Precision Tactics in HER2-Positive GI Malignancies: Capitalizing on HER2-Targeted Regimens to Improve Outcomes for Gastric/GEJ Cancers, CRC, and BTC

PeerView 24 views 83 slides Jun 19, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 83
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83

About This Presentation

Chair and Presenters, Yelena Y. Janjigian*, MD, Shubham Pant, MD, and John Strickler, MD, discuss HER2+ GI malignancies in this CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE activity titled “Precision Tactics in HER2-Positive GI Malignancies: Capitalizing on HER2-Targeted Regimens to Improve Outcomes for Gastric/GEJ Can...


Slide Content

Precision Tactics in HER2-Positive

Gl Malignancies
Capitalizing on HER2-Targeted Regimens to Improve
Outcomes for Gastric/GEJ Cancers, CRC, and BTC

Yelena Y. Janjigian", MD John Strickler, MD Shubham Pant, MD
Professor, and Chief Associate Professor of Medicine Professor
Attending, Gastrointestinal ‘Associate Director Department of Gastrointestinal
‘Oncology Service of Clinical Research - Gl Medical Oncology
Department of Medicine Duke University Department of Investigational
Memorial Sloan Kettering {8 Durham, North Carolina Y Cancer Therapeutics
Cancer Center E2 The University of Texas

New York, New York MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas
“This actviy was developed with Yelena Y. Janigian, MO, and is not
affiated in any capacity with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Go online to access full CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, including faculty disclosures.

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Our Goals for Today

Improve your understanding of the biologic rationale for therapeutic
targeting of HER2 aberrations and the latest evidence supporting biomarker
testing and HER2-targeted therapies

Equip you with skills to implement personalized, team-driven treatment
plans with HER2-targeted therapies based on safety/efficacy evidence,
guideline recommendations, and patient-specific needs

Provide you with tools to address practical aspects of care when utilizing
HER2-targeted regimens, including managing adverse events, coordinating
care, and educating and engaging patients

Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation Is an Excellent
Resource for Professionals, Patients, and Caregivers?

The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation’s ([email protected]) mission is to find a
cure and improve the quality of life for those affected by cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer)

Visit https://cholangiocarcinoma.org/ for multiple Selected resources include
resources that patients can use to MG International Cholangiocarcinoma

Get the latest information about their disease a Patient Registry (ICPR)

Connect with other patients „rm LE

feaistry/

Participate in clinical trials,

And much more A os pe
ee Find a Specialist
h hlios/cholangiocarcinoma org/specialist map!

Find and Learn About Clinical Trials
Ichol reiner roe ie

fesearchielinical-trials/
wwebina series =

“in supa l moving patent cae is cy has bean lanes an inpamented y PU, Poe Isa Mia Education, x
and ie Cholangiocarinoma Fou PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Colorectal Cancer Alliance Resources
to Share With Patients

colorectal
cancer
alliance

blueH@, ar RED

The Colorectal Cancer Alliance empowers a nation of passionate and determined allies to prevent, treat,
and overcome colorectal cancer in their lives and communities. Please visit the QR codes below and on
our downloadable practice aid for more information on valuable resources for patients and caregivers



Patient navigation/Helpline

a Clinical trials and CRC

Take our free screening quiz

PeerView.com/JPD827

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Welcome and Introduction
The Critical Need for Personalized Care
in GI Cancers

Yelena Y. Janjigian*, MD
Professor, and Chief Attending, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service
Department of Medicine

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York

fe

* This activity was developed with Yelena Y. Janjigian,
MD, and is not affiliated in any capacity with Memorial
Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

HER2 Aberrations:
Clinical Role and Frequency Across Tumor Types!

+ HER2 is an established therapeutic =, =... M.
target found across a variety of
solid tumors

+ Recognized as an agnostic "zn =e ES
biomarker with pan-tumor = ESE
approvals EEE _

+ _A number of novel HER2-targeted = ==
therapies are being evaluated _ EE
in Gl cancers EEE a

— Expanding role highlights the Uterus L MS
need for broader HER2 testing E \L - HOZ
Cen prostate
En Be « <
1. Oh D-Y, Bang Y-J. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020:17:33-48. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Understanding Real-World Evidence:
Unmet Needs in HER2+ Gl Cancers Can Be Addressed’
846):

Netherlands Cancer Registry and Dutch Pathology Registry (N
HER2 Testing Has Increased Over Time

* HER? assessment increased from 10] malpeients mEsophagus =GEucaria Narcan stomach
+ Median OS increased from H 80
6.9 (2010-2013) to 7.9 months 4 70
(2014-2016) = 8
+ Overall, 77% of the HER2+ patients 3 2°
received trastuzumab E =
+ Median OS was higher in patients FA 20
with positive (8.8 months) and =
negative (7.4 months) HER2 status A
compared with untested patients 2010-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016
(5.6 months) Time Since Diagnosis, y

HERZ testing and appropriate treatment can make a difference

+ Percentages within the bars efect he proportion of patients with tumors hat showed HER? overexpression gi
1. Diksterhuis WPM et al. Gastne Cancer. 2020.23:579-590. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

ERBB Family: Targeting HER2 and HER312

+ Human epidermal growth factor
receptor (HER) family includes

— Epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR)

— HER2 (ERBB2)

— HER3 (ERBB3)

— HER4 (ERBB4)
+ Share common structural features
Aberrantly activated in multiple cancers

+ Serves as drug targets and biomarkers RS
for precision oncology Nucleus

1. Adapted trom Ross JS. Drug News Perspect 2009.22.93-106. 2. Adapted from Reinholz MM ot al. Lancet Oncol. 2009:10:267-277. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Mechanisms of Action of Agents Targeting HER21

Bispecific antibodies

Single-epitope
mAbs

1. Oh DY, Bang Y3. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020:17:3348. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Strengthening Precision Care

in Gastric/GEJ Cancers
Modern Strategies With Targeted Therapies
in HER2+ Disease

Yelena Y. Janjigian*, MD
Professor, and Chief Attending, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service
Department of Medicine

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York

* This activity was developed with Yelena Y. Janjigian,
MD, and is not affiliated in any capacity with Memorial
Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Understanding Real-World Evidence (United States):
Unmet Needs in Current Practice and Focus on HER212

Electronic Health Records Data From 2011-2018
(N = 3,291 patients with advanced/metastatic gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma)

Workup + One-third (34%) of patients were not tested for HER2 status |

First-Line
Treatment

25% of patients did not receive treatment after diagnosis
Only 58% of HER2+ patients received trastuzumab in the first line

Approximately half of patients received 2L therapy

Less than 20% of patients received 3L therapy

In the 2L, chemotherapy-based regimens remained more frequently used
Initiation of 2L targeted therapy is often delayed from the time of
progression in community oncology practices

Second-Line
Treatment
and Beyond

1. Le DT etal. Gin Colorectal Cancer. 2020:19:32:38.03.2. Bray Fetal. CA Cancer J Cn, 2018,68:394-424 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Assessment of HER2 Status in Gastric/GEJ Cancer!”

Compared with breast carcinomas,
in gastric/GEJ cancer Tumor heterogeneity Incomplete membrane
is more comm g C is more

+ The heterogeneity of immunostaining is greater
+ The possibility of false-negative testing is higher
— Analyzing HER2 in <6 biopsy samples
leads to a false-negative rate as high
as 9%

+ HER2 protein expression is absent in the
digestive luminal membrane > membrane
staining that is not completely circumferential
(basolateral pattern)

These differences underscore the importance of using gastric/GEJ-specific

criteria to assess HER2 expression in clinical practice

ia Ann Oncol 201324728193. 5, Abarelo L ot al. Adv Anat Pathol 2011.18:59, 6. Holmann M

Gm MA et al paid 201129 022.992 Les HE tal uJ Cone 201349. ABUS. 3 Park SR tl Eu Cane 2010514250. 4 Warne VS
ai Histopathology 2008 ñ
7. Rüschoff Jet a. Virchows Arch. 2010:457:299-307. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

HER2 Testing in Gastric/GEJ Cancer

+ Who should be tested for HER2 overexpression?
+ When should HER2 testing take place?

Guideline
ESMO! Japan’ ASC NCCN*
aies À Forall patients with
— gastric/GEJ cancer at
Who? For all patients wah and potential diagnosis if metastatic
metastatic gastric/GEJ cancer candidates for y
KErotmgeied disease is documented or
‘suspected
therapy
+ Atdiagnosis
+ Repeat biomarker testing
bons may be considered at
When? At diagnosis At diagnosis ee
progression of advanced
or metastatic disease

4. Lori F et a. Ann Oncol 2022:38:1005-1020.2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer 2021;24:1-21. 3. Barley AN etal J Cin Oncol
2017.35.448-484. 4. Ajani JA otal. J Nol! Compr Cane Nat. 2022.20-167-192.

