Soil Stabilization and methods of soil stabilization.ppt

SunealBirkur 55 views 75 slides Jun 06, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 75
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75

About This Presentation

rail or road engineering


Slide Content

Use of Locally Available Materials
and Stabilisation Technique
Dr. M.S. AMARNATH
Bangalore University
Bangalore

Soil Stabilization
The soil stabilization means the improvement of
stability or bearing power of the soil by the use of
controlled compaction, proportioning and/or the
addition of suitable admixture or stabilizers.
Basic Principles of Soil Stabilization….
•Evaluating the properties of given soil
•Deciding the lacking property of soil and choose
effective and economical method of soil stabilization
•Designing the Stabilized soil mix for intended stability
and durability values

Need for Soil Stabilization
Limited Financial Resources to Provide a
complete network Road System to build
in conventional method
Effective utilization of locally available
soils and other suitable stabilizing agents.
Encouraging the use of Industrial
Wastages in building low cost construction
of roads.

Methods of Soil Stabilization
•Mechanical Stabilization
•Soil Cement Stabilization
•Soil Lime Stabilization
•Soil Bitumen Stabilization
•Lime Fly ash Stabilization
•Lime Fly ash Bound Macadam.

Mechanical Stabilization
•This method is suitable for low volume roads
i.e. Village roads in low rainfall areas.
•This method involves the correctly
proportioning of aggregates and soil,
adequately compacted to get mechanically
stable layer
•The Basic Principles of Mechanical Stabilization
are Correct Proportioning and Effective
Compaction

Desirable Properties of Soil-
Aggregate Mix
•Adequate Strength
•Incompressibility
•Less Changes in Volume
•Stability with Variation in water content
•Good drainage, less frost Susceptibility
•Ease of Compaction.

Factors Affecting Mechanical
Stabilization
Mechanical Strength of aggregates
Gradation
Properties of the Soil
Presence of Salts
Compaction

Mechanical Strength
•When the soil is used in small proportion to fill
up the voids the crushing strength of aggregates
is important
Gradation
•A well graded aggregate soil mix results in a mix
with high dry density and stability values
Properties of soil
•A mix with Plasticity Index, results poor stability
under soaking conditions. Hence it is desirable to
limit the plasticity index of the soil

Presence of Chemicals
•Presence of Salts like Sulphates and mica
are undesirable
•Presence of Calcium Chloride is Beneficial
Compaction
•Effective Compaction is desirable to
produce high density and stability mix

Soil Cement Stabilization
•Soil Cement is an intimate mix of soil,
cement and water, compacted to form a
strong base course
•Cement treated or cement modified soil
refers to the compacted mix when cement is
used in small proportions to impart some
strength
•Soil Cement can be used as a sub-base or
base course for all types of Pavements

Factors affecting soil cement stabilization
•Soil
•Cement
•Pulverisation and Mixing
•Compaction
•Curing
•Additives

Soil
THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
•Particle Size Distribution
•Clay content
•Specific Surface
•Liquid limit and Plasticity Index
Cement
A increase in cement content generally
causes increase in strength anddurability

Pulverisation and Mixing
•Better the Pulverisation and degree of mixing,
higher is the strength
•Presence of un pulverised dry lumps reduces
the strength
Compaction
•By increasing the amount of compaction dry
density of the mix, strength and durability also
increases

Curing
Adequate Moisture content is to be retained in
order to accelerate the strength
Additives
There are some additives to improve properties
•Lime
•Sodium hydroxide
•Sodium Carbonate
•Calcium Chloride

Design of Soil –Cement Mix
•Soil –Cement specimens are prepared with
various cement contents in constant volumes
moulds
•The compressive strength of these specimens
tested after 7 days of curing
•A graph is plotted Cement content Vs
compressive strength
•The Cement Content Corresponding to a
strength of 17.5 kg/cm
2
is taken as design
cement content

Soil Lime Stabilization
•Soil-Lime has been widely used as a
modifier or a binder
•Soil-Limeis used as modifier in high plasticity
soils
•Soil Lime also imparts some binding action
even in granular soils

Soil-Lime is effectively used in Expansive
soils with high plasticity index.

Factors affecting Properties of Soil-Lime
Lime Content
•Generally increase in lime content causes
slight change in liquid limit and considerable
increase in Plasticity index
•The rate of increase is first rapid and then
decreases beyond a certain limit
•The point is often termed as lime fixation
point
This is considered as design lime content

Type of Lime
After long curing periods all types of limes
produce same effects. However quick lime
has been found more effective than
hydrated lime
Calcium Carbonate must be heated at higher
temperature to form Quick lime calcium
oxide( CaO)
Calcium oxide must be slaked ( by the
addition of water) to form Hydrated lime
Compaction
Compaction is done at OMC and maximum
dry density.

