Model plant in Molecular biology.pptx by monika andhale

monikaandhale1 217 views 49 slides May 08, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 49
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49

About This Presentation

Model plant in molecular biology Arabidopsis, rice .


Slide Content

WELCOME

Course No: MBB-601 Course Title: Plant Molecular Biology Topic : Model Systems in Plant Biology(Arabidopsis, Rice, etc.)

1. Scientific classification of Arabidopsis Kingdom: Plantae Clade : Tracheophytes Clade : Angiosperms Clade : Eudicots Clade : Rosids Order: Brassicales Family: Brassicaceae Genus: Arabidopsis Species: A. thaliana

Arabidopsis : The Model Plant Arabidopsis thaliana  is a small dicotyledonous species, a member of the Brassicaceae or mustard family. Although closely related to such economically important crop plants as turnip, cabbage, broccoli, and canola, Arabidopsis is not an economically important plant. I t has been the focus of intense genetic, biochemical and physiological study for over 40 years because of several traits that make it very desirable for laboratory study. As a photosynthetic organism,  Arabidopsis  requires only light, air, water and a few minerals to complete its life cycle. It has a fast life cycle, produces numerous self progeny, has very limited space requirements, and is easily grown in a greenhouse or indoor growth chamber.

It possesses a relatively small, genetically tractable genome that can be manipulated through genetic engineering more easily and rapidly than any other plant genome. Arabidopsis , like all flowering plants, dehydrates and stores its progeny at ambient temperature for long periods of time. This fact of creating gene knockout lines, has made many basic biologists realize that Arabidopsis may be the best model system for basic research in the biology of all multicellular eukaryotes. All together, these traits make Arabidopsis an ideal model organism for biological research and the species of choice for a large and growing community of scientists studying complex, advanced multicellular organisms.

Genomics Nuclear genome Due to the small size of its  genome, and because it is  diploid,   Arabidopsis thaliana  is useful for genetic mapping and sequencing  - with about 157 megabase pairs  and five chromosomes,  A. thaliana  has one of the smallest genomes among plants. It was the first plant genome to be sequenced, completed in 2000 by the  Arabidopsis  Genome Initiative .   The most up-to-date version of the  A. thaliana  genome is maintained by the Arabidopsis Information Resource . The genome encodes ~27,600 protein-coding genes and about 6,500 non-coding genes.

Among the 27,600 protein-coding genes 25,402 (91.8%) are now annotated with "meaningful" product names. Uniprot lists more than 3,000 proteins as "uncharacterized" as part of the reference proteome. Chloroplast genome The plastome of  A. thaliana  is a 154,478 base-pair-long DNA molecule ,  a size typically encountered in most flowering plants. It comprises 136 genes coding for small subunit ribosomal proteins, large subunit ribosomal proteins ( rpl , orange), hypothetical chloroplast open reading frame proteins ( ycf , lemon), proteins involved in photosynthetic reactions (green) or in other functions (red), ribosomal RNAs ( rrn , blue), and transfer RNAs ( trn , black ).

Mitochondrial genome 1. The mitochondrial genome of  A. thaliana  is 367,808 base pairs long and contains 57 genes .   2. There are many repeated regions in the  Arabidopsis  mitochondrial genome. 3. The largest repeats  recombine regularly and isomerize the genome. 4. Like most plant mitochondrial genomes, the  Arabidopsis  mitochondrial genome exists as a complex arrangement of overlapping branched and linear molecules  in vivo .

Arabidopsis versus plants of economic significance Why Arabidopsis? Why not concentrate our research efforts and resources on a species that will actually provide food for our world or useful products for industrial uses? In order to make the strides necessary to increase crop production in a relatively short time, we have to be able to move forward quickly and spend the available human and financial resources as efficiently as possible. This is the advantage of a model system: an organism that is easily manipulated, genetically tractable, and about which much is already known. By studying the biology of Arabidopsis, the model plant, we can gain comprehensive knowledge of a complete plant. In the laboratory, Arabidopsis offers the ability to test hypotheses quickly and efficiently.

With the knowledge we gain from the model plant thus established as a reference system, we can move forward with research and rapidly initiate improvements in plants of economic and cultural importance. One advantage offered to the plant researcher by Arabidopsis is its relatively small genome size. Many crop species have large genomes, often as a result of polyploidization events and accumulation of non-coding sequences during their evolution. Maize has a genome of approximately 2400 Megabase pairs ( Mbp ) – around 19 times the size of the Arabidopsis genome – with probably no more than double the number of genes, most of which occur in duplicate within the genome. The wheat genome is 16000 Mbp – 128 times larger than Arabidopsis and 5 times larger than Homo sapiens – and it has three copies of many of its genes.

