Climate resilient agriculture

4,130 views 34 slides Feb 20, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 34
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34

About This Presentation

The climate resilient agriculture for rainfed and dryland farming is need of the hour. This discus the options of climate adapted agricultural technologies.


Slide Content

P. Arunachalam
Assistant Professor (PBG)
ICAR-KVK, TNAU, Ramanathapuram
gUtepiykhw;wKk; gaph; Nkyhz;ikAk;
g. mUzhr;ryk;
Ntshz;ikmwptpay; epiyak;
,uhkehjGuk;

Abiotic stresses-major constraints in attaining potential
yield of our crops
Drought Salinity High temperature
Yield losses by drought is 5 foldhigher than
all biotic factors

About 70% of cropped area is rain-fed
The rainfed area contributes about 36% to total production
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Percentage-Drought prone
Karnataka
TN
Rajastan
AP
J & K
Gujarat
Maharastra
Haryana
West Bengal
Bihar
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa
Uttar Pradesh
Water is the most overriding limitation
India –under low precipitation zone and high ET
Two fold increase in drought in mid 21
st
century and 3 fold
in end of 21
st
century in many areas.

RAINFED AGRICULTURE
Norecoursetoirrigation
Drought a major constraint in
realizing potential yield
Area under Rainfed
63% of cereals and
90% of pulses and oil seeds
comes from rainfed areas

Vulnerability of
Indian Agriculture to
Climate Change

Constraints –Early drought
Kamuthi
Muthukalat
hur
Malangudi

Constraints –Flood

58
167
294
462
58
144
206
415
Jan -MarApr - JunJul - SepOct - Dec
Rainfall (mm)
26
14
18
46
70
51
66
119
109
188
186
87
19
16
23
54
58
32
69
88
49
189
147
79
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Tamilnadu Sivagangai
Monsoon
Rainfall
Average
(mm)
Normal Onset Normal Cessation
SW (June-Sep) 206 1
st
Week of June2nd week of Sep.
NE (Oct-Dec) 415 3rd week of Sep.1
st
Week of Dec
955
823
TamilnaduSivagangai

Two scenarios
“More crop per drop”
Water is major constraint to realise the potential yields

3. Drought management
1.Choice of crop
Cropping system
2 .Improve the adaptation of choice crop
Drought mitigation
Tools and Techniques for Farm
Resilience

1. Choice of the crop
A drought tolerance genotype
gives acceptable productivity under
water limited conditions

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Sugarcane
Banana
Rice
Chillies
Cotton
Maize
Groundnut
Sorghum
Bajra
Ragi
Small millets
Pulses
Seasame
Water requirement (mm)
1. Choice of the crop

highly adaptable to the change
efficient biomass producers
Armoured with C4 photorespiratory physiology -thrive
better under moisture stress
Photosensitivity also related to soil moisture
Have multiple uses in food (including health foods),
feed, fodder (dry & green), and industrial raw materials
(including bioethanol from sweet stalk sorghum)
Eg., millets are “Resource Smart & Climate Smart”
Crop indicators -Climate resilient
1. Choice of the crop

Ramanathapuram

Tolerance
A boring lecture
Escape
2. Crop Improvement option to mitigate stress
Short duration varieties
Groundnut -TMV 7 , VRI 6, TMV 14
Drought tolerant varieties
CO 53 Anna (R) 4

2. Stress tolerant crops

Popularization of Paddy Varieties -NICRA
Paddy
variety Area (ha)
No of
beneficiary
Grain yield
(kg/ha)
TKM 13 2 10 5755
RNR 15048 6 28 5371
ADT 53 4 14 4340
CO 51 5 19 4286
CO 53 2 6 5250
Villages : Komboothi and Karukathi

Disease resistant varieties
2. Crop Improvement option

OFT: Assessment of cowpea varieties for rainfed
condition in Ramanathapuram District
Salient Observations:
•Grain yield : VBN 3 : 650 kg/ha
CO (CP) 7 : 550 kg/ha
•VBN 3 found to be determinate in
growth as compared to CO (CP) 7
•Also suitable to grown under coconut
garden
Area conducted
Bogalur and Utichipuli blocks

FLD: Demonstration of TNAU (Blackgram) VBN 11
with ICM practices
Area
conducted
Perumalkoil,
Malangudi,
Manajkollai
Salient Observations:
•Grain yield 720 kg/ha
•Less incidence of YMV

In situ Moisture conservation
-Ridging / dead furrow
-Broad bed furrow
-Crop residue incorporation
-Mulching
3. Agronomic Management options
Cropping system approach
-Inter cropping
-Mixed cropping
-Crop rotation

•Cropping system approach
-Inter cropping
-Mixed cropping
-Crop rotation
3. Agronomic Management options

Moisture
conservation/
Soil surface
encrustation
1. Simple intervention–
2. Crop Suitability
Ensure nominal yield
No yield ---------- Acceptable yield

In situ moisture conservation
Source: Prof Durai Singh, TNAU

Run of storage Farm Pond / Water shed

Seed Treatment
Seed hardening / Seed pelleting / Designer seed
DAP
Gypsum (Alfisol) –2.5 kg / acre

Year
?
B
S
K
Fe Fe
Zn Zn
P P P
N N N N N N
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2010
Soil Health
Management

Composting crop residue
Enriched fertilizers , Vermi-composting

•Spray in evening with surfactant
•2 times
-Budding stage
-Young pod stage
Foliar nutrition
PPFM

Forage production & Silage
Fodder sorghum –
CO(FS) 29 and CO (FS) 31
Cumbu Napier
CO (CN) 4 and Co (CN) 5

Arid Zone fruits
Canopy management Moisture conservation
Source: RRS, Arupukottai

Agro-Forestry
4F
5F
•Fuel
•Fodder
•Fertilizer
•Feed
•Food
Source: Prof C.Swaminathan, TNAU

Mitigate Labour Paucity

Thankyou