METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF new23.pptx

metode penelitian kuantitatif

1. CURRICULUM VITAE Prof.Drs.Dewa Komang Tantra , Dip.App.Ling , MSc,MA,Ph.D Pendidikan : Sarmu FKIP UNUD, S1 di Yogya , S2 Di Singapura , S2 di AS, S3 di AS, Post-Doctor di Australia Negara yg dikunjungi : Malaysia, Singapura , Thailand, Filipina, Jepang , Srilanka , India, Korea, Hongkong , Hawai , Jerman , Belanda , Perancis , Inggris , Cairo, Abudhabi , Oman, Hawai, Amerika Serikat , Australia , China, Turki, Bangladesh Pekerjaan : Dosen S1 dan S2 Undiksha Sgr UNUD (S2 dan S3 Linguistik , Kajian Budaya , Kedokteran , Pariwisata ), S2 UNHI, S2 IHDN, S3 di La Trobe Univ.Melbourne , Penguji Tamu di Newcastle University dan New South Wales, Australia Bank Dunia , Asian Development Bank (ADB), Dikti , Ditjen.PMPTK , Ditjen.Man Dikdasmen , Balitbang Diknas,Ditjen.PNFI , Ketua Badan Akreditasi Nasional PNF dll .

2. TEKNIKPENYUSUNAN PROPOSAL DAN LAPORAN HASIL PENELITIAN PROSES PENELITIAN MASALAH TEORI & EMPIRI HIPOTESIS VARIABEL DESAIN & INSTRUMEN POPULASI & SAMPEL PENGUMPULAN DATA ANALISIS DATA PELAPORAN HASIL

3. B . MASALAH PENELITIAN 1. DEFINISI MASALAH 1) TARGET ANALISIS (target of analysis) 2) KESENJANGAN ( real gap) 3) PENYAKIT (illness or in-efficiency) 2. SUMBER MASALAH 1) PENYIMPANGAN ANTARA PENGALAMAN DENGAN KENYATAAN 2) PENYIMPANGAN ANTARA YANG DIIDEALKAN DENGAN KENYATAAN 3) ADA PENGADUAN 4) ADA PERSAINGAN 3. RUMUSAN MASALAH 1) MASALAH DESKRIPTIF (Seberapa baik,tinggi atau luas suatu sistem/kebijakan/dll ? ) 2) MASALAH KOMPARATIF (Adakah perbedaan antara X dan Y ?) 3) MASALAH ASOSIATIF (Adakah hubungan/pengaruh/ kontribusi antara x dan y ? )

4. C . LANDASAN TEORI DAN KAJIAN PUSTAKA PENGERTIAN ( Seperangkat konstruk atau konsep yang saling berkaitan, definisi, dan proposisi yang menyajikan suatu pandangan tentang sebuah gejala dengan menspesifikasi hubungan antar variabel dan bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan memprediksi sebuah gejala tertentu). JENIS TEORI 1) TEORI DEDUKTIF : memberi keterangan yang dimulai dari suatu perkiraan atau pikiran spekulatif tertentu ke arah data yang akan diterangkan 2) TEORI INDUKTIF : memberi keterangan dari data ke arah teori 3) TEORI FUNGSIONAL : memberi keterangan dengan cara mengaitkan antara data dengan perkiraan teoretis 3. KAJIAN PUSTAKA 1) MEMBERI DUKUNGAN EMPIRIS 2) MEMPERKUAT SIGNIFIKANSI PENELITIAN 3) ALTERNATIF UNTUK PENELITIAN YANG DIAJUKAN

5. 4. KERANGKA BERPIKIR Sebuah penjelasan secara teoretik tentang pertautan antar variabel yang akan diteliti MODEL PENELITIAN Hubungan secara menyeluruh antar masalah, teori/kajian pustaka, metodologi, dan simpulan hasil penelitian

