Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdf

OECD_ENV 41 views 22 slides May 13, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 22
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22

About This Presentation

This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to s...


Slide Content

Integrated modelling for interrelated crises
Detlef van Vuuren
1

Multiple crisis world
2 mei 2024
2

Multiple crisis world
2 mei 2024
3
Planetary
boundaries 3.0
Richardson et al, 2023

4
Planetary
boundaries 3.0
•800 million people without access to
electricity
•828 million people suffering from a hunger
(2021)
•2.2 billion people lacking access to safely
managed clean water (2022)
•3.6 billion people lack access to adequate
sanitation

Model-based scenario analysis successful in specific
domains
2 mei 2024
5

Rio+20, 15 mei 2012
Drivers
Human system
Earth system
Impacts
Response

Rio+20, 15 mei 2012
IMAGE model
framework
›Exploration of global
environmental change
problems
›Simulation

Some examples of studies looking into addressing
multiple crises
›SHAPE (EU sponsored project on achieving SDGs)
›GEO7 (UNEP Global Environmental Outlook)
›IMAGE Planetary Boundary work
2 mei 2024
8
Storylines + modelling

Economy driven innovation
•Technology & market driven
•Globalized world with high
economic growth
•Technological solutions
Managing the global commons
•Human services driven
•Strong global institutions
•Efficient technological solutions
Resilient communities
•Post-growth society
•Local solutions
•Human well-being & behavioural
change
›SHAPE scenarios based on SDG
achievement (target space)
›Multiple routes – different
transformations
›Each have strengths and
weaknesses

2 mei 2024
Buildings
Transport
Interventions
•HT = Historical Trends
•SSP2 baseline
•RE = Resource Efficiency
•Reduced (material)
demands
•Efficient design
•Increased Recycling
•ST = Sustainable
Transition (RE + 1.5°C)
Emissions
Exampleofreducedmaterial demand(GRO)

12
Primary Energy
-Primary Energy stabilizes (efficiency)
-Continued use of fossil fuels
(combined with CCS)
-Rapid transition to renewables
-Focus on large scale renewables
-Long term reduction in demand
-Reduction in demand (behaviour)
-Slower transition to renewables
-Lower trade
-Continued increase in demand
-Continued reliance on fossil (+CCS)SSP2-RCP1.9
RC
EI
MC
RC
MC
EI
RC
MC
Vassilis Daioglou - The IMAGE Sustainable Development Pathways

13
-Small expansion on agriculture (high
demand and high yields)
-Expansion of forest area
-At expense of pasture area
-Similar to Economic-Innovation but
with more natural land
-Small expansion of agriculture
(lower yield increase)
-Large expansion of forest area
-Decrease of pasture area
-Strong afforestation (single species)
and intensive agricultureSSP2-RCP1.9
Land Cover
EI
RC
MC
Vassilis Daioglou - The IMAGE Sustainable Development Pathways

14
Emissions
-Slowest mitigation of all the SDPs
-Significant CDR from land, energy
& DAC
-Net negative from 2050
-“Limited” CDR, mostly from BECCS
-Energy demand emissions
approach net zero after 2050
-Limited CDR, mostly from land
sector
-Energy demand emissions
approach net zero after 2050
-“slower” mitigation
-Heavy reliance on CDRSSP2-RCP1.9
EI
RC
MC
Vassilis Daioglou - The IMAGE Sustainable Development Pathways

15
Synergiesand
trade-offs
Less irrigation to
restore environmental
flows + NUE
Nature protection (50%
of each eco regions)+
NUE
Diet change
Climate policy
(including
reforestation)

16
Synergiesand
trade-offs
Less irrigation to
restore environmental
flows + NUE
Nature protection (50%
of each eco regions)+
NUE
Diet change
Climate policy
(including
reforestation)

Trade-offs
Climate policy
(including
reforestation)

18
Earth-system process Control variable
*
Climate change Forcing-GHGs(W m-
2
)
Stratospheric ozone
depletion
O
3 concentration (DU) 60S-90S
Atmospheric aerosol
loading
Average pm2.5 concentration (g
m-
3
)
Ocean acidification pH
Biogeochemical flows
-Nitrogen
-Phosphorus N-balance (Tg Nyr
–1
)
P-balance (Tg P yr
–1
)
Freshwater use Water consumption(km
3
)
Land system change Area of forested land (Gha)
Change in biosphere
integrity
MSA
Planetary boundaries

›Current trends (SSP2)
implies further
worsening of
environmental
situation

Category Measure assumed
Climate mitigation Implementation of the 1.5
o
C target of the Paris Agreement, following
SSP2-1.9
37
Food consumption
change
a shift towards a healthy diet as defined by EAT-Lancet (80%
implementation in 2050 and 100% in 2100
38
Reduction of food
waste
a reduction of food loss by consumption group (leading overall to
approximately halving food waste)
39
Water withdrawal
for energy, industry
and households
implementation of efficiency in water use in industry, the residential
sector and electricity generation
40
Water withdrawal
for irrigation
reduction of water use for irrigation to ensure environmentally
ecologically sustainable levels
41
Use of N-fertilizersan increase in nitrogen use efficiency to maximum levels by 70/80%
(compared to 50% in the baseline)
42
Sustainability measures

Category Measure assumed
Climate
mitigation
Implementation of the 1.5
o
C target of the Paris
Agreement, following SSP2-1.9
37
Food
consumption
change
a shift towards a healthy diet as defined by
EAT-Lancet (80% implementation in 2050 and
100% in 2100
38
Reduction of
food waste
a reduction of food loss by consumption group
(leading overall to approximately halving food
waste)
39
Water
withdrawal
for energy,
industry and
households
implementation of efficiency in water use in
industry, the residential sector and electricity
generation
40
Water
withdrawal
for irrigation
reduction of water use for irrigation to ensure
environmentally ecologically sustainable
levels
41
Use of N-
fertilizers
an increase in nitrogen use efficiency to
maximum levels by 70/80% (compared to
50% in the baseline)
42

Some obervations
22Vassilis Daioglou - The IMAGE Sustainable Development Pathways
➢Need to develop more integrated scenarios
➢Major transformations needed (demand + supply)
➢Critical to focus more of just implementation
➢Mixed methods can help us to better understand the
transitions (economic / physical models / governance)