The large crop genomes pose challenges to the researcher, including difficulty in sequencing as well as in isolation and cloning of mutant loci. Evidence from the rice genome project suggests that the Arabidopsis genome may be missing some homologs of genes present in the rice genome. Despite this, most of the difference in gene number between Arabidopsis and crop species appears to result from polyploidy of crop species’ genomes, rather than from large classes of genes present in crop species that are not present in Arabidopsis. Therefore , the genes present in Arabidopsis represent a reasonable model for the plant kingdom. However, it is clear that Arabidopsis represents a starting point rather than the finish line for utilizing the full power of genomics for crop improvement.

Kingdom:  Plantae Division:  Magnoliophyta Class:  Liliopsida Order:  Cyperales Family:  Gramineae Genus:  Oryza Species:  Sativa Subspecies:  Indica Common name: Paddy 2. Scientific classification of rice

Rice is emerging as a model cereal for molecular biological studies. The main reasons for this are as follows: The complete genome has been sequenced. Although the complete rice genome sequence is the proprietary information of a private company, an international group is expected to generate complete genome sequences that will be accessible to anyone in the near future. In addition, a large expressed sequence tag (EST) database is available to researchers, facilitating a quick identification of genes of interest. Tools for functional genomics are available. Transposon- and T-DNA-tagged rice populations exist, and the microarray technology for studying mRNA expression profiles is available. Production of transgenic plants is relatively easy compared to that of other major cereals. Efficient use of  Agrobacterium -mediated transformation made routine use of transgenic rice possible for a variety of research purposes. Rice : The model plant

Rice has been cultivated as a major crop for more than 7000 years, and it currently sustains more than half the world population. Rice and many other food plants are monocotyledons - such plants are of clear importance, and yet they are distinct from the dicotyledonous model plant  Arabidopsis  in many aspects of development. Recent advances in research on rice include efficient transformation, the creation of a highly saturated molecular map, and the large-scale analysis of expressed sequence tags. Indeed , the number of complementary DNAs analyzed in rice is approaching the number analyzed in  Arabidopsis . Rice has reached the point where it can be usefully considered a model monocotyledonous plant.

Rice is an excellent model system for functional genomics studies due to its small genome size, availability of genetic resources, high transformation efficiency, and greater genomic synteny with other cereals. Therefore , rice has been increasingly used to test the efficiency of different types of genome editing technologies, to study the functions of various genes and demonstrate their potential in rice improvement. Although several reviews on genome editing and its role in plants have been published in the recent times, an elaborative review particularly on genome editing of rice is the need of the hour keeping in view the rapid and large accumulation of case studies on genome editing of this agriculturally important crop . The application of genome editing tools have broaden rice research, bringing in new opportunities to develop novel varieties with improved productivity and quality.

In the present review, we focus on the different genome editing strategies and their applications in rice improvement using specific case studies. We have also highlighted the emergence of CRISPR/Cpf1 system and base editing as a suitable alternative to traditional CRISPR/Cas9 system for rice improvement. Furthermore, review also focusses on the major challenges and future implications of genome editing the in rice improvement.

THANK YOU…

Forward Genetics Forward genetics  is a  molecular genetics  approach of determining the genetic basis responsible for a phenotype. Forward genetics provides an unbiased approach because it relies heavily on identifying the genes or genetic factors that cause a particular phenotype or trait of interest. [1] This was initially done by using naturally occurring mutations or inducing mutants with radiation, chemicals, or  insertional mutagenesis  (e.g.  transposable elements ). Subsequent breeding takes place, mutant individuals are isolated, and then the gene is  mapped . Forward genetics can be thought of as a counter to  reverse genetics , which determines the function of a gene by analyzing the phenotypic effects of altered DNA sequences .  

