Group 2 (Microsoft).pptx have js Jr sh u

Hope you learn something.

1. Slide Pilot: An Artificial Intelligence Tool For Creating PowerPoint Presentation

2. Background Of The Study The problem of creating a Slide Presentation is not a new issue among the teachers. However the rise of ICT and Artificial Intelligence Generated Tool (AI) can brought a new opportunity to the teachers which can contribute in creating Slide Presentation.

3. The World Economic Forum (2021) states that the use of technology has made teaching more accessible and it can also help them to manage their responsibility easier . Background Of The Study

4. The researchers want to study the Artificial Intelligence Generated Tool. This study can help not only the student but specifically the teachers. The researchers want to explore the different Artificial Intelligence Generated Tool (AI) generated tool like Slide Pilot that can help them in creating Slide Presentation. Background Of The Study

5. Technology has been given an opportunity to make the education easier specifically to the teachers that have to teach there studen ts . This study can help them to be prepared and make their work easier than before. Background Of The Study

6. The study seeks to answer the following specific questions: 1. Is there a significant difference in creating a PowerPoint Presentation in traditional way using the data that is collected through pre-test?
2. Is there a significant difference in the data that is collected using the post-test in creating a PowerPoint Presentation using the AI Generated Tool called Slide Pilot?
3. Is there a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test in the experiences of the teachers in Creating PowerPoint Presentation? Statement Of The Problem

7. Significance Of The Study The findings of this study can be useful to various school departments, including student, school staff, and specifically teachers. 1. Teachers can apply the effective strategies to handle their work easier, which can lead to a more productive teaching environment. Another, the study can inform the design of educational needs at promoting technology.

8. 2. School Staff can use the knowledge gained from this study to help them to improve their skills in using advanced technology and leading to a better performance, and a more positive attitude towards their work. Significance Of The Study

9. 3. Students can also apply the effective strategies to improve their skills in using technology, which can lead to a better learning environment in the school, and a better academic performance. Significance Of The Study

10. Scope and Delimitation The researcher s want to conduct pre-test and post-test using the liker t -scale method and this study will be conduct in Senior High School teachers in different strand in President Elpidio Quirino National High School.

11. This study was to be conducted on 10 teachers in President Elpidio Quirino National High School. Teachers at the age of 26-38 years old were involved. Scope and Delimitation

12. CHAPTER II Methodology

13. Research Design The researcher wanted to use a Pre-test and Post-test control group, which is one of the types of experimental research design. The researcher wanted to utilize a quantitative approach to measure the technical abilities of the teachers using Pre-tests and Post-tests before and after the intervention.n .

14. Research Design This study also explored the factors that influence the relationship between AI Generated Tool and Teachers, such as creating a PowerPoint Presentation in the fastest way, and the purpose of the AI Generated Tool used.

15. The Sample This study was conducted among different teachers at President Elpidio Quirino National High School to explore their different thoughts about their difficulties in creating PowerPoint Presentations.

16. The Sample The inclusion criteria for the sample are: (1) Teachers in President Elpidio Quirino National High School, (2) aged between 24-36 years old, (3) have a little experience in using AI Generated Tool.

17. The Instrument(s) The pre-test and post-test that were to be used in this study were developed by the researcher based on a review of literature on AI Generated Tool in education. They included items on the duration and purpose of AI Generated Tool used, the type and quality of AI Generated Tool, and the perceived benefits and challenges of using AI Generated Tool.

18. Research Hypothesis The researcher had a possible outcomes for this study.
• H0: There is no significant difference between the outcome of AI Generated Tool (Slide Pilot) and the traditional way using the Microsoft software in creating PowerPoint Presentation. H1: There is a significant difference between the outcome of AI Generated Tool (Slide Pilot) and the traditional way using the Microsoft software in creating PowerPoint Presentation.

19. Data Collection Procedure First, obtaining the permission from the teachers that would serve as the respondents of this study. Second, gathering the samples using convenience and quota sampling. Third, administering the Pre-test and Post-test to different teachers. It was taken at their convenient time.

