Maine DOT LIMMS Presentation On-site Interview June 19 2019 (v36).pptx

ASSURE IT Presentation

1. WORLD’S LEADER IN PROVIDING LABORATORY INFORMATION MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES World’s Best LIMMS

2. LIMMS Product Comparison: Key Functionality 10 Points of Distinction SpectraQest Elm Tree MetaField Aurigo Permission Model Greater Flexibility in Segmenting Roles ✔ ++ ✔ - ✔ -   Administration Chain of Custody Certainty Indexing RFID and Bar Coding Timely Reporting ✔ ++ ✔ ✔ -   Laboratory Activities Custom Dashboards Lab Management ✔ ++ ✔ ✔ -   Field Activities Off-Line Application Real Time Data ✔ ++ ✔  ✔ +  Accreditation Features Facilitate Accreditations AASHTO R18 Compliance ✔ ++ ✔ - ✔ - ✔ -  Easily Configurable Comprehensive Tests Workflow Compliance ✔ ++  ✔ - ✔ -  Statistical Analysis Tools Most Powerful Analysis Tool ✔ ++  ✔ - ✔ -  Scalability Large User Communities ✔ ++  ✔ - ✔ -  In-Service Modifications No Interruptions of Service ✔ ++ North American-Based American Deployment and Support Activities ✔ ++  ✔ - ✔ -  Proof : The ATSER Difference

3. Benefit: TxDOT NTE3A LIMMS’s Manager Easy to Adopt Easy to Adapt Easy to Use Facilitate Training In-Service Modifications Highly Customizable Easily Configurable Workflow Modification

4. Purpose: MassDOT Research Materials Services (RMS) and District Labs LIMMS Advancement of State of the Art: 1. Administration Lab Operation Accreditation Functions 2. 10 Materials Streams Individual Tests with Final Reports Summary Reports Global Bid Items Global Certifications (Statewide Approval Process) Global Mix Designs (Statewide Approval Process) Global ACC, QC and IA Requirements (f(quantities)) Global DOT Depts., Contractors, Labs and Suppliers Global Lab Equipment Linking to Test Report Global Warning and NCR 3. Bid Items Link with Testing Requirements (RMS) 4. Samples Indexing Bar Code RFID 5. Lab Equipment Data Synchronization 6. Field Collection 7. Lab Collection

5. Objectives: MassDOT LIMMS Experience Over a Quarter of a Century of LIMMS Experience 38 DOTs LIMMS Project Experience 2 Statewide Installations MassDOT LIMMS → Statewide Global Perspective

6. Proof: Major LIMMS Projects Experience Over $500 Billion Transportation Experience Nationwide No. Owner Project Name Delivery Method No. Named User/Month 1. GDOT Statewide DB/P3 Unlimited 2. GDOT Northwest Corridor DB < 50 3. GDOT I-28, SR 400 DB < 50 4. MDOT I-75 Modernization Segment 3 P3 Unlimited 5. MassDOT Statewide DBB/DB/P3 < 1200 6. HCTRA Ship Channel Bridge DBB Unlimited 7. METRO CIPMS DB < 100 8. TxDOT North Tarrant Expressway (3A) P3 < 500 9. TxDOT Chisolm Trail DB < 20 10. TxDOT Camino Columbia Toll Road DB < 50 11. HCTRA CIPMS DBB < 400 12. WSDOT Tacoma Narrows Bridge DB < 100 13. British Colombia Sea-to-Sky P3 < 100 14. CDOT I-25 Colorado Springs DB < 50 15. CDOT T-Rex DB < 100 16. UDOT I-15 Reconstruction Salt Lake City DB < 100

