SAS Visual Defect Detection System VP Steel Dragons.pdf

atabarezz 37 views 22 slides Oct 15, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 22
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22

About This Presentation

The SAS Visual Defect Detection System for VP Steel Dragons uses deep learning and real-time monitoring to improve defect detection in steel production. Key highlights include:

Background: The system was developed for BaoSteel, a leading steel company in China, to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and ...


Slide Content

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
SAS Visual Defect Detection System
with SAS Deep Learning and ESP
By Steel Dragon Team
SAS China
Jan 2020

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Agenda
Background
Demo
Solution Value

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Background

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
BaoSteelCo.
Mission: Becoming a top steel product, technology and service provider in the world.
•About the customer
•Largest steel company in China
•RMB 305.2 billion (US 44 billion) business
revenue in 2018
•RMB 27.82 billion ( US 4 billion) profit
in 2018
•No.1 Silicon steel sale in the world
•No.2Crude Steel output in the world.
•No.3Automobile plate sale in the world.
•Enhancing Strategy
•Technical leadership
•Digital transformation
•Service foremost
•Environment management
Source: http://www.baosteel.com/

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Business Challenge
Efficiency
Improve the efficiency of
inspector’s manual work
by automating the
process
Accuracy
Improve the predictive
model accuracy by adopt
Computer Vision
capability
Optimization
Continuously embed
expert’s domain knowledge
into the model and apply it
into production seamlessly.
Around 8.6 –21.6 million
pictures generated everyday,
around 2 million defects
pictures needs to be
analyzed.
The accuracy of the result
from current defect
detection system (Parsytec)
was just ~60%.
How to support experienced
QC staff embed their rich
knowledge into the production
line to achieve continuous
optimization?
People
Technology
Process

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Quality Control –Defect Detection and Classification
1.Surface Sensor:Take pictures
2.Junction Box: Image analysis
3.Inspection Server: Store defects
4.Inspection Terminal: Monitordefects
Parsytec
Main Defects are important.
ACC—Accuracy
FNR—False Negative Rate
Production
Line
Main
Defects
Fake
Defects
Main
Defects
ACC
Main
Defects
FNR
2050 23 14 63%4.2%
1580 27 13 64%3.7%
1880 21 13 59%6.9%
Current Situation

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Defect Examples
Black line:
Internal crack of slab caused during rolling.
Scratch
Mechanical damage to the surface during rolling.
BlackStripe:
Stripe-like pseudo-defect due to different light
and shadow conditions.
Rediron:
Scale consists of thin layers of iron oxide crystals.

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Demo

Product
LineBaoshan
Black Stripe Black Line Red Iron Scratch
Factory Hot Rolled Steel Line 2050Product Type Product Line Analytics Beyond Vision
342 defects of 4 defect types has been
detected, released 57 labor-hours from
Factory Baoshan, Hot Rolled Steel, Product
Line 2050.
SAS Visual Defect Detection System –Real-time Monitor
Black_Stripe
51
151 27 33
Total defects
Stripe-like pseudo-defect due to
different light and shadow conditions.
Internal crack of slab caused
during rolling.
Scale consists of thin layers
of iron oxide crystals.
Mechanical damage to the
surface during rolling.

SAS Visual Defect Detection System –Continuous Optimization
Product
Line
BaoshanFactory A 1Workshop Product Line 2019/11/05 12DateTime 20Condition This interface was
designed to help
operator, to modify the
classification result of
image and then re-train
the CV model for better
performance.
0,1629
0,3729
0,1024
0,3617
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4
Black Line
Black Stripe
Red Iron
Scratch
Probability of Defects
CHANGE
Black LinesBlack StripeSratchRed Iron
Train
Black Stripe

Architecture
JavaScript
User
Interface
ESPJS
connect
Source
Calculate
(Image Resizing)
Score
(Classification)
Model Reader
(ASTORE
Loading)
ESP Server
ViyaVDMML
SAS Server
Retrain
Analytic
store
Hardware
& Software
EEC 171_V35
•Viya3.5
•ESP 6.2
•CentOS 7.6
Hardware
•Memory:
128G
•Storage:
530G
•CPU:
12,
10 *2.27
GhzIntel Xeon
E7560

Machine Vision Life cycle
Source
Calculate
(Image Resizing)
Score
(Classification)
Model Reader
(ASTORE Loading)
ViyaVDMML
Training Once
Use everywhere
Database
Real Time Scoring
in ESP Edge
Nvidia TX2

Process Flow
Video: 2 Pics/s
Source
Calculate
(Image Resizing)
Score
(Classification)
Model Reader
(ASTORE Loading)
ESP Server
Black_line

Process Flow
Video: 2 Pics/s
Source
Calculate
(Image Resizing)
Score
(Classification)
Model Reader
(ASTORE Loading)
ESP Server
3132
Black_line
+1

