Evaluating published research-research publication

Evaluating published research-research publication

1. Preview of Article Does the abstract intrigue me to read this article? Will it be useful to me? Who are the researchers? Are they credible and unbiased? What sources did the researchers use?

2. Major Components Title Abstract Introduction Literature Review Research Question Hypothesis Methodology Summary of Results Discussion & Conclusion References

3. Qualitative Research The research is conducted in the natural setting Is descriptive Researcher observes a specific situation Sometimes variables are manipulated, but not always Goal is to gain insight or identify key variables or ask new questions for further research

4. Quantitative Research Attempts to quantify key variables and relate them Variables are manipulated in some way (Called a treatment) Results are measured and analyzed statistically Goal is to identify cause-and-effect relationships

5. Quantitative Research

6. Title Is it specific? Is the nature of the research clear? Does it reflect the content of the article? Are the results accurately indicated? Are the main variables clear? Is the population clear?

7. Abstract Was the purpose clear? Was the methodology indicated? Were the populations and samples clearly identified? Did the the abstract highlight the findings?

8. Introduction Is the purpose made clear? Did the authors explain the significance of the study? (Do you agree?) Clearly written and well-organized?

9. Literature Review Does the review establish significance of the study? Does the review address the problem area? Is the review easy to read and understand? Is it balanced? Are the reviewed articles relevant and current? Is the review comprehensive? How credible are the cited sources? Most should be primary sources.

10. Types of Sources General references Primary sources Secondary sources

11. Research Question/Hypothesis Is it clearly stated? Is there a hypothesis? How well is it related to the other components? Is it ethical to ask? ?

12. Methodology Experimental Survey Correlation Factorial study Causal-Comparative Regression analysis

13. Methodology - Research Design Do the authors justify the design decisions? Did they discuss the limitations? Are variables identified? Dependent & independent. Are any external variables identified? Are those external variables controlled? Was the design appropriate?

14. Methodology - Samples Is the population identified? Are the samples representative of that population? How were the samples selected and will the techniques compromise the results? Can the information be generalized to the proposed population?

15. Methodology - Instruments What instruments were used to collect the data? Was the choice of instrument justified? Is evidence of reliability and validity provided? Were any limitations addressed?

16. Common Threats to Validity Subject Characteristics Mortality Location Instrument Maturation Regression Hawthorne Effect History Implementation

17. Methodology - Procedures Is the description of procedures robust? Are there any threats to validity due to the procedures discussed? Are you able to identify additional threats to validity? Are there any ethical issues in the procedures?

18. Summary of Results Are the results reported without any interpretation first? Are the results directly tied to the question, hypothesis or problem? Did the author provide enough detail for you to independently check the results? Is there enough description for you to interpret the results in context?

19. Discussion & Conclusion What are are the findings? Are they clearly stated? Are the findings related to the results of the study and the literature review? Any weaknesses or limitations? Did the authors make any statements about generalizability? Recommendations for future study?

20. References Are most references primary sources? How many citations are offered? Are the cited references recent? Based on the given info, can you find them for your own review?

21. Qualitative Very descriptive

22. Similarities to Quantitative Title Abstract Introduction Review of Literature

23. Research Problem Did the focus of the research shift? (That’s not bad) Was the shift justified? Did the researchers avoid a hypothesis at the start? What (if any) hypotheses were formed based on the data?

24. Samples Often purposive. The purpose should be identified. Accessibility is sometimes an important consideration. It should be named if it is/was a factor. Is there a detailed description of the sample?

25. Setting Is there a full rich description of the setting?

26. Researchers Are there biases that may interfere with the study? Was there interaction between the researcher and the participants? Or was the researcher only an observer? How were observers trained?

27. Data Collection Did the researchers use more than one way to observe the same phenomenon? Was there evidence of validity by triangulation? Was there any quantitative data? Frequency counts are common.

28. Procedures Should be the strongest section. Are procedures fully described? Are they appropriate? Are there any ethical concerns? Are there any threats to validity?

29. Data Analysis Is analysis in descriptive form? If so, is the description supported by the evidence? Is there any quantitative data? Is data provided for reader to review?

30. Results What were the reported results? Did the researcher form a hypothesis?

31. Discussion and Conclusions What conclusions did the researchers reach? What implications can be drawn from the research? Are there suggestions for further research? What limitations were mentioned?

32. Now what?

33. You might want to…. Use one of their suggestions for further research for your own topic Replicate a research study Cite the article in your own research Use the research design in your own work Pick up other ideas for your own research Read the cited articles

34. Sway Link https://sway.office.com/xS3vBI0HXq8Q8QQT?ref=Link