Samsung electronics Organization Management

6,992 views 16 slides Nov 16, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 16
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16

About This Presentation

This presentation presents everything about Samsung company. Samsung history, SWOT analysis, Porter's 6 force analysis, Samsung future, Samsung performance, Samsung competitors, Apple vs Samsung, Samsung mobile market and everything about Samsung.


Slide Content

Samsung Electronics Team Sakshama Ghoslya, (B12122, 4 th Year, EE) Himanshu Rathore , (B12075, 4 th Year, EE)

History: Founded in: 1938 Founded by: Lee Byung-chul ( 1910-1987, South Korean ) 1951: It became the cooperation 1969: Started producing Television, Mobile, Computer etc. 1990: Started expending globally (US, Britain, Germany, China)

VISION ---------------- Inspire the world, Create the future

Synopsis: Semiconductors : DRAM, SDRAM, flash memory, and hard drives Digital displays : LCD displays, Plasma displays and OLED displays Home Electronics : TVs, DVD players, home cinema systems, set-top boxes, and projectors Mobile devices : mobile phones, MP3 players, digital cameras . Computing products : monitors, laptops, UMPCs, CD and DVD drives, laser printers, and faxes machine . Home appliances : refrigerators, washing machines, microwaves , vacuum cleaners, and air conditioners.

Competitors: Apple LG Sony

Performance:

SWOT Analysis: Strengths   Weaknesses   Innovation and design Low production costs Largest share in mobile phones Excellence in engineering and producing hardware parts Lack its own OS and software Focus on too many products Too low profit margin Opportunities   Threats   Growing mobile advertising industry Growth of tablets market Growing demand for quality application processors Growing India’s smartphone market Rapid technological change Price wars Declining margins on hardware production Saturated smartphone markets in developed countries

Structure and Model type: Centralized Structure Planning Model, Late stage companies Board of Directors : (Total members: 9) Vice chairman and CEO: 1 President and CEO: 2 President and CFO: 1 Independent Directors: 5

Organization Chart:

Porter’s 6 force analysis: Threat of new entrants: The White Goods industry is characterized by high barriers to entry especially where global companies like Samsung are concerned. Indeed, it is often very difficult to enter emerging markets because a host of factors have to be taken into consideration such as setting up the distribution network and the supply chain. So threat of new entrants is Low for Samsung. Threat of substitutes: This element is indeed high as the markets for white goods are flooded with many substitutes and given the fact that consumer durables are often longer term purchases, companies like Samsung have to be careful in deciding on the appropriate marketing strategy. So threat of substitutes for a particular product of Samsung is High . Power of buyers: The power of buyers for white goods makers like Samsung is somewhat of a mixed bag where though the buyers have a multitude of options to choose from and at the same time have to stick with the product since they cannot just dump the product, as it is a high value item. Further, the buyers would have to necessarily approach the companies for after sales service and for spare parts. So power of buyers is Medium for Samsung.

Porter’s 6 force analysis: Power of suppliers: In many markets in which Samsung operates, there are many suppliers who are willing to offer their services at a discount. However, this does not mean that the companies can exert undue force over the suppliers as once the supply chain is established; it takes a lot to build a new supply chain afresh. So power of suppliers is Low . Intensity of rivalry: This element is especially significant for Samsung as the other White Goods multinationals like LG, Nokia, and Motorola, Apple are engaged in fierce competitive rivalry. Indeed, Samsung cannot take its position in the market for granted as all these and other domestic white goods players operate in a market where margins are tight and the competition is intense. So intensity of rivalry is High in this case. Complementors : Public debates on multi brand companies and Indian government regulations and incentives are the complementors of Samsung which complements the effectiveness of the organisation in negative way. So 6 th force is also High .

Future: Samsung is still in the list of world’s biggest mobile phone vendors Samsung’s share of the global market slipped to 22.2% from 27.4% last year . I ts earnings could rise thanks to expanded sales of the S6 and curved-screen S6 Edge. Smart Phone Market shared in China