EFFECT OF SOUND POLLUTION ON FISHES

SaileshMagapatra 1,009 views 27 slides Oct 15, 2018
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 27
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27

About This Presentation

VIEWS ON SOUND POLLUTION OVER FISHES


Slide Content

A seminar on: EFFECT OF SOUND POLLLUTION ON FISH Submitted to- Prof. G. DASH Dept. of AAH AAH – 224 WEST BENGAL UNIVERSITY OF ANIMAL AND FISHERY SCIENCES Submitted by- Sailesh Mahapatra Roll no. – F/2016/21 Regd. No. – 5864 of 2016 – ’17 1

INTRODUCTION: Some anthropogenic (man-made) noise, such as that arising from traffic, resource extraction and construction, is now recognized as noise pollution both in air and underwater. From individual behaviour and physiology up to community structure , a wide variety of species are affected by noise. Since the anthropogenic noise has changed the soundscape of many aquatic ecosystems, International legislation recognizes the need to assess and manage the biological impacts of noise-generating human activities. 2

AUDITORY ORGANS OF FISHES: Fish can sense sound through their  lateral lines  and their   otolith   (ears). Some fish don’t have lateral lines, but do have cilia that serve as mechanoreceptors translating acoustically induced particle motion and pressure gradients into the sensory system of the fish. Some fishes, such as some species of  carp and herrings , hear through their swim bladders , which function rather like a hearing aid. Hearing is well-developed in  carp , which have the  Weberian organ , three specialized vertebral processes that transfer vibrations in the swim bladder to the inner ear. For shell fishes hearing organ is statocyst. 3

Mechanism of lateral line 4

Sound from Fish: Many species of fish are known to use sound for communication and produce sound incident to other behaviours, such as swimming and feeding . Some marine life, like sharks have been shown to respond to sounds from potential prey . Fish generally produce sounds by striking two bony structures together or regulating air within a swim-bladder . Therefore, the sounds they produce are usually pulsed signals below 1,000 Hz. These fish choruses have been known to increase ambient noise levels by 20 dB or more (in the 50 - 5,000 Hz band). 5

Atherogenic noise sources: Noise from marine dredging, tunnel boring, smaller explosives, pile-driving and pier construction, offshore drilling and mineral extraction, Several technologies ( airguns, sleeve exploders, and gas guns) can exceed ambient noise for considerable distances. Naval vessels also create considerable sound through their power plants, propellers, and hulls. Other sources of anthropogenic noise that can affect marine mammals include airplanes and helicopters. 6

Effect of boat noise: Tuna changed swimming direction and increased their vertical movement toward surface or bottom.  The school behaviour of tuna exhibited an unconcentrated structure and uncoordinated swimming behaviour . Agonistic behaviour was more evident when exposed to sounds from outboard motors of small boats. An alteration in schooling behaviour due to boat noise can affect the accuracy of their migration to spawning and feeding grounds . 7

sonic effects of offshore wind farms on fish: It is advisable that offshore wind farms should be listed in the noise databases in order to promote rational environment management. Activity of wind farm Type of impact on fish pre-construction of wind farm short-term potential impact Construction of wind farm short-term intensive impact long period while the wind farm is in operation. physiological and/or masking effects 8

IMPACT OF NOISE ON DEVELOPMENT OF LARVA: Noise has been shown to cause body malformations and delay development in scallop embryos. Exposure to additional noise during rearing would reduce growth , increase yolk sac use and reduce body width–length ratio ( condition indicator ). Scallop larvae exposed to playbacks of seismic pulses showed significant developmental delays and 46% developed body abnormalities. Malformations appeared in the D-veliger larval phase. 9

Stunted growth of scallop larvae – 10

scallop larvae – The Marine Scene scallop larvae – The microscopic view 11

Effects of Noise on Eggs and Larvae of Estuarine Fishes: Lethal effects of high noise levels were initially suspected during attempts to rear larvae of bluegill sunfish ( Lepomis macrochirus ). Viability of eggs and resulting Cyprinodon variegatus larvae was significantly reduced in the noisier tank . Growth rates of C. variegatus and Fundulus similis larvae were significantly lower in the noisier tank. 12