PeerView.com
PeerView.com/JPD827

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Current Treatment Algorithm’

+ Treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer
+ Molecular stratification according to HER2 status

IHC score 0/1 IHC score 2 IHC score 3

ISH test HER2

Platinum- Platinum-
fluoropyrimidine + fluoropyrimidine +
docetaxel trastuzumab

1. Adapted from LordckF. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016:13:248-360. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Progress in Validating HER2-Directed

Agent

Trastuzumab

Trastuzumab +
pembrolizumab

Trastuzumab
deruxtecan (T-DXd)

PeerView.com/JPD827

Regulatory Stat

Approved in the
United States and
European Union

Approved in the
United States and
European Union

Approved in the
United States, European
Union, and Japan

Therapy in Gastric/GEJ Cancers

Indicated for Patients Wi

HER2-overexpressing metastatic
gastric/GEJ cancers

PD-L1-positive HER2-expressing
gastric/GEJ cancers

Locally advanced or metastatic HER2+
gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma who have
received a prior trastuzumab-based regimen

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Phase 3 ToGA Study: Chemotherapy + Trastuzumab
as 1L Therapy in HER2+ mGC/GEJC!

+ 594 patients randomly — Events Median OS, mo
assigned to chemotherapy Sano 2 ne
ta A motherapy alone Ë
(fluoropyrimidine + platinum) 10 x

HR (95% Cl): 0.74 (0.60-0.91)
P= .0046

with or without trastuzumab

2 08
+ Significant improvement in OS 3
in HER2+ mGC with addition 2 °°
of trastuzumab to 304 estee netas
chemotherapy led to approval E 02

in many countries m

o 13.8_ Chemotherapy alone
0 24 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 32 34 36

Time, mo

1. Bang YJ et al. Lancet. 2010:376:687-697. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

ToGA: HER2 Subgroup Analysis!

+ OS benefit of trastuzumab appeared to vary by HER2 subgroup (best for HER2
IHC 3+ and ERBB2 amplification)

Rose en Net, Media OS, on cu
All a > Gal 1 074 Te Tree uzuman

w 60-0.
Preplanned exploratory analysis Regulatory Approvals
IHC O/FISH positive HA 61 10.6 vs 7.2 0.92 (0.48-1.76) N :
IHC 1+/FISH positive HH 70 87vs102 1.24 (0.70-2.20) * United States: IHC 3+
IHC 2+/FISH positive oe 159 — 12.3vs 10.8 0.75 (0.51-1.11) and/or FISH+ tumors
IHC 3+/FISH positive ea 256 1795123 0.58(0.41-0.81) (2010)
IHC 3+/FISH negative -———}—415_47.5 vs 17.7 0.83 (0.20-3.38)
Post hoc exploratory analysis Europe: IHC 2+/FISH+
IHC 0 or 1+/FISH positive He 131 10vs87 1.07 (0.70-1.62) or IHC 3+ (2022)
IHC 2+/FISH positive or IHC 3+ Hg 446 16vs118 0.65 (0.51-0.83) AS

02 0406 1 2 345
Favors Trastuzumab + Chemotherapy Favors Chemotherapy Alone

1. Bang Y-J etal. Lancet. 2010; 76:687-697. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

KEYNOTE-811: Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab +
Chemotherapy for 1L Treatment of HER2+ mGC':2

+ Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study

Stratified by geographic region, PD-L1 CPS,
chemotherapy choice

Patients with

Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W +

HER2+ advanced trastuzumab 6 mg/kg IV Q3W + wor
gastric or GEJ FP or CAPOX® progression,
adenocarcinoma, 2
no prior therapy in Placebo | er
e trast b 6 mg/kg IV Q3W + ea
advanced setting rastuzumab 6 mg/kg ‘withdrawal

FP or CAPOX:

FP: S.fluorouracil 800 mg/m? IV days 1-5 Q3W + cisplatin 80 mg/m? IV Q3W
CAPOX: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m? BID days 1-14 Q3W + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m? IV GW

(N = 692)

+ Primary endpoints: OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR
+ Secondary endpoints: ORR and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, safety

* Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose. ñ
1 Janjgin Y Nature 2021:600:727-730. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

KEYNOTE-811: Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab +
Chemotherapy for 1L Treatment of HER2+ mGC Efficacy’

Efficacy Population

Outcome: Pembrolizumab Placebo
(n= 133) (n = 131)

ORR, % (95% Cl) 74.4 (66.2-81.6) 51.9 (43.0-60.7)
ORR difference 22.7 (11.2-33.7); P = .00006
DCR, % (95% CI) 96.2 (91.4-98.8) 89.3 (82.7-94.0)
Best response, n (%)

CR 15 (11) 46)

PR 84 (63) 64 (49)

SD 29 (22) 49 (87)

PD 5(4) 76)

Not evaluable 0 2(2)

Not assessed 0 5(4)
Duration of response n=99 n=68

Median, mo (range) 10.6 (1.1+ to 16.5+) 9.5 (1.4+ to 15.4+)

26 mo duration, % 703 614

29 mo duration, % 58.4 511

| _ FDA approved May 2021 |

* Eficacy analysis: st 264 patents enroled; satty analysis: 433 paints who received 21 dose ol study medication. N
4. Janjgian Ÿ. Natur. 2021:800.727-790. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Key Efficacy Data From KEYNOTE-811'

All Patients PD-L1 CPS 21
ato! Pembrolitumab Placebo N Pembrolizumab Placebo
pee Modan PFS, mo 10 81 où Modan PFS, mo 108 72
(5% C1) CE) 7085) wc) (85-125) (6834)
po ee
70 70
æ 60 2 60
g 50 g 50
E 40 & 40
30 Pembrolizumab 30 Cited
20 20
10 10
o o
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 0 3 6 9 1215 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42
PA Time, mo Rd Time, mo
Pembro 350 206 234 171 129 90 65 50 42 34 26 14 5 2 0 Pembro 298 250 200 150 116 84 61 48 40 33 26 14 5 2 0
Placebo 348 273 183 120 90 66 47 32 26 19 13 7 3 1 0 Placebo 296 231 150 98 76 54 38 24 20 15 12 6 3 1 0

EDA approval amended only for tumors with PD-L1 CP:

In a subgroup analysis for PD-L1 CPS <1 (N= 104), the HR for OS and PFS were
1.41 (95% Cl, 0.90-2.20) and 1.03 (95% Cl, 0.65-1.64), respectively?

1. Janjian Y ot al Lancat.2023:402:2197-2208, 2. mps ww Ida govidrugs/resources-nfrmation approved drugsda-amends-pembrokzumabs-gastc-cancet- A
indication. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

KEYNOTE-811: Antitumor Response on Pembrolizumab +

Trastuzumab + Chemotherapy!

* 80
y

Change From Basel
8

8

1.Janigia Y et a. Lancot 2023:402:2107:2208.

PeerView.com/JPD827

Best Response, n (%)

Pembro Placebo Pembro Placebo
(n= 350) (n= 348) ee (n=350) (n=348)
58(17) 39 (11) ORR, % (95% CI) 73 (68-77) 60 (55-65)
196 (56) 170 (49)
DCR, % (95% Cl) 92 (88-94) 87 (63-91)
67 (19) 95 (27)
19(5) 20 DOR, median 13 95
REN =) (ange), mo (144104974) — (14+10487+)
Pembro Placebo

Change From Bas

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Intrinsic Trastuzumab Resistance in ERBB2+
Gastroesophageal Cancer!

« 30% of HER2+ tumors lacked ERBB2 amplification or had comutations of the

RTK/RAS/PI3K pathway

— These patients had rapid progression on trastuzumab

P=58409

ERBB2+ top quere ot
‘expression (n= 13)

HR (CI) Longer PFS Shorter PFS P
137 (84-601 HJ er
22301140) Ha 9
020209 EH 02

0 5 10 15 2 2

1. Janjgian YY et al. Cancer Discov. 2018:8:49-58

PeerView.com/JPD827

02 05 1 2 5 10 20 50
Time, mo

IM. ERBE2+ top quarto of expression ( = 13)

IM ERDER+/aterod RTHRASPIK (n= 9)

WERDER. (n= 4)

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Acquired Trastuzumab Resistance’

Pretreatmert ss of ERBB2 and KRAS and PIK3CA alterations
Torreta in 20% of cases

Pre trastuzumab (HER2+)
uu

li areas’
pra

[can
eyclo

wwrrers

HER2 IHC ERBB2 FISH
1.Janjgian YY et al. Cancer Discov. 2018:8:49-58 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Is a Novel ADC Designed
to Deliver an Antitumor Effect!

