Hot Topics and Hotboxing: Latest Research on Cannabis Inhalation
MarkusRoggen
297 views
34 slides
Aug 21, 2024
Slide 1 of 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
About This Presentation
Cannabis testing focuses on harm reduction, by testing for unwanted pesticides, heavy metals and biological contamination. Additionally, cannabinoid levels are measured in the product.
Although these final product tests miss one important aspect of cannabis consumption: the actual process of consum...
Cannabis testing focuses on harm reduction, by testing for unwanted pesticides, heavy metals and biological contamination. Additionally, cannabinoid levels are measured in the product.
Although these final product tests miss one important aspect of cannabis consumption: the actual process of consumption. For inhalable products, like joints and vape cartridges, the dosing of cannabinoids and chemical changes during burning/vaporization are mostly unknow.
We have developed a testing platform to quantify cannabinoid and terpene levels on a puff per puff basis. This setup also allows us to screen the aerosol and gas phase for potential toxicants present. We also looked at cannabinoid consumed, how those compare between joints and vapes, and how those levels change over the lifecycle of a product.
In this talk we will present our findings from our latest vape and joint experiment and answer the longstanding question: Which part of a joint is the best to smoke? Are kief-rolled joints better? And will an oil-infused joint get you higher?
Size: 30.09 MB
Language: en
Added: Aug 21, 2024
Slides: 34 pages
Slide Content
Hot Topics and Hotboxing: Latest Research on Cannabis Inhalation Dr. Korey Bedard, The University of British Columbia Dr. Markus Roggen , Controlled Chemistry ACS Fall 2024, Denver
Summary Introductions Joints are on Fire Meet KARL Smoking Research so far Initial Research into Infused Joints What’s Next?
Who are We? Controlled Chemistry is a research venture that seeks to add fundamental scientific insight to the field of cannabis production. We focus on cannabis chemistry at the intersection of academic and industry questions, with the support of staff and resources at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver: Process Design Process Optimization Process Analytics Formulation Research
Who is Korey Bedard ? Academic Upbringing: 2012-Present HBSc . in Biochemistry : Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada PhD. in Chemistry (Organic) : Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada with Dr. Tomáš Hudlický MITACS Postdoctoral Fellowship : The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada with Dr. Glenn Sammis , collaborating with: Dr. Marco Ciufolini , NanoVation Therapeutics Dr. Anthony Phillips, Resilience BioSciences Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) LinkedIn
Who is Markus Roggen ? Academic Upbringing: 2004 to 2014 M/Sci in Chemistry : Imperial College (IC), London, UK PhD in Organic Chemistry : Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich, CH with Prof. Dr. Erick Carreira PostDoc in Physical Organic Chemistry : The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI), San Diego, USA with Prof. Dr. Donna Blackmond Now into Drugs (Cannabis): 2014 to present CSO of analytical laboratory, VP of Extraction and Production, Founder/CEO/CSO of R&D laboratory LinkedIn
Following the Smoke Signs R&D inspired by what the consumer wants.