6. C. VARIABEL PENELITIAN 1. JENIS VARIABEL 1) ORGANISMIK ( organismic variable ) 2) ATRIBUT ( attributive variable ) 3) BEBAS VS TERIKAT ( independent vs dependent variable ) 4) TERSEMBUNYI ( lurking variable ) 5) MODERATOR ( moderator variable ) 6) SELA ( intervening variable ) 7) BONEKA ( dummy variable ) 8) PENEKAN ( suppresor variable ) 2. UNIT ANALISIS 1) INDIVIDUAL 2) KOMPOSIT 3. PENGUKURAN VARIABEL 1) INTERVAL 2) NOMINAL 3) ORDINAL 4) RASIO

7. D. PARADIGMA PENELITIAN 1. SEDERHANA 2. SEDERHANA BERURUTAN 3. GANDA DENGAN DUA VARIABEL 4. GANDA DENGAN TIGA VARIABEL 5. GANDA DENGAN DUA VARIABEL TERIKAT 6. GANDA DENGAN DUA VARIABEL BEBAS DAN DUA VARIABEL TERIKAT 7. JALUR

8. F. DESAIN PENELITIAN OBSERVASIONAL (SURVEI DANNATURALISTIK) EKSPERIMENTAL 1. PRA-EKSPERIMEN (ONE SHOT CASE STUDY, ONE PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN, INTACT GROUP COMPARISON) 2. EKSPERIMEN MURNI (POSTTEST ONLY CONTROL GROUP DESIGN,FACTORIAL DESIGN) 3. EKSPERIMEN KUASI (TIME SERIES DESIGN , NON-EQUIVALENCE CONTROL GROUP DESIGN ) G. POPULASI, SAMPEL, DAN SAMPLING 1. POPULASI 2. SAMPEL 3. SAMPLING (PROBABILITY DAN NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING TECHNIQUES)

9. SAMPLING TECHNIQUES NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING: QUOTA AND PURPOSIVE SAMPLING PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 1. STRATIFIED SAMPLING 2. PROPORTIONAL SAMPLING 3. AREA SAMPLING 4. RANDOM SAMPLING 5. MULTI STAGE SAMPLING

10. H. INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN 1. OBSERVATION CHECKLIST 2. INTERVIEW GUIDE 3. TEST 4. SKALA PENGUKURAN (LIKERT, GUTTMAN, THORNSTONE, SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL) 5. INVENTORY UJI COBA INSTRUMEN/KALIBRASI 1. PRATIKALITAS 2. RELIABILITAS (INTERNAL, STRUKTURAL, TEMPORAL) 3. VALIDITAS (ISI, KONSTRUK, CONCURRENT, PREDICTIVE, , INTERNAL, EXTERNAL)

11. J. TEKNIK PENGUMPULAN DATA 1 . INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN 2. TEKNIK PENGUMPULAN DATA * SETTING (ALAMIAH, NON-ALAMIAH) * SUMBER (PRIMARY, SECONDARY DATA) * TEKNIK (WAWANCARA, OBSERVASI) ANALISIS DATA 1. STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF 2. STATISTIK INFERENSIAL (PARAMETRIK, NON-PARAMETRIK )