+ Antibody-drug conjugate of Hanged ard anti-HER2

trastuzumab with a
\ 4 Ces a
cleavable E
AAA et de

topoisomerase inhibitor
+ Potential advantages

— High potency payload

© cystone residuo

— High ratio of trastuzumab Dogtra
to payload molecules
Topol Pal css ‘ng?
Lu » payloa hy
Bystander’ effect (exatecan derivative) bes
Lada oa Sm ram ut ate 2370852 TOA Pam mr 20011262 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-Gastric01 and 02: Improved Efficacy With 2L
T-DXd in HER2+ Advanced Gastric/GEJ Cancer

ORR, % (95% Cl)
Median DOR, mo
Median PFS, mo (95% Cl)

Median OS, mo (95% Cl)

Survival, mo
(95% CI}
125
SS (9.6-14.3)
HR for death = 0.59; P=.01
: 56
Median PFS 438g)

HR for PD or death = 0.47

1. Van Cutsom E eta. Lance. 2023:24:744:756.2. Ku G ot al. Annals of Oncol. 2022:33(suppl7):1100. 3. Shitara Ket a. N Engl Med. 2020;382:2419,
4. Yamaguch eta. JC. 2022 A0(suppl ) 242.

PeerView.com/JPD827

E

y
$
®
E
E

in Sum of Diam

Best % Change
in Sum of Diameters
From Baseline
388580352

DESTINY-Gastric02
(United States/Europe; Progression on 1L Trastuzumab)'

Confirmed ORR: 42% (95% Cl, 30.8-53.4)

DESTINY-Gastric01
(Japan/South Korea; Progression on 22 Prior Regimens)?

Confirmed ORR: 40.5% (95% Cl, 34-52)

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Adverse Events: T-DXd in HER2+ Advanced
Gastric/GEJ Cancer After Trastuzumab

DESTINY-Gastric02

(United States/Europe; Progression on 1L Trastuzumab)*

TRAEs in 215%

of Patients, n (%)

Patients with 21 TRAES
Nausea

Fatigue

Vomiting

Diarrhea

Decreased appetite
Alopecia

Anemia

Decreased platelet count
Decreased neutrophil count

T-DXd (N= 79)

74 (93.7)
46 (58.2)
29 (36.7)
26 (32.9)
2227.8)
18 (22.8)
17 (21.5)
15 (19)
13 (16.5)
12(15.2)

Grade 23

21 (26.6)
388)
388)
143)
1013)
103)

o
676)
1013)
6176)

Nausea
{neutrophil count
L appetite

Anemia

| platelet count

| white cell count
Malaise

Diarrhea

Vomiting
Constipation
Pyrexia

Alopecia

Fatigue

| lymphocyte count

1. Van Cutsom. ESMO 2021. Abstract LBASS. 2. Shitara K etal. N Engl Y Med. 2020:3822419.

PeerView.com/JPD827

DESTINY-Gastric01
(Japan/South Korea; Progressii

79 (63)
79 (63)
75 (60)
72 (58)
49 (39)
47 (38)
43 (34)
40 (32)
33 (26)
30 (24)
30 (24)
28 (22)
27 (22)
27 (22)

on 22 Prior Regimens)?

29 (47) 10)

22(35) 15(24)

28(45) 8(13)

19(81) 14(23)

46) 2(4)

22(85) 7m

10 (16) 0

20 (32) 10)

5(8) 0

14 (23) o

10 (16) 0

9 (15) o

15 (24) 2(3)

2(3) 1@)
PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Current Status and Next Steps With T-DXd

+ The results of DESTINY-Gastric01 and 02 led to regulatory approvals for T-DXd

Approved September 2020 Approved January 2021 Approved December 2022

2L or later therapy after
prior trastuzumab-based regimen

3L or later therapy after
AL trastuzumab-based regimen

+ DESTINY-Gastric04: phase 3 study of second-line T-DXd versus ramucirumab + paclitaxel
(NCT04704934)

+ DESTINY-Gastric03: phase 1b/2 study of T-DXd + chemotherapy and/or immune
checkpoint inhibitors in first and second line (NCT04379596)

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Management of Nausea Associated
With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Proactively
manage AEs + Do not wait for patients to develop nausea

related to T-DXd

Provide the + Consider how the patient tolerated their first-

patient with line treatment (ie, if a patient previously
multipl tion experienced severe nausea, they are likely to
(5 je ayia be have a similar experience with T-DXd)

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Detecting and Managing T-DXd-Related ILD:
The Five “S” Rules!

1 J E rn 4 Ç ) 5
6 à C= V4
= 7
Screen Scan Synergy Suspend Steroids
Treatment
+ Careful patient + The fundamental + Minimizing the risk + T-DXd should always ||| - The mainstay for
selection is warranted diagnostic tools for of ILD involves be interrupted if ILD is treating T-DXd-
before initiating T-DXd ILD remain teamwork, which suspected; it can only induced ILD remains
to optimize the radiological scans, includes educating be restarted in the corticosteroids, with
‘monitoring strategies with preference for Patients and all the case of asymptomatic the dose adapted to
based on baseline risk high-resolution CT care team, as well ILD that fully resolves the toxicity grade
+ Screening continues scans of the chest
during treatment, + Abaseline scan is management once
with regular clinical recommended, with ILD is suspected
assessments to repeat scans to be
exclude signs! performed
symptoms of ILD 6-12 weeks

1. Tarantino P, Tolanoy SM. JCO Oncol Prat. 2023:19:526-527.

PeerView.com/JPD827

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Management of ILD Associated
With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan'2

Grade 1: Hold until resolved to grade 0, consider corticosteroids
(prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/d), then

+ If resolved $28 d from onset: maintain dose

+ If resolved >28 d after onset: reduce dose by one level

+ If grade 1 ILD occurs beyond cycle day 22 and has not resolved within

49 days from last infusion: discontinue drug

Grades 2-4: Permanently discontinue treatment and promptly initiate systemic
corticosteroid treatment (eg, prednisolone 21 mg/kg/d or equivalent for 214
days followed by taper for 24 weeks)

1. Enbort (rastuzumab deruxtecan) Prosenbing Information. ps. accessdata da govidrugsatisa_docetabel2022/761 13980240 pd —
2. ModiS ot al N Engl J Med. 2020;382'610-621 PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines:
HER2+ Gastric Cancer!

First Line (HER2+ Recommendations Only)»

Preferred Regimens

+ Fluoropyrimidine? + oxaliplatin + trastuzumab

+Fluoropyrimidine® + oxaliplatin + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab

+ Fluoropyrimidine® + cisplatin + trastuzumab (category 1)

*Fluoropyrimidine® + cisplatin + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab
(category 1)

Other Recommended Regimens
* Fluorouracil + irinotecan
+ Paclitaxel + carboplatin or cisplatin
+ Docetaxel + cisplatin
+ Fluoropyrimidine®
* Docetaxel + cisplatin or oxaliplatin + fluorouracil

Second or Subsequent Line of Therapy (Depeni

Preferred Regimens
+ Ramucirumab + paclitaxel (category 1)

+ T-DXd (HER2+)

+ Docetaxel (category 1)

+Paclitaxel (category 1)

+ Irinotecan (category 1)

+Fluorouracil + irinotecan

«Trifluridine + tipiracil for 23L (category 1)

dent on Prior Therapy and PS)

Other Recommended Regimens
+ Ramucirumab (category 1)

+ Irinotecan + cisplatin

+ Fluorouracil + irinotecan + ramucirumab
+ Irinotecan + ramucirumab

+ Docetaxel + irinotecan (category 28)

* Oxalilatin general preferred over cisplatin due to lower toxic.» Fluorouracil or capecitabine

1.NCEN Cinial Pracice Guidelines in Oncology. Gastric Cancer. Version 1.2024. ps www ncen org/potessionaa/physican_s/pdigastrc pal

PeerView.com/JPD827

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Other New and Emerging Anti-HER2 Therapies

Zanidatamab
Bispecific antibody
Randomized phase 3
HERIZON-GEA-01 study of
zanidatamab + chemo +
tislelizumab as 1L therapy
(NCT05152147)

PRS-343
(cinrebafusp alfa;
HER2/4-1BB
bispecific)

PeerView.com/JPD827

Newer HER2
ADCs

Evorpacept
Anti-CD47 antibody
Randomized phase 2/3
ASPEN-06 study of
trastuzumab/ramucirumab/
paclitaxel + evorpacept
(NCT05002127)

BERD HERZ cellular

therapy

bispecific
antibodies

PeerView.com

Copyrigh!

