CSVLOD Enterprise architecture model .pdf

MarwanSaad22 7 views 31 slides Oct 25, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 31
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31

About This Presentation

CSVLOD Enterprise model


Slide Content

The CSVLOD Model of Enterprise Architecture
and Its Value for the EA Discipline
Svyatoslav Kotusev
Enterprise Architecture Researcher
([email protected])
Visit http://kotusev.com

WhatIs Enterprise Architecture?
What components constitute enterprise architecture?
Two conceptualizations of enterprise architecture
currently dominate in the EA discourse:
•Enterprise architecture as business architecture, data
architecture, application architecture and technology
architecture
•Enterprise architecture as the current state, future
state and transition roadmap
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 2

EA as Four Architectures
Enterprise architecture consists of four components:
•Business (or organization) architecture
•Data (or information) architecture
•Application (or system) architecture
•Technology (or infrastructure) architecture
Four “layers” of enterprise architecture, or BDAT stack
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 3

EA as Four Architectures
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 4
Business Architecture
Data Architecture
Application Architecture
Technology Architecture
Enterprise Architecture

Associated Problems
Problems with understanding enterprise architecture as
four separate architectures:
•No clear-cut architectures, e.g. EA artifacts can
describe many layers simultaneously
•Low explanatory power, e.g. what are the usage
scenarios or stakeholders of data architecture?
•Largely self-serving, e.g. same as classifying EA
artifacts into black-and-white and colored
•Other domains can be also described in EA artifacts
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 5

Overall Adequacy
Thinking about enterprise architecture as four separate
architectures is inadequate
Thinking about enterprise architecture in this way
resembles thinking about cars as a mix of metal, plastic,
glass and rubber, i.e. true but useless
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 6

EA as Two States and Roadmap
Enterprise architecture consists of three components:
•Current (baseline, as-is, existing, etc.) state
•Future (target, to-be, desired, etc.) state
•Roadmap (or transition plan)
Two states, gap analysis, getting from “here” to “there”
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 7

EA as Two States and Roadmap
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 8
Enterprise Architecture
Current
State
Future
State
Roadmap

Associated Problems
Problems with understanding enterprise architecture as
the current state, future state and roadmap:
•In most cases the long-term future state for the
whole enterprise is not (and even cannot be) defined
•There may be many future states for different scopes
(business department, change program, etc.) and
planning horizons (e.g. 1, 2, 3 and 5 years)
•Simplistic model, does not reflect full complexity
•Organizations cannot be engineered mechanistically
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 9

Overall Adequacy
Thinking about enterprise architecture as the current
state, future state and roadmap is inadequate
Thinking about enterprise architecture in this way is a
misguiding simplification of the organizational reality
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 10

Current Situation with EA
Current situation in the EA discipline:
•Both popular conceptualizations of enterprise
architecture are inadequate
•No alternative evidence-based conceptualizations
exists
•It is not clear what components constitute enterprise
architecture
•For many years the phenomenon of enterprise
architecture has no meaningful explanation
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 11

Introducing the CSVLOD Model
The CSVLOD model is a novel conceptualization of
enterprise architecture from scratch that:
•Emerged from research, not from marketing
•Supported by evidence from real organizations
•Reflects genuine industry EA best practices
•Accurately describes empirical realities of EA
•Fills the critical gap in the EA discipline
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 12

CSVLOD Taxonomy for Artifacts
13
Rules Structures Changes
Global conceptual
rules and fundamental
considerations
important for business
and relevant for IT
Business -Focused IT-Focused
Considerations
Standards
Visions
Landscapes
Outlines
Designs
High-level conceptual
descriptions of an
organization from the
business perspective
High-level descriptions
of separate IT initiatives
understandable to
business leaders
Global technical rules,
standards, patterns
and best practices
relevant for IT systems
High-level technical
descriptions of the
organizational IT
landscape
Detailed technical and
functional descriptions
of separate IT projects
actionable for project
teams
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

