Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge

asadwarraichc 4,131 views 37 slides Dec 22, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 37
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37

About This Presentation

Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge was a bridge constructed in Washington D.C. in 1940. The structure was a complete loss just after four months of its construction.

PRESENTED BY: Muhammad Asad Hayat, Student Department of Civil Engineering, Session (2014-18)
COURSE: Civil Engineering Practice
COURSE...


Slide Content

Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge Presented by: Muhammad Asad Hayat, 14-CE-148 Civil Engineering Department, UET Taxila

Introduction Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge was constructed in the Washington D.C., a state in United States, that connected the Tacoma Narrows strait of Puget Sound (‘ Sound’: narrow channel of the sea joining two larger bodies of water ) between Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula. This bridge collapsed just four months after its construction. It was world’s 3 rd longest suspension bridge in the world at the time of its failure.

Introduction ( Contd …) Total cost of bridge was 6.4 million U.S.D (105 million USD in 2012). Total structure length was 5939 ft with 5000 ft suspension span and it consisted of three spans, one central suspension span or deck and two short suspension spans one each side. Lengths of spans were as follows: 1 st Short Suspension Span (1100 ft) Central Span (2800 ft) 2 nd Short Suspension Span (1100 ft)

Introduction ( Contd …) Center span (Height above water) = 195 ft Width of roadway = 26 ft Width of sidewalk (On each side) = 5 ft Height of East Pier = 247 ft Height of West Pier = 198 ft Height, Towers above piers = 425 ft

Bridge Map

Main Cable Deck Anchorage Main Towers 1 st Short Span 2 nd Short Span Center Span Bridge at the time of its inauguration ceremony, 1940 E W N S

Need of Bridge This bridge, constructed in two years, was designed to join Tacoma and less-developed Kitsap Peninsula which could result in increase in development and population in both areas. Bridge also benefited the US Military (Air Force and Navy) connecting their air fields and ship yards. A road could be constructed to connect these two places, but it cost more money than to construct a bridge. Bridge was designed to hold 60,000 cars.

Historical Background and Funding Need of a bridge to connect two cities dates back to 1889 but concreted efforts began in 1920s. Initial design of bridge was given by Clark Eldridge in 1938 who was Washington State Engineer. Leon Moisseiff , New York bridge engineer who served as designer and consultant engineer for the Golden Gate Bridge - petitioned the PWA (Public Works Administration) and the RFC (Reconstruction Finance Corporation) to build the bridge for less. Moisseiff proposed shallower support which cost less. Moisseiff’s design won out.

Historical Background and Funding ( Contd …) Initial design of bridge by Eldridge, 23 May 1938 Safe Design ? Eldridge proposed truss deck for the bridge so that wind could easily pass through it.

BUT WHY? FAILED!

Movements during Construction A small movement in deck of bridge was noted many times by workers even during the construction of the bridge when wind blew. A small vibration could be expected in a bridge but vibrations produced in this bridge were not normal. Engineers were aware that bridge was prone to motion. Retrofitting to design, as bridge construction progressed, by new ideas from engineers was also done.

Prevention of Movements Retrofitting of bridge, to avoid the movements and stiffen the bridge, as mentioned earlier was done by installing hydraulic jacks and tie down cables. Tie-down cables

Failure Analytical studies have shown that this bridge failed due to winds running at 64 km/h velocity in the Eastern direction on 7 th of November, 1940. In fact, “Tacoma Narrows was made with wind-resisting plate girders rather than deep stiffening trusses.” In design of bridge, aerodynamic forces were not taken into account due to which winds running at 64km/h speed in one direction caused it to fail.

Failure ( Contd …) Twisting of deck of the bridge due to wind action

Failure ( Contd …) Bridge was too skinny, fragile and flexible. It had only two lanes, less mass. The wind exerted a lot of pressure, assisted by more and more severe aerodynamic forces, and made waves which caused the bridge to twist and collapse in water. During the collapse, the main suspension cables were thrown violently side to side, twisted, and tossed many feet into the air. On the north cable at mid­span , where the support cable had loosened, it broke more than 350 wires.

Failure ( Contd …) Other wires were severely distorted. The main cables were a total loss. Their only value was as scrap metal. Ultimate Collapse Courtesy: Wikipedia

Failure ( Contd …) Bridge after failure (Center span crashed)

Torsional (Twisting) Movements at the time of failure The nature and severity of the torsional movement is revealed in this image taken from the Tacoma end of the suspension span. When the twisting motion was at the maximum, elevation of the footpath at the right was 28 feet (9m) higher than the footpath at left side of the bridge.

Torsional (Twisting) Movements at the time of failure ( Contd …) Aerodynamic forces causing torsional movements

Damages to Side Spans Side spans, which became unbalanced, were too severely damaged. Sag of approximately 45 feet appeared in both side spans.