Practical Points: Insights on Safety Management
With Novel Options in HER2+ Disease
Patient with HER2+
gastroesophageal cancer
progressing after trastuzumab;

receiving additional HER2
therapy with T-DXd

Patient with HER2+
gastroesophageal cancer

receiving KEYNOTE-811
regimen in the frontline setting

+ Events to monitor for include

+ In KEYNOTE-811, events of

note included infusion-related ILD, neutropenia,
reactions and the classic thrombocytopenia, and left
spectrum of irAEs ventricular dysfunction

+ Standard guidelines for + Recommended strategies
managing irAEs include include dose
treatment holds, steroid modification/interruption

management, and resumption
of immunotherapy based on
grading/severity

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

HER2+ Advanced/Metastatic Gastric/GEJ Cancer:
Final Thoughts

The ToGA trial established trastuzumab + chemotherapy as first-line standard of care in
HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer

Addition of pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA based on response data from KEYNOTE-811

For patients with metastatic HER2+ gastric cancer, consider

Repeat prey a Ste ctDNA to assess ERBB2 amplification

T-DXd can provide benefit in second-line or later settings, regardless of prior
ICI exposure

+ Monitoring and patient education are essential to mitigate the risk of ILD with T-DXd
+ Studies of T-DXd in combination with other agents, including ICI, are ongoing

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Bolstering the Treatment Arsenal
for HER2+ CRC

Innovative Targeted Strategies
and Practical Applications of Care

John Strickler, MD

Associate Professor of Medicine

Associate Director of Clinical Research — Gl
Duke University

Durham, North Carolina

> 2000-2024, PeerView

Exploring Unmet Needs for Targeted Therapy
Advanced/Metastatic CRC

Molecular Profiling! Treatment Selection

+ Up to 72% of patients with CRC are not + More than 40% of patients with mCRC are
receiving biomarker testing that completely initiated on systemic therapy before complete
adheres to published guidelines biomarker test results are available, and many

Half (52%) of US cancer centers do not have a oc no Weatmen: Dased(onitties)

: y E
standard protocol for biomarker testing for biomarker testing results:
patients with CRC Only 74% of patients with mCRC receive

second-line treatment, only 63% receive
third-line treatment, and only 45.9% receive
fourth-line treatment

Recycling of chemotherapy and biologics in the
second- and subsequent-line settings is
common and occurs more frequently than
switching to a drug regimen with an alternative

mechanism of action*
{ps in ae cancer ocre ra cancer Doman: suey summary tna) pdstranees687 02 Guterer ME tal CO Precis 7s
Oncol 2010.34: 3 Tampetin Met al Cin Colorectal Cancer 2017 8372.76. 4. loos Weta J Can One 2020 (0 4) 38. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Current Guidelines for Molecular Testing in mCRC!

All patients diagnosed with mCRC sh be
tested for the following

‘AS mutations
+ NRAS ERA
+ KRAS mutations

dMMR/MSI-H HER2 (ERBB2)

status amplifications

1.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Colon Cancer. Version 3.2024 ps cn org professional physiian_ghpdlicolon pal. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

HER2+ mCRC

+ Usually left sided Transverse colon
+ Homogeneous HER2 Ascending (eft en”
expression

+ Not mutually exclusive with tymphnove
RAS or BRAF mutations Blood —

« Associated with lung and Cecum
brain metastases Small

intestine
Sigmoid
colon

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

HER2 Amplification in CRC

+ 5.3% HER2 amplification seen in HER2 overexpression and amplification is seen in a distinct subset of mCRC
HERACLES study (screened = 836)' Study. Pe eee FISH
ato, n (%) Concordance
— Long-term clinical outcomes of a
trastuzumab + lapatinib: ORR: 28%; aL td 139 fest ae 2 3 K=085
mPFS 4.7 mo; mOS: 10 mo ee aS
ae . Ooietal. Mod 244 IHC: 8 (3) 6 ® TOR
+ HER2 amplification enriched in KRAS, Pathol. 2004 FISH: 8 (3)
NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA WT tumors? — warcetal a
Human Path 1489s 36) 2 2 100%
HE HER? amplification Summary IHC 1822 16 36 9604
Quadruple
Unselected KRASWT Negative 4 =11)
(n= 2,349) (n=44) (Xenopatients) ERBB2 4% ||||]
KRAS 41%) mm
p == om a
NRAS 9% m som
27% 136%
En en as PIKSCA 20% mn mann mo ma
Partenón à ton
1. Siena S et al. ASCO GI 2015. Abstract 865.2. Berto A et al. Cancer Disco. 2011:1:508-523. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

HER2 as a Target in Colorectal Cancer?

IHC 3+ or ISH+ means HER2 is amplified/overexpressed (ERBB2+)*
Identifying ERBB2+: specific criteria for mCRC

Phenotype
+ ERBB2+ <5%19

+ Enriched in RAS WT

+ No evidence about differences

in sex 3 |
[ y + Rectal and left-sided tumors
+ CNS M1 avidity 3 E E A THC 2+ or 10%-
faint segmental 150% cells IHC 3+
or granular; any | circumferential | SIsH (it
‘cellularity
Biomarker role of HER2
+ I
Fee HER2+ mCRC is a challenging and heterogeneous disease

+ Low prevalence of disease limits phase 3 trials

. : controversial?
Ecole CT + Patients with HER2-low mCRC do not respond to targeted therapy (in contrast to other tumors)?

+ Negative predictive: anti-

EGER? (controversia, lack of + Sequencing anti-HER2 therapies in the treatment algorithm of mCRC is not clear
prospective data)‘ + Role ofliquid biopsy in detecting ERBB2+

+ Positive predictive: dual anti- + Resistance after targeted therapy
HERZ treatment + Role of HER2 mutations"?

* Tissue images: Li Fe al Vrchows Arch. 2020:476:391-398, Body image: BoRender.
1 Mece-Bomstam F ea. Cin Cancer Ros 201925:2033-2041.2. Seo AN et al PLOS One. 20169098528, 3. Nam SK et al. PLOS One. 2016:11:00151865,

4 Laurent Puig P et al. Ann Oncol 2016.27 vi. 5, Satore-BianchiA etal. Oncologist. 2019:24:1305-1402. 6. Raghav Ket al. J Cin Oncol 2016:34:3517.

7. Berto A et al. Cancer Disco, 2011:1508-523. 8, Valora E ot a. Mod Pathol. 2015:281481-1491. 9, Kavun SM e el. Cancer Discov. 2015:5832-41 N

40. Siena S e al. Lancot Oncol 202122.779.189. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

HER2 Testing in mCRC: When and How!

+ ERBB2 positivity in
breast and gastric
cancers was modified
for CRC tumors

+ HERACLES diagnostic
criteria: archival test
validation, n = 256;
clinical validation,
n= 830

+ Staining scale 0 to 3
but modified degrees
of cutoffs appropriate
for CRC tumor tissue
features

1. Vahoa E otal. Mod Pathol 2015:28:1481-1491.

PeerView.com/JPD827

He 3+

He 2+

Inc 1+

Heo

HERACLES Diagnostic Criteria

Intense circumferential, basolateral,
or lateral staining in 250% of cells

Intense circumferential, basolateral,
‘oF lateral staining in >10% and <50%
of cols

Intense circumferential, basolateral,
or lateral staining in 510% of cells

‘Moderate circumferential,
basolateral, or lateral staining in
250% of cell

‘Any type of moderate staining in
<50% of cells

Faint segmental or granular staining
with any cellularity

No staining

Positive

Negative

Equivocal

Negative
Negative

Negative

NA

Mandatory HC retest; SHconeidred
710% collar it ERBB2 CENT rai
confirmed, perform ISH il
a NA
Mandatory IHC reten SH considered,
coasts esla ERBBZICENTT rato
med. pa se
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

MOUNTAINEER: Agreement Varies
Among HER2 Testing Platforms’

Pairwise Percent Agreement Among Three Central HER2 Testing Modalities

Blood NGS vs IHC/FISH vs IHC/FISH vs
issue NGS Blood NGS
n/N 47/58 63/68 66/83

% 81 92. 79.