Curing
•The strength of soil-lime increases with curing
period upto several years. The rate of
increase is rapid during initial period
•The humidity of the surroundings also affects
the strength
Additives
•Sodium metasilicate, Sodium hydroxide and
Sodium Sulphate are also found useful
additives

Soil-Bituminous Stabilization
•The Basic Principles of this stabilization are
Water Proofing and Binding
•By Water Proofing inherent strength and
other properties could be retained
•Most Commonly used materials are Cutback
and Emulsion
•Bitumen Stabilized layer may be used as
Sub-base or base course for all the roads

Factors affecting properties of soil-bitumen
Soil
•The particle size, shape and gradation of the
soil influence the properties of the soil-bitumen
mix.
Types of Bitumen
•Cutbacks of higher grade should be preferred
•Emulsions generally gives slightly inferior
results than Cutback.

Amount of Mixing
•Increasing proportion of bitumen causes a
decrease in dry density but increases the
stability after a certain bitumen content
•The optimum bitumen content for maximum
stability generally ranges from 4 to 6%
Mixing
•Improved type of mixing with low mixing period
may be preferred

Compaction
•Effective Compaction results higher
stability and resistance to absorb water
Additives
•Anti stripping and reactive chemical
additives have been tried to improve the
properties of the mixes
•Portland cement can also be used along with
the soil bitumen

Use of Locally Available Materials
in Road Construction

Necessity
Scarcity of good quality
aggregates / soil for road
construction
Production and accumulation of
different waste materials
Disposal and environmental
problem
Economical and gainful
utilisation

Limitations of Using Waste Materials
Quality of waste is not controlled by
their manufacturers
Characteristics of by-products vary in a
wide range
Road construction practice is
accustomed to traditional materials of
steady quality
Specifications of layers compaction of
traditional materials are not suitable for
waste materials

General Criteria for Use of Waste
Materials
Amount of yearly produced waste
material should reach a certain lower
limit
The hauling distance should be
acceptable
The material should not have a
poissonous effect
The material should be insoluble in
water
The utilisation should not have a
pollutional effect to the environment

Special Requirement for Using Waste
Materials
Free from organic matter
Should not swell or decay as
influenced by water
Should not be soluble in water
Particles should be moderately
porous

Industrial wastes
Thermal Power Stations
* Fly ash
* Bottom ash
* Pond ash
Steel Plants
* Blast furnace slag
* Granulated blast furnace slag
* Steel slag

Utilisation of fly ash
Thermal power -Major role in power
generation
Indian scenario -Use of coal with high
ash content
-Negligible utilisation
of ash produced
Bulk utilisation -Civil engineering
applications like
construction of roads &
embankments

Can be used for construction of
Embankments and backfills
Stabilisation of subgrade and sub-base
Rigid and semi-rigid pavements
Fly ash properties vary widely, to be
characterised before use
Major constituents -oxides of silica,
aluminum, iron, calcium & magnesium
Environmentally safe material for road
construction
Possesses many favourable properties for
embankment & road construction
Utilisation of fly ash

Favourable properties of fly ash
Light weight, lesser pressure on sub-soil
High shear strength
Coarser ashes have high CBR value
Pozzolanic nature, additional strength due to self-
hardening
Amenable to stabilisation
Ease of compaction
High permeability
Non plastic
Faster rate of consolidation and low compressibility
Can be compacted using vibratory or static roller

Engineering properties of fly ash
Parameter Range
Specific Gravity 1.90 –2.55
Plasticity Non plastic
Maximum dry density (gm/cc) 0.9 –1.6
Optimum moisture content (%) 38.0 –18.0
Cohesion (kN/m
2
) Negligible
Angle of internal friction (j) 30
0
–40
0
Coefficient of consolidation C
v (cm
2
/sec) 1.75 x 10
-5
–2.01 x
10
-3
Compression index C
c 0.05 –0.4
Permeability (cm/sec) 8 x 10
-6
–7 x 10
-4
Particle size distribution (% of materials)
Clay size fraction
Silt size fraction
Sand size fraction
Gravel size fraction
1 –10
8 –85
7 –90
0 –10
Coefficient of uniformity 3.1 –10.7

Differences between Indian & US fly
ashes
Property compared Indian fly ash US fly ash
Loss on ignition
(Unburnt carbon)
Less than 2 per
cent
5 to 8 per cent
SO
3 content 0.1 to 0.2 per
cent
3 to 4 per cent
CaO content 1 to 3 per cent 5 to 8 per cent
Increase in
concentration of
heavy metals
3 to 4 times in
comparison to
source coal
10 times or more in
comparison to source
coal
Rate of leaching Lower Higher

