EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
MBA 4 H01
Dr.Amir Jafar
Associate Professor
Department of Business Administration
Aligarh Muslim University Centre, Jangipur, Murshidabad
Unit I: Introduction to Industrial Relations
•Scope & Objectives of IR
•Dunlop’s Model of IR
•Issues & problems of IR
•Changing Paradigm
•Preventive Machinery of IR
•Settlement Machinery of IR
Introduction
•AsperlabourdictionaryIndustrialRelations(IR)meanstherelationbetweenemployersand
employeesinindustry.
•DaleYoder-IRistherelationshipbetweenmanagementandemployees,oramongemployees
andtheirorganization,thatcharacterizeorgrowoutofemployment.
•JohnTDunlop-IRisinterrelationamongmanagers,workers,andagenciesofgovernment
•TherearethreepartiesinIR
1.Employee, employee representatives or union
2.Employer, employers’ associations or union
3.Government
Models of Industrial Relations
Dunlop’s Model
•Developed by Prof. John T. Dunlop of Harvard University.
•Also called system approach to IR
R=f[A,E,I]
R= Rules, A= Actors, E= Environment, I= Ideology
Rules-derivedfrominteractionsthatgoverntheemploymentrelationship.
Actors-Managementandhierarchyofmanagers,workersandhierarchyoftheir
organisationandspecialisedgovernmentandmutuallyagreednongovernmentagencies
concernedwithworkers,enterpriseandtheirrelationship.
Environment-externaleconomic,technological,political,legalandsocialforcesthat
influenceemploymentrelationships.
Ideology-philosophyorasystematisedbodyofbeliefsandsentimentsheldbytheactors.
Criticism of Dunlop’s Model
1.Noadequateattentionwaspaidtotheconflictaspectofindustrialrelations.
2.Emphasizedtheroleofthreeactorsincombinationintheformulationofrule.
3.Verylimitedapplicabilityinsmallsizedorganisation.
4.Doesnotprovideanswertotheimpactofthecreatedbyunionrivalriesandfactionalismin
theorganisation.
5.Doesnothavemuchapplicabilityinextraordinarysituationcreatedbywars,economic
crisisetc.
6.Didnotcoveredtheprocessesandprocedureinvolved,andthemannerinwhichrulesare
established.
Criticism of IILS Model
•Thismodeldoesn’tclearlyexplaintheimpactofmulti-unionismandunionrivalries.
•Thismodeldoesn’tpresentconvincingassessmentoftheconditioninsmall-sizedundertaking
andunorganisedsector
•Classificationofenvironmentisbroad.Thismodeldoesn’texplainimpactofaparticular
factoroperatingundervariablecondition.
•Thismodeldoesn’tclearlyexplaintheimpactofextraordinarysituationlikewar,economic
crisis,politicalinstability,downsizingetc.ontheformationofrules.
•Thismodelissilentaboutbehaviouralaspectofindividual.
Development of Industrial Relations in India
•PriortothefirstWorldWar
•Therelationshipbetweenemployerandworkerwaslikemasterandservants
•BritishgovernmentintervenedinthefieldofIRtoprotecttheinterestemployers.
•FromthefirstWorldWartoIndependence
•Strengtheningtradeunionmovementandactiveinvolvementofeminentnationalistin
themovement.
•EnactmentoftheTradeUnionAct,1926,theIndustrialEmployment(Standingorder)
Act,1946,theIndustrialDisputeAct,1947etc.
•Establishmentofpermanenttripartitebodiesvariouslevel.
•Enactmentofdifferentprotectiveandsocialsecuritylaws.
•Positionsinceindependence
•Strengtheningbothemployees’andemployers’organisationatvariouslevel
•Impositionoflegalrestrictiononstrikeandlock-out
•Provisionofdifferentmachineriestopreventindustrialdisputes
Methods of settling industrial disputes
Methods of settling industrial
disputes
Without state
intervention
Collective Bargaining
Without Conciliation
With Conciliation
Voluntary
Arbitration
With state
intervention
Compulsory Establishment of
Bipartite Committee
Establishment of Compulsory
Collective Bargaining
Compulsory Investigation
Compulsory Conciliation and Mediation
Compulsory Arbitration or Adjudication
Source: Industrial Relations, Trade Unions
and Labour Legislationsdby P R N Sinha,
InduBalaSinha, SeemaPriyadarshini
Shekhar; Pearson EducatioonIndia, 2017
Settlement under the influence of state
•Interruptions in production because of strikes and lock-outs cause untold
inconvenience and loss of economic welfare to people in general, especially if the
supply of essential goods and services is stopped.