90% Cl 68.6-90.1 83.7-97.6 69.2-87.6

+ Samples submitted for central testing for patients treated with tucatinib and trastuzumab (cohorts A and B)
+ Evaluable results

— 70 per IHC/FISH

— 50 per tissue NGS

- 71 per blood NGS

1. Sticker JH et a. ASCO 2023. Abstract 3528. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

MOUNTAINEER: Global, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial!

22L mCRC Cohort A (n= 45) Cohort B (n= 41)

HER2+ per local 3 >
: Tucatinib 300 mg PO BID + trastuzumab Tucatinib 300 mg PO BID +
IHCISHINGS testing 6 mg/kg Q3W (loading dose: 8 mg/kg C1D1) trastuzumab 6 mg/kg Q

RAS WT (loading dose: 8 mg/kg C1D1)

Measurable disease per
RECIST 1.1

Prior fluoropyrimidines, Cohort C (n= 31)
oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Tucatinib

and anti-VEGF mAb

MOUNTAINEER began as a US investigator-sponsored trial and initially consisted of a single cohort (cohort A) and was expanded
globally to include patients randomized to receive tucatinib + trastuzumab (cohort B) or tucatinib monotherapy (cohort C)

Efficacy endpoints: assessed in patients who received any amount of study treatment and had HER2+ tumors
Primary endpoints: confirmed ORR in cohorts A + B (RECIST 1.1 per BICR)
‘Secondary endpoints
= Cohorts A + B: DOR per BICR, PFS per BICR, and OS
— Cohort C: ORR by 12 weeks of treatment (RECIST 1.1 per BICR)
Safety presented in cohorts A + B who received any amount of study treatment

1. Sticker JH et al. Lancet, 2023:24:496-508 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

MOUNTAINEER: Summary of Efficacy
and Safety (Primary Analysis)

Efficacy Overview of Tucatinib + Safety Overview of Tucatinib +
Trastuzumab Cohorts A + B (N = 84)! Trastuzumab Cohorts A + B (N = 86)?

Tucatinib +

Confirmed ORR, % TEAES, n (%)

38.1 (27.7-49.3) Trastuzumab
(Cone) Any-grade AEs 82 (95.3)
Tucatinib related 63 (73.3)
mDOR, mo (95% Cl) 12.4 (8.5-25.5) aa 58 (67.4)
Grade 23 AEs 33 (38.4)
DCR, n (%) 60 (71) Tucatinib related 8(9.3)
Trastuzumab related 6(7)
PFS, mo (95% Cl) 8.2 (4.2-10.3) SAES: 19 (22.1)
Tucatinib related 3 (3.5)
Trastuzumab related 2(23)
Osiimo (95% Cl) er) RES leading to study treatment 568)
discontinuation**
ASCO 2024 AEs leading to tucatinib dose modification 22 (25.6)

create RASWT HER En Deaths due to AEs o

TERES leading lo discontinuaton ol tucaini included alanine aminotransterase increase (2.3%). COVID-19 pneumnia (12%). cholangs (1.2%) and fatigue

(12%) TEAES leading to discontinuation of tasturumal included alanine amineranlerase nerase (2.3%) and GOVID-10 pnoumona (12%) =
1. Sticker JH etal. Lancet Oncol. 2023:24:496-508, 2. Sticker JH et al. 2022 ESMO GI Congress. Abstract LBA-2. 3. Sticker JH et al ASCO 2024. Abstract 3500. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Most Common TEAEs (210%) for Tucatinib + Trastuzumab??

12 LESS
so M Grace 2 + Most common tucatinib-related AEs (210%): diarrh
80 I Grade 1 (52.3%), fatigue (29.1%), nausea (18.6%), and dermatitis

acneiform (17.4%)

Grade 23 tucatinib-related AEs (22%): alanine
aminotransferase increase (2.3%) and diarrhea

Frequency, %
8

o
‘a ESS FECES SET SENSE
# Cs LÉ Se EE e SES [E 3 e
Ca e o
e <
1. Sticker JH et al. Lancot Oncol. 2023/24:496-508. 2. Sticker JH et al. 2022 ESMO GI Congress. Abstract LBA 2. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Tucatinib + Trastuzumab: Confirmed ORR per BICR
in Prespe

ied Subgroups’?

CORR, %
Subsroupe (95% Cl)

38.1 (27.7-49.3)

Overall

Age
<65y 72 36.1 (25.1-48.3)
265 y 12 50 (21.1-78.9)
ECOG PS at baseline
0 50 44 (30.0-58.7)
12 34 29.4 (15.1-47.5)
Primary site of disease
Left-sided primary 71 42.3 (30.6-54.6)
All other primaries 13 15.4 (1.9-45.4)
Geographic region
North America 39.1 (27.6-51.6)
Europe

33.3 (11.8-61.6)

0 > 2

Confirmed ORR, %
1. Sticker JH ot al Lancot Oncol 2023/24:496-508.2. Sticker JH ot al 2022 ESMO GI Congress. Abstract LBA 2.

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

MOUNTAINEER: Results by Testing Modality’

Central IHC/FISH Tissue NGS (PGDX) Blood NGS (G360)

Primary
Analysis*

PFS, mo 82 10.1 28 10.9 24 8.1 109
(95% Cl) (42403) (42152) (1263) | (70207) (13NR) (31402) (20-184)
ORR, % 38.4 40 10 477 o 414 20
(5% Cl) (77-493) (NR) (0.344) (82-63) (045.9) (8.155) (43-481)
Duration of

124 16.4 153 124
(5% CD MO (85255) (10.6-25.5) - (8.9-25.5) = (6.2-38.3) -

* Tainted paint wth HERZ+ resul rom any sue based assay (HC, FISH, NGS) .
1. Sticker JH et al ASCO 2023. Abstract 3528. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Studies of Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab for HER2+ mCRC

ORR, % (95% Cl) Median PFS, mo Median OS, mo

(95% Cl) (95% Cl)
86 (all RAS} 28 (19-39) 2.9 (1.4-5.3) 11.5 (7.7-NE)
MyPathway'® 69 (RAS WT) 32 (21-44) 4.1 (2.7-5.6) 15.5 (10.3-20.9)
16 (RAS mut) 12 (2-38) 1.4 (1.2-2.8)° NIA
27 tissue+ 30 (14-50) 4 (1.4-5.6) 10.1 (4.5-16.5)
TRIOMEEE 25 ctDNA+ 28 (12-49) 3.1 (1.4-5.6) 8.8 (4.3-12.9)
SWOG-16135 26 31 44 NR
TAPUR® 28 25 (11-45) 4 (2.6-6.4) 14 (7.5-23.9)

One patient had unknown HER status. » For est 13 patients env,
1. Mere-Bemstam F tal. Lance Oncol. 2019:20'518-530.2. Manc-Bemstam Feta. J Cin Oncol 2021:0(supl 18) Abstract 3004.3. Sweeney Cet J Cin

Oncol 2024:42:256-265 4 Nakamura Yet al. Not Med. 202%;27 1699-1003. 5. Raghav KPS etal. J Cn Oncol 2023:41(supp 4) Abstract 140.8, Gupta Ret al JCO AN

‘Precis Oncol 2022602200308 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-CRC01 Assessed T-DXd in Patients
With Previously Treated HER2-Expressing CRC!

+ Open-label, multicenter phase 2 study (NCT03384940)

T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg Q3W

Unresectable and/or metastatic CRC
HER2 expressing (central confirmation)
RAS/BRAF WT
22 prior regimens
Prior anti-HER2 treatment allowed

Futility monitoring was done after 220 patients in
cohort A had 12 weeks of follow-up to inform opening
of cohorts B and C

Excluded patients with a history of or
current/suspected ILD

+ Primary endpoint: confirmed ORR by ICR in cohort A
Cohort C (n = 18)
+ Data cutoff: August 9, 2019 HER2 IHC 1+
- 38.5% (30/78) remained on treatment
— 61.5% discontinued, primarily for progressive disease (41%) and clinical progression (9%)

1. Siena S et al ASCO 2020, Abstract 4000

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-CRC01: T-DXd Shows Durable Activity
in HER2+ mCRC Refractory to Standard Treatment!

DESTINY-CRC01 Efficacy: Response Rate in Cohort A and Subgroup Analysis

Cohort A: Best Percentage

Change In Tumor Size Cohort A: ORR by Subgroup

Ego
FH

po T RR BE
ge Bat de —= 453 ness
E Fr + ao 0308
65 =— 280749
sl sur == 20 uses
HE == 8er
E Region =-— 23 18016
35 I 9 am
ERES == wu 275001
55 006 PS Das + ai ons
6% 10:9) —E => 128
EE HERZ stats Inc 3+ (n= 40) — ss 409730
5a eos | Fr tae
5% Pro HER2 veses Yon n= 1) = ae em
5 EE == do ass
SE A | EE ERE TE LT]
EC EE mn

1. Yoshino Tet al. Nat Commun. 2023:14:3332. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-CRC01: T-DXd Shows Durable Activity
in HER2+ mCRC Refractory to Standard Treatment!

