To accurately and reliably estimate the SOH of batteries, researchers have proposed various methods, including direct measurement, model-based approaches, and data-driven techniques [19]. Direct measurement methods are used in laboratory environments to measure capacity and internal resistance directly, such as ampere-hour counting, resistance/impedance methods, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and open circuit voltage methods [[20], [21], [22], [23]]. Although these methods are easy to deploy, their estimation accuracy relies on the precision of the measurement techniques and may not be sufficiently reliable in practical applications. Therefore, they are primarily suitable for offline SOH estimation in laboratory settings [24,25]. In contrast, model-based approaches treat lithium-ion batteries as electrochemical or electrical models to simulate the dynamic systems within batteries and track the degradation process [26]. However, accurate SOH estimation requires a thorough understanding of the degradation processes, which is challenging due to the complexity of battery electrochemical dynamics [27]. Moreover, the accuracy of model-based estimation depends heavily on the precision of battery modeling, making it difficult to balance SOH estimation accuracy and computational complexity in practical scenarios. Conversely, data-driven approaches, especially those based on machine learning, are pivotal in fields such as scientific data analysis, intelligent systems, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence [28,29]. These methods excel in representing and manipulating uncertainty within models and predictions [30]. These intelligent learning methodologies have become powerful tools across a wide range of applications, including classification, regression, anomaly detection, and space- or time-dependent state prediction. They can be applied in supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, or self-supervised modes, particularly within the context of Industry 4.0 [31].