Mutant phenotypes are often observed long before having any idea which gene is responsible, which can lead to genes being named after their mutant phenotype (e.g.  Drosophila   rosy  gene which is named after the eye colour in mutants ). Techniques used in Forward Genetics: Forward genetics provides researchers with the ability to identify genetic changes caused by mutations that are responsible for individual phenotypes in organisms .  There are three major steps involved with the process of forward genetics which includes: making random mutations, selecting the phenotype or trait of interest, and identifying the gene and its function. Forward genetics involves the use of several mutagenesis processes to induce DNA mutations at random which may include:

Chemical mutagenesis Insertional mutagenesis Radiation mutagenesis Post mutagenesis A)Chemical mutagenesis: Chemical mutagenesis is an easy tool that is used to generate a broad spectrum of mutant alleles. Chemicals like ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) cause random point mutations particularly in G/C to A/T transitions due to guanine alkylation . These point mutations are typically loss-of-function or null alleles because they generate stop codons in the DNA sequence .  

These types of mutagens can be useful because they are easily applied to any organism but they were traditionally very difficult to map, although the advent of next-generation sequencing has made this process considerably easier. Another chemical such as ENU, also known as N-ethyl-N- nitrosourea works similarly to EMS. ENU also induces random point mutations where all codons are equally liable to change. These point mutations modify gene function by inducing different alleles, including gain or loss of function mutations in protein-coding or noncoding regions in the genome .

B) Radiation mutagenesis : Other methods such as using radiation to cause large deletions and chromosomal rearrangements can be used to generate mutants as well. Ionizing radiation can be used to induce genome-wide mutations as well as chromosomal duplications, inversions, and translocations. Similarly, short wave UV light works in the same way as ionizing radiation which can also induce mutations generating chromosomal rearrangements. When DNA absorbs short wave UV light, dimerizing and oxidative mutations can occur which can cause severe damage to the DNA sequence of an organism.

C) Insertional mutagenesis : Mutations can also be generated by  insertional mutagenesis. Most often, insertional mutagenesis involves the use of transposons, which introduces dramatic changes in the genome of an organism. Transposon movements can create random mutations in the DNA sequence by changing its position within a genome, therefore modifying gene function, and altering the organism’s genetic information. For example, transposable elementscontaining a marker are mobilized into the genome at random. These transposons are often modified to transpose only once, and once inserted into the genome a selectable marker can be used to identify the mutagenized individuals. Since a known fragment of DNA was inserted this can make mapping and cloning the gene much easier.

D) Post mutagenesis : Once mutagenized and screened, typically a complementation test is done to ensure that mutant phenotypes arise from the same genes if the mutations are recessive .  If the progeny after a cross between two recessive mutants have a wild-type phenotype, then it can be inferred that the phenotype is determined by more than one gene . Typically , the allele exhibiting the strongest phenotype is further analyzed. A genetic map can then be created using  linkage and genetic markers, and then the gene of interest can be cloned and sequenced. If many alleles of the same genes are found, the screen is said to be saturated and it is likely that all of the genes involved producing the phenotype were found .

Reverse genetics: Reverse genetics  is a method in molecular genetics that is used to help understand the function(s) of a gene by analysing the phenotypic effects caused by genetically engineering specific nucleic acid sequences within the gene. The process proceeds in the opposite direction to forward genetic screens of classical genetics. While forward genetics seeks to find the genetic basis of a phenotype or trait, reverse genetics seeks to find what phenotypes are controlled by particular genetic sequences. Automated DNA sequencing generates large volumes of genomic sequence data relatively rapidly. Many genetic sequences are discovered in advance of other, less easily obtained, biological information.

Reverse genetics attempts to connect a given genetic sequence with specific effects on the organism . Reverse genetics systems can also allow the recovery and generation of infectious or defective viruses with desired mutations. This allows the ability to study the virus  in vitro  and  in vivo .

Techniques used: In order to learn the influence a sequence has on phenotype, or to discover its biological function, researchers can engineer a change or disrupt the DNA. After this change has been made a researcher can look for the effect of such alterations in the whole organism. There are several different methods of reverse genetics : Directed deletions and point mutations Gene silencing Interference using transgenes

A) Directed deletions and point mutation: Site-directed mutagenesis is a sophisticated technique that can either change regulatory regions in the promoter of a gene or make subtle codon changes in the open reading frame to identify important amino residues for protein  function Alternatively, the technique can be used to create null alleles so that the gene is not functional. For example, deletion of a gene by gene targeting ( gene knockout ) can be done in some organisms, such as yeast, mice and moss. Unique among plants, in  Physcomitrella patens , gene knockout via  homologous recombination  to create  knockout moss  (see figure) is nearly as efficient as in yeast. [4]  In the case of the yeast model system directed deletions have been created in every non-essential gene in the yeast genome. [5]  In the case of the plant  model system  huge mutant libraries have been created based on gene disruption constructs. [6]  In  gene knock-in , the endogenous exon is replaced by an altered sequence of interest. [7] In some cases conditional alleles can be used so that the gene has normal function until the conditional allele is activated. This might entail 'knocking in'  recombinase  sites (such as lox or frt sites) that will cause a deletion at the gene of interest when a specific recombinase (such as CRE, FLP) is induced.