Joints are on Fire Pre-Rolls sales USA: 3 rd after Flower, Vapor Pens CAN: 2 nd after Flower Sales growth vastly outperforming other products Most popular subsegments: ‘Hybrid - Single Strain’ ‘Connoisseur/Infused’ Demographics of Pre-Rolls: Wide appeal to different consumer groups Slight preference among women Headset
Pre-Rolls are Lighting Up Headset’s report on Pre-Rolls: “Massive success” 3rd in USA, 2nd in CAN
Joints are on Fire Overachievers: ‘Connoisseur/Infused’ Growth! 6 % of market share, early 2022 35 % by August 2023 Mixed Strain
Joints are on Fire
The Joint is lit, but we are still in the Dark Overview of current cannabis smoking research
Aerosol Sample Generation Using a Smoke Cycle Simulator (SCS) from Cambustion Aerosols from three puffs collected on glass microfiber filters Three smoking “zones” of the joint: beginning, middle, and end
Aerosol Sample Collection Using a Smoke Cycle Simulator Aerosols from three puffs collected on glass microfiber filters Volatile compounds, i.e. terpenes and toxicants caught in impinger
Chemical Properties of a Joint Average smoke temp.: 44˚C (111˚F) (lit.) THC boiling point: 155-157˚C at 0.05 mmHg Myrcene boiling point: 167˚C at 1 atm Humulene boiling point: 106˚C at 5 mmHg Full decarboxylation of THCA observed DOI: 10.1089/can.2021.0173
Inconsistent THC Delivery THC inhalation builds throughout consumption Highest delivery at end of a joint’s lifecycle Captured by impinger, per section DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0123 1/3 2/3 3/3
Smoke Signs On-line puff-by-puff analysis of smoke constituents Direct injection into qTOF Samples from Germany, mixed with tobacco 83% consumer cannabis together with tobacco 1.7% use vaporizers
Effect of Particle Size on THC Delivery Fine grind: More THC per puff Coarse grind: More THC per Pre-Roll Highest delivery at end of a joint Article
Infused: Same, but Different We wanted to investigate how Infused Pre-Rolls stack up: R&D samples for various types 1 g Standard (Flower-only) 1 g with Kief 1 g with Distillate More in upcoming paper
Infused: Same, but Different Infused Pre-Rolls deliver! Kief-containing: 160% THC Distillate-containing: 340% THC
Infused: Same, but Different Infused Pre-Rolls deliver! Kief-containing: 160% THC Distillate-containing: 340% THC There is a problem!!! Infused Pre-Rolls CoA Kief 108% THC Distillate 155% THC
Infused: Same, but Different Extraction Efficiency! Infused Pre-Rolls deliver! Kief-containing: 160% THC Distillate-containing: 340% THC There is a problem!!! Infused Pre-Rolls CoA Kief 108% THC Distillate 155% THC
Infused: Same, but Different Infused Pre-Rolls deliver! But not on a per-puff basis! Infused Pre-Rolls burn slower
Infused: Same, but Different Infused Pre-Rolls deliver! But not on a per-puff basis! Infused Pre-Rolls burn slower Tobacco research: Oils have higher energy density Modifies combustion characteristics Infusion -> superior heat absorption & retention Increased viscosity -> slower, more controlled burn
Infused: Same, but Different Infused Pre-Rolls deliver! More THC (~3.4x) More Terpenes (>4x) More flavor Different flavors Consumer preference
Toxicants of Cannabis Smoke & Vape Based on work by Prof. Strongin and others, we know: Cannabis smoke extract leads to inflamed lung fibroblasts, in vitro THC and terpenes degrade to including isoprene, 2-methyl-2-butene, 3-methylcrotonaldehyde, and 3-methyl-1-butene Other compounds of concern: methacrolein, benzene, butyraldehyde Cannabis joints emit fewer carbonyls per puff than tobacco cigarettes So many to choose from… DOIs: 10.1089/can.2020.0039, 10.3389/fphar.2022.852029, 10.1021/acsomega.7b01130, 10.1039/d1ra00934f
Infused & Toxicants: It’s Complicated We focus on: Aniline Styrene 3-Methoxycatechol 4-Formylbenzonitrile
Infused & Toxicants: It’s Complicated What happens in Distillate Pre-Rolls: Aniline: Same Styrene 3-methoxycatechol 4-formylbenzonitrile
Infused & Toxicants: It’s Complicated What happens in Distillate Pre-Rolls: Aniline: Same Styrene: More 3-methoxycatechol: More 4-formylbenzonitrile
Infused & Toxicants: It’s Complicated What happens in Distillate Pre-Rolls: Aniline: Same Styrene: More 3-methoxycatechol: More 4-formylbenzonitrile: Less
Let’s talk about Puff Profiles Cigarettes: FTC method in 1967, ISO 3308 standard in 1980s, but: Doesn’t accurately reflect real-life smoking U nderestimates real-life exposures due to individual variations & compensation behaviors DOIs: 10.1007/s00213-011-2480-4, 10.1089/can.2017.0024
Let’s talk about Puff Profiles Cigarettes: FTC method in 1967, ISO 3308 standard in 1980s, but: Doesn’t accurately reflect real-life smoking U nderestimates real-life exposures due to individual variations & compensation behaviors We use a method modified from a Health Canada 2014 method, but: Self-reported doses not reliable (overestimate) Greater intensity in initial puffs (larger volumes, longer durations) S teady decline in intensity over subsequent puffs DOIs: 10.1007/s00213-011-2480-4, 10.1089/can.2017.0024