CSVLOD Model of EA
14
Considerations
Standards
Visions
Landscapes
Outlines
Designs
Enterprise Architecture
Business
Applications
Data
Infrastructure
Security
Business
Applications
Data
Infrastructure
Security
Business
Applications
Data
Infrastructure
Security
Business
Applications
Data
Infrastructure
Security
Business
Applications
Data
Infrastructure
Security
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Considerations EA Artifacts
15
Considerations are Business-Focused Rules
Principles Policies
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Standards EA Artifacts
16
Standards are IT-Focused Rules
Technology Reference Models Guidelines
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Visions EA Artifacts
17
Visions are Business-Focused Structures
Business Capability Models Roadmaps
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Landscapes EA Artifacts
18
Landscapes are IT-Focused Structures
Landscape Diagrams Inventories
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Outlines EA Artifacts
19
Outlines are Business-Focused Changes
Solution Overviews Options Assessments
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Designs EA Artifacts
20
Designs are IT-Focused Changes
Solution Designs Preliminary Solution Designs
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Usage of EA Artifacts
21
Rules Structures Changes
Developed collaboratively
by senior business leaders
and architects and then
used to influence all
architectural decisions
Business -Focused IT-Focused
Considerations
Standards
Visions
Landscapes
Outlines
Designs
Developed collaboratively
by senior business leaders
and architects and then
used to guide IT
investments, identify,
prioritize and launch new IT
initiatives
Developed collaboratively
by architects and business
leaders and then used to
evaluate, approve and fund
specific IT initiatives
Developed collaboratively
by architects and technical
subject- matter experts and
used to shape
architectures of all IT
initiatives
Developed and maintained
by architects and used to
rationalize the IT landscape,
manage the lifecycle of IT
assets and plan new IT
initiatives
Developed collaboratively
by architects, project teams
and business
representatives and then
used by project teams to
implement IT projects
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Lifecycles of EA Artifacts
22
Rules Structures Changes
Developed once
and then updated
according to the
ongoing changes in the
business environment
Business -Focused IT-Focused
Considerations
Standards
Visions
Landscapes
Outlines
Designs
Developed once and
then updated according
to the ongoing changes
in strategic business
priorities
Developed at the early
stages of IT initiatives
to support decision-
making and then
archived
Developed on an as-
necessary basis and
updated according
to the ongoing
technology progress
Developed on an as-
necessary basis and
updated according to
the ongoing evolution
of the IT landscape
Developed at
the later stages of IT
initiatives to support
implementation and
then archived
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Purpose of EA Artifacts
23
Rules Structures Changes
Help achieve the
agreement on basic
principles, values,
directions and aims
Business -Focused IT-Focused
Considerations
Standards
Visions
Landscapes
Outlines
Designs
Help achieve the
alignment between IT
investments and long-
term business
outcomes
Help estimate the
overall business impact
and value of proposed
IT initiatives
Help achieve technical
consistency,
technological
homogeneity and
regulatory compliance
Help understand,
analyzeand modify the
structure of the IT
landscape
Help implement
approved IT projects
according to business
and architectural
requirements
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Benefits of EA Artifacts
24
Rules Structures Changes
Improved overall
consistency between
business and IT
Business -Focused IT-Focused
Considerations
Standards
Visions
Landscapes
Outlines
Designs
Improved strategic
effectiveness of IT
investments
Improved
efficiency and ROI
of IT investments
Faster initiative
delivery, reduced
costs, risks and
complexity
Increased reuse
and agility, reduced
duplication and legacy
Improved
quality of the
project delivery
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS)

Process View of EA Practice
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 25

Modeling Languages
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 26

Software Tools
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 27

Benefits of the CSVLOD Model
The CSVLOD model of enterprise architecture has two
major advantages over existing models:
•The CSVLOD model is realistic, evidence-based and
reflects actual EA artifacts and related best practices
•The CSVLOD model is highly explanatory and
describes many critical properties of EA artifacts
including their contents, formats, stakeholders,
usage, lifecycles, purposesand benefits
•The CSVLOD model helps understand how EA works
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 28

Enterprise Architecture on a Page
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 29

Conclusions
Svyatoslav Kotusev ([email protected]) for the British Computer Society (BCS) 30
Popular conceptualizations of enterprise
architecture as four architecture layers, current
states, future states and roadmaps are inadequate
for understanding enterprise architecture
The CSVLOD model is the first research-based
model of enterprise architecture which provides a
more accurate, realistic and explanatory view than
any other existing models

Questions?
Svyatoslav Kotusev
Enterprise Architecture Researcher
([email protected])
Visit http://kotusev.com