Cre or Flp recombinases can be induced with chemical treatments, heat shock treatments or be restricted to a specific subset of tissues . Another technique that can be used is  TILLING . This is a method that combines a standard and efficient technique of mutagenesis with a chemical mutagen such as  ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)  with a sensitive DNA-screening technique that identifies  point mutations  in a target gene . In the field of virology, reverse-genetics techniques can be used to recover full-length infectious viruses with desired mutations or insertions in the viral genomes or in specific virus genes. Technologies that allow these manipulations include circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) which was first used to generate infectious cDNA for Kunjin virus a close relative of West Nile virus. [8]  CPER has also been successfully utilised to generate a range of positive-sense RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, [9]  the causative agent of COVID-19.

B) Gene silencing : The discovery of gene silencing using double stranded RNA, also known as RNA interference ( RNAi ), and the development of gene knockdown using  Morpholino oligos , have made disrupting gene expression an accessible technique for many more investigators. This method is often referred to as a  gene knockdown  since the effects of these reagents are generally temporary, in contrast to  gene knockouts  which are permanent. RNAi creates a specific knockout effect without actually mutating the DNA of interest. In  C. elegans , RNAi has been used to systematically interfere with the expression of most genes in the genome. RNAi acts by directing cellular systems to degrade target messenger RNA (mRNA ). RNAi interference, specifically gene silencing, has become a useful tool to silence the expression of genes and identify and analyze their loss-of-function phenotype. When mutations occur in alleles, the function which it represents and encodes also is mutated and lost; this is generally called a loss-of-function mutation. [10]  The ability to analyze the loss-of-function phenotype allows analysis of gene function when there is no access to mutant alleles. [11]

While RNA interference relies on cellular components for efficacy (e.g. the Dicer proteins, the RISC complex) a simple alternative for gene knockdown is  Morpholino  antisense oligos . Morpholinos bind and block access to the target mRNA without requiring the activity of cellular proteins and without necessarily accelerating mRNA degradation. Morpholinos are effective in systems ranging in complexity from cell-free translation in a test tube to  in vivo  studies in large animal models .

C) Interference using transgene: A  molecular genetic approach is the creation of transgenic organisms that overexpress a normal gene of interest. The resulting phenotype may reflect the normal function of the gene. Alternatively it is possible to overexpress mutant forms of a gene that interfere with the normal ( wildtype ) gene's function. For example, over-expression of a mutant gene may result in high levels of a non-functional protein resulting in a dominant negative interaction with the wildtype protein. In this case the mutant version will out compete for the wildtype proteins partners resulting in a mutant phenotype. Other mutant forms can result in a protein that is abnormally regulated and constitutively active ('on' all the time).

This might be due to removing a regulatory domain or mutating a specific amino residue that is reversibly modified (by phosphorylation, methylation, or  ubiquitination ). Either change is critical for modulating protein function and often result in informative phenotypes.

WELCOME

Course No: MBB-601 Course Title: Plant Molecular Biology Course Teacher: Dr. M. P. Moharil Topic : Cytoplasmic Male Sterility

CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY Cytoplasmic male sterility  is total or partial male sterility in hermaphrodite organisms, as the result of specific nuclear and  mitochondrial interactions. Male sterility is the failure to produce functional anthers, pollen, or male gametes. Such male sterility in hermaphrodite populations leads to gynodioecious populations (populations with coexisting fully functioning hermaphrodites and male-sterile hermaphrodites). Cytoplasmic male sterility, as the name indicates, is under extranuclear genetic control (under control of the mitochondrial or plastid genomes). It shows non- Mendelian inheritance, with male sterility inherited maternally. In general, there are two types of cytoplasm: N (normal) and aberrant S (sterile) cytoplasms . These types exhibit reciprocal differences.

CMS is one case of male-sterility, but this condition can also originate from nuclear genes. In the case of nuclear male sterility (when male sterility is caused by a nuclear mutation), the transmission of the male sterility allele is cut in half, since the entire male reproductive pathway is canceled. CMS differs from the latter case (nuclear male sterility) because most cytoplasmic genetic elements are only transmitted maternally. This entails that for a cytoplasmic genetic element, causing male sterility doesn't affect its transmission rate since it is not transmitted via the male reproductive pathway .