7. Proof: Intellectual Property Overview No. Patent No. Title Date of Award 1. 7,295,940 Process Control System to Manage Materials Used in Construction November 13, 2007 2. 7,221,986 System & Methods for Real-Time determination of Asphalt Content May 22, 2007 3. 7,104,142 Systems and Methods for Automating Asphalt Mix Design September 12, 2006 4. 7,035,703 Systems and Methods for Real-Time Determination of Asphalt Content April 25, 2006 5. 6,889,148 Process Control System to Manage Materials Used in Construction May 3, 2005 6. 6,889,103 System & Methods for Real-Time determination of Asphalt Content May 3, 2005 7. 6,826,498 Computerized Laboratory Information Management System November 30, 2004 8. 6,711,957 Systems & Methods for Automating Asphalt Mix Design March 30, 2004 9. 5,943,234 Paving Mixture Design System August 24, 1999 10. 5,304,576 Waste Tire Disposal and Recycling April 19, 1994 Patent No. 6,826,498: Computerized Laboratory Information Management System

8. Proof: TxDOT LIMMS Experience QC Project: NTE 3A Budget: $1.6 B Duration: 7 Yrs. NTP: 2014 Concessionaire (P3) /DB Cintra/Ferrovial QA IQF QV 10% Verif . TxDOT Validation System I2MS XML (Web Services) FHWA Quarterly Report

9. Proof: GDOT LIMMS Experience FHWA Quarterly Reports LIMMS Statewide Nine (9) Projects Innovative Delivery GDOT MMIP Program: $13 B Duration: 10 Years NTP: 2015 Four (4) Materials Streams Aggregate Concrete Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Soil Asphalt Plant Rating Concrete Plant Rating

10. Proof: MassDOT LIMMS Experience Ten (10) Materials Streams Aggregate Asphalt Binder Asphalt Emulsion Cement Concrete Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Iron and Steel Pozzolan Soil Other MassDOT Statewide LIMMS MassDOT Legacy System TISH CMS Data Migration AASHTO 212 Individual Tests & Reports Automated Data Collection of 10 Pieces of Lab Equipment

11. Title Description of Activity Concrete Compressive Strength Tinius Olsen Compression Machine (Model: 2000SL) Asphalt Binder Brookfield Viscometer Rotational Viscometer (Models: RVDV-111 U and DV-111 Asphalt Binder DSR Dynamic Shear Rheometer (Model: KNX2102) Asphalt Binder BBR Bending Bear Rheometer (Model: TE-BBR) HMA Hamburg Wheel Tracker Instr TEK Smart Tracker HMA PMW Hamburg Rut Tester PMW Hamburg Rut Tester (Troxler) Concrete Compressive Strength Tinius Olsen Universal Machine (Model: 2000SL) Intron Tensile Machine Instron Tensile Machine Aggregate Sieve Analysis Automatic Shaker Soil XRF Analyzer X-5000 Series Mobile XRF Analyzer Olympus Scientific Solutions Americas (Model: X-5000-RH-U-EN-GC) Collection of Laboratory Equipment Upload

12. Legacy Systems TISH CMS Proof: MassDOT LIMMS Experience Construction Daily Progress Report QTY Bid Item Actual Quantity Test Report AASHTO – TXXX ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Project Information Assure-IT™ Laboratory Equipment (10) Desktops Mobile Devices Online Offline

13. Proof: MassDOT LIMMS Experience Global Features Global Bid Item List Global Producers List Global Mix Designs Global Testing Labs Global User Profiles and Certifications Global Receiving Global TISH/Manually Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2.5 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

14. Proof: MassDOT LIMMS Experience Custom Setup Add A New Project Project Testing Labs Project Users Project User Profiles Test Plan RMS 360 Initiation Contractual Non-Contractual Global TISH/Manually Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2.5 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

15. Proof: MassDOT LIMMS Experience P roject Level Test Plan RMS 360 Completed Project Producers List Project Mix Designs Concrete Mix Designs HMA Mix Designs Log a Sample Global TISH/Manually Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2.5 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

16. Proof: MassDOT LIMMS Experience Testing Process Change Physical Location Testing Activities Signoff Process Publish “Track-IT™” Aggregate Binder Emulsion Concrete HMA Iron & Steel Cement Soils Miscellaneous Global TISH/Manually Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2.5 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Pozzolan