What does Physics say about failure? Vertical Oscillations or Torsional Movements, as mentioned earlier, were noted during construction of bridge. Aerodynamic flutter is regarded as major cause of failure. Resonance effect and vortex shedding also caused it to fail.

Aerodynamic Flutter in Bridge Tendency to aerodynamic flutter is present in all flexible structures i.e. bridges, jet planes, aeroplanes. It is possible only if structural and aerodynamic forces are running at same frequency. Majority of researchers consider aerodynamic flutter to be the main reason for the failure of bridge.

Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter If a father is pushing his kid on swing then swing would have a natural frequency . If swing would come back to him after every 4 seconds, then to maintain the motion of swing, father must push the swing each time (after every 4 seconds) known as external force applied with periodic frequency . If he is not able to do so, he will damp the motion. If external periodic frequency matches natural frequency , we get a resonance frequency. If this phenomenon remains for some time, it will, ultimately, cause amplitude to increase due to proper timing of force i.e. failure of plane wings, failure of deck of bridge.

Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter ( Contd …) Tendency of a flexible structure to aerodynamic flutter causing vibration in whole body. Courtesy: Aerodynamic Flutter analysis of plane using ANSYS

Resonance We know that resonance happens when: “Any system is vibrated at its natural frequency or resonant frequency.” Take example of a rope. You can think of resonance as having the natural frequency of the system exactly in tune with your force.

Resonance effect on the bridges In design of bridge, resonance phenomenon plays an important role. This is susceptibility or tendency of any structure to respond at an increased amplitude when frequency of its oscillations meets its natural frequency. If it happens, severe vibrations are produced in the structure causing ultimate failure. Many factors are involved in vibrations of bridge i.e. vibrations due to traffic flow, heavy machinery, wind. One such affect was noted in Tacoma Narrows Bridge e.g. wind.

Resonance effect on the bridges ( Contd …) If natural frequency of structure is achieved due to any factor, it will cause more vibrations and more storage of energy in the system. When this energy exceeds an object’s load limits, structure will lose its integrity. In case of Tacoma Narrows, when natural frequency met frequency of wind blowing, it caused denominator to be very small and therefore caused increase in amplitude. Nearly or completely equal to zero?

Vortex Shedding It happens when winds hits a structure, then vortices of fluid (air) are formed at certain frequency. When a vortex is formed on one side of body (Say A), it immediately increases pressure on side A causing decrease in velocity in side A and ultimately causing less pressure on other side (Say B) and more velocity. Due to these vortices, a fluctuating force on the body is induced which causes vibrations in the structure. If vibrations coincide with the natural frequency or resonance frequency of structure, they lead to failure.

Vortex Shedding ( Contd …) Imagine wind blowing from left on the cable cross-section. Small vortex of low pressure Move towards low pressure

Summary of Physics Analysis Summarizing the whole analysis: “A small vibration produced, assisted by the more and more wind caused the natural frequency of bridge to meet wind frequency which ultimately resulted in an increase in the bridge oscillations. Bridge oscillations increased with time and it ultimately failed. Vortex shedding, resonance phenomenon and aerodynamic flutter were interlinked to each other in sense of natural frequency of the structure”.

Bridge (1950) Soon after failure of bridge, it was expected to be rebuilt with 1-1.5 years. Due to WW-II, its construction delayed. In 1950, new bridge was completed. Second bridge had truss-girders which allowed to wind to pass through bridge easily. New bridge, being wide and thicker, had more torsional stiffness than previous bridge. Wind tunnel test were also performed prior to its construction on small scale model.

Bridge (1950) ( Contd …) 1950 Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1988) Courtesy: Wikipedia

Bridge (2007) Due to high traffic flow, another bridge parallel to 1950 bridge was constructed to carry eastbound traffic. Westbound Bridge (1950) Eastbound Bridge (2007) Twin Bridges of Tacoma

Major difference between the two (1940 & 1950) Following are some of differences between 1940 & 1950 suspension bridges: 1940 Bridge 1950 Bridge Had two lanes Has four lanes Less stiff More stiff Less weight More weight Use of plate girders Use of trusses Wind -disturbance No wind-disturbance 2.4m deep plate girders 10m deep stiff trusses

A Lesson for New Design In modern suspension bridges construction, it is now made mandatory to test the bridge model on small scale prior to start its construction. Science of aerodynamic flutter in bridges was born after the failure of Tacoma Narrows 1940. Effects of resonance on bridges and other flexible structures were studied thoroughly. Vortex shedding and its affects on the bridge were also taken into account. Wide use of open stiffening trusses to let wind pass through started.

A lesson for New Design ( Contd …) Increase in the weight of bridge because: Vertical oscillations resistance ∝ Mass of bridge Increase in stiffness by using stiffening trusses and more depth of deck.

Thank You Any Questions?