Comparison of Screw pump and Kreisel Rotary Feeder System EN DS (By Kreisel).pdf

Compare of Pneumatic Desig

1. KREISEL GmbH & Co. KG
Tempowerkring 1b • 21079 Hamburg • Germany
Mühlenstrasse38 • 02957 Krauschwitz • Germany
ComparisonbetweenScrew
Pump &
KREISEL rotaryfeedersystem

2. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology
2
Energy comparison
Rotary valve vs. Screw pump
•Conveying rate: 150 t/h Cement
•Conveying distance: 257 m
•PPC Hercules (South Africa)
Data
Screwpump
Size 300
Rotary valve
Size 700 x 700
Operatinghours[h/a] 7500 7500
Energycosts[$/kWh] 0.08 0.08
Couplingpower offeedingdevice[kW] 155 5
Couplingpower ofaircompressor[kW] 336 294
Total energyconsumption[kW] 491 299
Total energyconsumptionper year[kWh/a] 3.682.500 2.242.500
Energycostsper year[$/a] 294.600 179.400
SavingofkW/year 1.440.000kW
Energycostsavings 115.200,--€ (-39%)

3. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology 3
PPC Hercules

4. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology 4
PPC Hercules

5. 5KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology
PPC Hercules

6. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology
6
Energy comparison
Rotary valve vs. Screw pump
•Conveying rate: 50 t/h Cement
•Conveying distance: 330 m
•Müllerkalk(BRD)
Data
Screwpump
Size 200
Rotary valve
Size 500 x 500
Operatinghours[h/a]
3.000 3.000
Energycosts[$/kWh]
0,08 0,08
Couplingpower offeedingdevice[kW]
55 3
Couplingpower ofaircompressor[kW]
196 176
Total energyconsumption[kW]
251 179
Total energyconsumptionper year[kWh/a]
753.000537.000
Energycostsper year[$/a]
60.240 42.960
Savingof[kW/Jahr]
216.000 kW
Energycostsavings
17.280,--€
Percentageofthesaving[%]
29%
3D PDF

7. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology 7
Energy comparison
Energy comparison between a rotary feeder conveying system and a screw
pump conveying system
•Conveying capacity : 300 t/h Cement
•Conveying distance: approx. 70m
Data
Screw pump
size350
Rotary feeder 2x
size700 x 700
Operation time [h/year] 7.500 7.500
Energy costs[$/kWh] 0,20 0,20
Motor power at coupling of feeder [kW] 120 2 x 11
Motor power at coupling ofaircompressor[kW] 390 2 x 165
Sum energy consumption [kW] 510 352
Sumenergy per year[kWh/a] 3.825.000 2.640.000
Energy cost[$/a] 765.000 528.000
Profit by using rotaryfeeder[$/a] 227.000,--$

8. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology 8
Energy comparison
Energy comparison between a rotary feeder conveying system and a screw
pump conveying system
•Conveying capacity : 100 t/h raw meal (OPTERRA, former Lafarge)
•Conveying distance: approx. 160 m including 80 m height
Data
Screw pump
size300
Rotary feeder
size630 x 630
Operation time [h/year] 7500 7500
Energy costs[€/kWh] 0.07 0.07
Motor power at coupling of feeder [kW] 4 x 140 4 x 2
Motor power at coupling ofaircompressor[kW] - -
Sum energy consumption [kW] 560 8
Sumenergy per year[kWh/a] 4.200.000 60.000
Energy cost[€/a] 294.000 4.200
Profit by using rotaryfeeder[€/a] 290.000,--

9. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology 9
Energy comparison

10. KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology 10
Height Comparison
•Conveying capacity : 50 t/h cement (Wotan / Germany)
•Conveying distance: approx. 310 m including 60 m height

11. 26.07.2023 11
Contact details
Contact:
Mr. Dicken Sze –Regional Sales Manager
KREISEL GmbH & Co. KG
Tempowerkring 6
21079 Hamburg -Germany
Phone:[phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [email protected]
www.kreisel.eu
KREISEL Materials ConveyingTechnology • 2016