Fly ash for road embankment
Ideally suited as backfill material for urban/
industrial areas and areas with weak sub soils
Higher shear strength leads to greater
stability
Design is similar to earth embankments
Intermediate soil layers for ease of
construction and to provide confinement
Side slope erosion needs to be controlled by
providing soil cover
Can be compacted under inclement weather
conditions
15 to 20 per cent savings in construction cost
depending on lead distance

Fly ash for road embankment



Earth
Cover
Earth
Cover
Bottom ash or
Pond ash
Typical cross section of fly ash road embankment

Approach embankment for second
Nizamuddin bridge at Delhi
–Length of embankment -1.8 km
–Height varies from 6 to 9 m
–Ash utilised -1,50,000 cubic metre
–Embankment opened to traffic in 1998
–Instrumentation installed in the
embankment showed very good
performance
–Approximate savings due to usage of fly
ash is about Rs.1.00 Crore

Approach embankment for second
Nizamuddin bridge at Delhi

Spreading of pond ash
Compaction of pond ash
Second Nizamuddin bridge approach embankment

Stone pitching for slope
protection
Traffic plying on the
embankment
Second Nizamuddin bridge approach embankment

Utilisation of fly ash
Four laning work on NH-6 (Dankuni to Kolaghat)
Water logged area
(soft ground conditions)
Compaction of fly ash over layer of geotextile
Length of stretch –54 km
Height of embankment –3 to
4 m
Fly ash utilisation –2 Million
cubic metres

Reinforced fly ash embankment
Fly ash -better backfill material for
reinforced embankments
Polymeric reinforcing materials –
Geogrids, friction ties, geotextiles
Construction sequence –similar to
reinforced earth structures

Okhla flyover approach embankment
–First geogrid reinforced fly ash approach
embankment constructed in the country
–Length of embankment –59 m
–Height varied from 5.9 to 7.8 m
–Ash utilised –2,700 cubic metre
–Opened to traffic in 1996
–Performance has been very good

Pond Ash Fill 7.8 to
5.9 m
Facing
panels
Filter
medium Geogrids
Reinforced foundation mattress of bottom ash
Okhla flyover approach embankment

Okhla flyover approach embankment
Erection of facing panels
Rolling of pond ash

Support provided to
facing panels during
construction
Laying of geogrids
Okhla flyover approach embankment

Hanuman Setu flyover approach embankment
–Geogrid reinforced fly ash approach
embankment
–Length of embankment –138.4 m
–Height varied from 3.42 m to 1.0 m
–Opened to traffic in 1997

Sarita Vihar flyover approach embankment
–Length of embankment –90 m
–Maximum height –5.25 m
–Embankment opened to traffic in
Feb 2001
–Polymeric friction ties used for
reinforcement

Sarita Vihar flyover reinforced approach embankment
Arrangement of
friction ties before
laying pond ash
Laying of friction ties

Compaction using
plate vibrator near
the facing panels
Compaction of pond
ash using static and
vibratory rollers
Sarita Vihar flyover reinforced approach embankment

Fly ash for road construction
Stabilised soil subgrade & sub-
base/base courses
–Mixing with soil reduces plasticity
characteristics of subgrade
–Addition of small percentage of lime or
cement greatly improves strength
–Leaching of lime is inhibited and
durability improves due to addition of fly
ash
–Pond ash & bottom ash can also be
stabilised
–Lime-fly ash mixture is better alternative
to moorum for construction of WBM /
WMM

Construction of semi-rigid/ rigid
pavements
–Lime-fly ash concrete
–Dry lean cement fly ash concrete
–Roller compacted concrete
–Fly ash admixed concrete pavements
–Lime-fly ash bound macadam
–Precast block paving
–High performance concrete
Fly ash for road construction

WBM Gr II/WMM 150 mm
WBM Gr III/WMM 75 mm
GSB 350 mm
BM 75 mm
DBM 100 mm
Bituminous concrete 40 mm
Typical cross section of flexible
pavement –conventional section

Fly ash + 6% cement
stabilised layer 150 mm
Typical cross section of flexible
pavement –using fly ash
WBM Gr III/WMM 75 mm
Pond ash 350 mm
BM 75 mm
DBM 100 mm
Bituminous concrete 40 mm

Pond ash 300 mm
DLFC 100 mm
Fly ash admixed PQC 300 mm
Typical cross section of rigid pavement
–using fly ash

Demonstration road project
at Raichur
Total length of the road –1 km
Five sections of 200 m each with different
pavement sections
Pond ash has been used for replacing moorum
in sub-base course
Stabilised pond ash used for replacing part of
WBM layer
One rigid pavement section using DLFC and
RCCP technology was laid
Performance of all the specifications is good