DESTINY-CRC01 Efficacy: PFS and OS

PFS

HER HG Je or MC 26nSH cohort A

HER IMC 2414: or 8

A E E E
sora Tine, mo
ass 44 36 99 27 22 18 18 10 9 7 5 3 1 0
Sono da a 6 1 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 0 0
cme 18 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 8
HERZ IMG 30 FIG MER NC 278
cn here MERE te coher ©
Megan PFS couse 210440 140320

1. Yoshino Teta Nat Commun. 2023:14:3352,

PeerView.com/JPD827

os
100
»
ze ERA IG + or WNC 2418 hota
o verano
Her
» ER cote
of
ae ar E UE TE UE UE E VETE TEE ES
ir Timo, mo
Cha st 44 08 a5 32012825 2 18 1 6 1
Corn 15 14

6 oo
10 8654000000000
Goo G 18 15 8 8 6 6 4 3 3 2 0 0 0 oo

HERZINC 20 or NC HERZIHC 2vnsH-
msn Coben Cohen HERZINC 1 Cohort

$i ig 0

(och. mo 15508208 7360N€) 110209)

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Safety Consistent With Prior T-DXd Trials: ILD, Pneumonitis
Require Careful Monitoring, Prompt Intervention!

hort A: HERZ IHC 3+ or
TH 2+1SH+ (a= 53)

DESTINY-CRCO1 Results: Safety

Cohort 8:

HER2 INC 2¥/ISH- (n = 15)

Any Grade, Any Grade, Any Grade Any Grade Grade 23
tients with any TEAE 53 (100) 15 (100) 18 (100) 86 (100) 56 (65.1)
Nausea 37 698) sw 7089) 5361) 569)
Anomia 21 (096) 40267) 6633) 31.06) 12014)
Fatigue 21098) 7487) 3167) 3100) 102)
Decreased appetite we 533) 789) 30 (49) o
Decreased platelet count 17624) 487) 789) 28 (26) eos
Vomiting 2384) 3020) 168) 27314) 102)
Decreased neutrophil count 2671) 2093) 4022) 20002) 19.224)
Drache 19958) o 4022) 2387) 102)
Adjudicated Drug-Related ILD/Pneumonitis in All Cohorts Median time to onset: 61 (9-165) d

Grade 1

1%)

o

sun

de? Grades

102)

1.Yoshino Teta. Nat Commun. 2023:14:3352,

PeerView.com/JPD827

Grade 4

o

8/8 patients received corticosteroids
4 patients with grade 2 cases recovered; 1 with a grade 3 case did not

recover (later died: PD)

3.5 (0-50) d

+ Median time from onset to initiation of steroid treatment in all cases:

In the 3 fatal cases, onset was 9-120 (median, 22) d
Death occurred 6-19 (median, 6) d after diagnosis PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-CRC02 Is Assessing Different Doses of T-DXd!

STAGE 2

STAGE 1°

Arm 1
T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg

Patients with
HER2- Stratification factors

overexpressing ECOG PS: 0 or 1

(IHC 3+ or IHC HER? status: IHC 3+
2+/ISH+)? or IHC 2+/1SH+

unresectable, RAS status (WT vs

recurrent, mutant)
or metastatic CRC

T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg Q3W

+ Primary objective: assess efficacy of T-DXd at the 5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg doses
+ Primary endpoint: confirmed ORR by blinded ICR

* Enrollment wil not be interrupted beton stages 1 and 2; is not the intent to modify the study design based onthe Interim analysis resus. Study is binded to
im and ants. Mase number plan wih HERZ IC 20+ 0 Manu and minimum nun of urs wih PAS man Sat

12 30 andn = 20, respective) A
1 ps calais gov show NCTO4T 4481 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-CRCO2: Efficacy Outcomes’

5.4 mg/kg Q3W
(n =82)

6.4 mg/kg Q3W
(n= 40)

Confirmed ORR, % (95% Cl) 37.8 (27.3-49.2) 27.5 (14.6-43.9)

mDOR, mo (95% CI) 5.5 (4.2-8.1) 5.5 (3.7-NE)

Disease control rate, % (95% Cl) | 86.6 (77.3-93.1) 85 (70.2-94.3)

PFS, mo (95% Cl) 5.8 (4.6-7.0) 5.5 (4.2-7.0)

OS, mo (95% Cl) 13.4 (12.5-16.8) NE (9.9-NE)

1. Raghav K otal ASCO 2023. Abstract 3501 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

DESTINY-CRC-02: Best ORR (BICR)
by T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg Subgroup’

Subgroups (N = 82) ORR, nN ORR, % (95% CI)
‘All patients, 5.4 mg/kg — —— 31/82 37.8 (27.3492)
HERZ status H

IHC 3+ os 30164 46.9 (34.3-59.8)

IHC 2eISH+ = H 1118 5.6 (0.1-27.3)
RAS status 1

WT —— 27168 39,7 (28.0-52.3)

Mutant et 4/14 28.6 (8.4-58.1)
ECOG PS {

0 — 18146 39.1 (25.1-54.6)

1 —— 13/36 36.1 (20.8-53.8)
Primary tumor site

Left colon? 24/61 39.3 (27.1-52.7)

Right colon? 721 33.3 (14.6-57.0)
Prior anti-HER2 treatment

No 24/65 36.9 (25.3-49.8)

Yes TAT 41.2 (18.4-67.1)

EE soon ©

ORR, %

Based on no exact Copper-Pearson mathod or binomial dstrbuton.* Al RAS muated responders wre IHC 3, Includes rectum, sigmoid, and descending
ncudos cecum, ascending, and vansvese. e
1. Raghav K et al. ASCO 2023, Abstract 3501. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Case Discussion: A Female Pati

Aged 60 years

No allergies

Former smoker

No other underlying illnesses

Father (smoker) had lung cancer at 75 years
Exons 2,3,4 KRAS WT
Exons 2,3,4 NRAS WT
Exon 15 BRAF WT
pMMR/MSS

Images courtesy of Elena Elez, MD, PAO.

PeerView.com/JPD827

ent Presenting With mCRC?

December 2018: weight loss and asthenia

Endoscopy PET-CT scan
Low-grade sigmoid adenocarcinoma Possible bone lesion (L4)

CT scan
‘Sigmoid tumor + liver metastasis.

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Progression After Upfront Therapy—What’s Next?

+ Aged 60 years

+ Exons 2,3,4 KRAS WT
+ Exons 2,3,4 NRAS WT
Exon 15 BRAF WT
pMMR/MSS

+ Diagnosis: stage IV sigmoid colon
adenocarcinoma (liver metastasis)

+ Multidisciplinary team assessment:
nonresectable/1L FOLFOX + panitumumab
(C1: January 2, 2019)

Images courtesy of Elena Elez, MD, PhD.

PeerView.com/JPD827

4 cycles
+ Partial response

10 cycles

+ Confirmed partial response

July 2019 December 2019

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Surgery With Additional Follow-Up Recommended

November 2019: sigmoidectomy
Aged 60 years + Pathology report: pT4a pNia G2
Exons 2,3,4 KRAS WT (1/28) IL+IV+ IP+, RO

Exons ZI NRASWT December 2019: liver

Exon 15 BRAF WT bisegmentectomy

PMMR/MSS + Pathology report: adenocarcinoma,
New multidisciplinary team RO, RAS/BRAF WT

assessment: patient is suitable for
surgery FOLLOW-UP

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

HER2+ Status Confirmed After Additional Therapy
and Another Progression—What Are the Options?