12. TERIMA KASIH

13. RESEARCH PROPOSAL Chapter I : INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background (philosophically, conceptually, empirically, relevantly) 1.2 Problems (variable, analysis, setting, question) 1.3 Objectives (output of research; general and specific;) 1.4 Significance (outcome of research ; theoretical and practical ) 1.5 Scope (delimitation of topic, time, area) 1.6 Assumption and Limitation (assumption of variable not controlled; the scope of generalizability ) CHAPTER II: CONCEPT, THEORY, EMPIRY, FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS 2.1 Concept (tautological/theoretical; operational/measurable) 2.2 Theory (descriptive, explanatory, expository, argumentative, associative, causal, deductive or inductive review) 2.3 Empery ( problem, theory, methodology, results/findings) 2.4 Framework (theoretical construct, conceptual framework, research model) 2.5 Hypothesis (null or alternative hypothesis; directional and non-directional) CHAPTER III : METHODOLOGY 3.1 Population (target and sampled population), Sample (size and representativeness), and Sampling (probability and non-probability sampling techniques) 3.2 Research Design (observational, experimental, case, ethonography , action, policy research) 3.3 Methods of Data Collection 3.3.1 Variables (definition and measurement) and Unit of Analysis (composite and individual) 3.3.2 Instruments (test, questionnaire, interview guide, inventory, scale) and Calibration (reliability, validity, practicality) 3.3.2 Process of Data Collection 3.4 Methods of Data Analysis 3.4 1 Type (interval, ordinal, nominal, ratio) and Status of Data (primary, secondary and tertiary) 3.4.2 Data Processing (graphics , diagram) 3.4.3 Data Analysis

14. TITLE : An Interactional Analysis of EFL in Speaking Classes at SMPN 1 Denpasar Background (Reasons for choosing the topic) 1 Philosophically? (essentially) 2. Theoretically? Empirically? Significantly? Speaking is essentially a means for expressing thoughts, ideas, feelings etc. Speaking is one of the four competencies in communication using a language. Speaking is the most crucial competency; however, many students failed to master it. Recent study conducted by Padmadewi (2011) show that about 50% of high school graduates are not able even to pronounce words correctly. Speaking competency will help students to widen social interaction nationally and globally. ,

15. Problems (identification and statement of research problems) Identified problems: Students were not able to find an idea to talk to; Students were not confident in expressing their ideas, thought, feelings etc.; Students’ pronunciation of English is not standard; Students lack of vocabulary to be used in interlocution; Students’ speeches are full of grammatical errors; Students’ fluency in speech delivery is low; Etc.. Statement of Problems (variables, analysis/design, setting, question) What are the interactional patterns ethno-graphed in the speaking class at SMPN 1 Denpasar ? What factors are related to students’ active participation in the speaking class at SMPN 1 Denpasar ? Objecticves (general and specific objectives in terms of research outputs) Mapping of interactional types found in the speaking class. Motives lay behind the students’ participation in learning

16. Significance (theoretical and practical in terms of outcomes) Theoretically, it could benefit teachers and students for successful teaching and learning speaking. Practically, it will enhance high students’ achievement in speaking and better performance. Scope (limit study based on topic, area, time alotted ) This study is limited on speaking classes at SMPN 1 Denpasar . Assumption and Limitation (variables not able to be controlled need to be assumed and there it serves as a limitation of the study)

17. CHAPTER II; CONCEPT, THEORY, EMPIRY, FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS Concept (explain the meaning of key words/variables conceptually and operationally based on a certain theory) Flanders (1978) defined interaction is a phenomenon whereby students and teachers are communicating verbally. Further he measured interaction patterns through three prominent indicators, namely: student questions, answers and participation. 2. Theoretical Foundation (what theory or theories will be used to base the study on) a. Theoretical concept of interaction based on Flander’s theory b. Types of interaction patterns c. Motives behind interaction d. Constraints in interaction development Empirical Foundation (locus of control, theory departure, methodological strategy, findings) Colovage (1990) studied about classroom interaction in EFL in Hongkong . She used an observational case study based on Jerry Master’s Cognitive Theory. She found there are three types of interaction most generally observed during teaching-learning processes, namely: personal, interpersonal and bilateral types. Theoretically, this study is very powerful in disclosing hidden patterns.

18. 4. Conceptual Framework Technique Personality Motivation Question Answer Participation Media The students’ active interaction in asking questions, answering questions and particpating in the classroom is due to their own motivation, which is developed by technique of teaching, students personality and teaching-learning media avaiability . 5. Hypothesis (non-directional/null, directional /alternative and working hypothesis)