Prevention of Periodontal Disease
and plaque control
DR.ABDIAZIIZ
Aims
Mechanism of chemical plaque control
Types of chemical agents
Indications of chemical plaque control
Chlorhexidine digluconate isan antibacterial
ingredient and broad-spectrum antiseptic and
disinfectantthat has been used in dentistry for over 40
years.
.It's effective against a wide range of bacteria, fungi, and
viruses, and can help prevent plaque build-up, gingivitis,
and other infectious diseases of the mouth.
Chlorhexidine digluconate is often used in
mouthwash along with regular brushing and flossing
to treat gum disease.It can help reduce gum swelling
and redness, and bleeding when brushing
Chemical Plaque Control
Supragingival plaque control
Mechanism of action
1.Prevention of
colonization of enamel
2.Removal of attached
organisms
3.Antimicrobials
Chemical Plaque Control
1.Bisguanide antiseptics –Chlorhexidine
2.Quaternary ammonium compounds
3.Phenolic antiseptics
4.Metal ions
5.Natural products
6.Oxygenating agents
Bisguanide -Chlorhexidine
(CHX)
Chlorhexidine (CHX)
Used in the form of chlorhexidine digluconate
Broad-spectrum bactericidal against
Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria
yeasts and fungi
Mechanism
immediate antibacterial
prolonged effect –for several hours
Both bacteriostatic and bacteriocidal
CHX
highly effective anti-plaque
agent
more effective in preventing
plaque accumulation on a clean
tooth surface
Little or no effect on established
plaqueand established gingivitis
where subgingivalplaque has
already formed
How is CHX administered?
Mouthrinse
0.2% (Corsodyl)
0.12% (Peridex)
Toothpaste/Gel
Spray
Chewing gum
CHX Spray
More popular than mouthwash or gels for use in
handicapped patients
Research shows that when used by parents less
effective than gels in trays
Applied to the teeth by a dentist under optimal
conditions –good results
Is CHX safe?
poorly absorbed by
the GIT -displays
very low toxicity
No carcinogenic or
teratogenic effects
have been found
following long-term
use
Side effects
1.Brown staining of
teeth/fillings
difficult to remove
result of dietary pigments
adhering to tooth surface
+
+
CHX
Tooth
Bacteria
Dietary
stains
Side effects (cont)
2.Supragingival calculus formation
suppresses acidogenic plaque bacteria
Raises pH
ppt of calcium and phosphate
1 +2 = dose-dependent
cannot be reduced without loss of
antiplaque effects
Side effects (cont)
3.Taste disturbances
4.Mucosal desquamation
3 and 4 can be decreased by reducing the
conc. and using a larger volume to maintain
clinical efficacy
5.Parotid swelling
? Mechanical obstruction of the duct
Chemical Plaque Control
1.Bisguanide antiseptics –Chlorhexidine
2.Quaternary ammonium compounds
3.Phenolic antiseptics
4.Metal ions
5.Natural products
6.Oxygenating agents
Phenolic compounds (cont)
Triclosan
Soaps, deodorants
Mouthwash
reduce plaque accumulation but to a much lesser
extent than CHX
dependent upon the presence of co-polymers in the
formulation to increase oral retention (Gantrez)
anti-inflammatory effect
Triclosan
Added to toothpaste -effect is improved by
Copolymer (Gantrez) to enhance retention in the mouth
OR
Zinc citrate to provide additional antibacterial activity
Provide significant reduction in plaque and
improvement in gingival health when
compared with fluoride toothpaste alone
(Volpe et al., 1996)
Chemical Plaque Control
1.Bisguanide antiseptics –Chlorhexidine
2.Quaternary ammonium compounds
3.Phenolic antiseptics
4.Metal ions
5.Natural products
6.Oxygenating agents
Metal ions
Zinc
additive effect with other antiseptics
Attaches to dental tissue and inhibits regrowth of plaque
Copper and Tin –local side effects of staining
Chemical Plaque Control
1.Bisguanide antiseptics –Chlorhexidine
2.Quaternary ammonium compounds
3.Phenolic antiseptics
4.Metal ions
5.Natural products
6.Oxygenating agents
Natural products -Sanguinarine
Root of Sanguinariacanadensis
(Bloodroot)
plaque inhibitory effect less
than CHX
Mouthwash is more effective
than toothpaste
Gingivitis prevention is questionable.
