Dipmeter Data, Borehole Image Logs and Interpretation

KrisVickerman 11,591 views 72 slides May 31, 2016
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 72
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72

About This Presentation

Introduction to Borehole Image Logs presented to Geoscience Data Managers in 2016 by Kris Vickerman of HEF Petrophysical Consulting Inc.


Slide Content

Dipmeter data, borehole image logs and interpretation Kris Vickerman May 25, 2016

Dipmeter refers to the bedding data (depth, dip, azimuth, quality, etc.). The small plot on top is a dipmeter plot. Dipmeter also refers to an older tool with 4, 6 or 8 buttons Borehole image logs refer to any tool that samples an array of measurements in the borehole: Resistivity – FMI, CMI, XRMI, etc. Ultrasonic images – UBI, CBIL, CAST LWD images – (GR, Density, Resistivity and so on.) Introduction

Data comes from the logging truck typically via satellite or FTP transmission: File types such as DLIS, TIF, LIS, XTF, AFF, LAS, CSV Large files, often 100’s of MB Data is also found in digital archives: Corporate archives as digital or paper well files Government archives (BCOGC), as scans, paper logs, and digital Service company archives (HEF for example has more than 10,000 wells in our Recall Database dating back to the early 90’s) Log data vendor archives as rasters , etc. Digitized data such as ASCII bed dip files from above sources Data can also be sourced from physical media: Magnetic tapes, CD/DVD, scanning old paper prints and so on… Introduction – input data sources

Outline Basics of borehole image interpretation Bedding and structural dip analysis Natural fractures Stress features

Basics of borehole image logs Wireline or MWD tool is positioned in the borehole (resistivity, sonic, density, gr) Inclined surfaces intersect the measurement buttons at different depths, unrolling to a sinusoid in the standard display

Basics of borehole image logs Wireline or MWD tool is positioned in the borehole (resistivity, sonic, density) Inclined surfaces intersect the measurement buttons at different depths, unrolling to a sinusoid in the standard display

Typical Conductivity Image plot is shown as an unrolled view of the inside of the borehole Conductive features are dark; resistive are light Planes that intersect the borehole become sine waves in this view Bedding (orange-yellow) and fractures (black) visible in this section Borehole Image Example (FMI)

Image normalization Image colour is statically normalized with conductive as black and resistive as white To enhance local contrast, colours are renormalized in a sliding 1m window making a “Dynamically Normalized” image Dynamically Normalized Static

Image logs and core Conductive shale is black, resistive bitumen sand is white/yellow We can often see resistivity contrast features that are hard to see in core Dynamic Static

Oil-Based horizontal field imager Horizontal field electric images see fractures better but also see bit marks Acoustic images are lower resolution Bedding is clear Some fracturing is visible Some induced features are visible

Borehole Image Interpretation Step 1: Processed Image

Borehole Image Interpretation Step 2: Beds

Borehole Image Interpretation Step 3: Large Fractures

Borehole Image Interpretation Step 4: Fine Fractures

Image interpretation Dip “Tadpoles” Hand-picked sinusoids Lithology zoning

“Basics” products Plot of the interpreted image at various scales (Paper / PDF / TIFF) Output of the interpreted image in DLIS Output/backup of the interpreted image in DB format like Recall or Geoframe , etc. Output of the interpreted features (Beds, fractures, etc.) in LAS

Outline Basics of borehole image interpretation Bedding and structural dip analysis Natural fractures Stress features

Basic Structural Dip Analysis Tadpole Plots Stereonet Plots Stick Plots True Stratigraphic Thickness Plots

Tadpole Plot

Stereonet

Stick Plot (cross-section)

Interpreted Stick Plot

True Stratigraphic Thickness Plot

True Stratigraphic Thickness Plot

Interpreted Stick Plot

Example of structural interpretaion Each domain is taken to have consistent average dip The boundaries between the domains are oriented on the bisectors of the dip domains

Interpreted Stick Plot Simple stereonets Uncluttered bed dips and subtle frac. den. curve GR and tops markers Depth tracks visible but not in the way Projected bedding Anything else you might like to add FDEN, tadpoles, openhole data

Interpreted stick plot

Interpreted stick plot ( Lithotect )

Stratigraphic beds Describing bedforms and lithology Sand count and facies plots Vuggy porosity analysis

Sandy IHS Moderate GR, moderate resistivity Inclined alternating sand/mud beds Consistent bedding dip direction towards channel centre Vsh 10-40%

Trough crossbedded sand Very clean GR, high resistivity >10 ° crossbeds Inclined truncations Vsh < 10% Dip Downstream

Trough crossbedded sand Very clean GR, high resistivity >10 ° crossbeds Inclined truncations Vsh < 10% Dip Downstream

Planar-tabular crossbedded sand Clean GR, high resistivity >10 ° flow crossbeds , often alternating direction Flat truncations Vsh < 10% Dip down-current

Mud Breccia Moderate to high GR, low resistivity Often crossbedded Clast supported conductive (dark) mud clasts Petrophysically indistinguishable from laminated mud beds below Vsh > 10%

Sand count plot Sand count / facies plots can take many forms This one shows: O penhole data on the right High-res resistivity curve for thin bed petrophysics (red, on the right) Facies track (Green/yellow/black) Sand count track (brown and yellow to the right of image) Sand bed thickness and percentage curves (yellow and grey to the right of image)

