Engineering Touchscreen Input for 3-Way Displays: Taxonomy, Datasets, and Classification

jeanvdd 8 views 11 slides Sep 02, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 11
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11

About This Presentation



Paper presented at EICS 2024: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3660515.3661331
In the family of personal multi-display devices and environments, 3-way displays conveniently integrate into the conventional form factors of laptops and tablets, featuring both a central display area and two symmetricall...


Slide Content

Engineering Touchscreen Input for 3-Way Displays: Taxonomy, Datasets, and Classification Jean Vanderdonckt, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Arthur Sluÿters

Engineering Touchscreen Input for 3-Way Displays: Taxonomy, Datasets, and Classification Jean Vanderdonckt LouRIM Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Radu-Daniel Vatavu Machine Intelligence & Information Visualization Lab Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava , Romania Arthur Sluÿters LouRIM Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium

Introduction and Motivation The 3-way screen used in our study

5 Cross-device taxonomy: for GUIs only Source: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300792

6 Revisiting this taxonomy for gesture UIs Cross-device | Multi-device | Distributed Cross-display | Multi-display Multi-mobile 2-way MDEs Multi-monitor/screen Multi-slate/tablet Multi-display environment Cross-surface | Multi-surface | Trans-surface a b c d e Flipping gestures [45] Pull gestures [22] Across screens [22] Between screens [22] 3-way MDEs This paper Spatially-aware gestures [5,23] Spatially-agnostic gestures [23] Shortcut gestures [21] Motion gestures [26] Surface gestures [18,43] Spherical Gestures [33] Data-sharing gestures [6], Synchronous gestures [9,24], Connection gestures [12,14], Data transfer gestures [13], Auxiliary display [22], Cross-device Drag & Drop [31] Multi-touch [7], Swipe-hand open [22], Pick & Drop [25], Prevalent gestures [28], Multi-surface gestures [29] within across level of distribution Stitching gestures [10] Dexterous gestures [46] Object movement gestures [17], Cooperative gestures [17]

Second gesture elicitation study

8 Revisiting this taxonomy for gesture UIs Cross-device | Multi-device | Distributed Cross-display | Multi-display Multi-mobile 2-way MDEs Multi-monitor/screen Multi-slate/tablet Multi-display environment Cross-surface | Multi-surface | Trans-surface a b c d e Flipping gestures [45] Pull gestures [22] Across screens [22] Between screens [22] 3-way MDEs This paper Spatially-aware gestures [5,23] Spatially-agnostic gestures [23] Shortcut gestures [21] Motion gestures [26] Surface gestures [18,43] Spherical Gestures [33] Data-sharing gestures [6], Synchronous gestures [9,24], Connection gestures [12,14], Data transfer gestures [13], Auxiliary display [22], Cross-device Drag & Drop [31] Multi-touch [7], Swipe-hand open [22], Pick & Drop [25], Prevalent gestures [28], Multi-surface gestures [29] within across level of distribution Stitching gestures [10] Dexterous gestures [46] Object movement gestures [17], Cooperative gestures [17]

9 Resulting classification of gestures Single-tap gestures Multi-tap gestures Vertical swipes Horizontal swipes Geometrical shapes Symbolic shapes Stichting gestures Edge-center gestures Pinch-in center, pinch-out lateral In-out lateral gestures

10 Conclusion Cross-device taxonomy for stroke-gesture interaction 2 Gesture Elicitation Studies Taxonomy: 20 classes of stroke gestures Most important: lateral in/out, stichting gestures Limitations No mid-air gestures No study of fatigue effect on gesture production Gesture vocabulary depends on the application ( here , only IoT and MDE)

Thank you very much for your attention