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Solution Value

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Quality optimization
IMPACT
Inefficiency of defect
analysis
CONSEQUENCECURRENT STATE
Inaccuracy of defect
classification
Gap between quality inspector
and quality analyst
Hard to continuously improve
the quality by embed expert
knowledge into the predictive
model in interactive manner
Longer product quality
problem solving time
More manual work
Limited understanding of what
drives product quality
Unforeseen down time is
driving down margins
Root cause analysis and quality
issues is costing too much time
and effort
Reduced Brand equity
Increased
maintenance cost
Increased rework
cost and call back size
Reduced Production
capacity resulting in a
potential hit to
revenue
Reduced yields
Increased
down time
Increased
waste/scrap
Product quality problem
repeating
Increased
labor cost
Customer
satisfaction

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Quality Optimization
Continuous Optimization
•Visual , interactive
interface for quality
analyst
•Embed expert
knowledge to achieve
optimization
Process
Seamlessly, integrated and
continuous quality
optimization process enabled
Reduced labor cost
increased yields
SAS® SOLUTION BUSINESS CHANGE ENABLED
Reduced rework and scrap
BENEFITS
Product Quality
Reduce Yield variations
Automatic , real-time defect
analysis minimize product
quality failures
Real-time monitor
•Visual real-time
•interactive dashboards
•Support mobile/edge
device
Aftersales
Minimize the impact of
aftersales defects
Increased brand equity
Quicker root cause
determination
Production Efficiency
Reduce rework efforts and call
back sizes –early intervention
Minimize efforts and
accelerate the process to
determine potential quality
issues
Increased quality –optimize
and tune the process
Prioritizes problems based
on business impact
Collaborative environment
enable more innovation
Increased product quality
Increased Customer
satisfaction

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Hot-rolled Steel Production Saving
Revenue Saved=Qualified Products Rev * FNR Improved (due to missed defects)
+
Defect Products Rev * AccIncreased (due to miss-classification)
SAS Visual Defect Detection Value Calculator (Million USD)
Revenue Accuracy Before FNR Before Hired Inspectors
Total
Labor Cost
11,272 62.00% 4.20% 280 4.86
Defects Rate Accuracy After FNR After
Labor-Cost
(Man/Year in USD)
Missed
Defects Rev
5.00% 90.00% 1.00% $17,340 340.87
Substandard
Rate
Accuracy
Improved
FNR
Decreased
Misclassified
Defects Rev
0.50% 28.00% 3.20% 173.59
Customer Data Input Total Rev
SavedSAS Input
Acc: Model Accuracy Rate
FNR: False Negative Rate
Totals 519.31

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Cold-rolled Steel Production Saving
SAS Visual Defect Detection Value Calculator (Million USD)
Revenue Accuracy Before FNR Before Hired Inspectors
Total
Labor Cost
13,588 62.00% 4.20% 330 5.72
Defects Rate Accuracy After FNR After
Labor-Cost
(Man/Year in USD)
Missed
Defects Rev
5.00% 90.00% 1.00% $17,340 410.89
Substandard
Rate
Accuracy
Improved
FNR
Decreased
Misclassified
Defects Rev
0.50% 28.00% 3.20% 209.25
Customer Data Input Total Rev
SavedSAS Input
Acc: Model Accuracy Rate
FNR: False Negative Rate
Totals 625.87
Revenue Saved=Qualified Products Rev * FNR Improved (due to missed defects)
+
Defect Products Rev * AccIncreased (due to miss-classification)

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Total-rolled Steel Production Saving
SAS Visual Defect Detection Value Calculator (Million USD)
Revenue Accuracy Before FNR Before Hired Inspectors
Total
Labor Cost
24,860 62.00% 4.20% 610 10.58
Defects Rate Accuracy After FNR After
Labor-Cost
(Man/Year in USD)
Missed
Defects Rev
5.00% 90.00% 1.00% $17,340 751.77
Substandard
Rate
Accuracy
Improved
FNR
Decreased
Misclassified
Defects Rev
0.50% 28.00% 3.20% 382.84
Customer Data Input Total Rev
SavedSAS Input
Acc: Model Accuracy Rate
FNR: False Negative Rate
Totals 1145.19
Revenue Saved=Qualified Products Rev * FNR Improved (due to missed defects)
+
Defect Products Rev * AccIncreased (due to miss-classification)

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Special Thanks
Xiangqian Hu SAS Advanced Analytics R&D Cary
Wenyu Shi SAS Advanced Analytics R&D Cary
Steel Dragon
Olivia Wang Customer Advisory SAS China
Jackie Hu Customer Advisory SAS China
Tianlun Gu Customer Advisory SAS China

C o p y r i g h t © S A S I n s t i t u te I n c . A l l r i g h t s re s e r ve d .
Thanks