Progressive Adition Lens

27,135 views 41 slides Nov 17, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 41
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41

About This Presentation

Pal lens Types and design.


Slide Content

Kewal Sahu (Optician) MGMEI Progressive Addition Lens

Definition – The power of addition gradually increases as the line of the vision sweeps downward through the lens. 2 09.12.2016 Progressive Addition Lens

Benjamin Franklin invented first bifocal spectacle lens in 1784. First patient on progressive power lenses was published in 1907 by Owen Ave. Forerunner of Essilor company introduced first commercially available PAL Varilux 1, in 1959. 3 09.12.2016 History

Basic Design in Bifocals 4 09.12.2016

Basic design in Trifocals 5 09.12.2016

Basic design in PAL 6 09.12.2016

Glasses Resins - CR- 39 - Polycarbonate - Trivex 7 Lens Materials 09.12.2016

All PALs contain important markings which are used to identify lenses & to assist in their fitting & verification . - Permanent Marking - Ordinary Marking 8 PALs Markings 09.12.2016 6 2.0

6 2.0 Distance Reference Circle Fitting Cross Add Power Near Reference Circle Micro-etching Prism Reference Circle Nasal Temporal RE Lens Logo Material Micro-etching 9 09.12.2016 PAL s Marking

Distance & near reference points for power measurement Fitting cross for fitting purposes Prism reference circle for prism measurement between lenses Micro etching for re-marking purposes Peripheral lens aberration in peripheral zone 10 09.12.2016 PAL s Marking

Power progression by increasing the front surface curvature from dist to near zone Rate of power progression determines the length of intermediate zone The position of the near zone is offset nasally (convergence for near) 11 09.12.2016 Optical Design

Design in PAL’S : Hard design Soft design Advanced soft design Symmetrical design Asymmetrical design Mono design Multi design 12 09.12.2016

Hard design – Rapid progression from dist to near power Large dist & near zone ( free of aberration area) Shorter & narrower intermediate zone More adaptation time People who do a lot of reading 13 09.12.2016 PALs Design Categories

Soft design – Slower progression from dist to near power Smaller dist & near zone ( free of aberration area) Longer & wide intermediate zone Less adaptation time Young presbyopes Active outdoor profession Professional driver 14 09.12.2016 PALs Design Categories

Hard and Soft Lens Design Hard Soft 15 09.12.2016

Advanced soft design – The progression zone is similar to a hard design Larger effective distance and near zones Unwanted cylinder(induced astigmatism)is pushed towards the periphery similar to a soft design. Therefore giving wider and larger intermediate zone Peripheral aberrations are very well controlled, so the wearer gets adapted very easily 16 09.12.2016 PALs Design Categories

Contour-plots Give Insufficient Product Information Do you see much difference between these 3 designs ? They look alike… But they perform differently 17 09.12.2016

Pattern of PAL’s Symmetrical PAL Identical right & left lenses Lens rotation of two eyes is equal & same amount ( i.e. 10 º ) Nasal decent ration of near zone Imbalance can cause more difficult wearer adaptation 18 09.12.2016

Pattern of PAL’s Asymmetrical PAL Incorporated a nasal offset of near zone Negates the lens rotation Leading to better adaptation & visual comfort 19 09.12.2016

The other design considerations are …... Multi-design Vs Mono-design : In Multi-design the position for the near vision changes with the addition power increase end the near area goes up with the increase in the addition which improves the comfort of the wearer In Mono design the position of the near vision doesn’t change with the addition powers- thus causing difficulty while viewing near objects/prints as the wearer holds the reading material closer to him as his add power increases 09.12.2016 20

Dispensing PAL….. 21 09.12.2016

Fitting Progressive Lenses When fitting progressive lenses, use the following procedure: 1. Select the frame 2. Pre-adjust the frame 3. Measure the fitting heights 4. Measure the distance PDs 5. Verify lay-out card 22 09.12.2016

Dispensing PALs – Frame selection Metal frame with adjustable pads is a good option. Frame height require to ensure adequate area for distance & near. - at least 18 mm below and - at least 14 mm above from the pupillary center . 23 09.12.2016

Pre-Adjust the Frame Ensure a minimal vertex distance Ensure at least 7° or more of Pantoscopic tilt Ensure a sufficient amount of face-form wrap Adjust frames with demo lenses in place 24 09.12.2016

Effect of Vertex Distance Shorter vertex distances increase the field of view through the viewing zones of the lens. 25 09.12.2016

Effect of Pantoscopic Tilt Pantoscopic tilt brings the near zone closer to the eye and increases the field of view through the near zone of the lens 26 09.12.2016

Effect of Face-Form Wrap Face-form wrap increases the field of view through the distance zone of the lens. 27 09.12.2016

PD measurements Monocular PD is more important. Measures from the center of nose to the center of the pupil . 28 09.12.2016

PD measurements Methods include Pupillometer Direct pupillary reflex marking method . PD ruler 29 09.12.2016

Verify cut-out card Use the correct cut-out card for the lens design Place the dotted demo lens on the fitting point of the Lay out card , and ensure that the frame will cut- out at the desired measurements 30 09.12.2016

Frame Verification Verify frame level with lay-out card followed PD markings. Make sure that frame is suitable for PAL, before fitting. 31 09.12.2016

Key points to success with PALs An accurate refraction. Correct size of frame and adjustments An accurate monocular PD measurements. Perfect fitting. Proper instruction on use. Motivate the patient to adapt the new type of vision. 32 09.12.2016

Advantages of PAL No visible segments. Continuous field of clear vision Comfortable intermediate vision Continuous support to eye’s accommodation Continuous perception of space Lighter & thinner than single vision of the same power 33 09.12.2016

No visible segments 34 09.12.2016 Bifocal lens Progressive lens

Progressive lens provides clear vision from far to near 35 09.12.2016

Extreme right picture shows clear intermediate vision through progressive lens 36 09.12.2016

Using the distance vision portion of a bifocal Using the near vision segment of a bifocal Using the intermediate portion of a progressive 37 09.12.2016

Perception of form and movement through a progressive lens 38 09.12.2016

Straight line appears curved Adaptation required Peripheral aberration More steps in fitting Increase in eye and head movement Eye must be dropped a longer distance Expensive compared to bifocals 39 09.12.2016 Disadvantages of pal

Bifocal Provide distance & near vision only Distinct junctions between zones Lower cost Fast fitting procedure Prismatic image jump Cosmetically unappealing PALs Provide intermediate vision also No visible junctions between zones More cost More steps in fitting No prismatic image jump Cosmetically appealing 40 09.12.2016 Bifocal vs. PAL s

41 09.12.2016
Tags