Mandibular fractures

73,296 views 45 slides Jan 09, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 45
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45

About This Presentation

fractures of mandible


Slide Content

MANDIBULAR FRACTURES Dr ARJUN SHENOY

Contents. Introduction. Surgical anatomy History. Epidemiology. Classification systems Clinical features and diagnosis Radiographic features Conclusion. References.

Introduction. Maxillofacial injuries. Mandibular fractures – prominence of mandible Occlusion Management.

Surgical anatomy Strongest facial bone Parabola shaped bone Angle of curvature is 110-140° Mandible is the 2 nd bone to ossify Energy of 44.6-74.4 kg/m required to fracture the mandible.

Weak areas of mandible Junction between alveolar bone & basal mandibular bone. Symphysis region - junction of two individual bones. Parasymphyseal region - lateral to the mental prominence, incisive fossa and mental foramen. Junction of the ramus and the body are fractured commonly. Presence of impacted tooth, canine with long roots.

Age changes of mandible. Mental foramena. child – near inferior border. old age – near alveolar ridge. Ramus angle. child & old – obtuse Alveolar ridge Blood supply

Safe distance in mandible. Average thickness of Cortex in symphysis & parasymphisis region is 2.5 mm Average thickness of Cortex in premolar & Body region is 3.5 mm

Distance between I .A. Canal & cortex At bicuspid - 4.0 mm Molar region - 5.9 mm Anteriorly distance Between adjacent Root apices is 3.7 mm Posteriorly distance Between adjacent Root apices is 6.3 mm

Champy’s principles Forces of mastication produce tensional forces on upper border & forces of compression on lower border. Champy put forward the lines where plates & screws have to be placed - “ideal osteosynthesis lines” It corresponds to course of a line of tension at base of the alveolar process. Only in symphysis region, 2 plates are placed to neutralize torsional forces.

Blood supply. Helps in the healing of fractured bone. Endosteal blood supply via inferior dental artery & veins. Peripheral blood supply - Periosteum

Nerve supply. Inferior alveolar nerve Damage - angle & body # Anesthesia or parasthesia of the nerve Recovery / regeneration - 3 to 12 months

History. Egyptian Papyrus (1650 BC) – Examination, diagnosis & treatment. Hippocrates – Approximation of # segments. Salerno, Italy (1180) – Proper occlusion. 1492, the book Cyrurgia by Guglielmo Salicetti – use of IMF. John Barton - Barton Bandage

1860 GILMER GILMERS WIRING & FULL ARCH BARS 1900 MAHE PLATING KIT SIMILAR TO MODERN SYSTEMS 1920 F. RISDON RISDONS WIRING 1961 LUHR DYNAMIC COMPRESSION PLATES 1970 BRONS & BOERING LAG SCREWS 1973 MICHELET MINIPLATES FOR MAND OSTEOSYNTHESIS 1978 CHAMPY MINIPLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS PRINCIPALS

Epidemiology. Etiology:

Age. Sex Site

CAR ACCIDENTS ASSAULTS BIKE ACCIDENTS

Classification General Anatomical Completeness Mechanism of injury Number of fragments Shape of fracture Direction & favorability of treatment Presence or absence of teeth AO classification.

Kruger's Classification SIMPLE ( CLOSED) Linear fracture lines which do not communicate with the exterior COMPOUND ( OPEN) The fracture is communicating intraorally or extraorally. COMMUNITED Shattering of bone into multiple pieces

COMPLEX COMPLICATED They is adjunct injury to the adjacent nerves or major blood vessels , joints. IMPACTED One fragment is firmly driven within the other fragment and clinical movement not appreciated GREENSTICK Only one cortex broken. Common in children PATHOLOGICAL Spontaneous fracture as a result of normal muscle contraction or trauma due to increased weakness of underlying bone . Impacted fracture

