HendrixAntonniAmante
19 views
19 slides
Aug 20, 2024
Slide 1 of 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
About This Presentation
grade 8 groupe 2.pptx for school presentation
Size: 1.58 MB
Language: en
Added: Aug 20, 2024
Slides: 19 pages
Slide Content
welcome to england
The scientific industrial revolution in england
Laying the groundwork at Oxford Modern science began when mathematical models replaced abstract ideas of 'sympathies' and 'innate virtues' as ways of explaining how the world works, and how we might harness nature to enhance human power over it. Arab and Indian mathematics and science played an important part in laying the foundations for modern science, and major early figures came from mainland Europe and beyond. In Britain, scientific development reached its zenith in the second half of the 17th century, during the period known as the 'scientific revolution'.
The 'new philosophy'...emerged from the ivory towers of Oxford and Cambridge and started to make an impact on people's everyday lives. The foundation was laid for modern science in Britain long before the Polish mathematician Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) demonstrated a model of the universe in which the Earth and other planets revolved around the Sun. At Merton College, Oxford, Robert Grosseteste (1168-1253) and his student Roger Bacon (1219-1292) argued that geometry was the basis for comprehending the mysteries of nature, and that mathematical models provided our understanding of the world around us .
By the time Galileo, in Italy, announced that the Copernican system was more than merely a mathematical model, and that the earth 'really' moved around the sun, the 'new philosophy' had emerged from the ivory towers of Oxford and Cambridge, and started to make an impact on people's everyday lives.
The empire of man over things Sir Christopher Wren We may trace the birth of the so-called 'scientific revolution' in Britain to the activities of three influential figures, all of whom flourished around the year 1600, and all of whom belonged to an exclusive inner circle of advisers to the royal family of the day, Elizabeth I, James I, and above all James's eldest son Prince Henry (who died in adolescence ).
Robotic palletizers CONVENTIONAL PALLETIZER
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626), often called the 'Father' of modern science, made no major scientific discoveries himself, but wrote extensively on empirical scientific method - the procedures by which experimentalists could arrive at general laws governing the natural world. He served as Lord Chancellor under James I, but was disgraced in 1621 for accepting bribes from clients, and retired to his estate, where he published his major work, the Novum Organum (1623).
William Gilbert (1544-1603) was court physician to Elizabeth I and (briefly) to James I. In his 'De magnete ' [On the magnet] (1600), written ten years before Galileo published his 'Starry Messenger' (1610), Gilbert proposed that the earth was a giant magnet or lodestone, with its poles at either geographical pole. He argued that the earth rotated about its axis because of terrestrial magnetism.
By 1660, the 'new natural philosophy' had become a fashionable pursuit for gentlemen and commoners alike . Gilbert's and Harvey's classic publications matched Bacon's theoretical expectation that close and repeated observation of nature would yield powerful laws, on the basis of which dramatic alterations could be made to man's environment (though Bacon complained that Gilbert extended his generalisations about magnetism to explain the phenomena with rather too much enthusiasm). It is probably no accident that these three groundbreaking scientific thinkers came from a single intellectual milieu. The combined effect of their influential writings kick-started the scientific revolution in England
The Civil War (1642-9), and the execution of Charles I, led in England to the establishing of first a Commonwealth, and then a Protectorate, under Oliver Cromwell. Between 1650 and 1659, both the victorious parliamentarians and the defeated royalists turned enthusiastically to science and technology for its potential economic and social benefits. Collaborative data-collection, organisation of knowledge, and production of new practical outcomes played a major part in the agenda of the Commonwealth. Royalists in retirement on their country estates, meanwhile, turned to intellectual pastimes in search of money-making initiatives to relieve their financial difficulties. By 1660, when Charles II, who had himself dabbled in chemistry and become fascinated with clock mechanisms during his exile, returned, the 'new natural philosophy' had become a fashionable pursuit for gentlemen and commoners alike.
Among those active in the Society in the early years were some of the major figures in British science: Robert Boyle (1627-91), Robert Hooke (1635-1703), Sir Christopher Wren (1632-1723), and Sir William Petty (1623-87). Boyle's experiments with his vacuum pump were central to the Society's programme of weekly experiments, presided over by Hooke, the Society's first Curator of Experiments. Wren's and Petty's contributions spanned an extraordinarily wide range of technologically driven discoveries, from detailed observation of the progress of comets, to attempts at blood transfusion from one large dog to another
In 1675 the Royal Observatory was established at Greenwich, and the talented astronomer John Flamsteed (1646-1719) appointed the first Astronomer Royal. Paid for with military money, the Observatory's explorations of the heavens using state-of-the-art telescopes and instruments were intended to put Britain ahead of France in the race to solve the problem of finding a way of measuring longitude at sea. Among those closely associated with charting the heavens over the next 25 years were Edmond Halley (1656-1742) and Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) . Newton, who emerged from scholarly near-reclusiveness at Trinity College, Cambridge, in the 1690s, to become Master of the Royal Mint (assuring the reliability of English coinage), and President of the Royal Society in 1703, now stands as a figurehead for British scientific achievement. His Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1687), in whose data- collection and computations fellow Royal Society members - including Wren and Halley - played a significant part, set science on its modern course (although few contemporaries understood it) .
The roots of industrialisation Long-term, however, 17th-century advances in microscopy, medicine, chemistry and biology have probably been as important as Newton's laws of motion, and the development of precision instruments placed Britain in the forefront of specialist equipment-making (a field in which Wren and Hooke were particularly active). This kind of mass-produced new technology looked set to make the fortune of the inventor and patent-holder, and as a result, the smooth collaboration amongst members of the Royal Society (and their cooperation with foreign members abroad) was regularly marred by ugly priority and patent disputes. These indicate the growing tension between the 'group' model of science (Bacon's dream of Solomon's house) and the individual, 'virtuoso' model. Britain's rapid industrialisation ... confirmed the importance of science in driving the economy.
By 1700 there were scientific institutions across Britain, and a commitment to science as the firm basis for success in commerce and industry, and for national prosperity, was an established plank in the political agenda. Britain's rapid industrialisation over the next century, and its domination of world trade, confirmed the importance of science in driving the economy. With the inevitable increasing professionalism of science, the success of the activities of the gentlemen amateurs who had founded the Royal Society, and who had always been regarded with some amusement by the public at large, looked increasingly irrelevant. However, the patterns of group activity, documenting and corroborating experimental results, and public dissemination of outcomes (including publication in science-dedicated journals), which the Society established, set lastingly important standards for scientific practice. In the long run, these standard protocols and procedures may turn out to have left a more lasting legacy than 'discoveries' made by individual scientist-members.
THANK YOU
GROUP 2 LEADER:JULIETH MANGOMPIT ASSISTANT:MARIA FAITH ARONG MEMBERS ARBIE MAINAR EDRIAN KAAMINO JINKY FRANZA REYNALOU GARCENIS MIA ROSE ENCARNACION MITCHEL DELACALSADA JOHN BENEDICT BAGARES ACMAD MACATUMAN