Lab diagnosis of ToRCH complex

5,735 views 82 slides Nov 10, 2013
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 82
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82

About This Presentation

A sincere effort

A compilation of all the diagnostic methods for diagnosis of ToRCH gp of infections in Pregnant women..

Presentation is done in two parts-
part-1 includes Toxoplasmosis and Rubella virus infection

Part-2- Cytomegalovirus, HSV-1, HSV-2 are covered

microbiological, lab diagnosis ...


Slide Content

Dr. Md. AshrafAli S. N
Post graduate
Dept. of Microbiology
KIMS Hubli

C -CYTOMEGALOVIRUS
H -HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS –1& 2
Covered in torch complex Part-II
To-TOXOPLASMOSIS
R –RUBELLA
Covered in torch complex Part-I

3.CYTOMEGALOVIRUS
4.HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS 1
5.HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS 2
All three belong to family herpesviridae.

Common characteristics:
Enveloped linear dsDNAviruses.
Haveabilitytoremainlatentintissues,leadingto
periodicreactivation.
Similarstructure.

Species Sub
family
Latency
Name Commonname
Human herpes virus type 1
Herpes simplex
virus type 1
alpha
Neurons
trigeminal
ganglia
Human herpes virus type 2
Herpes simplex
virus type 2
alphaNeurons
Sacral ganglia
Human herpes virus type 3 Varicella-Zoster
alphaNeurons
Human herpes virus type 4 Epstein-Barr virusgamma
Lymphoid
tissues
Human herpes virus type 5 Cytomegalovirus beta
Secretory
glands, kidneys
Human herpes virus type 6
Human B cell
lymphotropicvirus
beta
Lymphoid
tisues
Human herpes virus type 7 R K virus beta
Lymphoid
tisues
Human herpes virus type 8 gamma
Classification of herpes viruses
Human herpes virus type 2

Similar for all members of herpesviridaefamily.
4 structural elements
1.Core
2.Protein capsid
3.Tegument
4.Outer envelope with spikes

1. Core
-contains the linear dsDNA
-DNA stabilized by a series of protein fibrils
2. Capsid-encloses the core
-A closed shell (icosahedron)
-Has capsomeres in it
-162 capsomeres-150 hexamers and 12 pentamer

3.Tegument
Between capsid and envelope an amorphous
tegument is present.
Role
Important in early stages of viral replication
following entry into the host.
Shuts down host metabolic activity rapidly.

4.Envelope
Trilaminar
Derived from host cell
Envelope has glycoproteins-
gB, gC, gD, gE, gG, gH, gI, gJ, gK, gL, gM.
gB, gD, gH, gL-essential for virus infectivity
gC-mediates initial attachment of virus to host in HSV-1
gB-HSV-2
gD-bonding with co-receptor

Salivary gland virus.
It is a double stranded
DNA virus.
Largest in herpes virus
family (Size : 150-200nm),

•Congenitalinfectionoccursinapproximately2%
oflivebirths.
•Itisaleadingcauseofhearingloss,mental
retardationandcerebralpalsy.
•OpportunisticpathogeninImmunocompromised .
•Accountforapprox.10%deathinsymptomatic
newborns.

Humansareonlyhost.
Latentinhostcells
Latent CMV -
monocytes,lungs,spleen,kidneys,secretory
glandsandcervix.
Exhibitshostspecificity.

Scientific classification
Family: Herpesviridae
Subfamily: Beta
Genus: Cytomegalovirus
Species: 1.Human herpes virus 5(HHV-5) -
Human cytomegalovirus
2.CeHV-5= African green monkey
cytomegalovirus
3.CeHV-8 =Rhesus monkey
cytomegalovirus
4.Pongine herpes virus 4 (PoHV-4)

Vertical transmission
transplacentalinfection (prenatal)
genital-tract secretions during delivery.
breast-feeding (postnatal)
Horizontal transmission(blood
transfusion, organ transplant, salivary
secretions, sexual contact)
Incubation period 28-60 days, mean-40 days.

Mother Viraemia Placental Trophoblasts
Infection of fetal
endothelial cells
Fetal viraemia
Replication in
target organs (kidney)
Fetal viruria
Virus in
amniotic fluid
Infection of
the oropharynx

•CMV infection in pregnancy can be
Primary
Reactivation
Recurrent
Leading to congenital CMV infection.

•Primarymaternalinfectionleads
tofetalinfectionin30-50%of
cases.
•Recurrentmaternalinfection
lesslikelytoleadtofetal
infection(1-2%).

95% clinically inapparent.
35% transmitted to fetus.
Fetal damage more likely in first 26 weeks (32%)
than later (15%).
……….

Primary CMV Recurrent
CMV
Period
1
st
trimester
2
nd
trimester
3
rd
trimester
Risk of
infection40% 45% 78% 0.5%
Fetal
damage 32% 16% 1% <1%

•Vertical transmission of CMV can occur at
any stage of pregnancy.
•Severe sequelae are more common with
infection in the 1
st
trimester, while the
overall risk of infection is greatest in the 3
rd
trimester.

