IP Procurement Conference Part II-Reassembly.pdf

In Part I we accomplished an Overview of the Project and its Test Requirements. Part II is the Reassembly of the Project to test its goal strength in the new product certification and assembly. Part III will redirect the Product to its End User and the new conveyance requirements. And finally in Part IV we will Reconvene the IP Procurement Process in its Glass Conference to define how bidding and new product acquisition will be managed. Media is a huge IP consideration.
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/comments-on-ip-procurement-conference-part-ii-pdf/270279959

1. Glass Conference
IP Procurement &
Development
•BAKO Lam CERTIFICATION
MDIA
BAKO Lam
Certification Results
Contents
V1 Fenestration, Auto/Façade, Home/Interiors
V2 Intellectual Property
V3 Construction Means and Methods
“We are preparing to sign the agreements,”
Alex Marcus
2035
1
Paper #2
4 Separate
papers on Glass
FUTURES
Arrangement

2. 7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 2
City or State
Sponsors
Glass Institute
Supply Chain Model
The Goal of Part II: Reassembly, considers the
Supply Chain and Due Diligence aspects of the
work to develop the Glass Conference and to
arrange a Partner Agreement in appropriate
stages and to Finalize the Agreement.
We need to study the likely demand versus the portal
volume and dimensional requirements and value the
outcome
Apply new outcomes to financial portfolios and
compare the outcome for the profitability and
distributive value of the value-added strategy
Assess the results of synergy and reciprocity
1
2
3
Complete the mapping requirements4
5
Go to Part III: Redirect
PRE
To Finalize Due
Diligence
To Finalize Supply
Chain
3SYN
2
REP
1
DMD
4
MAP

3. 7/16/2024
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
3
Fees
Terms of Preliminary
Agreement
Terms OperationalFinancial
Legal Partners
Preliminary
Financial
IP Encryption
1.Soft Demand
2.Some Unproven Technology
3.Pre-Production Financial
4.Portal Assimilations of new
products rely on Installer’s Group
5.Test Plan not yet complete (Test
Plan not shown)
Design
Reason for Pending
Pending PendingCollectingCollectingTerms Shown
Terms of Agreement subject to Test Plan Outcomes
All Officers have
litigation immunity
except for criminal
acts or misconduct
Double ReviewDouble Review
Agreement can take 3 – 5 years to complete
Due Diligence
Portal size?
Gate Fee Instances
P
PRE

4. TEST PLAN
1. Final Certs 2. Glass Delivery
3. City Portal and Remote
To
Do
MV
V
7/16/2024
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 4
P
PRE

5. Mapping
Requirements
•While configuring the remaining
requirements we should keep in the
mind the lens commitment date of
8/22/2035 which will impact BAKO and
also find those significant metrics that
will ensure a positive response to drive
a retail response (new customers). An
early review of the lens may save
problems later.
•We are going to estimate the supply
chain developed in this process from
the simulation but as the actual supply
chain will reconstruct, the monitoring
of the results will instruct the process.
•Using a competent Demand
assessment of the TEST 1 facts of all
known customers in the Resource Pool
we will accomplish a well- defined
portal demand ratio.
10 yrs. ending 8/22/2035
8 yrs. ending 11/26/2051
8 yrs. ending 2/1/2062
4 yrs. ending 6/3/2027
Lens Commitment Dates
Appendix I
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 5
Demand Test, Slide 7
4MAP
P
PRE
Part I Part II
Part III
Part IV

