Michael Thomas Sadler was born on 3rd January 1780 in Snelston, England. He was a well-known English political economist and member of the House Of Commons. Sadler was the leader of the Factory Reform Movement and made significant contributions to the Factory act of 1833. He criticized the theorie...
Michael Thomas Sadler was born on 3rd January 1780 in Snelston, England. He was a well-known English political economist and member of the House Of Commons. Sadler was the leader of the Factory Reform Movement and made significant contributions to the Factory act of 1833. He criticized the theories of well-known economist-demographer Thomas Robert Malthus. Thomas Sadler died on July 29 1835 in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Size: 85.03 KB
Language: en
Added: Jun 29, 2022
Slides: 13 pages
Slide Content
SOCIAL DEMOGRAPHY POPULATION THEORIES- BIOLOGICAL THEORY( THOMAS SADLER)
MICHAEL THOMAS SADLER
MICHAEL THOMAS SADLER Michael Thomas Sadler was born on 3 rd January 1780 in Snelston , England . He was a well-known English political economist and member of House Of Commons. Sadler was the leader of Factory Reform Movement and made a significant contributions in Factory act of 1833. He criticized the theories of well- known economist- demographer Thomas Robert Malthus. Thomas Sadler died on July 29 1835 in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
BIOLOGICAL THEORIES The biological theories argue that the law regulating fertility among human being is the same as that which regulates the growth of plants and other animals .These theories therefore emphasize on what is common to all living beings and ignore what is unique or peculiar to human beings. The biological theorists believes in the existence of metaphysical will of nature to perpetuate the species. In short it is mainly concerned with human fertility.
MALTHUSIAN THEORY Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) was an English political economist. Malthus’s theory of population growth was outlined in his Essay on Population. He argued that human populations tend to grow at a much faster rate than the rate at which the means of human subsistence (specially food , but also clothing and other agriculture based products) can grow. Therefore humanity is condemned to live in poverty forever because the growth of agricultural production will always be over taken by population growth. While population rises in geometric progression(2,4,8,16,32,...), and agricultural production can grow only in arithmetic progression(2,4,6,8,10,..).
DENSITY PRINCIPLE The ‘ Density Principle ’ was the theory put forward by Thomas Sadler. He brought out his ideas in his volume entitled, ‘ The Law Of Population’ which is available in two volumes. The book runs into about 1300 pages in addition to many tables. This book is mainly concerned with the refutation of the Malthusian theory. In fact 2/3 of the whole volume is devoted to the criticism of Malthus and his theory .
Sadler put forward the principle that fertility varies inversely with the density of population. The Fecundity of human beings is in the inverse ratio of the condensation of their numbers. The variation in fecundity is affected not by wretchedness and misery but by the happiness and prosperity of the mankind. As the density of population increases, the tendency of increases in number naturally decreases. Moreover the fertility rate decreases with the increase in the density of population. In agricultural based or pastoral countries where the density of population is low, the fertility rate of the population becomes high. In such countries people have the capacity to work hard and hardworking people give birth to more children.
As the time passed when there is industrialization, population becomes more civilized, and literate, the density of population increases. Here people would limit the size of family and in such socio-economic condition they will be happier and there will be prosperity. Sadler believe that for maintaining fertility it was essential to maintain both labour as well as privacy. With the growth and advancement of civilization, he opined , desire to put labour and hard work was decreasing. The work which was being done till yesterday by human beings is today being done by machine. In other words, labour is becoming only a mental exercise. Due to shortage of accommodation, there is no privacy and such fertility rate is bound to come down.
He has therefore come to the conclusion that nature itself is helping mankind , rather than behaving in the negative way, which Malthus makes us believe. Thomas Sadler was a great critic of Malthus. He did not accept Malthus’s view that population increases in geometrical progression and food supplies in arithmetical progression. According to Sadler increase of population and food supply in mathematical terms cannot happen because when population increases density too will increase. When density increases capacity to produce children goes down. Thus with the increase in density, the fertility rate declines. He believed that population adjusts itself with time. He was of the view that If fertility rate of population increases , people will be able to produce food according to their needs and food supply and population get adjusted to each other.
Sadler also believed that when density of population increases, unhealthy atmosphere also increases which leads to increase of death rate. Further if death rate is high, it will lead to increase in birth rate. This happens to compensate for loss of population. And if death rate is low , birth rate also goes down. The natural law of population found out by Sadler, is that ‘the fecundity of human beings under similar circumstances varies inversely as their numbers on a given space. Fecundity means the physiological capacity to conceive or in short it is the ability to produce an abundance of offspring or new growth, fertility. His theory furnished the basis of an easy optimism about man’s economic future, because with the increase in density, the rate of growth of population will be lowered.
Criticism of Thomas Sadler’s theory Sadler failed to distinguish between fertility and fecundity. According to Thompson and Lewis, “ he did not distinguish clearly between fecundity and fertility and he believed that there was no antagonism between man’s natural capacity to produce, which he never defined, and his capacity to produce, adequate subsistence for all who would be born”. He said that fecundity of human beings is in inverse ratio to the condensation of their numbers. But in fact no biological reason is found to prove the idea that density brings down fertility, it will bring down fecundity also. This is because in slums the density is very high and at the same time fertility is also high among slum dwellers. Moreover in many countries including India , Japan etc the density of population is very high, but the rate of growth of population is not low. On the other hand it is high. Therefore Sadler’s theory is not empirically valid.
There is a contradiction in Sadler’s theory. He says that higher density leads to lower birth rate and higher death rate. But at some other place, he says that where death rate is high, the birth rate is also high . This means with the increase in density , the birth rate will also increase. But his own statement contradicts this finding. Sadler’s views that with industrialization population decreases has not been proved true. In a country like India, industrialization has not led to the decline in the growth of population. Sadler gives emphasis alone fecundity. For population growth, fecundity is not so important as fertility. Fertility implies actual reproduction , whereas fecundity implies only the capacity to reproduce.
Reference Asha A. Bhende , Tara Kanitkar - Principles of Population Studies , 1994, Bombay, Himalaya Publishing House. Dr. B.N. Ghosh , Population Theories And Demographic Analysis, Meerut, Meenakshi Prakashan . Hans Raj, Fundamentals of Demography-population studies with special reference to India , New Delhi, Surjeet Publication. www.yourarticlelibrary.com/population-geography-3-theories-on-fertility-biological-cultural-and - economic-theories/43232