Mixing of lime
stabilised pond ash
Compaction of
stabilised pond ash
using road roller
Demonstration road project using fly ash at Raichur

Construction of roller
compacted concrete
pavement
View of the
demonstration road
stretch after three years
Demonstration road project using fly ash at Raichur

A rural road near Dadri in District Gautam
Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh was selected
Total length of road –1.4 km
Bottom ash used as embankment fill
Base course constructed using fly ash
stabilised with 8% cement
RCCP Wearing course –10 cm thickness
RCCP Mix proportion –1:2:4
30 per cent of cement and 20 per cent of
sand replaced with fly ash in RCCP
Shoulders –8% cement stabilised fly ash
Demonstration road project using fly ash
near Dadri (U.P)

Bottom ash
RCCP wearing course -0.1 m
Stabilised fly ash
base -0.1 m
Stabilised fly ash
Shoulder
Soil cover
Demonstration road project using fly ash
near Dadri (U.P) –Typical section

Stabilised base course
Compaction of RCCP
Mixing & laying of RCCP
Demonstration
road project using
fly ash near Dadri
(U.P)

IRC Guidelines / Specifications
Guidelines available on pavement construction
IRC 60 ‘Tentative guidelines for use of lime fly
ash concrete as pavement base or sub-base’
IRC 68 ‘Tentative guidelines on cement fly
ash concrete for rigid pavement construction’
IRC 74 ‘Tentative guidelines for lean cement
concrete and lean cement fly ash concrete as
a pavement base or sub-base’
IRC 88 ‘Recommended practice for lime fly
ash stabilised soil as base or sub-base in
pavement construction’

Guidelines for use of fly ash in road
embankments
Published recently by Indian Roads Congress
(SP-58:2001)
Includes design aspects also
Handling and construction
–Loose layer thickness of 400 mm can be
adopted if vibratory rollers are used
–Moisture content -OMC +2 per cent
–Use of vibratory rollers advocated
–Minimum dry density to be achieved -95
per cent of modified Proctor density
–Ash layer and side soil cover to be
constructed simultaneously

Utilisation of steel slags
Total production of slag from steel
industries is about 8.0 million tonnes
Types of slags
–Blast furnace slag
Granulated blast furnace slag
(GBFS)
Air cooled slag
–Steel slag

Granulated blast
furnace slag
Contains reactive silica
Suitable for lime / cement
stabilisation
Air cooled blast
furnace slag
Non –reactive
Suitable for use as
coarse aggregates

CRRI work on utilisation of
steel slags
Characterisation of slags produced at
different steel plants
Laboratory studies on Lime-GBFS mixes
Semi-field studies on Lime-GBFS concrete
Test track studies on usage of slags in
road works

Properties of air cooled slag
Property Durgapur Bhilai Rourkela Delhi
Quartzite
Specification
requirements
Specific
gravity
2.78 –
2.82
2.82 –
3.33
2.97 –
2.99
2.67 -
Water
absorption
(%)
1.53 –
1.72
0.58 –
1.38
0.74 –
1.29
0.48 2% Max
Los
Angeles
abrasion
value (%)
18.80 25.00 14.28 34.00 40% Max
Impact
value (%)
15.79 14.80 16.90 24.50 30% Max
Soundness
value (%)
1.66 1.17 0.33 0.17 12% Max
Percentage
voids
46.40 43.90 43.10 43.80 -

Steel slags
Obtained as a waste product during
production of steel
Particle size varies from 80 mm to 300
microns
Compared to blast furnace slag, steel
slag contains lower amount of silica,
higher amounts of iron oxide and
calcium oxide
Due to presence of free lime, steel slag
should be weathered before using it in
construction

Road projects executed under CRRI
guidance using slags
Plant roads at Visakhapatnam
Test tracks in collaboration with AP
PWD using slags from Visakhapatnam
Steel Plant
Test tracks in collaboration with Orissa
PWD using slags from Rourkella Plant
Test tracks at R&D Centre for Iron &
Steel, Ranchi using Slags from Bokaro
Plant

Construction of
test track using
slag at Orissa
Labour based techniques
for construction of
stabilised layer

View of finished
surface of road
constructed
using slags at
Orissa
Lime
stabilisation
of iron slags
(Orissa)

Processed municipal wastes
Processed municipal wastes
utilised for construction of
test track on village road
near Delhi
Stabilised municipal waste
used for construction of sub-
base layer
Performance of stretch is
good

Kimberlite tailings
Kimberlite tailings are waste produced from
diamond mining
Can be used in base or sub-base course by
adopting mechanical or cement stabilisation
High value of water absorption makes them
unsuitable for use in bituminous pavement

THANK YOU