Is there a covariate?

plummer48 944 views 80 slides Sep 12, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 80
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80

About This Presentation

Decision-Based Learning - Is there a covariate?


Slide Content

You will now determine if the problem you are working on has a covariate.

Here are your options:

Here are your options: There is a Covariate There is NO Covariate

What is a covariate?

The best way to explain a covariate is to show an example.

Imagine you want to know the effect of gender on hand writing neatness scores.

Imagine you want to know the effect of gender on hand writing neatness scores.

Imagine you want to know the effect of gender on hand writing neatness scores. And you find that females tend to get higher handwriting neatness scores than males.

But then you ask yourself. What if age were added to the mix? Does the age of the male or the female have an effect? Is there a way to see what the difference would be if we eliminated the age effect?

But then you ask yourself. What if age were added to the mix? Does the age of the male or the female have an effect? Is there a way to see what the difference would be if we eliminated the age effect?

But then you ask yourself. What if age were added to the mix? If you took out the effect for age, would the gender difference be the same?

But then you ask yourself. What if age were added to the mix? If you took out the effect for age, would the gender difference be the same? Is there a way to see what the difference would be for neatness scores between genders if we eliminated the age effect?

So, let’s say the average handwriting scores (on a scale from 1-10) for females and males are as follows:

Average female handwriting scores: 9.3

Average female handwriting scores: 9.3 Average male handwriting scores: 7.9

Average female handwriting scores: 9.3 Average male handwriting scores: 7.9 So, it looks like females have better handwriting scores.

But let’s say age also has a big effect on handwriting neatness.

Meaning that the older you are, the better your handwriting, regardless of whether you are female or male.

One statistical analysis that you will learn can adjust the average between female and male handwriting scores – after taking out the effect for age.

Here would be the adjusted average scores after controlling for age:

Before controlling for age:

Before controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 9.3

Before controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 9.3 Male handwriting average score: 7.9

Before controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 9.3 Male handwriting average score: 7.9 After controlling for age:

Before controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 9.3 Male handwriting average score: 7.9 After controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 8.5

Before controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 9.3 Male handwriting average score: 7.9 After controlling for age: Female handwriting average score: 8.5 Male handwriting average score: 8.4

Based on these results it appears that if you control for age, that gender does not have as big of an effect on handwriting neatness scores.

Consider this illustration of the idea of a covariate.

Let’s imagine that a group of people is struggling with boredom in a university class.

Let’s imagine that a group of people is struggling with boredom in a university class.

So, they decide to seek help from a therapist as well as take medication for it.

So, they decide to seek help from a therapist as well as take medication for it.

Afterwards, you have them take a survey testing their level of interest in a boring lecture.

Afterwards, you have them take a survey testing their level of interest in a boring lecture.

And you find that they have a pretty high interest score:

And you find that they have a pretty high interest score: Interest score = 30 (out of 40)

But your not sure if it was the therapy or the medication that had the biggest impact on the survey results.

But your not sure if it was the therapy or the medication that had the biggest impact on the survey results.

So, you make the therapy a covariate to see what the unique effect medication has on interest without the therapy.

And it turns out that if you eliminate the therapy, the results with just taking the medication alone are much less:

And it turns out that if you eliminate the therapy, the results with just taking the medication alone are much less: BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 30 (out of 40)

And it turns out that if you eliminate the therapy, the results with just taking the medication alone are much less: BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 30 (out of 40)

And it turns out that if you eliminate the therapy, the results with just taking the medication alone are much less: Interest score = 30 (out of 40) BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy AFTER you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 2 (out of 40)

And it turns out that if you eliminate the therapy, the results with just taking the medication alone are much less : Interest score = 30 (out of 40) BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy AFTER you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 2 (out of 40)

Therefore, therapy becomes the covariate whose effect we are eliminating to see the unique effect of just medication on interest. Interest score = 30 (out of 40) BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy AFTER you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 2 (out of 40)

Therefore, therapy becomes the covariate that whose effect we are eliminating to see the unique effect of just medication on interest. Interest score = 30 (out of 40) BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy AFTER you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 2 (out of 40)

Therefore, therapy becomes the covariate that whose effect we are eliminating to see the unique effect of just medication on interest. Interest score = 30 (out of 40) BEFORE you eliminate the effect of the therapy AFTER you eliminate the effect of the therapy Interest score = 2 (out of 40)

So, what does a word problem with a covariate look like?

