Integrated basement floor design

Description and choice for the integrated basement floor for project Terminal A Schiphol

1. www.abt.eu





Terminal A - Integrated basement floor

2. KL AIR / integrated basement floor
Content
2
3 main design principles:
Description, examples and comparison
Comparison and choice for KL AIR
Questions and dialogue

3. water
pressure
underwater concrete floor
(UCF)
tension piles
retaining
wall
strut
Building stage
strut force
(compression)

4. Final stage
underwater concrete floor
(UCF)

in traditional design no
permanent function
permanent
basement
structure

5. bouw definitieve
constructie
Final stage

6. 3 basement floor principles
Traditional building method:












-Unreinforced UCF for temporary function
-Reinforced concrete floor for permanent
function
-Applied in many projects
(also with SFRUCF)

Integrated basement floor:
















-For the permanent function the steel
fibre reinforced UCF (SFRUCF) is
collaborating with a traditional
reinforced concrete floor
-Applied within 3 projects
Permanent SFRUCF:
















-SFRUCF has a temporary and a
permanent function
-Under investigation by ABT and
committee of SBRCURnet/CROW
-Not yet applied in practice

7. Traditional building method
unreinforced UCF
with temporary
function
reinforced floor
with permanent
function

8. P-Campusplein (VU Amsterdam)
unreinforced UCF
with temporary
function

9. Mauritshuis The Hague
SFRUCF with
temporary function

10. Groninger Forum
SFRUCF with
temporary function

11. SFRUCF with
temporary function
Traditional building method with SFRUCF

12. Project Location Year Basement floor principle
Potzdammerplatz Berlin 1997 Traditional building method
Onderdoorgang Heinoseweg Tilburg 2001 Traditional building method
2001: Eerste publicatie CUR-aanbeveling 77
Ontvangstschacht Botlekspoortunnel Rotterdam 2004 Traditional building method
Muziekpaleis Utrecht 2010 Traditional building method
Nieuwbouw Agrifirm Kampen 2013 Traditional building method
Ondergrondse uitbreiding Mauritshuis The Hague 2013 Traditional building method
Groninger Forum Groningen 2014 Traditional building method
2014: Herziene versie CUR-aanbeveling 77
Lammermarkt Leiden 2015 Traditional building method
Onderdoorgang langzaam verkeer Zevenaar 2016 Integrated basement floor
Strandhotel Cadzand-Bad Cadzand 2016 Semi integrated?
Parking garage Albert Cuyp Amsterdam 2016 Integrated basement floor
Dry dock Royal Van Lent Amsterdam 2018 Integrated basement floor
Projects with SFRUCF

13. SFRUCF collaborates
with a traditional
reinforced concrete floor
Integrated basement floor

14. Onderdoorgang Zevenaar
integrated
basement
floor

15. Onderdoorgang Zevenaar
integrated
basement
floor

16. Albert Cuyp garage
integrated
basement
floor

17. Albert Cuyp garage
integrated
basement
floor

18. Albert Cuyp garage
integrated
basement
floor

19. Droogdok Royal Van Lent
integrated
basement
floor

20. Droogdok Royal Van Lent
integrated
basement
floor

21. SFRUCF has a
temporary and a
permanent function
Permanent SFRUCF

22. Comparison
See previous slides for comparison:
- strength and stiffness,
- risk of leakage
- need for permanent retaining wall

To the right a general comparison:
•carbon footprint (green)
•direct building costs (blue)
Note:
Comparison for the floor only. Effects on foundation
(piles) and building pit are not taken into account.

only
possible
for shallow
basements
(no UCF)

23. Water tightness  crack width control (case Albert Cuyp)
Comparison
Albert Cuyp:
Integrated
basement
floor
Albert Cuyp:
Traditional
building
method
6,3 18,3
Albert Cuyp: traditional:
integrated:

24. Aspect
Traditional
building method
Integrated
basement floor
Permanent UCF
Excavation depth - 0 0
Innovation risks ++ + --
Risk of leakage - 0 --
Foundation capacity (piled-raft-foundation) 0 ++ +
Foundation flexibility 0 ++ 0
Building costs (including foundation) -- 0 +
Building time -- - +
Sustainability - 0 ++
Costs for permanent retaining wall No Advisable Yes
Comparison and choice for KL AIR
Note:
A permanent soilretaining wall
is assumed to be necessary for
this project.

25. More information:


Ruud Arkesteijn
[email protected]
[phone]
LinkedIn.com/ruudarkesteijn

Blogs on www.ABT.eu (in Dutch)
Articles in Civiele techniek and Geotechniek (in Dutch)
25