6. ORG DOCUMENT
Legacy Engineering
Prize Winning Partners
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 6
4MAP

7. Secant Math Attribution
•The Importance of Secant Math is to also arrive at that
join relationship in the attribution of a virtual object.
•The instance meets the demand requirement by its
differential equal to the push requirement, and that
labor thruput when added supplies the natural tan line.
•When we then apply the Secant (S) and Tan (T) functions,
we arrive at a square pi join between the secant delivery
and the tan hypotenuse.
Since we are now sure
that we can adjust the
statistical IM fact by a
secant differential,
we are more positive of
achieving the required
outcome. Secant
Engineering will be
used in the portal.
S(f)
S(f)
T(f)
T(f)
X 8
X 2
More on Secant Eng in Part III
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 7
Demand Test
Portal IM 509.46025970- BAKO IM 509.27955=.1807097
BAKO IM 509.0391 + .24045 = 509.27955
BAKO Product Test Data subset for ANOVA
Fig. 1
Fig. 3a
Fig-F1
1DMD
PRE
Fig-F2
PRE PRE
Rose Pattern
supplies good
secant relationship

8. Demand and Capacity
Management
7/16/2024
8
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
•See Appendix I for details
Pillar
construction is
later example
2
REP
Fig-F3
Fig-
F4a
Fig-F3- G
Fig-F4
Fig-F3-Ga

9. Portal Products
•Portal Products produce synergy
because they outpace the usual
spintronic method gaining
resource from the energy star.
•Customer Demand information
begins to outpace the proforma
BAKO Lam product theory that
constructed the first round of
diligence for Testing.
•Learning to construct columns,
pillars and beams is one of the
more difficult portal tasks in
constructing instances. This is
not demonstrated here.
However, David Marcus will still
need LIFT certification for the
process itself. The Gate and
Simulations will require it.
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 9
X 8
X 2
13.48868
-13.48454376
=.0041363
6.74434
-6.742271882
=.00206812
Synergy
LIFT
Fig-F1
See next
82
3SYN
P
PRE
PRE
Fig-F6
Demand
X 2
See Slide 16
Portal Proof, Slide 16

10. BAKO LAM FINAL STATEMENT (Gate Fee)
7/16/2024
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
10
Fig. 6
Fig. 3a
13.48868
-13.48454376
=.0041363
6.74434
-6.742271882
=.00206812
Differences in
Diligence
arguments
indicates
predicated
results
515ok
ok
ok
ok
Reassembly has caused only small changes to the Scrum Performance Statement, but the algorithm is much improved. This statement is not the full performance of BAKO LAM products but only the Gate Fee and resource attribution.
The Gate Rate is
acceptable as is.
The Margin,
Transition and
Transom cover the
remainder.
22REP
Fig-F3
Fig-F7

11. The product must be
recognized in its test,
certification and portal
compositions
Uses Portal Motivation
28.332 x 4 = 113.328-113.229697 = .098303 x 1000 x2= 196.606 – 196.03 = .576 x 2 = .1152 - .11509 = .00011
946.720 -
943.51246
=3.20754
App II Portal F
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall7/16/2024 11196.03x^2 -1258.2x +1927.7
BAKO IM 509.0391 + .24045 = 509.27955
Correct String
946.720 -
943.51246
=3.20754
-3.217724798=
algo delta
.010184798 x 2 =
-020369596 x 2 =
.040739192 -
.04042= R^2
.081159192+
.080280170454=
Branch
.000005043092
external IM
4MAP
Fig-F3
Fig-F8
Data Distribution for mining of comparative values see App I
Fig-F3-Ga
Fig-F5

12. Portal Notes
•Running the Stack
The six added strategic points in the customer test prove to
be some correlational requirements that may need to be
added to the portal instance after the initial process begins.
Because of this, it is notable to move from 502 to 509 in the
IM structure of the requirement and make these target
metrics for the performance requirement. Since more
product was moved to Candle Stone the build ratios are
slightly lower on the average, the IM reiterates and builds.
If testing is performed mid- stream the IM fact may hold at
504 and then returned. If this is the case it may be better to
check for defects and do manual corrections before
returning to the stack.
The Portal Climb in the Stack can build in layers and then
package in sticks.
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 12
Test
Note that the
Distribution of
Candle Stone
has changed
Candle Stone
4
MAP
VA = 547.726
See Appendix I
Build
Ave. Reiterates
Fig-F8
Fig-F9
Test,
Other
Sample Test Conditions
Fig-F9a
Fig-F9b
Fig-F9-G
See App V
Interiors
See App I 82

