Software Architecture Design Decisions

1,101 views 12 slides Sep 05, 2021
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 12
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12

About This Presentation

In software engineering and software architecture design, design decisions address architecturally significant requirements; they are perceived as hard to make and/or costly to change. It is called also architecture strategies and tactics.


Slide Content

Desi gn Decisions Afaq Mansoor Khan Teacher: Mr. Ahsan Ashfaq Subject: Software Architecture & Design

Architectural Design Decisions “In software engineering and software architecture design , design decisions address architecturally significant requirements; they are perceived as hard to make and/or costly to change.” It is called also architecture strategies and tactics.

Design as a series of Decisions A designer is faced with a series of design issues These are sub-problems of the overall design problem. Each issue normally has several alternative solutions(or design options) The designer makes a design decision to resolve each issue. The designer makes a design decision to resolve each issue. This process involves choosing the best option from among the alternatives.

Taking Decisions To take each design decision, the software engineer uses: →the “current” knowledge the requirements the design as created so far →and “past” knowledge the technology available what has worked well in the past software design principles and “best practices”

Types of Design Decisions There are two types of undocumented design decisions: The design decision is implicit: this can happen mainly because the architect is unaware of the decision. It happens when designers or developers break the architecture or use it in an unanticipated way without communicating the issue to software architects. The design decision is explicit but undocumented: the architect takes the decision for some reasons and due to the lack of governance they are not documented and there is no traceability why this decision has been taken.

Notations and Tools

QOC Questions, Options, Criteria Questions: key design issues Options: possible answers Criteria: assess and compare the options

Tools Archium: A meta-model and tool developed my Anton Jansen et al ADDSS: a web based tool developed by Rafael Capilla et al AREL: a rationale based model developed by Antony Tang et al DAMSAK: Data Model for Software Architecture Knowledge developed by Babar et al developed by Babar et al PAKME : a tool that supports DAMSAK SEURAT: Software Engineering using Rationale, which integrates tools for rationale capture, visualization, and use into a standard software engineering environment

Why are the architecture decisions important? We can consider it as a way of thinking to summarize why we needed this decision and why we decided this change to happen and chose this option for it. It will provide a way of traceability of these decisions as we know why we took them, what are the concerns and business requirements related to these decisions, who are the contributors to these decisions.

References https://melsatar.blog/2017/04/29/architectural-design-decisions/ https://www.infoq.com/articles/sustainable-architectural-design-decisions/ https://medium.com/omarelgabrys-blog/design-decisions-ac852e28270e https://stal.blogspot.com/2010/03/implicit-versus-explicit.html