Transplacentalinfection can result in
intrauterine growth restriction
intracranial calcifications
Microcephaly
hydrocephalus

CMV in Immunocompromised Patients
•Reactivation of the dormant virus.
•Primary CMV infection in immunocompromised
-scan cause serious disease.
Infection with CMV in immunocompromised patients,
Pneumonia
retinitis
gastrointestinal disease.

CMV Retinitis
small floaters
foggy or blurred vision
loss of central or peripheral vision
Complications
loss of vision
retinal detachment

Jaundice (67%)
Petechiae(76%)
Microcephaly(53%)
Hepatosplenomegaly(60%)
Chorioretinitis(20%)
Seizure (7%)
Fatal outcome (10%)

Seizures
Chorioretinitis
Periventricularcalcifications
Sensorineural hearing loss
Motor deficits

High risk of transmission
IgG POSITIVE
IgM NEGATIVE
IgG& IgMNEGATIVE IgG & IgM POSITIVE
IgGNEGATIVE
IgMPOSITIVE
REPEAT TEST
AFTER 3 WEEKS
IMMUNE
REASSURANCE
UNIMMUNE
Meticulous hand hygiene
< 20
WEEKS
FETAL WELL
BEING
USG & MRI
MATERNAL VIREMIA
BY URINARY & BLOOD
PCR
RETROSPECTIVELY
SCREEN 1
ST
TRIMESTER BLOOD
HIGH RISK OF
TRANSMISSION
INVASIVE
AMNI0TIC FLUID
PCR
HIGH CMV IgG
AVIDITY
NO FURTHER
TESTING NEEDED
> 20
WEEKS
HIGH CMV IgG
AVIDITY
LOW CMV IgG
AVIDITY
LOW CMV IgG
AVIDITY
MATERNAL SCREENING

A.In pregnant
B.In fetus (prenatal diagnosis) once
infection in mother proved

1.Microscopy
2.Virus Isolation
3.Serology
4.Demonstration of viral particles

SPECIMENS :
From active lesions of cervix, vagina .
Blood for CMV antibody -paired serum samples
Storage temperature maintained-4 degree Celsius

1.Microscopy
i.Direct observation---Electron microscopy
ii.Staining---
Haematoxylinand eosin (H &E stain)

Enveloped
Spherical
120 –200 nm in
diameter

ii.H & E stain from cervical secretions of CMV
infected individual.
Owl‟s eye
appearance

2. Virus isolation
Cell culture line used
Human Fibroblast cell line cultures
The characteristic cytopathiceffect develops
within hours to weeks after inoculation
depending on the amount of CMV present in the
specimen.
Human fibroblasts are the only cells in which
CMV reliably grows in vitro.

3.Serology
Antibody detection
i.Seroconversion
ii.IgMdetection-paired sera is taken
One blood sample should be taken on suspicion
of CMV, another within 2 weeks.
IgM-marker of active or recent CMV infection
Merits
Negative test will rule out infection
Demerits
Persistent IgM
False positive results

IgGassays
•CMV IgG antibody –sensitive and specific for past
infection.
•CMV IgM antibody –variable sensitivity and
specificity.
•Antibody avidity testing can increase accuracy of
detection of primary infection.

The anti-CMV IgG avidity test-currently the most reliable.
Specific------100%
Sensitive----60-94%
•Low avidity-recent/past infection
16
th
-18
th
wk of gestation, sensitivity 100%.
After 20 wks of gestation, sensitivity is reduced
(62.5%).
•A high avidity index during the first 12-16 weeks of
gestation indicator of past infection.

Method SensitivitySpecificityRapidity
Neutralisation + ++ -
Radio immunoassay +++ ++ ++
Enzyme immunoassay +++ ++ ++
IFA-LA
Immunofluorescent
antibodyagainst Late
Antigen
++ - ++

4.Detection of viral components
•Shell vial technique
•PCR

CMV detection methods comparison
Method SensitivitySpecificityRapidity
Conventional cell
culture
++ +++ +
ShellVial technique + +++ ++
PCR +++ +++ ++
Antigenemiadetection +++ +++ +++

Viral culture
1.Amniotic fluid
2.Fetal blood
Quantitative PCR
Ultrasound
Hematological tests

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Target-MIE region of CMV genome.
Primers used
•MIE1661
•MIE1909
The cycling conditions
•denaturationat 94°C for 2 min,
•30 cycles
94°C for 30 s,
58°C for 40 s,
72°C for 50 s.
A final incubation at 72°C for 3 min
Other primers
•MIE1517
•MIE1932

Clinical symptoms

A vaccine to prevent CMV infections is
desperately needed but not available.
Meticulous hand hygiene after
exposure to urine or saliva from
infants, toddlers and
immunocompromised patients.
Anti-CMV antibody may be effective.

Throughout pregnancy, practice good personal hygiene.
Women who develop a mononucleosis-like illness during
pregnancy should be evaluated for CMV infection.
Laboratory testing for antibody to CMV can be performed
to determine if a women has already had CMV infection.
The demonstrated benefits of breast-feeding outweigh the
minimal risk of acquiring CMV from mother.