Inactivation of the male reproductive pathway (sperm production, production of male reproductive organs, etc ) can lead to resource relocation to the female reproductive pathway, increasing the female reproductive capabilities (female fitness), this phenomenon is referred to as Female Advantage (FA). The female advantage of many gynodioecious species has been quantified (as the ratio between male- sterile's female fitness and hermaphrodites' female fitness) and is mostly comprised between 1 and 2.

In the case of nuclear male-sterility, a female advantage of at least 2 is required to make it evolutionary neutral (FA=2) or advantageous (FA > 2) since half of the transmission is cut because of the male-sterility allele . Cytoplasmic male-sterility requires no female advantage to be evolutionary neutral (FA=1), or a small female advantage to be evolutionary advantageous (FA > 1 ). As far as we know, CMS is much more common than nuclear male-sterility with results from a study of 49 gynodioecious plants found 17 species (35%) exhibiting CMS and only 7 (14%) exhibiting nuclear male-sterility (all remaining species have unknown determinism of male-sterility ).

Genetic sterility: While CMS is controlled by an extranuclear genome, nuclear genes may have the capability to restore fertility. When nuclear restoration of fertility genes is available for a CMS system in any crop, it is cytoplasmic–genetic male sterility; the sterility is manifested by the influence of both nuclear (with Mendelian inheritance) and cytoplasmic (maternally inherited) genes. There are also restorers of fertility ( Rf ) genes that are distinct from genetic male sterility genes. The   Rf  genes have no expression of their own unless the sterile cytoplasm is present.  Rf  genes are required to restore fertility in S cytoplasm that causes sterility. Thus plants with N cytoplasm are fertile and S cytoplasm with genotype  Rf - leads to fertiles while S cytoplasm with  rfrf  produces only male steriles .

Another feature of these systems is that  Rf  mutations ( i.e. , mutations to  rf  or no fertility restoration) are frequent, so that N cytoplasm with  Rfrf  is best for stable fertility. Cytoplasmic–genetic male sterility systems are widely exploited in crop plants for hybrid breeding due to the convenience of controlling sterility expression by manipulating the gene–cytoplasm combinations in any selected  genotype.. Incorporation of these systems for male sterility evades the need for emasculation in cross-pollinated species, thus encouraging cross breeding producing only hybrid seeds under natural conditions.

n hybrid breeding: Hybrid production requires a plant from which no viable male gametes are introduced. This selective exclusion of viable male gametes can be accomplished via different paths. One path, emasculation is done to prevent a plant from producing pollen so that it can serve only as a female parent. Another simple way to establish a female line for hybrid seed production is to identify or create a line that is unable to produce viable pollen. Since a male-sterile line cannot self-pollinate, seed formation is dependent upon pollen from another male line. Cytoplasmic male sterility is also used in hybrid seed production. In this case, male sterility is maternally transmitted and all progeny will be male sterile. These CMS lines must be maintained by repeated crossing to a sister line (known as the maintainer line) that is genetically identical except that it possesses normal cytoplasm and is therefore male-fertile.

In cytoplasmic–genetic male sterility restoration of fertility is done using restorer lines carrying nuclear genes. The male-sterile line is maintained by crossing with a maintainer line carrying the same nuclear genome but with normal fertile cytoplasm. For crops such as onions or carrots where the commodity harvested from the F1 generation is vegetative growth, male sterility is not a problem.

Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), a condition under which a plant is unable to produce functional pollen, is widespread among higher plants. CMS systems represent a valuable tool in the production of hybrid seed in self-pollinating crop species, including maize, rice, cotton, and a number of vegetable crops. Hybrids often exhibit heterosis , more commonly known as hybrid vigor, whereby hybrid progeny exhibit superior growth characteristics relative to either of the parental lines. CMS systems can be of considerable value in facilitating efficient hybrid seed production.

There is growing interest in improving hybrid technology both to help supply food for the world’s increasing population and to contribute to land conservation efforts. For example, the use of hybrid rice enabled China to reduce the total amount of land planted to rice from 36.5 Mha in 1975 to 30.5 Mha in 2000 while at the same time increasing total production from 128 to 189 million tons, representing a yield increase of 3.5 to 6.2 tons/ha. Understanding the molecular basis of CMS, as well as other hybrid production methods involving self-incompatibility and apomixis , is critical for continued improvements in hybrid technology
Tags