Lecture 6 new math3dadoiojai idajdiaiji (1).pptx

rndm99105 0 views 36 slides Sep 27, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 36
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36

About This Presentation

ajsasjd h ssddfjhajswwejjdbcw rdgc hfjsd hfhsjhjahdhad ah dahdj a ahj


Slide Content

Lecture 6 Differential equations of second – order. Reduction of order

Some second-order equation can be reduced to first-order equation, rendering then susceptible to the simple methods of solving equations of the first order. The following are three types of such second-order equations: Type 1 : Let (1) Integrating this equation (1), we obtain Integrating this equation once again we get

where Example 1 . Solve the differential equation Solution . This equation relates to the first type Then Type 2 : Second-order equations with the dependent variable mussing.

Example : ; Solution: = =  

; = = { ; } = = .  

This is an equation of the type (2) The dependent variable y does not explicitly appear in the equation. This type of second-order equation is easily reduced to a first-order equation by the transformation . This substitution obviously implies , and the original equation becomes a first-order equation for p Suppose we have managed to integrate this equation and have obtained its general solution .

Then we have and therefore the general solution of equation (2) is thus obtained: Example 2 . Solve the differential equation Solution . Since the dependent variable y is missing, let and . These substitutions transform the given second-order equation into the first-order equation

; , It is a separable equation. Separating the variables, we obtain Integrating , we have   Then or and hence So ;  

Example: Solution: ; ; ; ; ;  

. ; ; ; ;  

; ; ; ; ; ; ;  

; ;  

Type 3 . Second-order nonlinear equations with the independent variable missing. Let it be of the form ( 3) The independent variable x does not explicitly appear in the equation. The method for reducing the order of these second-order equations begins with the same substitution as for Type 2 equations, namely, replacing y / as p . But instead of simple writing y // as p / , the trick here is to express y // in terms of a first derivative with respect to y .

Therefore we write ; Now we deduce from equation (3) the equation   which is a first-order equation . If we manage to integrate it and to find its general solution then we have and therefore the general solution of equation (3) can be directly written in the form  

Example 3 . Solve the differential equation Solution. The substitutions and transform this second-order equation for y into the following first-order equation for p : Separating the variables, we obtain Integrating, we have It follows that or  

Now, since , this last result becomes Separating the variables, we get So or

Example: ; Solution: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  

, , ; ; ;  

Second – Order Linear Differential Equations  A second-order linear differential equation has the form where and are continuous functions. If equation (1) is nonhomogeneous . If (2) equation (2) is called homogeneous linear equation.

Theorem 1 . If and are both solutions of the linear homogeneous equation (2) and C 1 and C 2 are any constants, then the linear combination is also a solution of equation (2) Proof. Since and are solution of (2), we have and

Therefore, using the basic rules for differentiation, we have Thus, is a solution of equation (2). The other fact we need is given by the following theorem. It says that the general solution is a linear combination of two linearly independent solutions and .

This means that neither and is a constant multiple of the other. For instance, the functions and are linearly dependent, but and are linearly independent. Theorem 2 . If and are linearly independent solutions of equation (2), then the general solution is given by where and are arbitrary constants. Definition. Let and be two differentiable functions. The Wronskian , associated to and , is the function

Theorem 3 . If and are linearly dependent, then Wronskian . Theorem 4 . If and are linearly independent solution of equation (2), then . Theorem 5 . If and are two solutions of equation (2), then . Proof . Since and are solutions of (2) we have (4)

Example: are linearly dependent or linearly independent ? Solution: .  

Example: ? Solution: is general solution of homogenous equation. ; Type equation here. ; ; or =0;  

.  

Example: are linearly dependent or linearly independent? Solution: linearly independent  

Example: are linearly dependent or linearly independent? Solution: linearly dependent  

Example: If are solutions, then find differential equation? Solution:I )  

;.  

Example: ? Solution: =0 30  

Example: ;. ;  

(5) Now we multiply (4) by and multiply (5) by . Subtract the resulting two equations to obtain. (6) Recall the definition (3) and observe that Hence (6) is the equation   (7) Separating the variables, we get

Integrating, we have or   So   where .
Tags