“Herpes” –from the Greek “to creep, crawl.
It is a linear double stranded DNA viruses.
Humans are primary host.
Latent in nerve root ganglia.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV):
HSV type I, associated with cold sores around the
mouth;
HSV type 2, is usually associated with genital sores.
However, either type can infect either the mouth or
genitals and both can be passed on to the newborn.

One of most prevalent infections worldwide.
85% of adults are seropositivefor HSV-1.
20% adults seropositivefor HSV-2.
More are infected than symptomatic disease
would indicate.
50% HSV-1 infected individuals asymptomatic.
20% HSV-2 individuals asymptomatic.

Scientific classification
Family: Herpesviridae
Subfamily: Alpha
Species: 1.Human herpes virus 1(HHV-1) –
Herpes simplex virus type 1
2.Human herpes virus 2(HHV-2)-
Herpessimplex type 2

•Prevalence 1500 –2000 cases / year.
•70% HSV-2 (Genital Herpes) acquired at time of
delivery.
•HSV-1 acquired through postnatallyby contact
with oro-labial disease.
•30-40% of all adult women are seropositive.

25
Risk of infection :
1.Active recurrentlesion –
risk of infection is 2-5%.
2.Active primarylesion –
risk of infection is 33-50%.
Intrauterine infection occurs with Primary
lesions of mother.

Primary maternal HSV infection
1
st
and 2
nd
trimester-no significant risk
3
rd
trimester-can lead to premature rupture of
membranes
Significant risk
Vaginal delivery in a woman with active lesions

85% via infected maternal genital tract
Ascending infection
En route
10% postpartum
5% (or less) –
intrauterine infection

21
Clinical features
Lead to triad of symptoms:
1.Skin vesicles or scarring.
2.Eye disease (Microphthalamos, chorioretinitis,
keratoconjunctivitis).
3.Microcephaly, encephalitis and cerebral
calcifications.

Rare, but devastating
Only 50 cases described
Skin vesicles
Chorioretinitis
Microcephaly
Micro-ophthalmia
IUGRArchival Photo:
HSV “In Utero”
Healed by Time
Of Birth –With
Microcephally

Approximately ½ of all HSV
infections limited to
skin, eye, mouth/mucous
membranes
1
st
-2
nd
week presentation
60-70% of untreated
patients progress to
CNS/disseminated diseaseGroin Vesicles
16 Days of Life
HSV-1, This Infant
Had a Cardiac Cath
(Groin Line)
At 3 Days of Life

Long term neurologic sequelaeseen in 30% of cases –
even if treated
Ophthalmology involvement

HSV 2 Arm Lesions
9 Days of Life
Presenting Limb in a 34 Week
Premature Infant

Scalp Lesions
11 Days of Life
HSV-2, Monitored
With Scalp Lead

Encephalitis without
visceral involvement,
mainly involving the
temporal lobes.
Early to 3
rd
week of life
presentation.HSV –2, Necrotic Brain

Approximately 20% of all
infections
Hepatitis
Pneumonitis
DIC
Infant may be ill on first
day of life
Skin lesions appear late

1.Microscopy
2.Virus Isolation
3.Demonstration of viral antigen
4.Demonstration of antibodies

Sample taken-Vesicalfluid
Examination –
Transmission electron
Microscopy
Specimen should contain
atleast10
6
particles per millititre

Advantage
1.Most rapid
2.Morphology described (specific)
Disadvantage
1.Not available in all diagnostic laboratories
2.Relatively insensitive (specimen should contain
atleast>= 10
6
particles per millititre)
3.Cannot differentiate between HSV-1 and HSV-2

Tzanck smear
Smears prepared from base of lesion.
1% aqueous solution of toluidineblue
„O‟ for 15s
Positive smear
multinucleated giant cells with
faceted nuclei and homogenously
Stained ground glass chromatin

Giemsastain
Intranucleartype A inclusion bodies seen

2. Isolation :
Cell line cultures:
Human fibroblast cells.
Vero cell line cultures.
After 1-7 days of inoculation-
Cytopathiceffects:
ballooning
polykaryoticcells

3. Demonstration of viral antigen
Fluorescent antibody technique:
Immunofluorescent staining of virus by using
monoclonal antibodies .

Confirmatory Serological tests
1.Antigen Detection:
ELISA.
2.Molecular Methods:
PCR.
DNA probes.

25
Active primary herpes should be
treated with oral acyclovir.
Suppressive therapy in last four weeks
of pregnancy may prevent recurrence
at term and prevent LSCS.
NO LESION NO LSCS

THE TORCH TEST

•Thetestisorderedwhenapregnantwomanis
suspectedofhavinganyoftheTORCHinfections.
•Usedforscreening.
•Resultsgivenaspositiveornegative,
indicates the presence or absence of IgGand IgM
antibodies for each of the infectious agents tested
for with the panel.
A "normal“ result is negative(undetectable) IgM
antibody in the blood of the mother or newborn.

REFERENCES:
K. D. Chatterjeeparasitology, 13
th
edition.
Ananthanarayana& Paniker‟stextbook of
Microbiology, 9
th
edition.
Principles and practice of clinical virology 5
th
edition
Wiley publications.
Williams Obstetrics : 23rd edition.