17. Level Responsible Party Description 1 Customer: IT Support GDOT: Al Casteel Ron Wishon Basic customer issues Business process questions and/or application system functionality (password resets, logon issues) Internet connection problem Customer IT Break fix activities Hardware issues 2 Developer: ATSER - IT Administrator Basic configuration changes Browser related issues IT infrastructure Troubleshooting Prioritization Minor enhancements requests, and problem management, etc. 3 Developer: ATSER - Systems Engineer Application workflow issues and use 4 Developer: ATSER - Programmer Requiring code change Patches and/or bug fixes Proof: GDOT Support Levels ATSER’S SaaS Model Customer Service Culture Tickets Resolved in 15 Minutes

18. Proof: Client Testimonial, GDOT LIMMS Statewide We have been using Assure-IT for over three years and could not be more satisfied with their application, Help-Desk Support, and overall Customer Service, which has been exceptional with most tickets being resolved within 15 minutes .

19. Deployment Work Plan

20. Proof : MassDOT Permission Model Security Access Levels Roles & Responsibilities Software Gates

21. Proof: ElmTree System’s Permission Model

22. Proof: SpectraQest Permission Model

23. Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) Quality Management Experts Program Management Experts Concrete Experts Asphalt Experts Geotechnical Experts Construction Materials Experts Hot Mix Asphalt Experts Soil Experts North American-Based | SME-Supported Help Desk An Unwavering Focus on Quality | Customer Satisfaction Proof : The ATSER Difference

24. U.S. Patented ATSER’s innovation and Assure-ITs™ uniqueness was recognized by the U.S. Patent Office with the award of Patent No. 6826498 Computerized LIMMS An Industry Leader Assure-IT™ was successfully employed on the Nation’s First Design-Build Projec t – Interstate 15 Reconstruction in Salt Lake City, Utah for the 2002 Winter Olympics . More Than Just a LIMMS Assure-IT™ is way more than just a LIMMS – it is a fully functioning, highly capable Quality Management System that can take your Quality Program to the next level. Proof : The ATSER Difference Exceptionally User Friendly Extremely Reliable A Proven Solution Highly Flexible and Scalable Innovative and State-Of-The-Art

25. Product Comparison: Standard Features  SpectraQest Elm Tree MetaField Aurigo Web-Based Server and Connection ✔ ✔ - ✔ - ✔ _ ✔ _ Permission Model Advanced Roles ✔ ++ ✔ - ✔ - ✔ _ ✔ - Sample Logging ✔ ✔ _ ✔ _ ✔ _ ✔ _ Billing Assignment ✔ ✔ - ✔ - ✔ _ Dispatching Features ✔ + ✔ _ ✔ _ ✔ - ✔ - Export Data Excel, Adobe Acrobat (PDF), Crystal, Etc. ✔ + ✔ - ✔ + ✔ _ Compatible with All Browsers ✔ ++   ✔ - Compatible with All Operating Systems ✔ ++ ✔ _   ✔ _ ✔ _ Mobile Device (Online) Compatibility ✔ + ✔ _ ✔ _   ✔ + ✔ _ Mobile Device (Offline) Compatibility ✔ ++     ✔ _   Easily Integrates with Project Management Software ✔       ✔ - Customizable Facilitates Future Testing Methods ✔ +     ✔ -   Customizable Workflows ✔ +     ✔ _ ✔ _ Proof : The ATSER Difference

