Critique and Review PPT.pptx

MariaSalveHuarde 163 views 9 slides May 21, 2023
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 9
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9

About This Presentation

According to Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, critique and review overlap in meaning. A critique is a careful judgment in which an opinion is given about the good and bad parts of something; while a review is a critical evaluation of a work of art (as a book or play) but written in a more casual opin...


Slide Content

Critique and Review

Both are forms of assessment and evaluation of piece of work. Both are written in a technical manner

CRITIQUE REVIEW or CRITICAL ASSESSMENT is a form of evaluation in which the critic focuses on a particular area/variable of a piece of work Written by an expert in the field A form of assessment, wherein the writer provides an overall evaluation on a piece of work Can be written by anyone, who has an idea about the work

CRITIQUE REVIEW Doesn’t provide an overall assessment but rather stresses points for discussion. More often observes a technical and objective tone Emphasizes on the strong and weak points of a piece of work Provides its readers with an overall view of the piece of work Uses a tone that balances subjective thoughts and objective approach. explore less technical weight

CRITIQUE REVIEW Will look at points such as character development, writing styles, plot creation, and then provide his/her assessment and recommendations. an in-depth analysis of a particular work of art, a literary work such as a novel, short story, poem, or play. Will more often entice you or prevent you from taking time to look at the work discussed The reviewer will read the book and assess the book as a whole, he or she might tell a gist of the story and then write whether it was good or not. an assessment of a particular work, such as a movie, a book, or music.

CRITIQUE REVIEW It is argumentative; the writer, who presents arguments about whether or not a certain work is good, aims to persuade readers to think about the work from his or her perspective. contains a writer’s opinion of the quality of any piece of writing or work of art. In writing a review, the author presents his or her observations in a general context. He or she analyzes how parts constitute the entirety of the material. refers to a writer’s evaluation of a specific work of art in a general context.

CRITIQUE REVIEW The writer is usually knowledgeable of certain theories or approaches which serve as a basis of his or her review. Because a critique is subjective, the writer can be biased. The person who writes a critique is usually an expert on the matter. He or she uses a critical approach or theory to evaluate a certain work. He or she examines how a part contributes to the totality of a material. Like a critique, it is argumentative in nature. However, unlike the critique, a review has a general audience. A writer who writes a review may or may not be an expert. Also, his writing is subjective as it depends on his or her perception of the material.

CRITIQUE REVIEW He or she may tackle either specific components of a work or its overall aesthetics. A critique then has a specific audience. The readers must have a similar educational or professional background as the author to understand what he or she is trying to point out in his or her critique.

FEATURES OF CRITIQUE FEATURES OF REVIEW A critique is comprehensive A critique uses a specific approach or theory A critique can have an objective tone. A critique uses formal language. A critique uses credible references. A review is usually brief and concise. A review is subjective. A review uses informal language.