•The changing nature of strikes and took-outs involving entire industries, has further
strengthened the need for intervention by the state in the settlement of industrial
disputes.
•The most common ways in which the state intervention takes place arc the
following:
1.Compulsory establishment of bipartite committees;
2.Establishment of compulsory collective bargaining;
3.Conciliation and mediation (voluntary and compulsory);
4.Compulsory investigation; and
5.Compulsory arbitration or adjudication.
Machinery for the Prevention and Settlement of
Industrial Dispute in India
Statutory Machinery
•WorksCommittee
•Permanentconciliationservicefora
particulargeographicalarea
•adhocBoardsofConciliationatthecentral
andstatelevel
•adhocCourtsofInquiryatthecentraland
statelevel
•TribunalandlabourCourt
•NationalTribunalatthecentrallevel
Non-Statutory Machinery
•IndianLabourConference(ILC)
•StandingLabourCommittee(SLC)
•WageBoards
•IndustrialCommittees
•StateLabourAdvisoryBoards
Indian Labour Conference (ILC) and Standing Labour Committee (SLC)
•Bothofthemaretripartitebodyandweresetupin1942
•ILChas44membersandSLChas20membersatinitiation.
•Mainobjectivesfortheirestablishmentwere:
•Promotinguniformityinlabourlegislation
•Layingdownofprocedurefirthesettlementofindustrialdisputes
•Discussingallmattersofnationalimportanceasbetweenemployerand
employee
Code of Discipline in Industry
Draftedbyatripartitesub-committeeappointedbyILCin1957
ItwasanoutcomeoftheeffortsofGuljariLalNanda,theUnionLabourMinisterin1957to
1958.
Itwasformallyadoptedatthe16thsessionoftheIndianlabourconference(1958)andcameinto
forcefrom1
st
June,1958andhadbeenratifiedbytheemployers’andworkers,organisation.
Thiscodewasauniqueformulationtovoluntarilyregulatelabourmanagementrelations
The Management and Unions agree
1.Nounilateralactionshouldbetakenandthatdisputesshouldbesettledatappropriatelevel.
2.Existingmachineryforsettlementofdisputeshouldbeutilizedwiththeutmostexpedition.
3.Thereshouldbenostrikeorlockoutwithoutnotice
4.Affirmingtheirfaithindemocraticprinciples,theybindthemselvestosettleallfuturedifferences,disputesandgrievancesby
mutualnegotiation,conciliationandvoluntaryarbitration.
5.Neitherpartywillhaveto(i)coercion,(ii)intimidation,(iii)victimizationor(iv)go-slow
6.Theywillavoid(i)litigation,(ii)sit-downandstay-instrikeand(iii)lock-outs
7.Theywillpromoteconstructivecooperationbetweentheirrepresentativesatalllevelsaswellasbetweenworkersthemselves
andabidebythespritsofagreementsmutuallyenteredinto.
8.Theywillestablishuponamutuallyagreedbasisagrievanceprocedurewhichwillensureaspeedyandfullinvestigationleading
tosettlement.
9.Theywillabidebyvariousstagesinthegrievanceprocedureandtakenoarbitraryactionwhichwouldbypasstheprocedure.
10.Theywilleducatethemanagementpersonnelandworkersregardingtheirobligationtoeachother.
The first National Commission on Labour (1969) on the methods of settling industrial disputes
TherecommendationsoftheCommissionregardingthemethodsandmachineryfor
settlingindustrialdisputesare:
•CollectiveBargaining
•VoluntaryArbitration
•ConciliationandAdjudication(IndustrialRelationsCommission)
References:
•Dynamics of Industrial Relations by Mamoria, mamoria, and Gankar
•Industrial relations by ArunMonappa
•Industrial Relations, Trade Unions and Labour Legislationsdby P R
N Sinha, InduBalaSinha, SeemaPriyadarshiniShekhar; Pearson
EducatioonIndia, 2017