EI Guidelines for Pipeline Inspection.pptx

AsimovRiyaz 11 views 31 slides Aug 27, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 31
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31

About This Presentation

PIPELINE


Slide Content

EI Guidelines

Likelihood of Failure(LOF) Form of scoring used for screening Does not deal with consequences Score depend on mainly Pipe Dia and Wall thickness Excitation mechanisms considered

Qualitative Assessment(TM-01) Key Information Required PIDs PFDs Knowledge of Plant operation Plant History Plant maintenance and corrosion management

TM-02 Main line Qualitative assessment Score of >0.5 vibration transmission check

TM-03 Quantitative Assessment of SBC Based on the mainline score Geometric Data and Location Isolated assessment is possible Tonal Excitation Pulsation: Flow induced excitations PDP Mechanical excitations Structural Natural Frequency

TM-04 Quantitative assessment of Thermowells Ignored for now

TM-05 & TM-06 Visual Assessment Vital Enquiry of corrective actions

TM-07 Vibration Measurement Techniques Threat determination Data taken for worst case

TM-08 Specialist Techniques Strain Measurements Pulsations Monitoring CFD and Structural Simulations

TM-11 Corrective Actions SBC LOF Vibration Measurement Results Depend on dominant excitation mechanism and response

Type of Project Existing Plant

Score Determination g

Approach Identify a vibration source

TM-01 Focus Safety or Business critical Quantitative assessment

T2 Quantitative assessment of Main Line

Mechanical Excitation LOF

Pulsations

T3 Quantitative Assessment of SBC Assessment of all SBC for main line score >0.3 Tonal excitation should be avoided of all types Natural Frequencies must be determined Two Stages of LOF score Geometric LOF Location LOF

Geometric Assessment

Location Assessment

T5 Visual Inspection Complete guidelines are available User ability Location for Measurements

T7 Vibration Measurements Location of Highest level of Vibrations Midspan or unsupported section of main line For SBC follow the provided figure Max value of vibration measurement for three axes should be used

Accelerometer and Data Processing Completer guidelines regarding Choice Location Sensitivity of accelero are provided Guidelines and Charts for FFT analysis Criterion determinations

T8 Special Measurements Dynamic Strain measurement based on T8-2 should be made as Time history can be converted into frequency domain to observe dynamic strains in response to frequencies Rapid Less time consuming More suitable in fatigue assessment BS7608 Fatigue curves for welds Experimental modal analysis to verify simualtions

T9 Special Predictive Methods Finite element analysis Modal Acoustic CFD

T10 & T11 Provide Corrective action for T10 Main Line T11 SBC Determined based on results of data and simulations Choices can be made from the EI guidelines

Summary Following steps are to taken as per EI Guidelines Qualitative assessment of Main line Qualitative assessment of SBCs Process flow and Operation scenarios LOF score determination of Interested SBC as per Appendix C Depending on LOF score design or assessment decision be made Vibration Measurements Choice of accelerometer Data logging FFT analysis Source identification Natural frequency and Mode shape determination Predicted stress level Tonal Excitations sources Dynamic Strain Measurement Fatigue decision based on BS7608 or PD5500 If critical then proceed further Experimental modal analysis if possible Corrective actions based on guidelines
Tags