Temper Embrittlement Examaple 2.good ppt

Suhelsuhelkhan 11 views 30 slides Sep 17, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 30
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30

About This Presentation

temepering emrittlement


Slide Content

Temper Brittleness
&
Fracture Toughness

Temperature of Tempering

Specified Temp
1st tempering - 520 - 550ºC
2nd tempering - 530 - 570ºC

Tempered at (1st & 2nd)
380 - 460ºC
( most of the barrels were tempered between
this range prior to 1996)

METALLURGICAL REPORT SUMMARY
FAILED INVESTIGATED CONCLUSION
IMPORTED 30 19 No remarkable metallurgical
deficiency that could lead to
failure
INDIGENOUS 7 7 No metallurgical deficiency.
(T2 - 500C Overload failure
& above)
INDIGENOUS 13 12 a) Temper brittleness due to
(T2 – 460 C low tempering temperature
& below) -(8 Cases)
b) No metallurgical deficiency
(3cases)
-

Salvaging of Low Temperature Tempered
Barrels
Barrels tempered at temp. 401-430ºC be
grouped based on trace elements contents
(As, Sb, Sn, P) , since they play major role in
development of temper brittleness.
• Grouping of Barrels (Sn + Sb + As + P)
• Category A - > 0.025
• Category B - 0.025 % - 0.02 %
• Category C - < 0.02 %
• Category D - <0.02%, but Impact Value Lower
than specified min
on th Drawing.( 2 )

Proposal of DMRL

Effect of Trace Elements

Decisions
Category A - Rejected
Category B - • Re-tempered at 500ºC for 4 hrs
• Each barrel Subjected to high pressure proof
•Two barrels subjected to life cycle proof
Category C - • Initially 3 barrels from first batch of
100 be subjected to life cycle proof
• next 1 barrel from every 100 barrels
subjected to life cycle test
Category D - • Not to be considered now
 Barrels tempered below 400ºC not considered

Implementation of the Decision

436 Nos of such barrels were identified

435 Nos analysis of trace elements
completed

Barrels were categorised and confirmed by
rechecking at DMRL as under
A B C D
40 42 347+5* 1
* 5 barrels used for LIFE CYCLE firing

Life Achieved
Barrel EFC Bore Dia(mm)
L/882 304.25 128.15
L/993 303.63 127.60
L/762 304.125128.15
L/868 309.00 128.40
L/1610 312.75 128.13

All the Barrels were brought to CQA
(Metals) for further study of fire crack
growth

Report on Fire Crack Growth

Barrels were parted longitudinally across its
whole length and examined visually for any
abnormality

Discs from various section were cut and extent
of crack depth was measured
Barrel No Max Depth Of
Crack(mm)
L/762 0.39
L/882 0.70
L/933 0.30
L/868 0.42
L/1610 0.34

Evaluation from Fracture
Toughness Point of View

Fracture toughness & critical crack lengths for
failure were calculated

Fracture toughness of few tempered brittle failed
barrels were estimated

Fracture toughness of 4 low temperature
tempered ‘C’ category barrels were estimated

Fracture toughness of Russian barrel was
estimated

Fracture toughness of correctly tempered MSF
barrels were estimated

Calculated KIC Values & Critical
Crack Length
KIC acr Expected Life
(mm) Initial Crack (2mm) Initial Crack (3mm)
85.00 2.63049-
90.00 3.59311338
93.34 5.00192117
95.00 10.73508433
100.00 13.17622547
Where acr is critical crack length
Taking into consideration that life of the barrel is 250
FSAPDS rds or 250 EFC, critical value for fracture
toughness with ultrasonic acceptance standard 2mm
hole size works out to be 95 MNm
-3/2

Tested Value ( KIC )

Russian Failed Barrel - 102

Failed temper brittle (Indian) - 85

MSF (tempered correctly) -
102/113

‘C’ cat barrel - 95/105

This data generally agrees with calculated
values

Data also fairly agree with literature

Failure of T-72
Barrels
Photographs

Barrel No. L/876 – Blown of region of barrel

Barrel No. L / 876 – Small longitudinal crack on inner
surface

Barrel No. L / 876 – Point of initiation of fracture from
the region containing longitudinal crack on inner surface

Barrel No. L / 876 – propagation of fire crack in inter
crystalline mode

Barrel No. L /0199 – Barrel piece in as received condition

Barrel No. L / 0199 – Inter crystalline crack

Barrel No . L / 0199 – Macro Photograph. Presence
of transverse crack inside the wall

Barrel No. L / 0199 – Secondary Inter Crystalline
crack from the main fracture

Barrel No L / 014 – Transverse crack on inner surface of
the barrel piece
Bore
Outer Surface

Barrel No. L / 014 Fracture surface where inside crack
extended to outer surface

Barrel No. L / 014 – Fracture surface away from severed zone

Barrel No. L / 014 – Fracture towards inner
surface where crack progresses transversely

Barrel No. L / 231 – Failed barrel

Barrel No L/231- Some fragments of the barrel

Barrel No. L / 753 – Transverse fracture surface of segments

Barrel No L / 753 – Fragments of barrel