+ Tissue sample

PeerView.com/JPD827

Liver sample 2019: IHC HER2+++

NGS (liquid biopsy): TP53, APC, and
PTEN mutations

ERBB2 amplified +++ (CN 5.7)
MSS

May 2020: liver, peritoneal, and bone

progression (progression-free interval: 6 mo)

+ 5 cycles FOLFIRI + bevacizumab
(C1: May 2020)

PROGRESSION OF DISEASE

liver, lung, and bone)

« Palliative radiotherapy (L4)

October 2020: liver and peritoneal

progression

+ Clinical trial: dual-HER2 blockade
(C1: November 2020, 3 cycles total)

Partial response

* 6cycles

PROGRESSION OF DISEASE (July 2021)

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Three Key Take-Homes From This Case

For this patient with CRC, earlier HER2 testing would have
been optimal

Early confirmation of HER amplification would have supported

earlier use of HER2-directed therapy

Clinical trials testing trastuzumab or T-DXd—based options
could have been considered, allowing for earlier use of
HER2-directed therapy

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827

HER2 in mCRC:

HER2 amplification/overexpression is an actionable target in refractory HER2+ mCRC
HER2 should be tested in all patients with mCRC (NGS testing and/or IHC/FISH)
Anti-HER2 therapies demonstrate greatest efficacy
in biomarker-selected HER2+ mCRC patient populations

IHC 3+ High gene copy number KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF WT

Several anti-HER2 therapies have demonstrated efficacy

+ Trastuzumab + tucatinib has high ORR and DOR with favorable tolerability
+ Trastuzumab deruxtecan has activity in RAS-mutated HER2+ disease and retains activity after
progression on prior anti-HER2 therapies

Key considerations: clinical/genomic characteristics, efficacy, and AE profile

PeerView.com

inal Thoughts

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Wielding New Therapeutic Tools

to Manage HER2-Amplified BTC

Modern and Emerging Targeted Approaches
to Improve Patient Survival

Shubham Pant, MD

Professor

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas

2000-2024, PeerView

The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation Is an Excellent
Resource for Professionals, Patients, and Caregivers?

The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation’s ([email protected]) mission is to find a
cure and improve the quality of life for those affected by cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer)

Visit https://cholangiocarcinoma.org/ for multiple Selected resources include
resources that patients can use to [ga] International Cholangiocarcinoma

Get the latest information about their disease a Patient Registry (ICPR)
Connect with other patients —— ss
Participate in clinical trials, A
And much more # un ===]
ee WU Find a Specialist
a hlios/cholangiocarcinoma org/specialistmap/

Find and Learn About Clinical Trials
I x

Https://cholangiocarcinoma.org/professionals!
fesearchiclinical-trials/ S
Behinarseries

“in supa l moving patent cae is cy has bean lanes an inpamented y PU, Poe Isa Mia Education, x
and ie Cholangiocarinoma Fou PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Right hepatic duct

PeerView.com/JPD827

Cystic duct

Distal common
bile duct

Biliary Cancers

Left hepatic duct

Common
hepatic duct

Common
bile duct

I intrahepatic—in the liver

I Pertilar—near the hilum
(where the bile ducts exit the liver)

[M Distal extrahepatic—outside the liver

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Current Shortcomings in the Management
of Advanced Biliary Cancers’

of 1,009 oncology pro

rs found that 81% were not confident in their ability

to use targeted therapies in patients with advanced CCA

Moreover...

meas

First Line Second Line

|

een coma |

er

ser

==
sms |
=


Third Line

|

en
nt chem =
oer

1. Parikh K ta, ASCO GI 2021. Abstract 347.2. Valderrama A at a, ASCO GI 2022. Abstract 398.

PeerView.com/JPD827

85% of patients initiated gemcitabine-based
chemotherapy as their first-line treatment

About 46% of patients initiated second-line
treatments, which were predominantly
5-FU-based chemotherapies

Few patients (17%) moved to the third line
of treatment

Median time on treatment in the first line was
3.2 months; in both the second and third lines,
median time was 2.7 months

PeerView.com

Copyright O 2000-2024, Peerview

Biliary Tract Cancers: Genomic Differences
Based on Tumor Location!

Biomarker-driven management to
improve outcomes.

Biospecimen sampling
(tumor, blood, urine) __A

Gallbladder carcinoma

UL Eco

“GBC ana EOS
AS muta
(OO 10 48%)
Lo equ ot
Large duct 60 a
KR mios || sor ee

Grow || “aseo =

FPR re
(Gon 020%)

tr

1. Seott Ad et al. J Cin Oncol. 2022:40:2716:27%4. PeerView.com
PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Phase 3 ABC-06: Second-Line FOLFOX Chemotherapy vs
Active Symptom Control for Advanced BTC’

Best Response Rate

(RECIST v1.1)

CR
PR

so

Response rate
—— (CR+PR)

Disease control rate
(CR + PR + SD)

Progressive disease
Death
Not evaluable

(nonmeasurable
disease)

1. Lamarca et al. Lancet Oncol. 2021:22:690-701.

PeerView.com/JPD827

23

27

23

‘Arm B (ASC + FOLFOX),

28

33

37

3

Ito
2:
24 0
33 190+ Faro
HE
28
“ ‘oy
EN a
o
man

ASC*FOUFOK 81 54 20 16 8

x

2

ASC + mFOLFOX

Radiological PFS.

16 mo
133m Yen
184m

Median PFS: 4 months
(95% Cl, 32-5.0)

PAC
EE)

o

OS by Trial Arm

o

‘Time From Randomization, mo

0

o

ArmA AmBiasc+

(ASC Alone) _"MEOLEOX
Sm

Adjusted HR

53 62
0.69 95% cl,0.50.097)
Pe ot

os, eo TE TE TE TE ETE
cual Time From Randomization, mo

Mouse 8 @ 20 1 0
ASCemrourox 81 Gt 41 20 21

9

A
$

3

4

2

¿ PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

HER2 Overexpression and Prognosis’

100 Disease-Free Survival 100 Overall Survival
80 80
&
$
2
Eso 60
3
2
£ 40 40
©
8 HER2- HER2-
© 20 20
HER2+ HER2+
0 0
O 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 O 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108120132
Time, mo Time, mo
DFS according to HER2 status OS curves according to HERZ status
Median DFS: 10.1 vs 17.8 months, P =.04 Median OS: 23.5 vs 36.1 months, P = 241
1. Vivaldi © et al. The Oncologist 2020;25:886-893. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

MyPathway Trial: Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab
for HER2+ Metastatic BTC’

661 patients enrolled in MyPathway

39 with HER2+ metastatic BTC

39 treated and eligible for efficacy analysis

36 discontinued from study

3 still on treatment treatment (35 PD, 1 death)

HA

32 discontinued from study
treatment (28 deaths:
1 completed study;
2 patient withdrawals;
1 lost to follow-up)

4 still in follow-up

1.Jave M ot al Lancot Oncol. 2021:22:1290-1300.

PeerView.com/JPD827

ORR 29%

Be
Es
ö

38
38
BE | ost overt response
& a Partial response

Sule casa

100 LM Progressive disease
THAW WTOTNNTHAMS CANON ENS EU TIT ETES

Patient

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

HERB Trial: T-DXd Shows Activity in Patients

1. Ohba A et a. ASCO 2022. Abstract 4006

PeerView.com/JPD827

Maximum Tumor Shrinkage
From Baseline, %

With HER2-Expressing BTCs!

Key inclusion criteria
+ Histologically confirmed
‘unresectable or recurrent BTC
+Centraly confirmed HER2-
‘expressing status
expressing | +Retractory or intolerant to
treatment, including gemcitabine
«ECOGPS 0 or t

7 7 Noireienes 16 inal sites’

ORR (HER2+): 36.4%

HERZ»
HER? low oxpressng

8858.83888

Patients

SCRUM-Japan registry study

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

DESTINY-PanTumor02: T-DXd Has Broad Activity,

Including for HER2+ BTC’
846
5
57.5 ] se 56.3
147.1 0) 40 45 I u

Endometrial____Cervical Ovarian Bladder Pancreatic
NR (9.9-NR)

Objective Response and Duration of Response
MAIL mIHC 3+ mIHC 2+

Confirmed ORR
by Investigator, %
0383888338388

Median DOR,

mo (95% Cl 142(4.1-NR) 113(41221) 87(43118) 221(41-NR) | 86(21-NR) 5.7 (NR-NR)

All Patients ) IHC 3+ (n= 75) 25)
‘ORR, % (05% CI) 37.1 (31.3-43.2) 61.3 (49.4-72.4) 27.2 (19.6-35.9)
Median DOR, mo (95% Cl) 11.3 (06-178) 22.1 (9.6-NR) 98 (4.3-12.6)

1. Mere Borstam F ota

:SMO 2023. Abstract LBA. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Tumor-Agnostic FDA Approval for T-DXd

Updated NCCN Guidelines for Biliary Cancer!
Second- or subsequent-line therapy: T-DXd added for HER2+ tumors (IHC 3+)
Useful in certain circumstances

Accelerated FDA Approval?
For adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2+ (IHC 3+) solid tumors who have

received prior systemic treatment and have no satisfactory alternative treatment options

ASCO 2024

T-DXd showed clinically meaningful benefit in patients with BTC across primary tumor
locations, and data support further exploration of T-DXd in this population?