Example 1:

A herd of horses are tested for their agility in an obstacle course.

A herd of horses are tested for their agility in an obstacle course. A certain breed tends to out perform another breed.

A herd of horses are tested for their agility in an obstacle course. A certain breed tends to out perform another breed. What are the results after eliminating the effect of where they were bred (either on the east or on the west coast)?

A herd of horses are tested for their agility in an obstacle course. A certain breed tends to out perform another breed. What are the results after eliminating the effect of where they were bred (either on the east or on the west coast)? “Eliminating the effect of” is an expression that signals the presence of a covariate

A herd of horses are tested for their agility in an obstacle course. A certain breed tends to out perform another breed. What are the results after eliminating the effect of where they were bred (either on the east or on the west coast)? What’s being controlled for is where the horses are bred.

A herd of horses are tested for their agility in an obstacle course. A certain breed tends to out perform another breed. What are the results after eliminating the effect of where they were bred (either on the east or on the west coast)? Does where horses were bred (the covariate) effect horse performance as much or more than their type of breed?

Example 2:

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to.

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices:

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices: Football, Basketball, or Soccer players.

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices: Football, Basketball, or Soccer players. She decides to control for their year in school (upper or lower-classmen).

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices: Football, Basketball, or Soccer players. She decides to control for their year in school (upper or lower-classmen). “Control for” is a phrase that generally means you have a covariate

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices: Football, Basketball, or Soccer players. She decides to control for their year in school (upper or lower-classmen). It essentially has the same meaning as “Eliminating the effect of”

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices: Football, Basketball, or Soccer players. She decides to control for their year in school (upper or lower-classmen). What’s being controlled for is year in school.

A pizza café owner wants to know who to market her pizza to. She devises a test to determine who eats more pizza slices: Football, Basketball, or Soccer players. She decides to control for their year in school (upper or lower-classmen). Does year in school effect the amount of pizza slices eaten as much or more than the type of athlete you are?

Example 3:

An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy.

An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy . To test their degree of boredom the groups listen to a statistics lecture for 1 hour and then are administered a boredom survey.

An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy. To test their degree of boredom the groups listen to a statistics lecture for 1 hour and then are administered a boredom survey. After determining the difference between the groups, you have been asked to hold constant the video game playing by asking each teenager how much video gaming they engage in.

“Hold constant” is another way of saying “eliminating the effect of”. An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy. To test their degree of boredom the groups listen to a statistics lecture for 1 hour and then are administered a boredom survey. After determining the difference between the groups, you have been asked to hold constant video game playing by asking each teenager how much video gaming they engage in.

An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy. To test their degree of boredom the groups listen to a statistics lecture for 1 hour and then are administered a boredom survey. After determining the difference between the groups, you have been asked to hold constant video game playing by asking each teenager how much video gaming they engage in. This also is a signal that there is a covariate.

An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy. To test their degree of boredom the groups listen to a statistics lecture for 1 hour and then are administered a boredom survey. After determining the difference between the groups, you have been asked to hold constant video game playing by asking each teenager how much video gaming they engage in. We are eliminating the effect of video game playing.

An anti-boredom therapy was used with a group of teenagers, while another group of teenagers did not receive any such therapy. To test their degree of boredom the groups listen to a statistics lecture for 1 hour and then are administered a boredom survey. After determining the difference between the groups, you have been asked to hold constant video game playing by asking each teenager how much video gaming they engage in. Does video gaming effect degree of boredom as much or more than the anti-boredom therapy?

Note - Not all covariate problems will use these expressions: control for, eliminate the effect of, or partial out

Note - Not all covariate problems will use these expressions: control for, eliminate the effect of, or partial out

Note - Not all covariate problems will use these expressions: control for, eliminate the effect of, or partial out

Note - Not all covariate problems will use these expressions: control for, eliminate the effect of, or partial out

Note - Not all covariate problems will use these expressions: control for, eliminate the effect of, or partial out, h old constant

But if the word problem has to do with looking at the degree to which there is an effect (e.g., boredom) when you take away the effect of something else (e.g., video-gaming), then you most likely have a covariate.

Which option is most appropriate for the problem you are working on:

Which option is most appropriate for the problem you are working on: There is a Covariate There is NO Covariate
Tags