitimate ways to move from
codes to final narrative, but core among them is
systematic work and adherence to logic.
•Systematic analysis is advanced when codes are put
into “data displays” which reflect the researcher’s
judgments about the data
•Data displays link various codes and help to build
themes

Displays (1)
Source: http://journals.culture-communication.unimelb.edu.au/platform/yecrea_2011_kaprans.html
Thematic
network of
YouTube
comments
about Borat

Displays (2)
•Such arrangements help researchers:
1.“dimensionalize,” or recognize dimensions of similar
thoughts or
•E.g., thoughts about how to appear masculine:
•Clothes Presence
–Short hair -- Confidence
–Plain shoes -- Taking up space
–Shirt with collar
2.Connect codes in more sophisticated ways
3.Document patterns in “user-friendly” ways (never rely on
memory)

Displays (3)
•Relationships between codes become more apparent
as codes are grouped
•Themes should be explored
–Why do some codes co-occur?
–Why are some dimensions related to other codes while
others are not?
–Are some codes linked to particular emotions?
•Exploration of themes is analysis. The discoveries
should be written down. These eventually (with very
heavy and serious editing) turn into your written text.

Analysis
•Process of Qualitative Analysis:
–Data Reduction
–Data Display
–Conclusion Drawing and Verification

•As one creates and views displays, the salient components of
meaning and activities become apparent.
•Research may be:
–Descriptive: Represents the data (meanings, observations) to readers
in such a way that they will “understand” what the researcher “sees”
in the data.
–Causal: Links concepts in the data together to explain observed
meanings or phenomena, and to write in such a way that readers will
“understand” what the researcher “sees.”
•This stage relies very heavily on logical evaluation and
systematic description
Drawing Conclusions and Verification

•The researcher WRITES what he or she sees as logical
descriptions of themes
•The researcher always refers back to the data
displays and raw data as descriptions or causal
statements are made.
–Systematic, organized, and good coding and notes will
really pay off at this point, allowing efficient, accurate
access to data
•Conclusions are made through this process
Drawing Conclusions and Verification (1)

Drawing Conclusions and Verification
•Articles and reports often include quotes.
They are not the text “speaking for itself.”
•Quotes are used for:
–Evidence
–Explanation
–Illustration
–Deepening understanding
–Giving participants a voice
–Enhancing readability

Drawing Conclusions and Verification
In the end, like good quantitative research, good
qualitative research gives a portrayal of the human
experience that is as accurate as possible, but which
always has limitations.

Qualitative Methods
•It is often difficult to plan qualitative research
•Group Discussion:
–Spend several minutes generating ideas for a qualitative
research study. What are you going to study and why?
–Create a plan for:
•Sampling
–How will you determine whether your sample is representative of a
target group?
•Data Collection
•Data Analysis
–How will you evaluate causality?
•How will you write about or present your findings?
Introduction