Secondary porosity plot Image thresholding produces an estimate of irregular (secondary) porosity as a percentage of the whole Plot shows limestone / dolostone flag on left, thresholded black and white image on right followed by secondary porosity curves in red, green and grey

Bed Interpretation products Stereonet, Tadpole, Stick, TST, etc. (Paper / PDF) Lithology zonation file (LAS) and plots Bed dip types on plots and in LAS / ASCII

Outline Basics of borehole image interpretation Bedding and structural dip analysis Natural fractures Stress features

Natural fracture interpretation Fracture types (open, closed, shear) Fracture properties (geometry, density, aperture)

Open Fractures Open fractures are filled with conductive drilling mud (dark on borehole images) Fractures are not infinite in length so partial intersections are common Direct measurements include dip, azimuth, trace length, minimum radius, type (LAS)

Open Fracture Exaggeration 50 cm This fracture is probably on the order of .5 mm, not 5 cm as it is seen here Tool current “seeks” the conductive fracture before and after it, making it appear much larger *From Cheung, 1999

Open Fractures

Mineralized fractures might be filled with calcite, quartz or dolomite, all resistive Often fracture traces are invisible See artificial halo inside fracture plane Healed Fractures

Healed Fracture Haloing 50 cm *From Cheung, 1999 The resistive fracture itself is invisible, see halo instead Tool current “piles up” inside of resistive fracture plane and is dispersed outside of it

Healed Fractures

Shear feature in Borehole Images Visible as a bedding offset Can be healed or open Can be mm-scale to km-scale in throw Geologists would call these faults but some managers might not be so keen

Shear features

Natural fracture interpretation Fracture types, (open, closed, shear) Fracture properties (geometry, density, aperture)

Fracture Density Fracture density can be calculated a few ways: As line-density 1-D As tracelength density 2-D As a modelled volumetric density 3D

Fracture Density Comparison 2 metres of image

Fracture Density Comparison 9 m 2 /m 3 5 m 2 /m 3 2 metres of image

Fracture Density Plot Gives an at-a-glance curve to tell fracture intensity but no indication of aperture, permeability or connection to porosity If drilling induced fractures or foliation is included, it gives false results

Fracture aperture estimation 50 cm Open fractures are invaded by conductive drilling mud The amount of invaded mud is somehow proportional to aperture

MUD Fracture aperture estimation *U.S. Patent No: 52435211 Aperture = A * Rt 0.1505 * Rm 0.8495 A = Excess conductance Rt = Formation resistivity Rm = Mud resistivity

Fracture aperture plot Apertures are calculated two ways: As an average for each fracture (red dots, second to right) …And as a rolling mean (blue-red cuve on right)

Fracture Interpretation products Fracture types on tadpole, image and stereonet plots and in LAS / ASCII Fracture density plot and LAS file Fracture aperture plot and LAS file Fracture statistics like trace length, minimum radius, height and so on in LAS file

Outline Basics of borehole image interpretation Bedding and structural dip analysis Natural fractures Stress features

Un-natural fractures Stress direction from borehole breakout Stress direction from induced fractures

Stress direction from breakout Measure s hmin by observing where breakouts occur in the wellbore Vertical and oriented in the plane of s hmin Borehole sloughs in when the drilling fluid pressure is less than formation pressure After: Mossop, Shetsen, 1994 Low Pf

Stress direction from breakout Breakout visible as paired vertical conductive smears Can pick the centre of the breakouts to get s hmin

Stress direction from breakout Breakout visible as paired vertical conductive smears Can pick the centre of the breakouts to get s hmin s hmin s hmin

Stress Magnitude from breakout Width of the breakout is proportional to the magnitude of s hmin Width of the breakout is also proportional to the rock strength Need a database of the strengths of various formations to measure s hmin Width

Un-natural fractures Stress direction from borehole breakout Stress direction from induced fractures

Stress direction - Induced fractures Measure s hmax by observing where drilling induced fractures occur Vertical and oriented in the plane of s hmax Borehole wall cracks when drilling fluid pressure is more than formation pressure High Pf

Stress direction – Induced fractures Induced fracs . visible as paired thin vertical conductive cracks Can pick the centre of the induced fractures to get s hmax

Stress direction – Induced fractures Induced fracs . visible as paired thin vertical conductive cracks Can pick the centre of the induced fractures to get s hmax s hmax s hmax

Stress direction – Both types s hmin s hmax s hmax s hmin

Stress direction – Both types s hmin s hmax s hmax s hmin

Stress Interpretation products Horizontal maximum stress direction on stereonet Stress features on tadpole plots and in LAS files Further analysis can be done for more in depth geomechanical understanding

Interpreted borehole image data should always be distributed as digital files (Downloaded via FTP/website or on DVD) Can be printed on paper Can be supplied in a format that can be loaded into other software packages (a DLIS array of the processed image) Should be stored by the interpreter and logging contractor (if different) in some permanent database (Recall, etc.) Ideally should become part of government databases once off confidential Outtroduction – data outputs

The words Dipmeter and Borehole image log are pretty loaded and can mean a lot of things Depending on the questions, these logs can provide a large suite of answers about the nature and textures of bedding and fracturing in the subsurface The products come in a wide and challenging variety of plots, files and media Conclusion