Chemical Plaque Control
1.Bisguanide antiseptics –Chlorhexidine
2.Quaternary ammonium compounds
3.Phenolic antiseptics
4.Metal ions
5.Natural products
6.Oxygenating agents
Oxygenating agents
Hydrogen peroxide, sodium peroxyborate
Mouthrinses
Inhibit obligate anaerobes
Some retardation in plaque growth
Further investigation is needed
Alcohol containing
mouthwashes dis
Accidental swallowing by children
Link with oral and pharyngeal cancer ???
Reduce the hardness of composite and hybrid-resin
restorations
related to % alcohol content of mouthwash
Bottom line
Chlorhexidine most effective
chemical agent
Indications of chemical plaque
control
1.To replacetoothbrushing when this is not possible
2.As an adjunctto toothbrushing in situations when this may be
painful or inadequate
1. Replacing Toothbrushing
A.After oral/periodontal therapy
and during the healing period
B.Intermaxillary fixation
1. Replacing Toothbrushing
c.Acute oral mucosal or gingival infections
D.Mentally or physically-handicapped patients who are
unable to brush their teeth themselves
2. With Toothbrushing
Following subgingival scaling/root planing when
the gingivae may be sore
(used for ~3 days)
Following scaling -cervical hypersensitivity due
to exposed root surface
2. With Toothbrushing
Following scaling in situations where the patient’s oral
hygiene remains inadequate
Need to remedy situation quickly
duration of the CHX mouthwash use should not >2
weeks
Antibacterial agent that does not cause significant
staining in a toothpaste or pre-brush rinse-TRICLOSAN
Assess mouthwash
Range of antibacterial activity against the various plaque bacteria
Substantivity (retention) to the oral surface
Possible anti-inflammatory effect
Acceptable taste
Ability to promote fresh mouth sensation
Categories –Group A
good substantivity (oral retention)
wide antibacterial spectrum
good anti-plaque effects
can be used to replace mechanical cleaning methods
for short periods when this is not possible
chlorhexidine
Group B
little or no substantivity
good antibacterial spectrum
cannotbe used to replace
toothbrushing but can be used as
adjuvantsto mechanical cleaning
cetyl pyridinium chloride, Listerine and
triclosan.
Group C
antibacterial effects in vitro
plaque inhibitory effects from moderate to low or
no statistical difference from the negative control
limited or no adjuvanteffects when combined
with mechanical cleaning and therefore cannot be
recommended for this purpose
Oxygenating agents, sanguinarine (Veadent)
REMEMBER!!!
Anti-plaque mouthwashes have noplace in the treatment
of existing periodontal disease(gingivitis or
periodontitis) since they cannot either reach the
subgingival environment or penetrate thick layers of
established plaque.
Miswak (Siwak) –chewing stick
Mechanical effect of fibers
Release of antibacterial
chemicals against
Periodontal pathogens
Cariogenic bacteria
Antiplaque effect similar to
0.2% CHX mouthwash
Salvadora
persica
Miswak
Recommended by WHO as alternative oral hygiene method
Proper use
Pen grip
Rolling or up and down movement
Massage the gum and tooth surfaces
Longer time than brushing –5 to 10 min
Literature
Essential oil mouthwash (EO) may be equivalent to
chlorhexidine (CHX) for long-term control of gingival
inflammation but CHX appears to perform better than
EO in plaque control.
Neely 2012
EO less staining
Neely 2012
The alcohol-free CHX rinse was as effective as the one
containing alcohol in controlling plaque and reducing
gingival inflammation.
Todkaret al. 2012
Maintaining and recovering soft tissue
health around dental implants
”There was weak evidence that antibacterial
mouthrinsesare effective in reducing plaque
and marginal bleeding around implants”
Grusovinet al. 2010
Chemical plaque control in
special needs patients
“No-spell”
Beaker