26. Product Comparison: Key Features   SpectraQest Elm Tree MetaField Aurigo Bid-Item Link to Test Requirements and Testing Frequency ✔ ++         Audit | Inspection Checklists QA, QC and Safety ✔ +     ✔ - ✔ - Field Coordination Through GPS ✔ ++       ✔ - Validation Features ✔ +   ✔ -   ✔ - Accreditation Features ✔ +     Adhoc Report Generation Web-Based ✔ +     ✔ +   Multiple Test Assignments ✔ +     ✔ - ✔ - Chain of Custody Documentation and Tracking ✔         Sample Indexing (Barcode) ✔ ++     ✔ -   Sample Indexing (RFID) ✔ ++       Sample Indexing (Traceability & Activity Numbering) ✔ +       Materials Tracking (Detailed) ✔ +     ✔ - ✔ - Dashboards Sampling and Testing ✔ ++       ✔ - GIS Indexing and Mapping (Sample & Test Location) ✔ ++         Field Inspection Reporting (iOS, Android, Windows, MacOS) ✔ + ✔ -   ✔ - ✔ - Non-Conformance Alerting and Reporting ✔ +     ✔ -   Field-Testing Worksheets ✔     ✔ - ✔ - Library of Best Practices (Testing) ✔       ✔ - Library of Best Practices (Inspections) ✔ +     ✔ - ✔ - Connects Lab Materials to Testing Equipment ✔ +       ✔ - Direct Link to Laboratory Equipment and Material ✔ ++ ✔ - ✔ -     Testing | Inspection Planning Development and Control ✔   ✔ -   ✔ - Non-Conformance Alerting and Reporting ✔ +       ✔ - Plant Rating Feature ✔ +         Statistical Analysis Advanced, Robust, Web-Based ✔ ++   ✔ -   ✔ - Proof : The ATSER Difference

27. 1996 UDOT Interstate 15 1999 CDOT T-REX 2000 WsDOT Tacoma Narrows 2004 HCTRA Program Wide 2005 TxDOT Camino Columbia 2010 British Columbia Sea to Sky 2011 TxDOT Chisolm Trail 2013 TxDOT NTE 3A 2015 GDOT NWC 2016 GDOT I-285 2016 GDOT Statewide Bridge Repair 2017 MassDOT Statewide 2019 GDOT Statewide 2019 MDOT I-75 Proof: LIMMS Experience Over A Quarter-Of-A-Century of DOT LIMMS Experience:

28. LIMMS Deployment References No. Client Contact Phone Number E-Mail Address 1. Utah DOT John Bourne, P.E. [phone] [email protected] 2. Colorado DOT Del Walker, P.E. [phone] [email protected] 3. HCTRA Burt Lee, P.E. (713) 5878-7981 [email protected] 4. Georgia DOT Ron Wishon, P.E. Al Casteel [phone] [phone] [email protected] [email protected] 5. TxDOT (NTE 3A) Scott Hall, P.E. Rodney Castle [phone] [phone] [email protected] [email protected]

29. Highly Available Production Environment (100% on Power and Connectivity) Multiple Data Centers (in the event of disaster) Scale Out Architecture Multiple Layers of Security (Real-Time Alerts) Compliant with SSAE16, SOC1 and SOC2 (NIST) Proof : IT Infrastructure Policy

30. Q & A

31. Cost Proposal Item Cost   Named User Block (NTE) 465 $, Cost for Period 12 Mos. (see Note 1) $83,700.00 One Time Fixed Costs: (Set-Up $30,000.00, Adaptation $ 60,000.00, Technical Support $ 10,000.00) $100,000.00 Total of all fixed costs for initial contract period (Year 1 through 5) $518,500.00 AD HOC COSTS over initial contract period $12,100.00 Grand Total $530,600.00 Additional Items  (If Authorized) $, Cost for Period 24 Mos. (Year 6-7) $250,000.00 $, Cost for Period 24 Mos. (Year 8-9) $250,000.00 Note(s): 1. Assumes a Five (5) Year Contract with optional Two (2) two Year Renewals.

32. Cost Proposal Breakdown There are Three Phases for Deployment and Implementation: Phase 1: 58 Test Methods Phase 2: 35 Test Methods Phase 3: 15 Test Methods We ignored the second part ( AdHoc )? There are 400 Hours: Included within the presented Adaption Cost is 400/ Hrs of which Maine DOT has the choice to allocate those hours where they feel the software needs to be adapted to suit their needs. 465 NU – Required by MaineDOT: