NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 1 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation.docx

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 1 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation.docx

1. Assessment 1: Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
Student Name
Capella University
Course Name
Prof Name
June 1, 2024
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample

2. Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
Clinical consideration affiliations from one side of the planet to the other are
interminably attempting to work on their quality and prosperity execution to agree with
the solicitations of clinical benefits structures. These affiliations are actually making
quality and prosperity undertakings to chip away at their presentation as per public,
state, and government benchmarks spread out for the clinical consideration region. One
basic pointer in clinical benefits affiliations is the show dashboard, which gives
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample

3. information on current practices and quality and security markers. This information is
fundamental for clinical consideration relationships to assess whether needed results
are achieved and to execute huge exercises to further develop clinical consideration
quality and prosperity for buyers (Helminski et al., 2022).
Evaluation of Dashboard Metrics with Benchmarks Set
The dashboard estimations used for this evaluation are gotten from the Tolerance
Clinical Center (MMC), known as one of the top clinical consideration relationships in
the district. The picked estimations from a diabetes dashboard incorporate eye
evaluation, foot evaluation, and HBA1c, overviewed quarterly for the years 2019 and
2020. In the last quarter, the vast majority of patients were female (62%), with the
greatest number of yielded patients in the 40-64 age pack (38%).
Generally, 63% of the patient population was White, while simply 6% were Asians.
Assessment of MMC estimations reveals that in 2019, 200 eye tests were driven,
extending to 232 out of 2020. Foot evaluations extended from 230 to 235 in the two
years, while HBA1c tests essentially extended from 210 to 272. This augmentation
raises stresses for the Graciousness Clinical Center.
The dashboard data exhibit high fluctuations in foot evaluations and HBA1c tests, with
immaterial change in the number of eye tests driven. These appraisals are huge for
diabetic patients, and the information is essential for MMC to further develop clinical
consideration organization quality. The benchmark set by the Public Clinical benefits
Quality and Uniqueness Report (NHQDR) for foot evaluation is 84% every year.
Regardless, in Kindheartedness Clinical Center, around 40% of patients had foot tests
in 2019, and around 42% in 2020. For HBA1c levels, MMC data in 2019 showed 37.3%
of tests coordinated, extending to 48.3% in 2020, diverged from the public benchmark of
79.5% undertaking HBA1c tests something like twice consistently.
The benchmark set for eye tests is 75.2%, shifting from MMC with 35.5% tests in 2019
and generally 41% in 2020 (AHRQ, n.d.). The relationship between's open benchmarks
and Mercy Clinical Center data uncovers an immense opening, showing the necessity
for MMC to deal with its quality and execution. The missing information is crucial for
examination of the purposes behind the affiliation's deficiency in diabetes evaluation
compared to public benchmarks.
Analysis of the Consequences of Not Meeting the Benchmarks
Huge differentiations between open benchmarks and MMC data are perceived in foot
appraisals and HBA1c levels. This underperformance could incite implications for
diabetic patients, including extended facility readmission rates, morbidities, and
mortalities. Besides, the affiliation risks losing its clinical benefits reputation and
experiencing a reduction in patient union. Lacking testing for diabetic patients could
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample

4. achieve rash assurance, treatment, and the executives, inciting lamentable outcomes
and extended readmissions. According to the Center Readmission Decline Program,
clinical consideration relationships with high readmission rates are rebuffed for reduced
quality and execution (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Organizations, 2023).
Another outcome is an extended inauspiciousness and demise rate. Cautious
appraisals, including foot and leg evaluations and HBA1c tests, help early finding and
affliction the board. HBA1c fills in as a biomarker for diabetes finding, while early foot
evaluations hinder diabetic foot ulcers (Kaiafa et al., 2020; Tune and Chamber, 2023).
Inadequate tests could achieve bad quality of care, conceded end and treatment, and
potentially cause patient passings. Financial loads may moreover arise for both the
clinical facility and patients because of massive costs related to readmission rates and
outrageous morbidities.
These outcomes have implications for patients, the affiliation, and the gatherings.
Patients could face limited clinical consideration access, diminished trust in the
affiliation, and worsening sicknesses. Crisis centers and gatherings could experience
frustration, disappointment, and a lessened remaining within the clinical benefits region.
Evaluation of the Underperformed Benchmark
The public benchmark for foot evaluations and HBA1c tests essentially beats MMC
data, highlighting the significance of these tests in diabetes prevention, diagnosis, and
treatment, according to the Association for Clinical benefits Investigation and Quality.
HBA1c fills in as an indication of glycemic control, supporting early assurance and the
executives of diabetes. It depicts hyperglycemia as well as recognizes related risks and
complications, helping interprofessional teams in making strong measures for patients'
conditions (CDC, 2022).
A focus on HBA1c testing through point of care testing determined that standard blood
glucose testing, especially HBA1c, achieves effective patient outcomes, with high
satisfaction levels reported by patients (Smits et al., 2022). This shows positive
outcomes for the assurance and management of diabetes, in the end further creating
clinical consideration quality and legitimate execution against public benchmarks.
Another basic benchmark in diabetes management is foot evaluation. Diabetic foot
complications can lead to impediment and passing if early signs are not recognized.
Subsequently, foot evaluations are essential for diminishing the risks of serious
intricacies, in the long run dealing with the quality of care provided by clinical benefits
affiliations that meet public benchmarks for foot evaluations (Zhao et al., 2023).
Ethical and Sustainable Actions to Address Benchmark Underperformance
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample

5. To address the underperformance of benchmarks, MMC should make suitable moves in
view of moral standards to guarantee enduring changes. Moral activities will advance
diabetes control and the executives by tending to moral problems, giving patient-
focused care, and working on in general personal satisfaction. Moral standards in
medical care settings incorporate independence, value, non-perniciousness, and equity.
Independence awards patients the option to pursue informed decisions with respect to
their wellbeing.
Value commits medical services suppliers to work to assist patients and their families.
Non-evil accentuates keeping away from mischief to buyers, while equity guarantees
fair activities and medical services for each person (Varkey, 2020). Moral activities to
work on quality and execution in diabetes screening include:
Illuminating patients about the significance regarding finishing tests, giving
exhaustive data on the advantages and downsides of screening. This follows the
moral rule of independence and guarantees supportable activity as patients settle
on informed decisions all through their lives (Liang et al., 2022).
Compelling instruction and preparing for attendants to create mindfulness among
the populace for convenient and standard screening of HBA1c levels and foot
assessments. This activity lines up with the moral standards of value and equity,
helping patients by getting great consideration and instruction to further develop
their medical services-related life decisions. It guarantees decency as a similar
information is spread to the whole populace (Cheraghi et al., 2023).
Conclusion
All in all, considering dashboard information in contrast to public benchmarks is
fundamental for distinguishing deficiencies within medical care associations. This data
helps in executing compelling, moral, and maintainable activities to further develop
medical services quality and authoritative execution. In this appraisal, the
underperformance of MMC was distinguished, and activities were proposed to upgrade
medical care quality, eventually working on persistent results and adding to the
development and notoriety of the association in the medical services area.
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample

6. References
AHRQ. (n.d.). National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports (NHQDR). NHQDR
Data Tools | AHRQ Data Tools. Retrieved from. https://datatools.ahrq.gov/nhqdr?
count=2&tab=nhqdrnabe&type=subtab
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). Hospital Readmissions Reduction
Program (HRRP). Retrieved from. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-
service-payment/acuteinpatientpps/readmissions-reduction-program
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). All about your A1C. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/managing/managing-
blood-sugar/a1c.html
Cheraghi, R., Valizadeh, L., Zamanzadeh, V., Hassankhani, H., & Jafarzadeh, A.
(2023). Clarification of ethical principle of the beneficence in nursing care: An integrative
review. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01246-4
Helminski, D., Kurlander, J. E., Renji, A. D., Sussman, J. B., Pfeiffer, P. N., Conte, M.
L., Gadabu, O. J., Kokaly, A. N., Goldberg, R., Ranusch, A., Damschroder, L. J., &
Landis-Lewis, Z. (2022). Dashboards in health care settings: Protocol for a scoping
review. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/34894
Kaiafa, G., Veneti, S., Polychronopoulos, G., Pilalas, D., Daios, S., Kanellos, I.,
Didangelos, T., Pagoni, S., & Savopoulos, C. (2020). Is hba1c an ideal biomarker of
well-controlled diabetes? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 97(1148), 380–383.
https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138756
Liang, Z., Xu, M., Liu, G., Zhou, Y., & Howard, P. (2022). Patient-centered care and
patient autonomy: Doctors’ views in Chinese hospitals. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00777-w
Smits, M., Hopstaken, R., Terhaag, L., de Kort, G., & Giesen, P. (2022). Early
experiences with quality-assured hba1c and professional glucose point-of-care testing
in general practice: A cross-sectional observational study among patients, nurses and
doctors. BMC Nursing, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00969-0
Song, K., & Chambers, A. R. (2023). Diabetic foot care. In StatPearls. StatPearls
Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553110/
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample

7. Varkey, B. (2020). Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Medical
Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
Zhao, N., Xu, J., Zhou, Q., Hu, J., Luo, W., Li, X., Ye, Y., Han, H., Dai, W., & Chen, Q.
(2023). Screening behaviors for diabetic foot risk and their influencing factors among
general practitioners: A cross-sectional study in Changsha, China. BMC Primary Care,
24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02027-3
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Email Us [email protected]
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample