Theories of economic development

14,399 views 30 slides Jun 16, 2021
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 30
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30

About This Presentation

The classical growth theory argues that economic growth will decrease or end because of an increasing population and limited resources Classical growth theory economists believed that temporary increases in real GDP per person would cause a population explosion that would consequently decrease real ...


Slide Content

Theories of Economic Development

What`s classical development theory ? The basic theme of the classical model was the development of the economy from a progressive state into a stationary state . The classical growth theory argues that economic growth will decrease or end because of an increasing population and limited resources. Classical growth theory economists believed that temporary increases in real GDP per person would cause a population explosion that would consequently decrease real GDP. The classical theory is basically a synthesis of the doctrines put forward by Adam Smith, T. R. Malthus, David Ricardo, J. S Mill and others.

Adam Smith’s model of growth Smith considered to be Father of Economics. His book: An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. (1776 ) He wanted to examine: Why some countries are richer and some poorer? What are the basic economic factors that can increase the wealth of an economy? Wealth of a country is not gold as assumed by Merchantalists . Or agriculture as assumed by Physiocrats .

According to Adam Smith: Wealth of an economy is the Value of its Total Output – includes industrial and agricultural output . Growth increases wealth by increasing total output, income and wealth, and standard of living. How can growth increase? If inputs increase, output will also increase. - Three factors (inputs) – land, labour and capital – owned by landlords, workers and capitalists.

Specialisation of Labour Labour specialisation increases output, by increasing productivity of labour . This leads to increasing returns to scale . So Growth is self-reinforcing. Labour specialisation increases output because: Skill increases with repetition Time is saved, The worker can innovate and improve his performance. But increase in labour specialisation depends on demand (Market) for the product. So Adam Smith states: “Division of labour must always be limited by the extent of the market.”

Capital Accumulation Capital accumulation is crucial for economic growth. As capital increases, capital per man (K/L) also increases, leading to increase in labour productivity, and growth. Investment  capital formation Only capitalist class invests . Workers receive subsistence wages, cannot save, Landlords only consume, not save

The Virtuous Cycle Capital accumulation increases K/L Higher productivity of labour with higher K/L Higher productivity leads to higher incomes , Higher income leads to increased demand and bigger markets, Leads to specialisation of labour, with more division of labour. But more division of labour leads on to higher productivity 

Stationary State Although there are increasing returns to labour specialisation , growth cannot go on forever. This is because: Competition for labour increases, as K accumulation increases Employment increases, and total wage payment increases Profits decrease, investment falls, and growth levels fall. Ultimately , rate of growth becomes zero. This is the Stationary State.

Ricardian theory of growth Like Smith, David Ricardo also presented his views on economic development in an unsystematic manner in his book The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation . This book was published in 1917. It was its third edition of 1921 and Ricardo’s correspondence with a number of economists that contain his ideas on which his model of development has been built.

In the Ricardian system whole economy is assumed to be a big farm fixed in supply used to produce one output corn and output is distributed between landlords, capitalist and workers in form of rent , wages and profit . First rent is given its shares and residual is distributed between profit and wages while interest is included in profits. Process of capital accumulation- capital accumulation is outcome of profits because profits lead to saving which leads to capital. So long as rate of profit is positive capital accumulation will continue. Capital accumulation depends on capacity to save or will to save . In reality profits depends on wages on price of corn and price on productivity of marginal land. If there is more corn prices will fall and so does the wage and profits will rise and more capital accumulates.

Model of Growth Economic growth takes place due to capital accumulation. Capital accumulation is by capitalists, through investment, Investment comes from profits, As growth takes place, demand for food increases, and intensive and extensive margins of land increases Total rents and wages increases. This squeezes out profits, which eventually falls to zero. This point is called the “Stationary State”. In Industrial sector also: – Rate of profit is same in industry and agriculture, – Corn is paid as wages. – With growth, labour input increases, total wages increase, – Profits fall, investment falls and also rate of capital accumulation .

stationary state According to Ricardo, there is a natural tendency for the profit rate to fall in the economy so that the country ultimately reaches the stationary state. When capital accumulation rises with increase in profits, total output increases which raises the wages fund. With the increase in the wages fund, population increases which raises the demand for corn and its price. As population increases, inferior grade lands are cultivated to meet the increasing demand for corn. Rents on the superior grades of land rise and absorb a greater share of the output produced on these lands. This reduces the share of capitalists and labourers . Profits decline and wages tend to fall to the subsistence level. This process of rising rents and declining profits continues till output from the marginal land just covers the subsistence wage of the labour employed. Then profits are zero.