20. Fourth, providing instructions on how to access and use the type of AI generated tool that would be used. Sixth, administering the questionnaires to know the opinions and the experiences of the teachers while using the given AI generated tool in creating their PowerPoint Presentation. Lastly, collecting the data and storing them correctly. Data Collection Procedure

21. The data collected from the pre-test and post-test by a crucial way of creating PowerPoint Presentations, the questionnaire on AI generated tool used, and the questionnaire on ethical issues related to AI generated tool were analyzed using different statistical methods. Plan for Data Analysis

22. CHAPTER III Results and Discussion

23. Table 1. (The experience of the teachers using the traditional way of creating PowerPoint Presentation)

24. Results Based on the results below, almost half (47%) of the teachers that are chosen as respondent of this study are experiencing the related problems in creating PowerPoint Presentation while the others (2%) are Strongly Disagreed.

25. Discussion Based on the researcher findings below, some of the teachers that create a PowerPoint Presentation in traditional or using the Microsoft app have a good neither bad experience.

26. Table 2. (The experience of the teachers using the Slide Pilot in creating PowerPoint Presentation)

27. Results Based on the results below, almost (32%) of the teachers of this study has a good experience in creating PowerPoint Presentation using the AI tool called Slide Pilot while the remaining teachers (2%) has a bad experience in using the AI tool.

28. Discussion Based on the researcher findings there are some teachers that has a good experience in creating PowerPoint Presentation using the AI tool called Slide Pilot but the others had experience some issues about this AI tool. Almost of the teachers in President Elpidio Quirino National High School had gained more technical skills and they are more productive in creating their PowerPoint Presentation.

29. Table 3. (The difference between the experience of the teachers using the traditional way and Slide Pilot in creating PowerPoint Presentation)

30. Results Based on the results above, there is a big difference between the pre-test and the post-test of the teachers. The pre-test shown above that there is almost half of the population of the teachers is most likely agreed about the effectiveness of the Microsoft app, on the other side not all the teachers are agreed on the effectiveness of the AI tool called the Slide Pilot in creating PowerPoint Presentation.

31. Discussion However, there is a difference between the outcome of AI Generated Tool (Slide Pilot) and the traditional way using the Microsoft software in creating PowerPoint Presentation. Based on the researcher findings there are some teachers that has a good experience in creating PowerPoint Presentation using the traditional way or using the Microsoft app than the use of AI tool called Slide Pilot in creating a PowerPoint Presentation.

32. CHAPTER IV Conclusion and Recommendation

33. Conclusion This study aimed to examine the effective AI Generated Tool that teachers can use in creating Slide Presentation that can be helpful to there teaching environment, the difficulties they face on creating Slide Presentations, and the strategies they use to overcome these challenge.

34. Conclusion Some of the teachers have previous experience generating PowerPoint presentations in the traditional manner using the Microsoft software. However, in some situations, this approach can generate significant problems, such as the time spent in creating the presentation, which is one of the most prevalent problems that teachers face.

35. The use of the AI tool (Slide Pilot) in the teaching activities of teachers is also a useful tool in generating PowerPoint presentations. However, there are some issues that the user may meet, such as access to the features (themes and font style) of this AI tool. Conclusion

36. Conclusion Their is no significant difference in the results of using AI to create PowerPoint presentations and from those of using traditional methods. A few of the differences include the final product, the amount of time needed, and the potential presentation design.

37. 1. Future researchers could look at the successful AI Generated Tool that teachers can use in their classrooms, as well as various approaches for employing this AI Tool and the potential outcomes of using the Slide Pilot to create PowerPoint presentations. Recommendations

38. 2. Future researchers could also assess the usefulness of various ways for assisting teachers in overcoming the hurdles of generating slide presentations and improving their technological skills. Recommendations

39. Recommendations 3. Future researchers should broaden the scope of the study to include additional useful ways for creating PowerPoint Presentations to assist students, particularly teachers at President Elpidio Quirino National High School and other schools that will benefit from this AI Tool.

40. Researcher’s Capalaran, Carl Jansen C. Calub , Charles Lester J. Mendoza, Ezekiel F. Terrado , Denver Klyd R. Rivera, Sebastian V.