Deformity in the larvae of Cyprinodon variegatus Deformity in the larvae of Fundulus similis 13

noise disrupts orientation behaviour in fish: Coral reef fish larvae use sound to find suitable habitat during their vital settlement stage. Anthropogenic noise could have a disruptive effect on the settlement and population dynamics in coral reef habitats disturbed by boat traffic. 14

Ocean noise pollution makes fish stressed and disoriented 15

Puget sound effect: Puget Sound extends approximately 100 miles (160 km) from Deception Pass in the north to Olympia, Washington in the south. From Puget Sound low egg fertility has been reported in salmonids and reduced sperm counts have been reported in stressed rainbow trout Current work in Puget Sound with male English sole is showing that fish from some contaminated locations are showing vitellogenin induction indicating that multiple mechanisms of endocrine disruption are in operation . 16

Infertile eggs of salmon– Delay development of eggs in salmon 17

Behavioural Changes to Assess Anthropogenic Noise Impact: Anthropogenic noise may lead to spatial deterrence , behavioural interruption , and signal modifications , which are all factors that involve some sort of active response from the fish. Exposure to unpredictable and uncontrollable noise events and biologically relevant sounds that are critical for survival and become unpredictable and uncontrollable due to masking noise may yield physiological changes that deserve the label of stress. 18

Noise impact on fish Physical damage Physiological Stress Auditory Masking Spatial Deterrence Behavioural Interruption Signal Modification Passive Active + - 19

Impact on reproduction of fish: Noise can change fishes’ activity, force them to live in bad habitats and affects reproduction . Masking effect caused a decrease in overall aggressiveness and territoriality during spawning which can negatively impact reproductive success . ( Sebastianutto et al. 2011). Reduced hearing for vocalizing species can have reproductive and evolutionary implications . (Vasconcelos et al. 2007). 20

Reproductive failure due to stress: Atretic eggs, Agglutinated sperm Spawning impairment Changes in hormones level Timing of reproduction Differences in egg volume Fertilization rate 21

Threats to fishes: If noise affects the reproduction or viability of a prey species, every species above it on the food chain could be affected. Noise can be considered not only a discrete threat to whales, but a source of overall habitat degradation . Shrimp exposed to noise exhibited reduced reproduction and growth rates and increased aggression and mortality . Noise causes fish to move from an area for an extended period of time and return later when the noise ceases. 22

Remedy: It is commonly accepted that noise levels are rising due to increased human activities in coastal and offshore areas. 23 One potential source of historical ambient noise data is the US Navy’s Sound Ocean Surveillance system ( SOSUS ), which was designed to provide worldwide acoustic submarine surveillance. The Bio-Acoustic Fish Fence ( BAFF ) is a completely novel system using a sound generator in conjunction with an air-bubble sheet to create a ` wall of sound’ designed to deflect fish .

Bio-Acoustic Fish Fence ( BAFF ) 24

Conclusion: Internationally, more than 200 agreements address ocean issues such as biodiversity, sustainable use of ocean resources, fisheries , and pollution. Natural Resources Defence Council ( NRDC ), National Marine Fisheries Service ( NMFS ), National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ), Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System ( SURTASS ), Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S.) ( FWS ), Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission ( IOC ) are working on prevention of under-water sound pollution. The Silent Oceans Project that focused on the issue of ocean noise pollution that celebrated a “ Silent Oceans Day ” in September 1999. 25

References: INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF UNDERWATER SOUND (Establishing Rules and Standards to Address Ocean Noise Pollution) By Elena McCarthy, Marine Policy Center ; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Effects of Pollution on Fish (Molecular Effects and Population Responses Edited by Andrew Lawrence, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Hull, UK And Krystal Hemingway Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies, University of Hull, UK Measuring Behavioural Changes to Assess Anthropogenic Noise Impact in Adult Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) by H. Slabbekoorn , Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. [email protected] Boat noise disrupts orientation behaviour in a coral reef fish by Sophie Holles1, Stephen D. Simpson, Andrew N. Radford1, Laetitia Berten,David Lecchini Risk formulation for the sonic effects of offshore wind farms on fish in the EU region by Ryunosuke Kikuchi, Departamento de Ciências Exactas e do Ambiente (CERNAS) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633878/ https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10544 http://ocr.org/learn/how-fish-hear/ Anthropogenic noise causes body malformations and delays development in marine larvae by Natacha Aguilar de Soto1, Natali Delorme, John Atkins, Sunkita Howard, James Williams & Mark Johnson 26

27 THANK YOU