13. Portal Climb
•Installations can be
fused but also glass
bolted with secant
engineering.
Installation can
impact the “make”
decisions such as
internal menus,
fasteners, etc..
Each layer in the laminate fusion plait is
carrying properties essential to the glass
warranty and installation requirement
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 13
*
*
Menu driven installation
Media Fixated
Fenestration
Glass Mix
4
MAP
The use of the Energy Star makes a big
difference in the pull capability for smooth
production, conveyance and installations
82
This roughout requires an engineering drawing,
storyboard and certification, with valuation for IP
Multiple production layersRun process
See App II

14. Financial Sales
7/16/2024Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 14
2
REP
In Part III as Partners
Sign the Agreements,
IP decisions are
made, other contracts
negotiated
Bako is likely to get a boost of $31 B in Assets for
agreement to receive $3 B in Margin apportioned
for 5 years plus annual royalty for a total of $77.5
B within the five-year window. Support of IP
Position leaves Royalty in question.
Ch. Assets+
+29 B, FV
Maintenance
Contracts
-19 B Sec. Eq.
-10 B Invest.
+14.5 IP
JAM Notes per
slide 15
Fig-F10
Fig-F11
5.18 E(V)
Question use of earnback
*
*

15. Draft Performance Statement
7/16/2024Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
15
2
REP
BAKO Plan Model vs. ProformaBako will bring
$29.37B into the
Warehouse plus
purchase of
shares is $48.7B
See Intellectual Property on APP IV
See Change in Assets on Slide 14
Fig-F12
Fig-F13 Intellectual Property Est.
2,016,810,947*-costs
12,502,640,948
14,519,451,895
70.97 -70.70 = .27 x2 = .54
5- year earnback on IF*
*
Recommend a
Sale and
Leaseback
Arrangement
We are noting here
that hyD may be a
Buy and Bailback
Arrangement
Likely bailment of the 5-yr
Earnback with automaker
Owned by M&M ENG Owned by M&M ENG

16. Portal Based Algorithm
The machine composition
includes the algorithm and the
metrics that organize it.
The remainder of this
requirement will be settled in
Part III.
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 16
82
See Metrics Audit on App II
Fig-F8
See App V
40802
See Slide 9
IP
IP
See App IV

17. Demand and Capacity Management
7/16/2024
17
•Appendix I
Details of…
Fig. 3a
P
P
Note that 311 is supply chain, APP II
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
946.720 -
943.51246
=3.20754
App II Portal F
2REP
VA = 547.726
PRE
Fig-F3,4,4a,G
Fig-F14
Fig-F3-Ga

18. 7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 18
Appendix II
PORTAL OUTPUT
Supply Chain
F 946.720 -
943.51246
=3.20754
Supply Chain
Fig-F14
Fig-F14a
Fig-F14b
Production Data
Metrics used to solve
problem on slide 16 are
considered financially viable
{Production Algorithm 196.03x^2 -1258.2x +1927.7 ~~1258.2 x 2 = 2516.4 - 2572.2 Portal= .558 x2 = 116 thruput }
Fig-F3-Ga
Warehouse Equivalent

19. Milestone Dates of
Origination
These are Supply Chain shifts for
the Milestone Dates that built the
product cartography. The product
dates are likely to shift with re-
specification, so we are initiating
the project with tentative finish
dates for the lens and lead times.
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall7/16/2024 19
mMLens Positions
Milestone Related
m
m M
M
M
10 yrs. ending 8/22/2035
8 yrs. ending 11/26/2051
8 yrs. ending 2/1/2062
4 yrs. ending 6/3/2027m
M
M
M
- 4 Agile years
Lens Commitment Dates
Appendix III
Table <or> SA Associations