Dingman & Natvig classification Symphysis fracture Canine region fracture Body of the mandible fracture Angle fracture Ramus fracture Coronoid fracture Condylar fracture Dentoalveolar fracture

Direction & favorability of treatment Horizontally Favourable Fracture line runs downward & forward so upward displacement avoided Horizontally Unfavourable Fracture line runs Down Wards and Back Wards so upward Displacement Unrestricted

VERTICALLY FAVORABLE VERTICALLY UNFAVORABLE FRACTURE LINE RUNS FROM THE OUTER BUCCAL PLATE OBLIQUELY BACKWARDS AND LINGUALLY , MEDIAL MOVEMENT RESTRICTED FRACTURE LINE RUNS FROM THE INNER LINGUAL PLATE OBLIQUELY BACKWARDS AND BUCCALLY , MEDIAL MOVEMENT UNRESTRICTED

Presence or absence of teeth Kazanjian V.H. & Converse J.M. CLASS 1 TEETH ON BOTH SIDES OF FRACTURE LINE MONOMAXILLARY CLASS II TEETH ONLY ON ONE SIDE OF THE FRACTURE LINE INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION CLASS III EDENTULOUS PATIENT OPEN REDUCTION / PROSTHESIS

AO Classification F NO. OF FRACTURE OR FRAGMENTS L LOCATION OF THE FRACTURE O STATUS OF OCCLUSION S SOFT TISSUE INVOLVEMENT A ASSOCIATED FRACTURES

F: NO. OF FRACTURES F0 Incomplete fractures F1 Single fractures F2 Multiple fractures F3 Comminuted fractures F4 Fracture with bone defect

L: Location of fracture L1 Pre-canine L2 Canine L3 Post-canine L4 Angle L5 Supra-angular L6 Condyle L7 Coronoid L8 Alveolar process

O: Status of occlusion O 0 No malocclusion O 1 Malocclusion O 2 Edentulous mandible

A: Associated fracture A 0 None A 1 Dentoalveolar fracture A 2 Nasal bone fracture A 3 Zygoma fracture A 4 Lefort I A 5 Lefort II A 6 Lefort III

Clinical examination. History Mechanism of injury Extraoral / Intraoral

Clinical features. Extensive edema Tenderness. step deformity bone crepitus Facial asymmetry

Deviation of jaw Restriction of mouth opening

Extensive soft tissue and bony defect

Collapsed arch and Interfragmentary mobility Open bite due bilateral poster Gagging of occlusion Open bite and cross bite due to Unilateral gagging of occlusion Occlusal step with Unilateral cross bite

Mandibular fracture has to be differentiated from extensive Soft tissue injury and dentoalveolar trauma UNILATERAL CROSS BITE UNILATERAL OPEN BITE

Multiple fragmentation With complete loss of occlusion Sublingual hematoma Unfavorable fracture line Causing displacement

Displacement of fracture Direction and intensity of the traumatic force. Site of fracture. Direction of fracture line. Muscle pull exerted on fractured fragments. Presence or absence of teeth. Extent of soft tissue wound.

Radiographic features OPG PA View PNS View Lateral oblique Radiograph Occlusal view CT scan.

Commonly used. Entire mandible is visualized. OPG view

PA view. Medial / lateral displacement.

Indicated for Visualizing Medial Displacement Of Condylar Neck The 4 th & 5 th MacGregor Line coincides with Mandible PNS view

Because of distortion in Symphysis Region in an OPG , an Occlusal View is indicated in Symphysial fractures Also shows Vertical Favorability of Body Fractures Occlusal view

CT scan. Condylar fracture. Cervical spine injury.

Management of mandibular fractures. To be continued…..

References. Oral & maxillofacial trauma- Fonseca,vol 1 Maxillofacial Injuries- Rowe & Williams Textbook of oral & maxillofacial surgery by Peter Ward Booth. Textbook of oral & maxillofacial surgery by Neelima malik. Killeys - fractures of the mandible