Isodose lines

12,978 views 58 slides Dec 24, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 58
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58

About This Presentation

Importance of Isodose lines in Radiotherapy and Clinical Physics practise


Slide Content

Iso dose l i nes definition , influencing factors , clinical application LIBIN SCARIA Resident Medical Physicist

Beams of ionising radiation have characteristic process of energy deposition, in order to represent volumetric & planar variations in absorbed dose are depicted by isodose curves

Dose distribution

PERCENT DEPTH DOSE Quotient expressed as percentage, of the absorbed dose at any depth d to the absorbed dose at d max along the central axis of the beam

Isodose curves Lines joining the points of equal percentage depth dose(PDD) Curves are usually drawn at regular intervals of absorbed dose & expressed as a percentage of dose Isodose charts Family of isodose curves PDD values are normalised at Dmax or reference depth

Field size ( dosimetrical ): lateral distance between the 50% isodose lines at a reference depth Field size (geometrical) : field defining light is made to coincide with 50% isodose lines of the radiation beam projected on a plane perpendicular to the beam axis and at standard SSD or SAD

Beam profile Falloff of the beam By the reduced side scatter Physical penumbra width High dose or ‘horns’ near the surface in the periphery of the field Outside the geometric limits of the beam and the penumbra, the dose variation is the result of side scatter from the field both leakage and scatter from the collimator system

PEN UMBRA Dose transitions near the boarders of the field R egion at the radiation beam over which the dose rate changes rapidly as a function of distance from the central axis Geometric penumbra Transmission penumbra Physical penumbra Scatter penumbra

For cobalt-60 teletherapy : P ~ 1cm For linacs : P~ 3mm

Measurement of isodose curves Ion chambers Solid state detectors TLD,Silicon diodes, Radiographic films Computer driven devices Ion chamber is the most reliable method due to its relatively flat energy response and precision

Beam Analysing System 3D water phantom- IBA Wellhofer Blue Phantom Two ion chambers : Detector A: to move in the tank of water to sample the dose rate Detector B: fixed at some point in the field to monitor the beam intensity with time F inal response A/B is independent of fluctuation in the output

Sources of i sodose chart Atlases of premeasured isodose charts Generated by calculations using different algorithms Manufacturers of radiation generators

Parameters of isodose curves Beam quality Source size, SSD, SDD Penumbra Collimation and flattening filter Field size

Beam Quality D epth of a given isodose curve increases with beam quality Greater lateral scatter associated with lower-energy beams For megavoltage beams, the scatter outside the field is minimized as a result of forward scattering becomes more a function of collimation than energy

4 MV 6MV 15MV

Field size One of the most important parameters in treatment planning PDD increases as field size increases Field size dependence of PDD is less pronounced for higher energy than for lower energies Field size smaller than 6 cm Relative large penumbra region Bell shape TPS should be mandatory for small field size

5*5 cm 2 10*10 cm 2 15*15cm 2

SSD affects the PDD and the depth of the isodose curves PDD icreases with SSD

Beam fattening filter Intensity is more at central axis and decreases as we move away Non-uniform dose at any given depth FF is used to uniform it Usually made up of Al or Brass

Wedge filters Wedge shaped absorber causes a progressive decrease in intensity across the beam Results in tilt of the isodose curve & degree of the tilt depends upon the slope of the wedge filter Material: tungsten, brass. Lead or steel

15 o Wedge

30 o Wedge

4 5 o Wedge

60 o Wedge

W edge isodose angle (θ) is the complement of the angle through which the isodose curve is tilted with respect to the central ray of the beam at any specified depth This depth is important because the angle will decrease with increasing depth . A ngle of isodose tilt to decrease with increasing depth in the phantom. The choice of the reference depth varies : 10 centimeters 1/2 - 2/3rd of the beam width At the 50% isodose curve

Hinge angle, φ It is the angle between central axes of two beams passing through the wedge Relationship b/w φ & θ Wedge angle, θ = 90 – φ /2

B o lus A tissue equivalent material used to reduce the depth of the maximum dose ( D max ) In megavoltage radiation bolus is primarily used to bring up the buildup zone near the skin in treating superficial lesions . The thickness is usually 0.5 cm to 1.5 cm

Combined Open Field Technique Criteria: The dose distribution within the tumor volume is reasonably uniform (±5 %). The maximum dose to the tissue in the beam is not excessive (not more than 110% of the prescribed dose ) Normal critical structures in the beam do not receive doses near or beyond tolerance

Parallel Opposed Fields Advantages The simplicity and reproducibility of setup Homogeneous dose to the tumour Less chances of geometrical miss Disadvantage E xcessive dose to normal tissues and critical organs above and below the tumour

Multiple fields To deliver maximum dose to the tumour and minimum dose to the surrounding tissues Using fields of appropriate size Increasing the number of fields or portals Selecting appropriate beam directions Adjusting beam weights Using appropriate beam energy Using beam modifiers

Multiple fields Certain beam angles are prohibited Presence of critical organs in those directions Setup accuracy of a treatment may be better with parallel opposed beam arrangement The acceptability of a treatment plan depends not only on the dose distribution but also on P ractical feasibility Setup accuracy Reproducibility of the treatment technique

Isodose lines of Electrons

Isodose curves Scattering of electrons determines shapes of isodose curves Expansion Lateral constriction Larger field size required at surface

Proton isoeffective dose

“Charged Particle Therapy” to better preserve healthy tissues and organs at risk

Medicine is a science of uncertainity and an art of probability Dr. William Osler A canadian Physician and one of the four founding professors of John Hopkins Hospital, USA

T h a n k u …
Tags