20. Statement Model
The original statement model for the Bako
Financial Position in the Preliminary
Agreement can be rewritten for the final
agreement.
7/16/2024Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
20
Appendix IV
Bako Prototypes and Production Book are carried as
IP on the Project books as the cost to secure the
patent. They are essentially Portal Assets.
The material cost is certified but the drawings and
tests of the portal arrangement and instance
mappings must be added to the production book
and certified, valued at that time and adjusted here.
Bako Oats are leased by Magi & Marcus according to
their agreement. The project remains within the plan
model and is not on the corporate books.
Intellectual Property Est.
BAKO Plan Model vs. Proforma
2,016,810,947*
12,502,640,948
14,519,451,895
Alex, Marcus
New Director of IP Procurement
Negotiator
2
REP
Fig-F13
Fig-F13a
Fig-F9
* Cost of Testing 13.5 mil volumize as EV
Production Equivalent
{Production Algorithm 196.03x^2 -1258.2x +1927.7 ~~1258.2 - 8.2 = 1250 }
82
Fig-F3-Ga
IP
EST
Soft
Demand is
cured with
Testing

21. Averaging
Branch
relationship
seems to
mimic
Team
results
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 21
Appendix V
Eliminate Redundant Costs
8.0285 x 2 = 16.057
See Fig-F3

22. 7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 22

23. 7/16/2024
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
23
The document provides
information about Bako Lam
(Laminate) and its potential entry
into the supply chain of ark glass
products. It discusses the four
enterprise areas for various
applications of laminated glass,
such as Automotive/Facades,
Fenestrations, Home/Interiors, and
Candle Stone.
Papers on the full glass
treatment of architectural
services in Ark Science
methods
This Paper is dedicated to the transitional requirements of BAKO Lam [in Union with Magi & Marcus
Eng pursuit of Glass Building in Ark
Science,] in our continuing story
about their requirements.
Preliminary Agreements and
Justifications are presented.
The Overview document is about the
development and certification of a
new type of laminate design using
granular glass for enhanced building
compositions. Glass Futures can trade
due to securitized tasking. Part I
considers the Testing Requirements
The Part II Document considers the
Supply Chain and Due Diligence
aspects of the work to develop the
Glass Conference and to arrange a
Partner Agreement in appropriate
stages to finalize the Agreement.
The Part III Document considers the
conveyance and engineering methods
for construction and IP development
in the industry. The final analysis of
the Agreement is rendered.

24. Glass Outcomes from Double-Down
Digital Growth
Rules for Synergism
Portal Design Theory
Metric Map
Plan Disposal and Fair- Trade
Arrangement
Recent Papers on Project
Valuation and Scorecard
Arrangements
Brij Consulting, LLC | SlideShare
The document contains a series of papers
and presentations related to glass
concepts and algorithms. The contents
include discussions on topics such as
momentum in glass building, impact
engineering, continuous modeling,
synergies, instancing, remote cloud
assembly, simulations, portal design
theory, metric maps, and the future
projections of the glass plan.
Christmas, 2023
The document is divided into three parts:
Bookmarks, Golden Bricks, and Casting Crowns.
It discusses various aspects of glass projects,
including remote cloud assembly, metric maps,
scrum performance, golden bricks, hyD Auto,
casting crowns, and portal arrangements. ​ It
also mentions the importance of branding,
marketing, and simulations in these projects. ​
Additionally, the document contains a series of
papers and presentations related to glass
concepts and algorithms, covering topics such
as benchmarking, glass impact, green energy,
solid-state engineering, cloud-star evolution,
simulations, and more. ​
May 2024
24

25. 7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 25
25

26. Thank you
Mirjam Nilsson
[email protected]
www.contoso.com
26

27. Add a Slide Title - 3
7/16/2024 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 27