GAS TURBINE ENGINE
20
REFERENCE
1. Dr. R.K BANSAL Fluid Mechanics
2. Crouse GL, Leishman JG. 1992. Interactional aerodynamic effects on rotor performance
in hover and forward flight. Presented at Annu. Forum Am. Hel. Soc., 48th,Washington
D.C.
3. Crouse GL, Leishman JG. 1993. A new method for improved free-wake convergence in
hover and low-speed forward flight. Presented at Aerosp. Sci. Meet., 21st.
4. Desopper A, Lafon P, Ceroni P, Phillippe JJ. 1986. Ten years of rotor flow studies at
ONERA: state of the art and future studies. Proc. Annu. Forum Am. Hel. Soc.,
42nd,Washington, D.C.
5. Duque EPN, Dimanlig ACB. 1994. Navier- Stokes simulation of the AH-66
(Commanche) helicopter. Presented at Am. Hel. Soc. Aeromech. Spec. Conf., San
Francisco
6. Hafka, R. T., Scott, E. P., Cruz, J. R., “Optimization and Experiments: A Survey,”
Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 435 – 448, 1998.
7. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., Vecchi, M. P., “Optimization by Simulated Annealing,”
Science, vol. 220, pp. 671 – 680, 1983.
8. Trepanier, J. Y., Lepine, J. L., Pepin, F., “An Optimized Geometric Representation for
Wing Profiles Using NURBS,” Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, vol. 46, no. 1,
pp. 12 – 19, 2000.22
9. Wang, G., “Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design
Points,” Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design (in print), 2002.
10. Wang, G., Dong, Z., Aitchison, P., “Adaptive Response Surface Method – A Global
optimization Scheme for Approximation-based Design Problems,” Journal of
Engineering Optimization, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 707 – 734, 2001.