1. NCCN Cinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Bilary Tract Cancers. Version 2.2024. 2. ht
rugsia.grant- accelerated approval lam-vastusumab-deruxtocar-naki-unresectabe-oF met

vs da. goviéregsesourcos-informas
ener. 3 Oh D-Y etal, ASCO 2024. A

PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyrigh!

Tucatinib and Trastuzumab Efficacy and Safety’

Change From Baseline in Each Patient

Change From Baseline, % _
os eas s

ees 8

Median DOR: 6 mo

Individual Patients (N = 29)*

' Percentages may not add upto a total due to rounding,
4. Nakamura Y at al ASCO 2023. Abstract 4007.

PeerView.com/JPD827

Most Common TEAEs (210%)

y Grace 12
Grade 23

Frequency, %.

A +

Most common grade 23 TEAEs were nausea, decreased
appetite, and cholangitis, each in 3 patients (10%

ll Utd "GPL. Yl Cle
rd

PeerView.com

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Phase 1 Trial of Zanidatamab in Patients With Locally
Advanced/Metastatic HER2-Expressing Cancers!

rt 1 Dose Escalation

{N = 46)
Cat ny conc
cones 1 amy concer Gras Cate 56: GEA cohen 7.86
A IN O CS)
ow caw caw am
Smoke tong 15m conato nota mato sonoro

Part 2 Dose Expansion
(N= 86)

‘Cohort: any cancers other than BC or GEA
IHC 3e or IHC 2+/FISHe

20 mg Qu

BTC cre Other
n=22 8. n=36

2 ncudes BC (n= 8) gastri cancr (= 5), CRC (n = 1) skin cancer (= 1) an osophageal cancer (n = 1) * Includes BC (n = 3). ceria cancer ( 1). esophageal
cancer (n= 1), GE (n= 1 and gaste cancer (n= 1). One patent wth CRC recewed 10 mghg QW and was pooled wit th 20 mag Q2W dose for analyses A
1. Merc Berstam F cet Oncol, 2022:23:1858-1570. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Antitumor Activity in Patients With HER2-Expressing BTC
Treated With Zanidatamab in Part 2 of Study’

Phase 1 Study:
Patients With Biliary Cancers

3 8

8 à

o

Median DOR:

Median PFS;

ORR 40% DCR 65% DOR 7.4 mo

* Doted Ines represent 20% increase or 30% decrease in tumor size. Watrtal lt of greatest percentage change inthe sum ol th longest diameter of measurable
tumors in palta wth Dry tract cane. 7
1. Mare Bornstam Fetal, Lancet Oncol 2022.23:1558-1570. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

HERIZON-BTC-01 Trial: A Global Phase 2b Study
of Zanidatamab Monotherapy in HER2-Amplified BTC1

Repeating every month + Primary endpoint: ORR

+ Key secondary endpoints:
DOR, DCR, PFS, OS,
frequency and severity of
AEs, and frequency of SAES
and deaths

Every 8 weeks:
CTMRI

Patients with Day 1 Day 15
HER2-amplified BTC
(N = 100)

Zanidatamab

By Investigator Assessment
(0 = 80)
‘Confirmed ORR, % (95% CI) 41.3 (804-528) 413 004-528)
Confirmed BOR, n (%)
CR 103 46) 16 patients had
PR 32.0) 20639)
u Es a ongoing responses at the time
Po 24 (80) 25 (51.3) of data cutoff
NE 1113) 143)
DCR (CR + PR + SD), % (95% CI) 688 (574787) 675 (561-776)
CBR (CR + PR + [SD 26 mo} %
ce 475 (862500) 475 (862-500)
1. Pant 8 et al ASCO 2029. Abstract 4008. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Treatment Duration for Patients With Response (CR or PR)
or Stable Disease per RECIST v1.1 by ICR (Cohort 1)!

N=80
12.9 (1.5-16.9+)

Median DOR, mo (range)

2 Median time to first response, mo (range) 1.8 (1.655)
= Median duration of follow-up, mo (range) 124 (7-24)
a ‘Median duration of treatment, mo (range) 56 (0.5-19.84)

© Tumor response
M Disease progression
> Treatment ongoing

21

18

9 12 15
Time From Treatment Start, mo

Time to tumor response or treatment duration end Time from tumor response to treatment duration end
PeerView.com

o 3 6

1. Harding et al. Lancet Oncol 2029,24:772:782.

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Adverse Events of Special Interest!

Cohort 1 (N = 80) Total (N = 87)

Any Grade Grade 23 Any Grade Grade 23

AESI, n (%)
IRR
Confirmed cardiac events ree 4 Gn 4 oy 3 en
Noninfecious pulmonary 1(13) 113) 1(11) 111)

- 675) 38 (43.7) 6 (69)

+ IRR events: all events resolved, generally within 1 day; most occurred with the first cycle of treatment
(26/29); most had no recurrence (26/29)
+ Confirmed cardiac events: decreased LVEF in 5 patients (5.7%); patients were clinically asymptomatic,
and the events were confounded by pre-existing or concurrent conditions
+ Diarrhea: all but two events (both grade 3) were managed in the outpatient setting, typically with
loperamide; most events (87/99) were resolved at the time of data cutoff; median time to resolution of 2
days (range, 1-267)
AESis that occured in 21 patient. N
1. Harding 3 et al Lancot Oncol. 2029,24:772:782 PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Quality of Life Outcomes With Zanidatamab*

EQ-5D-5L QoL Outcomes in Patients With HER2+ BTC by Tumor Response

Best Confirmed Overall Tumor Response

cR so
BL & eL | sont | eL | sont | eL | Bont
(a=) | m=n | m=3n | (n=32) | (0=20 | (n=22) | (n= 24 | (n= 19)

Median VAS score o 09 0 8 0 8 © 7

Median VAS change from basaline® = = 40 == 5 - +0

Least severe response level (no problem), n (%)

Mobility o O 23(74) 30(94) 16T) 19(86) 15) 12(63)
Self-care o © 28(90) 31(97) 18(86) 19(86) 23) 1618)
Usual activities o 0 23(74) 29(91) 11(52) 158) 16(67) 100)
Pain/discomtort O 10100) 15(48) 28(88) TO) 130) 10) 7(37)
Anxiety/depression o O 18(58) 28(88) 12(57) 14(64) 13(54) 14(74)
aan aa ESO 203 Anne IR PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

TAB Study: Trastuzumab + Gemcitabine/Cisplatin
for Treatment-Naive HER2+ BTC’

Consort Diagram

876 patients were screened for HER2 status

118 (13.4%) patients were HER2 positive

90 patients enrolled in a single-arm trial

28 were excluded
+ 23 did not meet inclusion criteria
+ 5 declined to participate

18 patients with ongoing treatment,
72 patients discontinued intervention
+ 70 had dise

1.Ostwal VS et al. JCO, 2023:41:4089-4089. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

TAB Results!

Overall Survival Progression-Free Survival
6-month OS: 81.1% (95% CI, 72.9-90.3) 10

6-month PFS: 75.6% (95% Cl, 66.6-84.6)

12monh OS: 29.1% (25% Cl 273509) a 12:monih PFS: 17.6% (95% Cl, 167-185)
2 \_, Median OS:8.95 months 05% Cl 9201056) à Medion PFS: 7 months (5% Ci, 6278)
3 " 3
on 075
i i
3 3
dos Eos
a a
8 ¿
dos os
E E
3 3
o o
° y y = à y y y = 2
Time, mo Time, mo
No. at Rak No. at Rsk
so 1 2 D 2 so se 6 4 1

1. Ostwal VS etal..CO. 2023:41:4089-408. PeerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

A Phase 2 Multi-Institutional Trial Evaluating Trastuzumab +
FOLFOX for HER2+ BTC Refractory to Gem/Cis!

Treatment-Related Adverse Events

N=34 D oc ne ve om
ORR: 29.4% Es 00 sm a
A Median PFS: 5.1 mo Ft rt deed 9 er)
3. ‘een
35 m) Personen coat wm am o
¿E cer ventes wo
Es Dies rey 20 o
ez pa O
53 Fave 2 10 o
ze
E mans CT
ee nt cet rey oo
Ez Pe 0 0.
r= 50 o. e
tii i mi oO
eon 40m er)
> zu 4 mm,
PeerView.
1. Choong-Kun L. Lancet Gastroenterol. 2023:8:56-65. ‘eerView.com

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Audience Q&A

PeerView.com/JPD827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView