In Mold Labeling Technology "IML"

In-Mold Labeling Technology and Trends presentation by StackTeck Inc. (2014) entitled "In Mold Labelling Technology IML".

1. In Mold Labelling Technology “IML” 2013

2. Typical IML Project Scope Design of parts & label outlines Pilot/Prototyping and pre-production runs IML mold & IML robotics System integration: Supplier collaboration S ystem integration at StackTeck T raining at StackTeck Field integrations Many product launch successes!

3. Strengths in IML (In Mold Labeling) Fully automated high speed systems High volume system capabilities increasing Low volume system flexibility improving Advantages of IML packaging: Excellent quality graphics Finished goods – reduced inventory Versatility of small production runs

4. Trends in IML Part Focus Increased visual statement Enhanced molded features & colors Expanding range of package types Improved cost effectiveness Greater complexity of part & label(s) System Focus Increasing system flexibility Greater simplicity for low volume Improved tools for system design

5. IML Case Study – 56 oz. TE Container

6. Diagram “C” Traditional IML Cup

7. Traditional IML Cup

8. Large Corner Radius for improved drop impact and conveying on filler Dairy Container

9. IML Case Study – 56 oz. TE Container

10. Unique elliptical shape Tamper resistant Optimal scooping Major US launch Product Launch Successes

11. Unique handle Optimal volume use New label feature to show flavour Cost effective 1-sided wrap-around front label Major US launch 2009 Product Launch Successes

12. 2009 IMDA Award Winner

13. 2009 IMDA Award Winner

14. 2010 IMDA Award Winner

15. 2010 IMDA Award Winner

16. 2010 IMDA Award Winner

17. Pack Expo Award Winner, ‘Q-Line’

18. Plastic Part Design Innovations Expanding range of applications Technical hurdles are being overcome New approaches for cost effectiveness Complementary features to enhance IML

19. 56 Oz. Packaging

20. 4.5 Quart Package

21. Duo Cup

22. 6 Oz. Cup with Cut-In-Place Labels

23. Flex IML Cells

24. Modular approach Mold frame vs. molding inserts Automatic alignment Automatic connection of services Minimum changeover time Flexible Tooling Approach QPC – Quick Product Change

25. Flexible System for Small Volumes Typically single or dual cavity Standardized multi-axis robot used Simplest possible mandrel and magazine Small format makes for flexible changeover

26. IML Pilot System

27. 32/64 oz 1 Cavity IML Flex Cell

28. 32/64 oz 1 Cavity IML Flex Cell

29. 32/64 oz 1 Cavity IML Flex Cell

30. Boxer - Counter Boxing of products inline Only inspected parts Product never been touched Contamination kept to the minimum 600 x 310 x 600 standard size box 665 x 340 x 301 special size box

31. 32/48/64 Cavity Closure Flex Cell Options In line vision inspection In line laser etching In line printing Counting and boxing