5. Conclusions
In this paper, a review on the recent development in integration of IT into routine
geotechnical design/analysis process is given with emphasis on the GIS application. A
technique that combines the artificial neural network (ANN), the numerical analysis,
and the GIS is then introduced for use in routine geotechnical design. The proposed
approach involves the development of ANNs using a calibrated finite element model(s)
for use as a prediction tool and the use of GIS for visualization and analysis of spatial
distribution of the predicted results. A novel feature of the proposed approach is an
ability to expedite routine geotechnical design processes that otherwise require
significant time and effort in performing a series of numerical analyses for different
design scenarios. Two illustrative examples are given, in which the concept and details
of the proposed approach and its practical use in typical geotechnical design are
illustrated; one for an urban tunnelling design project and the other for a soft ground
improvement design project.
It is demonstrated that ANNs, when generalized using the results of FEA, can
make tunneling performance and consolidated related predictions with comparable
degrees of accuracy to that of FEA, but with a minimal effort. It is also demonstrated
that the integrated GIS-ANN approach can be effectively used as a decision making
tool in routine geotechnical design works
References
[1]Abaqus users manual-version 6.7, Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Pawtucket, Providence, R.I. 2006.
[2] N.O. Atto-Okine, Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Methods in Pavement and Geomechanical
Systems, Proc. Int. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Methods in Pavement and
Geomechanical Systems, Florida, USA, Balkema, 1998.
[3] G. Beer, Numerical simulation in tunnelling, Springer, New York, 2003.
[4] Z.T. Bieniawski, Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, Wiley, New York. 1989.
[5]Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). Getting to know ArcGIS desktop, 2
nd
Ed., Redland,
Calif. 2004.
[6] H. Demuth, M. Beale, Neural Network Toolbox User’s Guide, The Mathworks Inc., Natic, USA, 1997.
[7]GEODATA Geoengineering Consultants. Website, 2010.
[8] E. Grimstad and N. Barton, Updating of the Q-system for NMT. Proc. International Symposium on
Sprayed Concrete, Fagernes, Norway, (1993), 46-66.
[9] H. Netzel and F.J. Kallberg, Numerical damage risk assessment studies on masonry structures due to
TBM-tunnelling in Amsterdam, Proceedings Geotechnical Aspects on Underground Construction in
Soft Ground, Tokyo, Japan, (1999), 235244.
[10] M.P. O'Reilly, B.M. New. Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdon-their magnitude and
prediction.Proc. Tunnelling '82, Inst. Mining & Metallurgy, London. (1982), 173-188.
[11] R.B. Peck, Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground. State of the Art Report, Proc. 7th Int. Conf.
SMFE, Mexico City, State of the Art Volume. (1969), 225-290.
[12] M. Xie, T. Esaki, G. Zhou, and Y. Mitani, Geographical Information Systems-Based Three-Dimensional
Critical Slope Stability Analysis and Landslide Hazard Assessment, Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering,129 (12), 2003, 1109-1118.
[13] M. Xie, T. Esaki, and M. Cai, GIS-BAsed Implementation of Three-Dimensional Limit Equilibrium
Approach of Slope Stability, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,132 (5),
(2006), 656-660.
[14] C. Yoo, Y.W. Jeon and B.S. Choi, IT-based tunnelling risk management system (IT-TURISK) –
Development and implementation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,21(2) (2006), 190-
202.
[15] C. Yoo and J.H. Kim, A Web-based tunnelling-induced building/utility damage assessment system:
TURISK. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,18(5) (2003), 497-511.
C. Yoo / Integration of IT into Routine Geotechnical Design 35
Information Technology in Geo-Engineering : Proceedings of the 1st International Conference (ICITG) Shanghai, edited by D. G. Toll,
Copyright © 2010. IOS Press, Incorporated. All rights reserved.