Marxian theory of economic development Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) A German philosopher, economist, historian, political theorist, sociologist, journalist and revolutionary socialist. Father of Scientific Socialism Epitomized as ‘Marx the Prophet’ and is ranked with Christ and Mohammed if we are to judge him by the number of his followers

Marxian Theory of Economic Development Gravest and the most penetrating examination of the process of capitalist development Major assumptions: 1 . There are two principal classes in the society a . Bourgeoisie b . Proletariat 2 . Wages of the workers are determined at subsistence level of living. 3 . Labour is the main source of value generation.

4. Factors of production are owned by the capitalist. 5 . Capitalist exploit the workers. 6 . Labour is homogenous and perfectly mobile. 7. National Income is distributed in terms of wages and profit. Marx contributed the theory in 3 respects: a . economic interpretation of history b . motivating forces of capitalist development c . alternative path of planned economic development

Surplus Value Economic basis of the class struggle under capitalism Class struggle is simply the outcome of accumulation of surplus value in the hands of few capitalists. Labour is the sole source of value in a commodity Capitalism is divided into two groups: 1 . the workers who sell their labour power; 2 . the capitalist who own the means of production Marx calls the unpaid labour as surplus value The net output of the economy is given as T he total value of product (w) = constant capital (c) + variable capital (v) + surplus value ( s ) W= (c + v) + s.

Capital Accumulation Surplus value leads to capital accumulation The capitalist is always try to increase their profit in 3 ways 1.By increasing working hours 2.By diminishing no. of hours required to produce labour’s subsistence 3.Increasing the productivity of labour “ Capital is dead labour, which , vampire like, lives only by sucking living labour and lives the more, the more labour it sucks”- Karl Marx

Downfall of capitalism Replaces the workers by machines which leads to the reduction in surplus value Industrial reserved army is created Poverty and limited purchasing power Over production of commodities Dump their products in market which results in the fall of market price and leads to a ‘sharp decline of profit’ Finally capitalism falls and socialism replace capitalism

Schumpeter theory of economic development Joseph Alois Schumpeter first presented his theory of economic growth in Theory of Economic Development published in German in 1911 (its English edition appeared in 1934) which was elaborated and refined but in no way altered in any essential respect in his Business Cycles (1939) and Capitalism , Socialism and Democracy (1942).

Schumpeter’s Model of Economic Development Schumpeter assumes a perfectly competitive economy which is in stationary equilibrium. In such a stationary state ,there is perfect competitive equilibrium. no profits, no interest rates, no savings, no investments and no involuntary unemployment . This equilibrium is characterized by the term “circular flow”, continues to repeat itself every year. In the circular flow, the same products are produced every year in same manner . According to him economic development “is spontaneous and discontinuous change in the channels of the circular flow, disturbance of equilibrium, which forever alters and displaces the equilibrium state previously existing ” Development consists in the carrying out of new combinations for which possibilities exist in the stationary state. New combinations come about in the form of INNOVATIONS.

INNOVATIONS An innovations may consist of: 1.The introduction of a new product 2.The introduction of new method of production 3.The opening up of a new market 4.The conquest of a new source of raw materials 5.The carrying out of a new organization of any industry like the creation of monopoly According to Schumpeter ,it is the introduction of new product and the continual improvements in the existing ones that lead to development.

Schumpeter’s cyclical process of economic development has been illustrated in the above diagram where the secondary wave is superimposed on the primary wave of innovation. In the prosperity period, as the above figure reveals, the economic development proceeds more rapidly due to over optimism and speculation. The business cycle continues to fall below the level of equilibrium with the beginning of the recession and ultimately reaches the point of depression. In the end, the retake of economic activities leads to revival of the economy. In the Schumpeterian analysis of development entrepreneurs have to play the central role in business cycles. They initiate the economic development in the spontaneous and discontinuous manner. The cyclical swings are the cost of economic development under capitalism.

The Decay of Capitalism Schumpeter believed that the innovation carried out by the entrepreneurs will not continue for long and will be turned into routing activity through highly trained managers. This would reduce the position of entrepreneur in a society and undermine their functions and turn them into “warrior knight”. Another factor responsible for the downfall of capitalism is the weakening of its institutional framework. The tendency towards concentration and increase in the size of the production unit destroy capitalistic institutions like private property and freedom of conflict. Finally, the destruction of the protecting political strata will give a big blow to capitalist system. With the rise of capitalism not only the institutional frame work will crumble but also the political strata who would have protected capitalism at it’s early stage gets destroyed. The very success of capitalism is destroyed by the royal power. With the progress of capitalism the industrial units and merchants becomes more powerful and pose big threat to political class and virtually dominate them .

Leibenstein's Critical Minimum Effort  Harvey Leibenstein is of the view that UDCs are characterized by vicious circle of poverty (VCP) which keeps them around a low income per capita equilibrium state. The way out of this impasse is a certain 'Critical minimum effort' which would raise the per capita to a level at which sustained development could be maintained.vicious circle of poverty ( VCP). In other words, a UDC will have to introduce 'Stimulus' in an amount which should be more than a critical level for the sake of change. Leibenstein says that every economy is subject to 'Shocks and Stimulants'. A shock has the impact of reducing the per capita income initially; while a stimulant tends to increase it.

Certain countries are poor and backward because of the reason that the magnitude of stimulant is small while that of shocks is large. On the other hand, if income raising forces are more than income depressing forces the economy will be having critical minimum effort which will take the economy on the path of development Shocks refer to those forces which reduce the level of output, income, employment and investment etc. In other words, shocks dampen and depress the development forces. Stocks depress development forces which reverse the wheel of development. On the contrary, stimulants refer to those forces which raise the level of income, output, employment and investment etc. In other words, Stimulants impress and encourage development forces. They are called ‘Income Generating forces’ which lubricate the wheel of development. Stimulants have the capacity to raise per capita income above equilibrium level

The 45 ° line measures induced increases and decreases in income. P ’ curve represents stimulants and Z’ curve shows stocks . OM is the subsistence living standard. At M’ curve P’ Z’ intersect each other indicating the equality between growth rate of population and the growth rate of income so that the income is caught in the vicious circle of poverty. If the income level is raised from OB to OC which is not in accordance with the critical minimum effort, the rising population will neutralize the increased income. The system will once again hand on the subsistence level of living. Shocks being more powerful than the stimulants. At OJ level of income raising forces are just FE while the depressants up to GM. This will bring the income level down to M again which is just the subsistence level. Solution of this problem for such a rise in the level of national income where stimulants are stronger than the shocks so that the growth in income becomes self-sustaining.

Balance-Unbalance Growth A Balanced Economy Nurkse was concerned with the path of development and the pattern of investment He argued that these should be of such a nature that growth is balanced between different sectors such that no bottlenecks or excess capacity arise Integral to this proposition is the notion that the agricultural and industrial sectors must be balanced Unbalanced Growth Hirschman , Rostow , Fleming and Singer propounded the theory of unbalanced growth as a strategy of development to be used by the underdeveloped countries. This theory stresses on the need of investment in strategic sectors of the economy instead of all the sectors simultaneously. According to this theory the other sectors would automatically develop themselves through what is known as “linkages effect”.

Path Of Development This figure demonstrates the path of development, using strategy of unbalanced growth. X-axis: Investment cost in Socially Productive Activities Y- axis: Investment Cost in Direct Productive Activities AA, BB, CC curves: equi- productive curves indicating various combinations of SOC, DPA corresponding to given level of national income HIGHER THE CURVE GREATER THE LEVEL OF OUTPUT!! Growth process maybe explained by making initial investments either to DPA or SOC. It is because it is assumed that in underdeveloped countries SOC or DPA cannot be expanded simultaneously. While the former is called Development by Excess Capacity of SOC, the latter is known as Shortage of SOC.