Reducing waste from questionable research practices

AustralianNationalDataService 485 views 25 slides Jun 26, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 25
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25

About This Presentation

Presentation from Professor Paul Glasziou, Bond University, to the AHMEN meeting on 19 June 2017, in Sydney, Australia.


Slide Content

Reducing waste from questionable
research practices
Paul Glasziou, Bond University
www.crebp.net.au

http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/01/14/paul-glasziou-and-iain-chalmers-is-
85-of-health-research-really-wasted/
Lancet Adding Value, Reducing Waste 2014
www.researchwaste.net
Five stages of waste in research
Annual waste in research is estimated to be 85% - from stages:
2. avoidable design flaws (50%),
4. non-publication (50%) and
5. unusable reports (50%)
– global total of over $140 Billion/year.
http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/01/14/
paul-glasziou-and-iain-chalmers-is-85-of-health-research-really-
wasted/

50% of research is not published
Lancet 2014;383:257–66
But similar across countries, size, phase, …
WASTE

Non-Publication: a solution*
All Trials Registered; All Results Reported
*Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1986

Non-reporting: lots of variation
Trials Tracker
Total (45% missing)
Kyowa (80% missing) Univ Ghent (84% missing)
Eli Lilly (5% missing)Johns Hopkins (24%
missing)

Trials registration rates: 2000-2016
International Committee of
Medical Journal Editors
requires registration
Food and Drug
Administration
Amendments Act of 2007

Posting of Summary Trial Results
10% of
registered
trials

Trials registration
Opportunities to check registration at:
1.Funding approval
2.Ethics approval
3.Final report to funder *
(+ post summary results)
4.Publication
(+ post summary results)
* NIHR’s HTA program requires, and has 98%
publication rate for their trials!

http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/01/14/paul-glasziou-and-iain-chalmers-is-
85-of-health-research-really-wasted/
Lancet Adding Value, Reducing Waste 2014
www.researchwaste.net
Five stages of waste in research
Annual waste in research is estimated to be 85% - from stages:
2. avoidable design flaws (50%),
4. non-publication (50%) and
5. unusable reports (50%)
– global total of over $140 Billion/year.
http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/01/14/
paul-glasziou-and-iain-chalmers-is-85-of-health-research-really-
wasted/

So what can journals do?

Improving Reporting: brief history
1930s: IMRaD structure
(Introduction; Methods;
Results and Discussion)
1987: Structured Abstracts
1996: CONSORT for Trials
2006: EQUATOR Network
Uptake of IMRaD.
Luciana B. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004

Missing elements in Reports of
Randomized Clinical Trials (PubMed)
13

Reproducible controlled trials
CONSORT checklist 2010 (25 items)
TITLE & ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Background
Objectives
METHODS
Trial design
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Sample size
Randomization
Sequence generation
Allocation concealment
Implementation
Blinding (Masking)
Statistical methods
RESULTS
Participant flow
Recruitment
Baseline data
Numbers analyzed
Outcomes and Estimation
Ancillary analyses
Harms
DISCUSSION
Limitations
Generalisability
Interpretation
OTHER INFORMATION
Registration
Protocol Funding

Outcome switching
Ask for the protocol
at submission
Have open “rapid
responses” of use
PubMed Commons

Reproducible controlled trials
CONSORT checklist 2010 (25 items)
TITLE & ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Background
Objectives
METHODS
Trial design
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Sample size
Randomization
Sequence generation
Allocation concealment
Implementation
Blinding (Masking)
Statistical methods
RESULTS
Participant flow
Recruitment
Baseline data
Numbers analyzed
Outcomes and Estimation
Ancillary analyses
Harms
DISCUSSION
Limitations
Generalisability
Interpretation
OTHER INFORMATION
Registration
Protocol Funding

What is the treatment?
The paper’s description of sodium reduction
"Individual and weekly group counseling sessions were offered
initially, with less intensive counseling and support thereafter,
specific to sodium reduction."

What would you tell a patient to do?
TOHP Study BMJ, Apr 2007; 334: 885

What is sodium reduction?
The paper’s description
"Individual and weekly group counseling sessions were
offered initially, with less intensive counseling and support
thereafter, specific to sodium reduction."
Description in earlier (paywalled) reference:
1.an individual session followed by 10 weekly group 90
minute sessions with a nutritionist, followed by a
transitional stage of some additional sessions
2.Topics in the weekly sessions included Getting Started,
sodium basics, the morning meal, midday sources of sodium,
the main meal, planning ahead, creative cooking, eating out,
food cues, and social support,
3.the sessions included sampling of foods, discussion of
articles on sodium reduction, and problem-solving,
4.patients kept diaries at least 6 days per week, and urine
sodiums were measured.

Poor reporting of non-pharmacological
interventions in 6 major medical journals
Of 133 trials in 2010
59% adequate after
contacting author
39% adequate in
primary sources
Hoffmann, Erueti, Glasziou. Poor description of non-pharmacological
interventions: A remediable barrier to evidence use in practice? BMJ 2013

The TIDieR checklist (1-7)

Methods, Materials, and Data

Fig 3. Reportedly available materials.
Kidwell MC, Lazarević LB, Baranski E, Hardwicke TE, Piechowski S, et al. (2016) Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A
Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLoS Biol 14(5): e1002456.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

Fig 2. Reportedly available data.
Kidwell MC, Lazarević LB, Baranski E, Hardwicke TE, Piechowski S, et al. (2016) Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A
Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLoS Biol 14(5): e1002456.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

What might journals do?
Study registration at submission
Use reporting guidelines
Ask & link protocol/materials
Assign someone to “ensure value”